They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
On 3/17/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit.
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit. That's always
a weasel-word with you.
Nothing was taken out of context. Trump always speaks
discursively,
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
On 2024-03-17, Max Boot <max.boot@lathymes.com> wrote:
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit. That's always
a weasel-word with you.
"Fuck off" typically indicate
Nothing was taken out of context. Trump always speaks
discursively,
Sweeping swath words like 'nothing' and 'always' typically indicate
a writer isn't capable of nuance.
On 3/17/24 11:46, Max Boot wrote:
On 3/17/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit.
Context is always important.
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit. That's always
a weasel-word with you.
"Fuck off" typically indicate
contempt for a chronic liar. That's right.
Nothing was taken out of context. Trump always speaks
discursively,
Sweeping swath words like 'nothing' and 'always' typically indicate
a writer isn't capable of nuance.
"Nuance" and "Trump" don't belong within a parsec of one another.
Fuck off
you charlatan.
On 2024-03-17, Max Boot <max.boot@lathymes.com> wrote:
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit. That's always
a weasel-word with you.
"Fuck off" typically indicate
contempt for a chronic liar. That's right.
Congratulations! You're right again!
Nothing was taken out of context. Trump always speaks
discursively,
Sweeping swath words like 'nothing' and 'always' typically indicate
a writer isn't capable of nuance.
"Nuance" and "Trump" don't belong within a parsec of one another.
Fuck off
Simply not reading me is the better solution
You and Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness constantly
lie about things being taken "out of context" when they
were not.
Trump was not speaking figuratively.
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>>around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You know it's bullshit because Kremlin Girl doesn't even
try to produce an exact transcript (as I did) only a
hand-waving paraphrase.
On 3/17/24 11:46, Max Boot wrote:
On 3/17/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit.
Context is always important. The fact that you don't see this is of
interest.
Congratulations! You're right again!
Obviously.
Fuck off
Simply not reading me is the better solution
I enjoy laughing at charlatans who pompously deliver
declarations as if from on high that are self-evidently
bullshit.
On 2024-03-17, Max Boot <max.boot@lathymes.com> wrote:
You and Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness constantly
lie about things being taken "out of context" when they
were not.
"constantly lie about things" sounds desperate. The reality is
likely closer to "believe a certain way about things and, therefore,
write in the *context* (haha) of believing that certain way".
But I suppose that's likely too nuanced a point of view for those
who can independently determine guilt of others better than a trial
by peers.
Trump was not speaking figuratively.
It takes either faith or serious mind-reading skills to know that.
You can only know whether *you* would or wouldn't be speaking
figuratively about something using the same words. You've absolutely
zero access to another's inner conceptual context - aka mind.
Trump always says what he means most of the time.Trump was not speaking figuratively.
It takes either faith or serious mind-reading skills to know that.
You can only know whether *you* would or wouldn't be speaking
figuratively about something using the same words. You've absolutely
zero access to another's inner conceptual context - aka mind.
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ... <https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You know it's bullshit because Kremlin Girl doesn't even
try to produce an exact transcript (as I did) only a
hand-waving paraphrase.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You know it's bullshit because Kremlin Girl doesn't even
try to produce an exact transcript (as I did) only a
hand-waving paraphrase.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the automotive industry.
You should have your throat slit for your lies.
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the
automotive industry.
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>>>> around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I >>>>> like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You know it's bullshit because Kremlin Girl doesn't even
try to produce an exact transcript (as I did) only a
hand-waving paraphrase.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the
automotive industry.
You should have your throat slit for your lies.
<https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/2924478/social-media-captures-full-context-of-
trumps-bloodbath-comment/>
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
He still believes the bullshit fake news.
=====
Fake News and Biden Campaign lies:
Trump Says Country Faces 'Bloodbath' If Biden Wins In November - MSN
In Ohio Campaign Rally, Trump Says There Will Be A "Bloodbath" If He Loses >November Election - CBSnews
Trump Predicts A 'Blood Bath' If He Loses
In A Caustic And Discursive Speech In Ohio, Former President Donald J. Trump >Once Again Doubled Down on A Doomsday Vision of The United States. - NYT
Trump Says There Will Be A 'Bloodbath' If He Loses The Election
Trump's comments came at a rally in Ohio in the context of auto manufacturing. >The Biden campaign responded by criticizing the former president's "threats of >political violence." - NBCnews
Mmmm... no he didn't.
=====
Corrections:
Trump Warns of 'Bloodbath' For AUTO INDUSTRY and Country If He Loses The >Election >https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-warns-bloodbath-auto-industry-041210875.html
LOL... notice how they added "and country". Trump did not say anything about >the "country" alone... he was talking about the Auto Industry, ONLY. (see words
below)
HOAX ALERT: Trump Warns of Auto Industry 'Bloodbath' If Biden Wins,
Leftists Including Biden Campaign Lie And Claim He Is Declaring Civil War
https://thepatriotlight.com/178174/hoax-alert-trump-warns-of-auto-industry- >bloodbath-if-biden-wins-leftists-including-biden-campaign-lie-and-claim-he-is- >declaring-civil-war-the-ga/
Trump's Team Said Joe Biden's Policies on Auto And Manufacturing Are
Creating An Economic Bloodbath For Americans
https://www.indiaherald.com/Politics/Read/994689125/Trumps-team-said-Joe- >Bidens-policies-on-auto-and-manufacturing-are-creating-an-economic-bloodbath- >for-Americans
Trump 'Bloodbath' Comment Taken Out-of-Context to Make Him Look Like He's
Calling for Violence
https://www.thaimbc.com/2024/03/17/trump-bloodbath-comment-taken-out-of- >context-to-make-him-look-like-hes-calling-for-violence/
=====
Too bad he was talking about the AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY, you fucking child.
Context, for the faggots on Usenet and the Media in general, who may have used >this to spread their usual lies about Trump:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1769120579150360577/vid/avc1/1280x720/nps
YC4orQ7EfLS0w.mp4?tag=14
You know, Mexico has taken, over a period of 30 years, 34 percent of the >automobile manufacturing business in our country.
Think of it. Went to Mexico.
China now is building a couple of massive plants where they're going to build >the cars in Mexico and think, they think, that they're going to sell those cars
into the United States with no tax at the border.
Let me tell you something to China. If you're listening, President Xi, and you >and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal... those big monster car >manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now, and you think >you're going to get that, you're going to not hire Americans, and you're going >to sell the cars to us now... we're going to put a 100 percent tariff on every >single car that comes across the line, and you're not going to be able to sell >those cars.
If I get elected. Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for
the whole. That's going to be the least of it. It's going to be a bloodbath for
the country. That'll be the least of it. But they're not going to sell those >cars.
They're building massive factories. A friend of mine, all he does is build car >manufacturing plants. He's the biggest in the world.
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote:
On 3/17/24 11:46, Max Boot wrote:
On 3/17/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>>>> around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I >>>>> like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit.
Context is always important. The fact that you don't see this is of
interest.
Conservative: "That embarrassinng quote
from Trump was taken out context"
Liberal: "OK, show us the context you
think justifies it"
Conservative: (disappears)
Someone pretending to be super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:bloodbath.
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
Most Trumpers will abandon him and his losing ways before facing a >
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html> >>>
automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:31:38 -0000 (UTC), oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> wrote:
On 2024-03-17, Bradley K. Sherman <bks@panix.com> wrote:
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ... >>><https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
<sarcasm>
It's hard to beat the unquestionable quotes-extracted-from-context
powers of an organization that declares itself a bastion of "fit"
news, or of those who put glassy-eyed faith in it as though news
gospel....
</sarcasm>
"Mr. Trump promised to place tariffs on cars manufactured abroad if he won in November. He
added: Now, if I dont get elected, its going to be a blood bath for the whole thats
going to be the least of it. Its going to be a blood bath for the country."
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>>around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You know it's bullshit because Kremlin Girl doesn't even
try to produce an exact transcript (as I did) only a
hand-waving paraphrase.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
On 3/17/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit.
Now, if I dont get elected, its going
to be a bloodbath for the whole thats gonna be the least of it.
Its going to be a bloodbath for the country. That will be the least
of it. But theyre not going to sell those cars. Theyre building
massive factories." <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/2924478/social-media -captures-full-context-of-trumps-bloodbath-comment/>
His promise is bullshit.
On 2024-03-17, Max Boot <max.boot@lathymes.com> wrote:
You and Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness constantly
lie about things being taken "out of context" when they
were not.
"constantly lie about things"
Trump was not speaking figuratively.
It takes either faith or serious mind-reading skills to know that.
Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking
around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You know it's bullshit because Kremlin Girl doesn't even
try to produce an exact transcript (as I did) only a
hand-waving paraphrase.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
You conveniently left out the context
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:57:36 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@verizon.net> wrote:
David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote in
news:dqWcnQt8J6QavWr4nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com:
On 3/17/24 11:46, Max Boot wrote:
On 3/17/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>>>>> around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I >>>>>> like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context
Fuck off with this "context" bullshit.
Context is always important. The fact that you don't see this is of
interest.
Conservative: "That embarrassinng quote
from Trump was taken out context"
Liberal: "OK, show us the context you
think justifies it"
Conservative: (disappears)
Trouble with the context is, the statement stops making sense.
"Were going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes
across the line, and
youre not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected, Trump
said. Now, if I
dont get elected, its going to be a bloodbath for the whole thats
gonna be the least
of it. Its going to be a bloodbath for the country. That will be the
least of it. But
theyre not going to sell those cars. Theyre building massive factories." <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/2924478/social-media-captures-full-context-of-trumps-bloodbath-comment/>
His promise is bullshit.
The voter ignorance Trump is counting on is illustrated below. On the "American Made"
vehicle index, the US makes only three of the 25 highest US content
vehicles. Honda has
four just in the top ten. The only trucks in the top 25 are both Japanese.
But that doesn't mean we can necessarily know what *he* means,
i.e. what that which he says means to *him* when he says it.
What testimonial! Trump is so delusional he doesn't even
understand what he's saying!
People who imagine they can know what he means simply don't
understand the plight of entirely separate conceptuality
contexts - i.e. individuals - pretending that using the
same words is the same as meaning the same things.
Word salad.
No thanks, I've had as much word salad as I can take
just now.
On 2024-03-17, suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
Trump always says what he means most of the time.Trump was not speaking figuratively.
It takes either faith or serious mind-reading skills to know that.
You can only know whether *you* would or wouldn't be speaking
figuratively about something using the same words. You've absolutely
zero access to another's inner conceptual context - aka mind.
I suspect he does. I suspect we all think we do.
But that doesn't mean we can necessarily know what *he* means,
i.e. what that which he says means to *him* when he says it.
You and Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness constantly
lie about things being taken "out of context" when they
were not.
"constantly lie about things"
is accurate.
Trump was not speaking figuratively.
It takes either faith or serious mind-reading skills to know that.
Wrong.
"Mr. Trump promised to place tariffs on cars manufactured
abroad if he won in November. He added: 'Now, if I don't
get elected, it's going to be a blood bath for the whole
that's going to be the least of it. It's going to be a
blood bath for the country."
even Swilly is able to produce the correct context.
On 2024-03-18, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
But that doesn't mean we can necessarily know what *he* means,
i.e. what that which he says means to *him* when he says it.
What testimonial! Trump is so delusional he doesn't even
understand what he's saying!
No idea how that follows from what I wrote.
Well... apart from what you quoted, i.e. that you couldn't possibly
know for sure what I meant by the words I wrote because they were
written in a conceptuality context (mind) not accessible to your conceptuality context (mind)....
Trump always says what he means most of the time.
I suspect he does. I suspect we all think we do.
But that doesn't mean we can necessarily know what *he*
means, i.e. what that which he says means to *him* when
he says it.
We know what he means, fuckwit. We have plenty of
experience with the clown.
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an
economic one. If you follow what's happening in the car
market, he's absolutely correct.
Odd how these people have suddenly forgot that "bloodbath"
is an expression, eh?
No idea how that follows from what I wrote.
Well... apart from what you quoted, i.e. that you couldn't
possibly know for sure what I meant by the words I wrote
because they were written in a conceptuality context (mind)
not accessible to your conceptuality context (mind)....
Fuck off, you pompous windbag.
On 2024-03-18, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.corn> wrote:
Trump always says what he means most of the time.
I suspect he does. I suspect we all think we do.
But that doesn't mean we can necessarily know what *he*
means, i.e. what that which he says means to *him* when
he says it.
We know what he means, fuckwit. We have plenty of
experience with the clown.
Unless you're a mind-reader,
On 2024-03-18, Max Boot <max.boot@lathymes.com> wrote:
You and Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness constantly
lie about things being taken "out of context" when they
were not.
"constantly lie about things"
is accurate.
In
Trump was not speaking figuratively.
It takes either faith or serious mind-reading skills to know that.
Wrong.
To you
On 2024-03-18, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
"Mr. Trump promised to place tariffs on cars manufactured
abroad if he won in November. He added: 'Now, if I don't
get elected, it's going to be a blood bath for the whole
that's going to be the least of it. It's going to be a
blood bath for the country."
even Swilly is able to produce the correct context.
Ah, so the context *was* economics after all?!
On 2024-03-18, Scout <me4gunzzzzz@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> wrote:
No idea how that follows from what I wrote.
Well... apart from what you quoted, i.e. that you couldn't
possibly know for sure what I meant by the words I wrote
because they were written in a conceptuality context (mind)
not accessible to your conceptuality context (mind)....
Fuck off, you pompous windbag.
Feel free to not read
No idea how that follows from what I wrote.
Well... apart from what you quoted, i.e. that you couldn't
possibly know for sure what I meant by the words I wrote
because they were written in a conceptuality context (mind)
not accessible to your conceptuality context (mind)....
Fuck off, you pompous windbag.
Feel free to not read
Feel free not to respond, fucking newbie poseur shitworm.
"Mr. Trump promised to place tariffs on cars manufactured
abroad if he won in November. He added: 'Now, if I don't
get elected, it's going to be a blood bath for the whole
that's going to be the least of it. It's going to be a
blood bath for the country."
even Swilly is able to produce the correct context.
Ah, so the context *was* economics after all?!
No, you fraud, it wasn't.
You and Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness constantly
lie about things being taken "out of context" when they
were not.
"constantly lie about things"
is accurate.
In
fact. Yes, it is accurate in fact.
Trump was not speaking figuratively.
It takes either faith or serious mind-reading skills to know that.
Wrong.
To you
No, objectively.
Trump always says what he means most of the time.
I suspect he does. I suspect we all think we do.
But that doesn't mean we can necessarily know what *he*
means, i.e. what that which he says means to *him* when
he says it.
We know what he means, fuckwit. We have plenty of
experience with the clown.
Unless you're a mind-reader,
No need. We know how Trump talks and what he means. "Stand
back and stand by." We knew that was a signal to
terrorists, and the terrorists themselves knew it.
On 2024-03-18, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.corn> wrote:
Trump always says what he means most of the time.
I suspect he does. I suspect we all think we do.
But that doesn't mean we can necessarily know what *he*
means, i.e. what that which he says means to *him* when
he says it.
We know what he means, fuckwit. We have plenty of
experience with the clown.
Unless you're a mind-reader,
No need. We know how Trump talks and what he means. "Stand
back and stand by." We knew that was a signal to
terrorists, and the terrorists themselves knew it.
I'm merely suggesting
super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:
On 2024-03-17 10:51:04 +0000, AlleyCat said:
He still believes the bullshit fake news.
This isn't "fake" at all you moron.
Ad hominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
P.S.
Is there a reason you didn't include this part?
=====
Fake News and Biden Campaign lies:
Trump Says Country Faces 'Bloodbath' If Biden Wins In November - MSN
In Ohio Campaign Rally, Trump Says There Will Be A "Bloodbath" If He
Loses November Election - CBSnews
Trump Predicts A 'Blood Bath' If He Loses
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html> >>>>
automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
No need. We know how Trump talks and what he means. "Stand
back and stand by." We knew that was a signal to
terrorists, and the terrorists themselves knew it.
I'm merely suggesting
You're merely trolling, you fucking pompous newbie. Fuck off.
On 2024-03-18, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.corn> wrote:
No need. We know how Trump talks and what he means. "Stand
back and stand by." We knew that was a signal to
terrorists, and the terrorists themselves knew it.
I'm merely suggesting
You're merely trolling, you fucking pompous newbie. Fuck off.
"Trolling"? What does that mean?
On 2024-03-18, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.corn> wrote:
Trump always says what he means most of the time.
I suspect he does. I suspect we all think we do.
But that doesn't mean we can necessarily know what *he*
means, i.e. what that which he says means to *him* when
he says it.
We know what he means, fuckwit. We have plenty of
experience with the clown.
Unless you're a mind-reader,
No need. We know how Trump talks and what he means. "Stand
back and stand by." We knew that was a signal to
terrorists, and the terrorists themselves knew it.
I'm merely suggesting that knowing something is true/real isn't as
simple as believing/deciding it is.
So you keep saying you or we "know", but I have absolutely no
reason to believe you because your word isn't good enough for
me.
Nor are the words of others - especially those quick to name-call
profanely when the verbal going apparently rises above their verbal >wherewithal.
...We know what he means, fuckwit. We have plenty of
experience with the clown.
No need. We know how Trump talks and what he means. "Stand
back and stand by." We knew that was a signal to
terrorists, and the terrorists themselves knew it.
Rudy_Tooty_full_of Fruity has demonstrated many times that
he really doesn't know much of anything. He's only here
for the attention he gets.
"Trolling"? What does that mean?
Sure thing, newbie troll.
On 2024-03-18, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.corn> wrote:
"Trolling"? What does that mean?
Sure thing, newbie troll.
So... "trolling" means
You know what trolling means, little fuckwitted newbie troll.
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 14:40:41 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:19:13 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>>>around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I >>>>like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
Bullshit on top of bullshit. Here's the exact quote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ... >><https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
Interesting how the media leaves out the important sentences:
"Using the stage, Trump said, Were going to put a 100 percent
tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and youre not
going to be able to sell those guys if I get elected Now, if I dont
get elected, its going to be a bloodbath for the whole thats going
to be the least of it. Its going to be a bloodbath for the country."
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/donald-trumps-bloodbath-comment-misquoted-maga-on-the-defensive-elon-musk-posts-full-context-101710742895315.html
You know it's bullshit because Kremlin Girl doesn't even
try to produce an exact transcript (as I did) only a
hand-waving paraphrase.
I just provided what you were too lazy to look for.
Your lies take so little effort to be demolished.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
They can do clean up on aisle 3 all they want but this one's sticking >>around forever, like "there are good people on both sides..." and "I
like people who weren't captured, OK?"
If you review his remarks in context he's referring to an economic
one. If you follow what's happening in the car market, he's
absolutely correct.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:36:06 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the >>>>>> automotive industry.
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath >>>>>>> | for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html> >>>>>>
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here: https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:48:44 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:36:06 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath >>>>>>>>> | for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's >>>>>>>>> | going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the >>>>>>>> automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here: https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070 >>>>
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
What hypocrisy?
The right works exactly the same trick on it's leftist political opponents.
Low information voters are those who buy bullshit like that without even bothering to look
it up and see if it's true.
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
The most American car you can buy is a Honda.
The most American pickup you can buy is a Honda. #2 is a Toyota.
But low information voters don't realize that because they're too lazy to look up the
truth.
Which cars are the most American?
<https://www.cars.com/articles/2023-cars-com-american-made-index-which-cars-are-the-most-american-467465/>
Swill
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:48:44 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> >> wrote:
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:36:06 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com>
wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's >>>>>>>>>> | going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the >>>>>>>>> automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here: https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070 >>>>>
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
What hypocrisy?
The right works exactly the same trick on it's leftist political opponents. >>
Low information voters are those who buy bullshit like that without even
bothering to look
it up and see if it's true.
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a
pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and stupid. How
is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:29:53 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:<snip>
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a
pronouncement made during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless
incendiary and stupid. How is Trump going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he wasn't elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100% tariffs on imports, Chinese or otherwise?
Or Sheldon Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve >Kornacki, Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy >Ann Reid, Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe >Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana >Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David
Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone >Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans
Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
When did any of them promise a 100% tariff on imports in order to avoid an economic "bloodbath"?
I don't recall a similar outcry. Why not?
Because those people didn't utter the sheer stupidity and hate mongering that Trump did.
Probably, likely, because smarter people understood the context of the word >and didn't knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the other side.
That is exactly the point! Why do pols say such stupid stuff? Because the typical American voter is ignorant enough to buy it. Doesn't matter what party.
The difference with Trump is the desire to inflame, to stir the pot. He was notorious for setting staff members at odds with each other, then sitting back to
enjoy the fireworks.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:29:53 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:<snip>
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he wasn't
elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100% tariffs on imports,
Chinese or otherwise?
In article <aupmvipdm5gfgm7c2520cl8du1a8m69rq1@4ax.com>,
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:29:53 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:<snip>
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a >> >> pronouncement made during a rant about car imports, it's neverthelessWas it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
incendiary and stupid. How is Trump going to tariff imports when . . . >> >
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he >> wasn't elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100%
tariffs on imports, Chinese or otherwise?
Or Sheldon Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve
Kornacki, Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy
Ann Reid, Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe >> >Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana
Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David
Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone
Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans
Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
When did any of them promise a 100% tariff on imports in order to avoid an >> economic "bloodbath"?
I don't recall a similar outcry. Why not?
Because those people didn't utter the sheer stupidity and hate mongering that
Trump did.
Probably, likely, because smarter people understood the context of the word
and didn't knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the other side.
That is exactly the point! Why do pols say such stupid stuff? Because the >> typical American voter is ignorant enough to buy it. Doesn't matter what party.
The difference with Trump is the desire to inflame, to stir the pot. He was >> notorious for setting staff members at odds with each other, then sitting back to
enjoy the fireworks.
If Trump ever gets the opportunity to slap a 100% tariff on imported
cars I'm anxious to see the faithful explain how the drastic additional >inflation of car prices that would ensue isn't his fault.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:29:53 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:<snip>
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he wasn't
elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100% tariffs on imports,
Chinese or otherwise?
Or Sheldon
Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve Kornacki, Neil
Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy Ann Reid,
Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe
Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana
Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David
Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone
Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans
Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
When did any of them promise a 100% tariff on imports in order to avoid an economic
"bloodbath"?
I don't recall a similar outcry. Why not?
Because those people didn't utter the sheer stupidity and hate mongering that Trump did.
Probably, likely, because
smarter people understood the context of the word and didn't
knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the other side.
That is exactly the point! Why do pols say such stupid stuff? Because the typical
American voter is ignorant enough to buy it. Doesn't matter what party. The difference
with Trump is the desire to inflame, to stir the pot. He was notorious for setting staff
members at odds with each other, then sitting back to enjoy the fireworks.
The most American car you can buy is a Honda.
The most American pickup you can buy is a Honda. #2 is a Toyota.
But low information voters don't realize that because they're too lazy to look up the
truth.
Which cars are the most American?
<https://www.cars.com/articles/2023-cars-com-american-made-index-which-cars-are-the-most-american-467465/>
Your analysis of the auto industry is fine; however, the thread is about
Trump's statement and how the media, and the left in general, has not
given the bloodbath commentary its proper context.
Sure. I watched the video of the entire paragraph. Notice his pause, repeat, and *then*
comes the incendiary word. We both know what he's trying to convey and why.
Swill
On 3/20/2024 12:29 PM, Fred Barchetta wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:48:44 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:36:06 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood >>>>>>>>>>> bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking >>>>>>>>>> about the
automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
What hypocrisy?
The right works exactly the same trick on it's leftist political
opponents.
Low information voters are those who buy bullshit like that without
even bothering to look
it up and see if it's true.
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been
a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and
stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Biden didn't do it,
nor did any of the other people you lied about.
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:44:35 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 6:59 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:29:53 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:<snip>
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he wasn't
elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100% tariffs on imports,
Chinese or otherwise?
Yeah I know, it's always different when the left does it.
It is to them. My complaint is less the bloodbath comment than the promise to start yet
another tariff war. Tariffs can cause more problems than they're worth. Global trade is
too convoluted.
Swill
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:59:15 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:29:53 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:<snip>
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he wasn't
elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100% tariffs on imports,
Chinese or otherwise?
Neither did Trump (unless you dishonestly remove the context of his
remarks).
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a >>>>> pronouncement made during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless >>>>> incendiary and stupid. How is Trump going to tariff imports when . . . >>>>Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he
wasn't elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100% >>> tariffs on imports, Chinese or otherwise?
Or Sheldon Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve >>>>Kornacki, Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy
Ann Reid, Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe >>>>Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana >>>>Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David >>>>Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone >>>>Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans >>>>Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
When did any of them promise a 100% tariff on imports in order to avoid an >>> economic "bloodbath"?
I don't recall a similar outcry. Why not?
Because those people didn't utter the sheer stupidity and hate mongering that
Trump did.
Probably, likely, because smarter people understood the context of the word
and didn't knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the other side.
That is exactly the point! Why do pols say such stupid stuff? Because the >>> typical American voter is ignorant enough to buy it. Doesn't matter what party.
The difference with Trump is the desire to inflame, to stir the pot. He was
notorious for setting staff members at odds with each other, then sitting back to
enjoy the fireworks.
If Trump ever gets the opportunity to slap a 100% tariff on imported
cars I'm anxious to see the faithful explain how the drastic additional >>inflation of car prices that would ensue isn't his fault.
And suddenly the left would be terrified and outraged by inflation
while they've ignored and excused Biden's outrageous inflation.
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a >>>>>> pronouncement made during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless >>>>>> incendiary and stupid. How is Trump going to tariff imports when . . . >>>>>Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he
wasn't elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100% >>>> tariffs on imports, Chinese or otherwise?
Or Sheldon Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve >>>>> Kornacki, Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy
Ann Reid, Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe
Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana >>>>> Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David
Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone
Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans
Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
When did any of them promise a 100% tariff on imports in order to avoid an >>>> economic "bloodbath"?
I don't recall a similar outcry. Why not?
Because those people didn't utter the sheer stupidity and hate mongering that
Trump did.
Probably, likely, because smarter people understood the context of the word
and didn't knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the other side.
That is exactly the point! Why do pols say such stupid stuff? Because the
typical American voter is ignorant enough to buy it. Doesn't matter what party.
The difference with Trump is the desire to inflame, to stir the pot. He was
notorious for setting staff members at odds with each other, then sitting back to
enjoy the fireworks.
If Trump ever gets the opportunity to slap a 100% tariff on imported
cars I'm anxious to see the faithful explain how the drastic additional
inflation of car prices that would ensue isn't his fault.
And suddenly the left would be terrified and outraged by inflation
while they've ignored and excused Biden's outrageous inflation.
Dems in 2021: The economy is fine!
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have
been a pronouncement made during a rant about car imports, it's
nevertheless incendiary and stupid. How is Trump going to tariff
imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a
bloodbath if he wasn't elected. Come to think of it, when did
Biden promise to slap 100% tariffs on imports, Chinese or
otherwise?
Or Sheldon Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow,
Steve Kornacki, Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, >>>>>Jake Tapper, Joy Ann Reid, Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika >>>>>Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna >>>>>Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John >>>>>Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara >>>>>Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali,
Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans Nichols, Catherine Rampell, >>>>>Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
When did any of them promise a 100% tariff on imports in order to
avoid an economic "bloodbath"?
I don't recall a similar outcry. Why not?
Because those people didn't utter the sheer stupidity and hate
mongering that Trump did.
Probably, likely, because smarter people understood the context of >>>>>the word and didn't knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the >>>>>other side.
That is exactly the point! Why do pols say such stupid stuff?
Because the typical American voter is ignorant enough to buy it.
Doesn't matter what party. The difference with Trump is the desire
to inflame, to stir the pot. He was notorious for setting staff
members at odds with each other, then sitting back to enjoy the
fireworks.
If Trump ever gets the opportunity to slap a 100% tariff on imported
cars I'm anxious to see the faithful explain how the drastic
additional inflation of car prices that would ensue isn't his fault.
And suddenly the left would be terrified and outraged by inflation
while they've ignored and excused Biden's outrageous inflation.
Dems in 2021: The economy is fine!
Dems in 2022: The economy is fine!
Dems in 2023: The economy is fine!
Dems in 2024: We inheritabed a bad economy from President Trump!
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:36:06 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath >>>>>>>> | for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's >>>>>>>> | going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the >>>>>>> automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here: https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070 >>>
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
What hypocrisy?
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:48:44 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:36:06 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood >>>>>>>>>> bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's >>>>>>>>>> | going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking
about the
automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
What hypocrisy?
The right works exactly the same trick on it's leftist political
opponents.
Low information voters are those who buy bullshit like that without
even bothering to look
it up and see if it's true.
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been
a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and
stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it? Or Sheldon Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve Kornacki, Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy Ann Reid,
Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David
Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone
Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans
Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
I don't recall a similar outcry.
smarter people understood the context of the word and didn't knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the other side.
The most American car you can buy is a Honda.
The most American pickup you can buy is a Honda. #2 is a Toyota.
But low information voters don't realize that because they're too lazy
to look up the
truth.
Which cars are the most American?
<https://www.cars.com/articles/2023-cars-com-american-made-index-which-cars-are-the-most-american-467465/>
Swill
Your analysis of the auto industry is fine; however, the thread is about Trump's statement and how the media, and the left in general, has not
given the bloodbath commentary its proper context.
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:54:08 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/21/2024 9:28 AM, Governor Swill wrote:The problem is getting credible information in context from both sides without the usual
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:42:33 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 3:31 PM, Scout wrote:
On 3/20/2024 12:29 PM, Fred Barchetta wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:48:44 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:36:06 -0400, Fred BarchettaWhat hypocrisy?
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >>>>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about the
automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote. >>>>>>>>>>>>
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife. >>>>>>>>
The right works exactly the same trick on it's leftist political >>>>>>> opponents.
Low information voters are those who buy bullshit like that without >>>>>>> even bothering to look
it up and see if it's true.
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been >>>>>>> a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and >>>>>>> stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Biden didn't do it,
What we cant let happen is let this primary become a negative
bloodbath, Biden told more than 100 donors gathered at a private
residence in Bethesda, Maryland.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/07/bernie-sanders-attacks-joe-biden-mini-super-tuesday
nor did any of the other people you lied about.
https://tippinsights.com/bloodbath-hypocrisy/
You're welcome.
LOL! Context is everything.
Ya think? I mean, it's only been the whole point of this entire thread.
attached hatemongering. Don't know what it is about humans that we can't seem to find our
way factually through our lives.
Swill
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been a >>>>>> pronouncement made during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless >>>>>> incendiary and stupid. How is Trump going to tariff imports when . . . >>>>>Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it?
Less incendiary, yes. Biden didn't say it was going to be a bloodbath if he
wasn't elected. Come to think of it, when did Biden promise to slap 100% >>>> tariffs on imports, Chinese or otherwise?
Or Sheldon Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve >>>>>Kornacki, Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy
Ann Reid, Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe
Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana >>>>>Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David >>>>>Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone >>>>>Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans >>>>>Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
When did any of them promise a 100% tariff on imports in order to avoid an >>>> economic "bloodbath"?
I don't recall a similar outcry. Why not?
Because those people didn't utter the sheer stupidity and hate mongering that
Trump did.
Probably, likely, because smarter people understood the context of the word
and didn't knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the other side.
That is exactly the point! Why do pols say such stupid stuff? Because the
typical American voter is ignorant enough to buy it. Doesn't matter what party.
The difference with Trump is the desire to inflame, to stir the pot. He was
notorious for setting staff members at odds with each other, then sitting back to
enjoy the fireworks.
If Trump ever gets the opportunity to slap a 100% tariff on imported
cars I'm anxious to see the faithful explain how the drastic additional >>>inflation of car prices that would ensue isn't his fault.
And suddenly the left would be terrified and outraged by inflation
while they've ignored and excused Biden's outrageous inflation.
Dems in 2021: The economy is fine!
Dems in 2022: The economy is fine!
Dems in 2023: The economy is fine!
Dems in 2024: We inheritabed a bad economy from President Trump!
On 3/20/24 2:29 PM, Fred Barchetta wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:48:44 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:36:06 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:09:23 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood >>>>>>>>>>> bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking >>>>>>>>>> about the
automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
What hypocrisy?
The right works exactly the same trick on it's leftist political
opponents.
Low information voters are those who buy bullshit like that without
even bothering to look
it up and see if it's true.
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been
a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and
stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it? Or Sheldon
Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve Kornacki,
Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy Ann
Reid, Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber,
Joe Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex
Witt, Ana Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor
Blackwell, David Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders /
Symone Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian,
Hans Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
I don't recall a similar outcry.
I don't see any actual quotes, video, or audio either. Should we take
what you say on faith?
Can't we get any smarter sockpuppets than this?
Why not? Probably, likely, because
smarter people understood the context of the word and didn't
knowingly/intentionally use it to attack the other side.
The most American car you can buy is a Honda.
The most American pickup you can buy is a Honda. #2 is a Toyota.
But low information voters don't realize that because they're too
lazy to look up the
truth.
Which cars are the most American?
<https://www.cars.com/articles/2023-cars-com-american-made-index-which-cars-are-the-most-american-467465/>
Swill
Your analysis of the auto industry is fine; however, the thread is
about Trump's statement and how the media, and the left in general,
has not given the bloodbath commentary its proper context.
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 03:57:30 -0500, trotsky wrote:
On 3/20/24 2:29 PM, Fred Barchetta wrote:
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it? Or Sheldon
Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve Kornacki, Neil >>> Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy Ann Reid,
Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber, Joe
Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex Witt, Ana
Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor Blackwell, David
Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders / Symone
Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian, Hans
Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo?
I don't recall a similar outcry.
I don't see any actual quotes, video, or audio either. Should we take
what you say on faith? Can't we get any smarter sockpuppets than this?
He provided a link earlier in the thread. A real eye opener it is, too! https://tippinsights.com/bloodbath-hypocrisy/
On 3/20/24 7:48 AM, Fred Barchetta wrote:
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
bks@panix.com (Bradley K.Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| ...You conveniently left out the context where he was talking about the >>>>>>>> automotive industry.
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath >>>>>>>>> | for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's >>>>>>>>> | going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html >>>>>>>>
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote.
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here: https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070 >>>>
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
What hypocrisy?
Exactly, a bloodbath makes perfect sense because it might give the fat
orange guy a day off from having to put orange greasepaint on his face. >Although iodine would last longer.
On 3/22/2024 4:57 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 3/20/24 2:29 PM, Fred Barchetta wrote:
On 3/20/2024 11:32 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2024 8:07 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2024 9:09 AM, NoBody wrote:
bks@panix.com (Bradley K.Sherman) wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-03-18, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
| "Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood >>>>>>>>>>>> bath
| for the whole -- that's going to be the least of it. It's
| going to be a blood bath for the country."
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/politics/trump-speech-ohio.html>
You conveniently left out the context where he was talking >>>>>>>>>>> about the
automotive industry.
More hand-waving. No dispute of the accuracy of the quote. >>>>>>>>>
--bks
Liar. Context was produced.
Even more context here:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1769245792831701070
The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it with a butter knife.
What hypocrisy?
The right works exactly the same trick on it's leftist political
opponents.
Low information voters are those who buy bullshit like that without
even bothering to look
it up and see if it's true.
I watched the larger interview edit and while it appears to have been
a pronouncement made
during a rant about car imports, it's nevertheless incendiary and
stupid. How is Trump
going to tariff imports when . . .
Was it any less incindiary or stupid when Biden did it? Or Sheldon
Whitehouse, Joe Courtney, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Steve Kornacki,
Neil Cavuto, Van Jones, Ali Velshi, Erin Burnett, Jake Tapper, Joy Ann
Reid, Trace Gallagher, Brian Williams, Mika Brzezinski, Ari Melber,
Joe Scarborough, Michael Steele, Brianna Keilar, Max Foster, Alex
Witt, Ana Kasparian, Whoopi Goldberg, John Heilemann, Victor
Blackwell, David Frum, Meghan McCain, Tara Setmayer, Symone Sanders /
Symone Sanders-Townsend, Ali Vitali, Bill Weld, Yasmin Vossoughian,
Hans Nichols, Catherine Rampell, Andrew Yang, Dasha Burns, Bianca Nobilo? >>>
I don't recall a similar outcry.
I don't see any actual quotes, video, or audio either. Should we take
what you say on faith?
No, you could have just gone to the link that I posted earlier in the
thread if you had bothered to read through it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 124:29:06 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,763 |