The last non-spam topic was four months ago -- a question was posed, a followup question asked by Erland, then silence.

Is there any reason I should keep this group in my watchlist?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Ross Presser (rpresser@gmail.com) writes:

The last non-spam topic was four months ago -- a question was posed, a followup question asked by Erland, then silence.

Is there any reason I should keep this group in my watchlist?

Overall, Usenet is not buzzling with traffic these days, is it?

Whether you should keeping monitoring the group is up to you. Myself, I find the spam level tolerable.


--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:40:16 UTC, Ross Presser wrote:

The last non-spam topic was four months ago -- a question was posed, a followup question asked by Erland, then silence.

Is there any reason I should keep this group in my watchlist?

I'm not sure who else is here. On the other hand, it means
that any problem I share is both exciting and nostalgic
to anyone who may offer to address it for me. Especially
as I'm still professionally using SQL Server 2005.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

There are far quicker ways to get an answer to a question, but this
group exists for the sake of existing if nothing else.

Which is honorable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)