On 2021-11-03 15:18, olcott wrote:
On 11/3/2021 4:03 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
But your halt decider doesn't implement a 'pure simulation' under any
reasonable definition of the term.
_P()
[00000c36](01) 55 push ebp
[00000c37](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00000c39](03) 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] // 2nd Param
[00000c3c](01) 50 push eax
[00000c3d](03) 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] // 1st Param
[00000c40](01) 51 push ecx
[00000c41](05) e820fdffff call 00000966 // call H
[00000c46](03) 83c408 add esp,+08
[00000c49](02) 85c0 test eax,eax
[00000c4b](02) 7402 jz 00000c4f
[00000c4d](02) ebfe jmp 00000c4d
[00000c4f](01) 5d pop ebp
[00000c50](01) c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0027) [00000c50]
Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation at Machine Address:c36
machine stack stack machine assembly
address address data code language
======== ======== ======== ========= =============
[00000c36][002117ca][002117ce] 55 push ebp
[00000c37][002117ca][002117ce] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00000c39][002117ca][002117ce] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00000c3c][002117c6][00000c36] 50 push eax // push P
[00000c3d][002117c6][00000c36] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00000c40][002117c2][00000c36] 51 push ecx // push P
[00000c41][002117be][00000c46] e820fdffff call 00000966 // call H(P,P) >>
We can perfectly know that H(P,P) does precisely simulate the first
seven instructions of P when it simulates the first seven instructions
of P.
We can also know that when it perfectly repeats this sequence again
that it has acted as a pure simulator for the execution of these two
sequences.
And so what? Somethings either a pure simulator or it isn't.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 384 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 60:17:07 |
Calls: | 8,173 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 13,113 |
Messages: | 5,864,381 |