• Concise refutation of halting problem proofs V20 [ Ben Bacarisse ]

    From olcott@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 19 22:43:01 2021
    XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math

    #include <stdint.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    typedef int (*ptr)();

    int H(ptr x, ptr y)
    {
    x(y); // direct execution of P(P)
    return 1;
    }

    // Minimal essence of Linz(1990) Ĥ
    // and Strachey(1965) P
    int P(ptr x)
    {
    H(x, x);
    return 1; // Give P a last instruction at the "c" level
    }

    int main(void)
    {
    H(P, P);
    }

    Computation that halts
    a computation is said to halt whenever it enters a final state.
    (Linz:1990:234)

    PSR set: Combinations of H/P having pathological self-reference
    For every possible H of H(P,P) invoked from main() where P(P) calls this
    same H(P,P) and H simulates or executes its input and aborts or does not
    abort its input P never reaches its last instruction.

    PSR subset: Because we know that the input to H(P,P) never halts for the
    whole PSR set and a subset of these H/P combinations aborts the
    execution or simulation of its input then we know that for this entire
    subset the input to H(P,P) never halts and H(P,P) halts.

    When int main(void) { P(P); } is invoked on H/P elements of the above
    PSR subset, then we have a cases where the input to H(P,P) never halts
    and P(P) halts.

    This conclusively proves when the input to H(P,P) never halts and the
    same P(P) does halt that this does not form a contradiction.



    Halting problem undecidability and infinitely nested simulation (V2)
    November 2021 PL Olcott

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356105750_Halting_problem_undecidability_and_infinitely_nested_simulation_V2


    --
    Copyright 2021 Pete Olcott

    Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
    Genius hits a target no one else can see.
    Arthur Schopenhauer

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)