Not from a Quora question, but one did remind me.
Which (well known) languages were mostly defined before the first
compiler was written? (Not counting the one you did for a homework assignment.)
Not from a Quora question, but one did remind me.
Which (well known) languages were mostly defined before the first
compiler was written? (Not counting the one you did for a homework assignment.)
Not from a Quora question, but one did remind me.
Which (well known) languages were mostly defined before the first
compiler was written? (Not counting the one you did for a homework assignment.) ...
[COBOL, Algol60 and 68, Ada. Maybe Pascal? -John]
I don't really consider any of Wirth's languages to be designed as
they would not have the gaping big holes they have.
On 10/27/23 5:57 PM, Luke A. Guest wrote:
I don't really consider any of Wirth's languages to be designed as
they would not have the gaping big holes they have.
The *languages* are all well designed, system *libraries* are incomplete
or missing.
On 10/27/23 5:57 PM, Luke A. Guest wrote:
I don't really consider any of Wirth's languages to be designed as
they would not have the gaping big holes they have.
The *languages* are all well designed,
or missing.
On 30/10/2023 03:26, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
On 10/27/23 5:57 PM, Luke A. Guest wrote:
I don't really consider any of Wirth's languages to be designed as
they would not have the gaping big holes they have.
The *languages* are all well designed,
That's not what the Oakwood guidelines say.
system *libraries* are incomplete
or missing.
Yes.
[I'd prefer not to refight 30 year old arguments about language design details here.
At this point Oberon is purely of historical interest and Pascal is close to dead. -John]
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 68:04:13 |
Calls: | 6,712 |
Files: | 12,244 |
Messages: | 5,356,545 |