• Ignoring a Text Message or Email Isn't Always Rude. Sometimes It's Nece

    From Bill Horne@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 22 02:55:18 2022
    OPINION
    GUEST ESSAY

    By Erica Dhawan

    It was a Tuesday night. In my apartment, I was doing three things at
    once -- packing for a short business trip, trying to get dinner on the
    table for my family and taking turns with my husband to calm a crying
    baby. Behind me, one work Slack alert after another dinged from my
    laptop. I ignored them all. During dinner, a text popped up on my
    phone. "Where are u????" asked my colleague.

    I wanted to scream. Instead, I didn't reply to the text. This wasn't
    the first time I'd ignored a digital summons, and it wouldn't be the
    last. I didn't mean to be disrespectful or malicious -- but at the
    same time I knew what I wanted my silence to communicate: This is not
    a priority for me right now. You are not my priority.

    Ignoring messages is frowned upon in these always-on times. At its
    most egregious, dropping out of communication is condemned as
    "ghosting," which, in the years since the term became widespread, has
    become a deadly sin of digital communications.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/21/opinion/culture/ghosting-work-digital-overload.html



    ***** Commentary *****

    My son and his friends long ago stopped answering voice-mail messages:
    having grown up with the always-on cellular world, they have made a
    choice to take a step back, It isn't magic, or mysterious, or
    otherwise special to him: it's just another PITA.

    My Brother-In-Law's voice mail greeting warns callers that he checks
    messages only once or twice a week, and it reminds callers that
    they've alredy left the most important info (their phone number and
    the time of their call), and he asks them to just hang up and wait for
    him to call them back.

    We Baby Boomers have been early adapters of many technologies: color
    TV, direct dial long-distance, fast-food restaurants, CLASS features,
    24-hour news and weather broadcasts, and then the Internet, and cell
    phones, and a presumed obligation to use them whenever they need our
    attention.

    Television producers, for years now, have been making immense sums of
    money by having the actors on TV *ALWAYS* answer every cellphone call,
    as soon as the phone rings. This shilling became so obvious that it
    was breaking the dramatic continuity of the shows, so now the quick
    hand jerk reactions when a cellphone rings are being parenthesized by
    glances at the phone and "gotta take this" excuses. None over the
    actors ever says "I can ignore this," or "I don't know who that is,"
    or "He's a jerk, I'll ignore this." They *ALWAYS* answer every call,
    no matter what their producers put in the script to try to maintain
    dramatic continuity. This is not "product placement" advertising -
    this "Lifestyle Leadership" propaganda. Think about it: important,
    decisive, well-liked, and pretty people *ALWAYS* answer their cell
    calls. The Tall White Guy on TV told me so.

    WE are coming to the nth inflection point in the history of electronic communication: I don't know how many times the graph hit a knee before
    now, but I hope the latest bend is the last, as ordinary people decide
    that they will take back the most important part of their lives: the
    right that they gave away as children, sold too cheaply as
    adolescents, and now have come to value: the right to be left alone.

    Bill Horne


    --
    (Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)