• Re: YOU Wanted It... YOU Got It - Loopholes

    From pothead@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Fri Mar 15 12:36:36 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2024-03-15, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:14:22 -0700, Alan says...

    Tell me: who was president in May of 2019?

    More Off-Topic Bullshit From The Off-His-Rocker Ski Bunny

    This is New York

    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1768026700632166400/vid/avc1/640x880/7d72
    gjonqqi7oOc5.mp4?tag=14

    ...why is it that the Republicans have refused to pass border reform?

    Tell us... what EXACT reforms need to be passed, that aren't already in law?

    The Democrats want to write in loopholes, you fucking dingbat. Are you REALLY too stupid to know this?

    Oh, they WANT to put in "tougher" restrictions on asylum and other circumstances, but they also are trying to put in loopholes.

    5,000 a week? Why not ZERO illegal entries? See? Loopholes. You might be conflating LEGAL crossings with illegal.

    "In response, the border bill creates a "border emergency authority," creating
    a Title 42-like expulsion mechanism that kicks in once the border numbers hit a
    one-week average of 5,000 per day. Migrants would BE REQUIRED TO USE A PORT-OF-
    ENTRY TO REQUEST ASYLUM, where the ports must process at least 1,400 claims per
    day. The authority turns off within 14 days of the weekly average decreasing by
    25% (which should be fairly immediate)."

    That's fine... but I'm still talking about ILLEGAL crossing that DON'T happen at ports-of-entry.

    "The problem is, 5,000 illegal crossers per-day is an enormous amount (no shit!), nearly the record-breaking 2023 levels. The daily average from 2007 through 2019 was 1,354, less than the mandatory number to be processed between
    ports. With the port-of-entry processing and the nonexistent closure of parole,
    this appears to be a cosmetic offering to team border security.

    While the bill does dedicate $3.2 billion to create new detention capacity, (how about we just cut down on entry and use the EXISTING DETENTION CAPACITY?),
    each of these beds will be filled and refilled with individuals caught and released into the interior of the country without serious structural changes.

    We know this because, for example, THE LOOPHOLE REMAINS-DEMANDING THE RELEASE OF "FAMILY UNITS" INTO THE COUNTRY, as they cannot be processed within the 20-
    day court-ordered limit. In addition, aliens will continue to hurdle the first
    bar to seeking asylum, even though they have no valid claim. Once aliens cross
    this first hurdle, they are often released, meaning one real key to reducing asylum fraud is raising that first hurdle. The border bill purports to raise the initial threshold, but it doesn't. It actually lowers the bar from assessing whether the alien has a "significant possibility" of proving asylum to a mere "reasonable possibility" of the same.

    Fuck off, brain dead.


    These progressives are reciting the CNN / MSNBC talking points to the word. Sometimes I wonder if there are BOTS running wild because even liberals can't possibly be this
    gullible.


    --
    pothead
    Tommy Chong For President 2024.
    Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
    Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)