• root owns files in db2 instance directory.

    From Grzegorz Powiedziuk@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 2 09:50:23 2020
    One of the reasons db2start and db2stop need to be setuid-root is so
    that you do not need to be the instance owner to start/stop the
    instance. As long as you're a member in the SYSMAINT_GROUP (dbm
    config param), you can issue the db2start/db2stop command, and the
    start/stop code will verify the user is authorized to run the command,
    then switch over to run as the instance-owning ID. There are also a
    few other things done during db2start that require root, like setting
    up ulimits, privileges, etc.
    If you want to get away from setuid-root files, there's a new non-root feature in 9.5. Using a non-root install, those files will be setuid- instance_owner, instead of setuid-root. There are some limitations to non-root instances though - search for 'non-root' in the 9.5
    Information Center (or google 'non-root DB2') for more details.
    Cheers,
    Liam.


    Wow, 12 years later I find this post which answer both of my questions at the same time!
    - where the heck db2sysc process is getting ~65k nofile ulimit from
    (I already found that db2start has a setuid and root ownership so I was suspecting this has to be it but wasn't sure it would do it on it's own.I was about to start stracing db2start but though I would try to google this first)
    - db2stop also has setuid bit and it has "execute" for anyone so I wanted to know if there are other ways db2 is making sure that user is authorized to stop the database (sysmaing_group)

    thanks! Internet gives immortality ;)

    Gregory

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)