On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression >> of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius >> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes >> the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius >> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on your
personal communications ?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am >> providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire >> rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes >> the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on your

personal communications ?

well I'm gonna do like Siri does when you ask her an off-color question and she says "I'm going to pretend like I didn't hear that " so I'm going to just pretend like I didn't read your post that I'm responding to here I sent you an email in response
to your email where you covered several different subjects I responded to them nice and diplomatic sort of Kumbaya-like . I wish you would concentrate on that instead of this material which you posted here hope you're doing well.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 7:21:29 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote: >>>>>

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am >> providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire >> rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on your

personal communications ?

well I'm gonna do like Siri does when you ask her an off-color question and she says "I'm going to pretend like I didn't hear that " so I'm going to just pretend like I didn't read your post that I'm responding to here I sent you an email in response

to your email where you covered several different subjects I responded to them nice and diplomatic sort of Kumbaya-like . I wish you would concentrate on that instead of this material which you posted here hope you're doing well.

you need to be careful with what you write my wife did not swindle any money out of me in fact she gave me money she gave me enough money so that I can post here and comp AI philosophy and everything has a big effect on my personality like when I was
three I tried to sing and my brother would put his hands over his ears and scream stop singing stop singing you're hurting my ears and that does a lot of good for my singing in fact right now I'm the mezzo soprano at Carnegie Hall and also I've realized
that I'm making a response here to you and that there is an infinity of responses I could've made instead of this one I'm going to make or I am making now you see but mathematicians will sit there and argue with you forever that it's not a true infinity
because True infinity is just a mass concept whereas when your instantiating comments to someone that's a physical thing or maybe it's not physical one of the two so the number of possible comments I could make it we could just call RFB that's real far
killing me big and true infinities would be something like oh Magritte this is not a pipe painting the number of things that the pipe is not would probably be a true Infiniti rather than something that's physical or constructible or I want my dolly

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 2:44:59 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 7:21:29 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote: >>>>>

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on your

personal communications ?

well I'm gonna do like Siri does when you ask her an off-color question and she says "I'm going to pretend like I didn't hear that " so I'm going to just pretend like I didn't read your post that I'm responding to here I sent you an email in response

to your email where you covered several different subjects I responded to them nice and diplomatic sort of Kumbaya-like . I wish you would concentrate on that instead of this material which you posted here hope you're doing well.

you need to be careful with what you write my wife did not swindle any money out of me in fact she gave me money she gave me enough money so that I can post here and comp AI philosophy and everything has a big effect on my personality like when I was

three I tried to sing and my brother would put his hands over his ears and scream stop singing stop singing you're hurting my ears and that does a lot of good for my singing in fact right now I'm the mezzo soprano at Carnegie Hall and also I've realized
that I'm making a response here to you and that there is an infinity of responses I could've made instead of this one I'm going to make or I am making now you see but mathematicians will sit there and argue with you forever that it's not a true infinity
because True infinity is just a mass concept whereas when your instantiating comments to someone that's a physical thing or maybe it's not physical one of the two so the number of possible comments I could make it we could just call RFB that's real far
killing me big and true infinities would be something like oh Magritte this is not a pipe painting the number of things that the pipe is not would probably be a true Infiniti rather than something that's physical or constructible or I want my dolly

The fact that you would even make the statement that my wife swindle me out of money proves to me that you're not on my side anymore you hate me you're out to make me feel bad by saying such statements especially here in public where not only will
everybody see them now but they will be here forever basically since they go into an information retrieval system I like the information retrieval system they had in the movie Brazil information retrieval system means a system where are you hunt someone
down straps into a chair and torture the information out of them kind of funny it's gonna be very hard to continue on with you saying things like my wife swindling money out of me that's just a little below I guess you and Britain there if if you're
really in Britain you do have the phrase low blow don't you you do know what that means that's win like two fighters are in the ring in one of them hits the other one like the same thing it's kind of like hitting below the belt or a low blow although low
blow could have some type of sexual meaning but what it basically means is is that you said that my wife swindled me out of money is that just really hurts and it proves that we're really not very good friends anymore and probably you won't be coming
over here and utilizing the polls in the bar and like I wanted you to the very final thing I have to say about all this just before I go to bed and cry in my pillow is that I want my dolly Partin that is

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 3:55:58 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 2:44:59 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 7:21:29 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote: >>>>>

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on

your personal communications ?

well I'm gonna do like Siri does when you ask her an off-color question and she says "I'm going to pretend like I didn't hear that " so I'm going to just pretend like I didn't read your post that I'm responding to here I sent you an email in

response to your email where you covered several different subjects I responded to them nice and diplomatic sort of Kumbaya-like . I wish you would concentrate on that instead of this material which you posted here hope you're doing well.

you need to be careful with what you write my wife did not swindle any money out of me in fact she gave me money she gave me enough money so that I can post here and comp AI philosophy and everything has a big effect on my personality like when I was

three I tried to sing and my brother would put his hands over his ears and scream stop singing stop singing you're hurting my ears and that does a lot of good for my singing in fact right now I'm the mezzo soprano at Carnegie Hall and also I've realized
that I'm making a response here to you and that there is an infinity of responses I could've made instead of this one I'm going to make or I am making now you see but mathematicians will sit there and argue with you forever that it's not a true infinity
because True infinity is just a mass concept whereas when your instantiating comments to someone that's a physical thing or maybe it's not physical one of the two so the number of possible comments I could make it we could just call RFB that's real far
killing me big and true infinities would be something like oh Magritte this is not a pipe painting the number of things that the pipe is not would probably be a true Infiniti rather than something that's physical or constructible or I want my dolly

The fact that you would even make the statement that my wife swindle me out of money proves to me that you're not on my side anymore you hate me you're out to make me feel bad by saying such statements especially here in public where not only will

everybody see them now but they will be here forever basically since they go into an information retrieval system I like the information retrieval system they had in the movie Brazil information retrieval system means a system where are you hunt someone
down straps into a chair and torture the information out of them kind of funny it's gonna be very hard to continue on with you saying things like my wife swindling money out of me that's just a little below I guess you and Britain there if if you're
really in Britain you do have the phrase low blow don't you you do know what that means that's win like two fighters are in the ring in one of them hits the other one like the same thing it's kind of like hitting below the belt or a low blow although low
blow could have some type of sexual meaning but what it basically means is is that you said that my wife swindled me out of money is that just really hurts and it proves that we're really not very good friends anymore and probably you won't be coming
over here and utilizing the polls in the bar and like I wanted you to the very final thing I have to say about all this just before I go to bed and cry in my pillow is that I want my dolly Partin that is

What you wrote is pretty rough as my dad would say. I'm just wondering if our relationship can survive it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am >> providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire >> rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes >> the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on your

personal communications ?

Dealbreaker

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote: >>>>>

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am >> providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire >> rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on your

personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote: >>>>>

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on your

personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million other
people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote: >>>>>

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on

your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million other

people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with you
there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out information
where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on

your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million other

people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with you

there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out information
where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer because
that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect

on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with you

there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out information
where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer because

that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.
Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect

on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer because

that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

I can't tell from your post whether you approve of me posting here or you don't approve . in any case I've posted more worthwhile stuff to this group than most people have.

I was just saying back when you thought about coming here you could never find your passport ; I do agree with you that it's a dumb idea unless you wanted to tour the Grand Canyon or do other sightseeing.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 5:56:55 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said. >>>
You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ)) >> It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

I can't tell from your post whether you approve of me posting here or you don't approve . in any case I've posted more worthwhile stuff to this group than most people have.

I was just saying back when you thought about coming here you could never find your passport ; I do agree with you that it's a dumb idea unless you wanted to tour the Grand Canyon or do other sightseeing.

from what I have noticed people who deal with each other online virtually never see each other in person.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

lol On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 9:22:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 5:56:55 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said. >>>
You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ)) >> It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8

million other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating

with you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

I can't tell from your post whether you approve of me posting here or you don't approve . in any case I've posted more worthwhile stuff to this group than most people have.

I was just saying back when you thought about coming here you could never find your passport ; I do agree with you that it's a dumb idea unless you wanted to tour the Grand Canyon or do other sightseeing.

from what I have noticed people who deal with each other online virtually never see each other in person.

I want to say something but it's very difficult to put into words I think we've kind of come to reality as opposed to the early days when we did talk about you coming over here but in the last few years it seems like we've kind of agreed that it's
probably not very realistic and early on you said something about it would cost like $6000 or something like that in it I guess it's just a lot cheaper to to use the Internet and then I started talking about the Grand Canyon and I don't want it to seem
like that I'm telling you you can't come here and that you should go to the Grand Canyon instead I'm just saying something like I don't want to tell you that you can't come to the United States at all but we sort of agreed that maybe you be kind of may
be like not wants to come here to Texas but I don't wanna tell you that you can't come to the United States at all so that's why I talked about the Grand Canyon you you're certainly allowed to like make a trip to America flying to New York or wherever
and then maybe like rent a car and do some sightseeing across America and The Grand Canyon you're trying to be the a pitta me of the trip the Grand Canyon is actually pretty nice area if if you believe this in this is true this is it this is the true
statement is the Internet is nothing but lies with this statement is true I am I took 20 trips from Victoria Texas to the American west between the years 1985 and 2004 this is never mind I am outfitted my SUVs for sleeping in and I could just camp
wherever I stopped so I made it to the Grand Canyon they have two rules about the Grand Canyon one is you don't try to hike from the rim to the river and back and in one day you just don't do that the second rule they have is for every hour that you take
going down take two hours to come back up so I figured if I left at five in the morning and I was at the Colorado river at 10 in the morning and then I take twice as much time to go back up well that's five hours and 5×2 is 10 last time I checked and I
am 1010+10 is 20 but you some kind of modular can you come out with so eight in the evening so I left at five in the morning got there at 10 in the morning it was back in the bright angel rim trail head thingy at 8 PM and I want to say one thing about
all of this when I was down at the river sitting there some Kraut came and sit next to me and he breaks out his little little bottle of whiskey and he's celebrating in doing the he never offered any of that to me and I think you know who you are wherever
you are although you probably don't because you didn't know my name and I'm just writing here and there's no in fact there's no way lotta times I get to thinking like him suppose I wanted to know the identity of somebody that you liked was that I'm sorry
to stop like 20 years ago away how can I ever get that identity in the answer is it's about as impossible as if you want to name right there so anyway so you could like a tour of the Grand Canyon and then go back to New York City and although if you go
to all that trouble you could probably well I guess you could come here and visit Who knows this whole visiting thing is been a fly in the ointment the whole time and I guess this is why people just do online stuff so they don't have to actually travel
anywhere and kind of think I'm maybe have going on a little too long hair and no so forth and so on and I just wanted to say have a nice day and I want my dolly

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect

on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer because

that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

I see a slight evidence here that you might want to resume a conversation . I'm not getting my hopes up too much though. I'll just have to take it easy, don't try to rush anything . Of course it would be better to discuss matters via private email or
hand written letter than out here in the public and you did warn me about not abusing comp AI philosophy because there are little children wishing to learn from it . but in any case that's the way it is . I'm so glad that you're not 100% ignoring me
that would be disastrous so probably this very posting will jinx everything and everything will go to ruin .

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect

on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer because

that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

ok

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 9:25:05 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said. >>>
You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ)) >> It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

ok

Who is thinking that someday my travels might take me to London and then I could give you a call in wherever you live which I'm not sure of maybe we could like have a dinner together we could pick some point halfway between London and he lives somewhere
is Mary Merseyside or Mersey say is that I seem to remember that from your address so then we could like you know meet halfway and have a nice dinner at least something to show for 15 years of interaction and so that's what I was thinking about but the
distinct possibility comes that I will never leave Victoria here because I kind a like I'm being held prisoner here show room so I might never get to London so maybe all of this is just what do they call it while spinning or just ruminating or or or just
like just dreaming or just don't know

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 9:25:05 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said. >>>
You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ)) >> It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

ok

Why travel halfway around the world when you can communicate with someone with a few tippy taps of the keyboard in five minutes.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect

on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer because

that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

Oh well. Keep in touch.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 10:05:15 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said. >>>
You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ)) >> It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

Oh well. Keep in touch.

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect on your
personal communications ?

sorry about all of this you know we had some scuffles along the way but nothing too bad apparently asking you to establish a video link with me is what did it in. At this point, who cares?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect

on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer because

that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

well Nic that was a pretty low blow , your comments about my ex-wife , it really hurt .
Can I get the identity of your children because you know how evil I am I was thinking about selling them into white slavery .
I figure the relationship is destroyed so hell why not be vindictive like this? Never form a relationship on the Internet , only with someone next-door.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:45:59 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said. >>>
You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ)) >> It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

well Nic that was a pretty low blow , your comments about my ex-wife , it really hurt .
Can I get the identity of your children because you know how evil I am I was thinking about selling them into white slavery .
I figure the relationship is destroyed so hell why not be vindictive like this?
Never form a relationship on the Internet , only with someone next-door.

A relationship is like a delicate champagne glass ; drop it and if it breaks in two you can fix it ; drop it and if it falls into 1000 pieces you can't fix it , go out and find another champagne glass.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 2:19:47 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:45:59 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said. >>>
You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ)) >> It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8

million other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating

with you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

well Nic that was a pretty low blow , your comments about my ex-wife , it really hurt .
Can I get the identity of your children because you know how evil I am I was thinking about selling them into white slavery .
I figure the relationship is destroyed so hell why not be vindictive like this?
Never form a relationship on the Internet , only with someone next-door.

A relationship is like a delicate champagne glass ; drop it and if it breaks in two you can fix it ; drop it and if it falls into 1000 pieces you can't fix it , go out and find another champagne glass.

Actually , the way I look at it people are fortunate to be rid of me because of the jerk I am.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:39:16 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 2:19:47 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:45:59 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory* >>>

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8

million other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating

with you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

well Nic that was a pretty low blow , your comments about my ex-wife , it really hurt .
Can I get the identity of your children because you know how evil I am I was thinking about selling them into white slavery .
I figure the relationship is destroyed so hell why not be vindictive like this?
Never form a relationship on the Internet , only with someone next-door.

A relationship is like a delicate champagne glass ; drop it and if it breaks in two you can fix it ; drop it and if it falls into 1000 pieces you can't fix it , go out and find another champagne glass.

Actually , the way I look at it people are fortunate to be rid of me because of the jerk I am.

actually , most people just go ahead and block me to make sure that I can no longer communicate with them.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 11:25:45 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 8:50:35 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:39:16 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 2:19:47 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:45:59 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>> On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue" >>>>>

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence. >> --
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an

extraordinary effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8

million other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops

communicating with you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you
find out information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a

scammer because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

well Nic that was a pretty low blow , your comments about my ex-wife , it really hurt .
Can I get the identity of your children because you know how evil I am I was thinking about selling them into white slavery .
I figure the relationship is destroyed so hell why not be vindictive like this?
Never form a relationship on the Internet , only with someone next-door.

A relationship is like a delicate champagne glass ; drop it and if it breaks in two you can fix it ; drop it and if it falls into 1000 pieces you can't fix it , go out and find another champagne glass.

Actually , the way I look at it people are fortunate to be rid of me because of the jerk I am.

actually , most people just go ahead and block me to make sure that I can no longer communicate with them.

I wonder if it's better just to remain silent in trying circumstances?

Having A temper will guarantee that one has no friends

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 8:50:35 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:39:16 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 2:19:47 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:45:59 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>> On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue" >>>>>

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory* >>>

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an

extraordinary effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8

million other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops

communicating with you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you
find out information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

well Nic that was a pretty low blow , your comments about my ex-wife , it really hurt .
Can I get the identity of your children because you know how evil I am I was thinking about selling them into white slavery .
I figure the relationship is destroyed so hell why not be vindictive like this?
Never form a relationship on the Internet , only with someone next-door.

A relationship is like a delicate champagne glass ; drop it and if it breaks in two you can fix it ; drop it and if it falls into 1000 pieces you can't fix it , go out and find another champagne glass.

Actually , the way I look at it people are fortunate to be rid of me because of the jerk I am.

actually , most people just go ahead and block me to make sure that I can no longer communicate with them.

I wonder if it's better just to remain silent in trying circumstances?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 11:25:45 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 8:50:35 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:39:16 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 2:19:47 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 7:45:59 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:38:44 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>> On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof
is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue" >>>>>

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*,
to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence. >> --
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an

extraordinary effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8

million other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops

communicating with you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you
find out information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a

scammer because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

well Nic that was a pretty low blow , your comments about my ex-wife , it really hurt .
Can I get the identity of your children because you know how evil I am I was thinking about selling them into white slavery .
I figure the relationship is destroyed so hell why not be vindictive like this?
Never form a relationship on the Internet , only with someone next-door.

A relationship is like a delicate champagne glass ; drop it and if it breaks in two you can fix it ; drop it and if it falls into 1000 pieces you can't fix it , go out and find another champagne glass.

Actually , the way I look at it people are fortunate to be rid of me because of the jerk I am.

actually , most people just go ahead and block me to make sure that I can no longer communicate with them.

I wonder if it's better just to remain silent in trying circumstances?

Building relationships goes according to the mathematical trap door function : very hard to build, easy to destroy.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 6:38:44 PM UTC, Artist wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said.

You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ))
It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary effect

on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer because

that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

Don Stockbauer,
Cease your confabulations. I quit, as you know I'm married.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, December 18, 2022 at 1:11:25 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 6:38:44 PM UTC, Artist wrote:

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 3:27:05 PM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 12:04:01 PM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 2:46:22 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-6, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-6, jobsearc...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 6:56:31 AM UTC, Don Stockbauer wrote:

uOn Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 9:45:10 AM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 4:44 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:33:32 PM UTC-6, olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 11:51 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 18:31:28 UTC+1, _ Olcott wrote:

On 11/28/2022 3:46 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On Monday, 28 November 2022 at 01:20:41 UTC+1, olcott wrote:

"Gödel sentence in the 1931 incompleteness proof >>>>>> is not a truth bearer thus simply untrue"

Prove it... Moron.

Moron.

Corollary: model theory my ass.

*Here is how Wittgenstein ties to model theory*

There is how you quote Wittgenstein *out of context*, >>> to make him say the exact opposite of what he said. >>>
You bloody troll and spammer.

*Plonk*

Julio

When I provide word-for-word everything that Wittgenstein said I am
providing the complete context. https://www.liarparadox.org/Wittgenstein.pdf

I know that Wittgenstein is correct because I formulated his entire
rebuttal shortly before I ever heard of him.
Incomplete(T) ↔ ∃φ ((T ⊬ φ) ∧ (T ⊬ ¬φ)) >> It is common knowledge that the above definition correctly formalizes
the notion of incompleteness.

What is not common knowledge is that every self-contradictory expression
of language fulfills the above logic sentence.
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Have you heard of Wittgenstein's poker?

It was a card game he was involved in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj5omcY21bE
--
Copyright 2022 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

OMG it wasn't about a card game at all it was about a philosophical argument not an intellectual argument but one that could have resulted in a philosopher with a red hot post poker driven into his eye

have a nice day

Don old chap, these men are serious researchers, quit disturbing them I plea, they could just discover something extraordinarily significant....and whilenI'm here how much did your ex-missus swindle from you, its had an extraordinary

effect on your personal communications ?

Dealbreaker i'm

So , with those words you're aiming for a reconciliation, Nic?

Found your passport yet?

yeah I do that too I kind of keep trying and trying to maintain the relationship and then it becomes obvious that it's doomed so then I lash out in horrible things against my conversational opponent and then that's it you know there's 8 million

other people to go and have a conversation with you so it's absolutely no big thing right? Have a nice day.

The Apple dictation keeps putting down million instead of billion it's really irritating.

yeah, it's really hard for me to have a relationship because I just get irritated with people too easily and in this modern lobotomize sheep world we live in you get irritated at somebody they're just gone and if somebody stops communicating with

you there's nothing on earth that can get them to communicate again because all they have to do is be lazy and not deal with you I thought of this one funny thing suppose your conversational opponent refuses to talk to you but then you find out
information where they can get a kid needs to save their lives so you write to them about that they still won't contact you did rather die than contact you have a nice day I want my Dolly

so what is the lesson learned? if you try to get your conversational opponent to establish a video link with you in order to reduce the possibility that they might be a scammer and that person refuses dont actually call that person a scammer

because that ends the relationship immediately, what you should do is not call that person a scammer and then just wait and see if that person ever asks you for money , then the relationship is immediately over.

Since you have found somebody to talk physics and computers with you, there seems no o alterior motive and write to comp.ai.philosophy.

nope I have not found my passport and travelling to the states seems like a dumb idea.

Don Stockbauer,
Cease your confabulations. I quit, as you know I'm married.

You've always told me you are single but you must've gotten married here recently . Airing publicly my problems with my
ex-wife , demanding that I not post to comp.ai.philosophy, I guess 15 years of fun is over. I keep trying to write to you but you're unforgiving of the past. Oh well.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)