• Special counsel report concludes Biden willfully retained classified in

    From 10-40 Joe@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 13 05:31:09 2024
    XPost: alt.security, law.court.federal, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: talk.politics.misc

    Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that
    concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified military and national security information but recommended he not face
    charges after a yearlong investigation into his handling of classified documents.

    “We concluded that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter,” Hur determined in the report, which marks the conclusion of his investigation.
    “We would reach the same conclusion even if Department of Justice policy
    did not foreclose criminal charges against a sitting president.”

    The public release of the 345-page report comes as Biden looks to shape
    his 2024 reelection campaign as a referendum on former President Donald
    Trump, but could provide the Republican front-runner a fresh political
    opening. Though the special counsel said he would not charge Biden and
    made clear how different his and Trump’s classified information cases are
    – namely, that Biden cooperated with investigators while Trump did not –
    the former president and his allies swiftly seized on the lengthy and at
    times scathing report.

    The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his
    home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer vice president, and that
    he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir
    published that year.

    Biden, Hur wrote, believed he was allowed to keep the classified
    information that was contained in his personal notebooks, concluding that prosecutors wouldn’t be able to prove Biden intended to break the law at
    trial.

    In remarks late Thursday, Biden said he’s pleased Hur “reached a firm conclusion that no charges should be brought against me in this case.”

    “The special counsel acknowledged I cooperated completely. I did not throw
    up any roadblocks. I sought no delays,” the president said of his response
    to the investigation.

    The report also mentioned apparent memory lapses, saying investigators
    found Biden’s “memory was significantly limited” during interviews with
    his ghost writer and an interview with Hur’s office last year. According
    to the report, Biden – during the 2023 interview – did not remember when
    his son Beau died nor the years he was vice president.

    Hur, according to the report, chose not to bring charges in part because
    he said it would be difficult to prosecute Biden, who could appear
    sympathetic to a jury.

    “Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” the report stated, adding that Biden “is someone for whom many
    jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt.”

    A visibly seething Biden responded to that passage later, saying, “I am well-meaning. And I’m an elderly man. And I know what the hell I’m doing.
    I’ve been president – I put this country back on its feet. I don’t need
    his recommendation.”

    White House officials and Biden’s personal lawyer forcefully rejected what
    they said were inappropriate and incorrect statements about the
    president’s memory, noting the interview took place in the immediate
    aftermath of Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel and suggesting his
    attention was elsewhere.

    The president criticized the special counsel’s focus in the report on his memory, telling reporters: “My memory is fine.”

    “There’s even reference that I don’t remember when my son died. How in the
    hell dare he raise that?” Biden said from the Diplomatic Reception Room in
    the White House, later appearing emotional as he referenced a rosary he
    wears that had belonged to Beau.

    Hur wrote that Biden cooperated with the investigation and returned the classified documents once they were discovered, noting the significant differences between this case and the charges against Trump.

    Biden pointed to that cooperation in a statement after the report was
    released, noting that he participated in five hours of interview in the
    days just after the October 7 attack that dominated much of his attention
    over the final quarter of 2023. “I just believed that’s what I owed the American people so they could know no charges would be brought and the
    matter closed,” he said.

    Hur also wrote that the government did not believe it could prove that
    Biden “intended to do something the law forbids.”

    Biden was “emphatic,” according to the report, that his handwritten
    notebooks containing classified information were his property, saying in
    his interview with the special counsel’s office that “every president
    before me has done the exact same thing.”

    FBI agents, according to the report, recovered “materials from the garage, offices, and basement den in Mr. Biden’s Wilmington, Delaware, home.”

    The materials included “marked classified documents about military and
    foreign policy in Afghanistan and notebooks containing Mr. Biden’s
    handwritten entries about issues of national security and foreign policy implicating sensitive intelligence source and methods.”

    Differences between Trump and Biden classified documents investigations
    The report’s findings drew harsh criticism from Trump, who is preparing
    for a general election rematch with Biden in November. Republicans have
    long drawn parallels between Hur’s investigation and that of special
    counsel Jack Smith, who last year brought charges against the former
    president related to his handling of classified documents after he left
    the White House, despite critical differences in the two cases.

    Trump claimed Biden’s case “is 100 times different and more severe than
    mine” and argued that he is facing different treatment under the justice system.

    “THIS HAS NOW PROVEN TO BE A TWO-TIERED SYSTEM OF JUSTICE AND
    UNCONSTITUTIONAL SELECTIVE PROSECUTION,” the former president said in a statement.

    Hur noted in his report there were distinctions between the Trump and
    Biden cases.

    Among them is the fact that the National Archives repeatedly tried and
    failed to get back documents in Trump’s possession. At one point, the FBI secured a search warrant to search his Florida estate.

    Biden’s attorneys, on the other hand, notified the National Archives of
    the materials found in his possession. Those documents were discovered on November 2, just six days before the midterm elections, but the
    president’s attorneys only publicly acknowledged the discovery of the
    documents on November 7 — when news reports about the discovery broke.

    “Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite,”
    Hur wrote. “According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting
    others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.

    “In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National
    Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
    multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview, and
    in other ways cooperated with the investigation,” Hur noted.

    White House and Biden’s lawyers rip report
    The White House counsel and Biden’s personal attorney criticized several
    of the assertions made in Hur’s report, including comments about the president’s memory.

    White House counsel Richard Sauber and Biden personal attorney Bob Bauer
    wrote in a five-page letter to Hur on Monday that raising issues with
    Biden’s memory was “entirely superfluous.”

    In a follow-up statement, Bauer accused Hur of “investigative excess” and
    said he flouted Justice Department regulations and norms.

    “We do not believe that the report’s treatment of President Biden’s memory
    is accurate or appropriate,” Sauber and Bauer wrote. “The report uses
    highly prejudicial language to describe a commonplace occurrence among witnesses: a lack of recall of years-old events.”

    In a statement Thursday, Bauer said that the special counsel “could not
    refrain from investigative excess, perhaps unsurprising given the intense pressures of the current political environment.”

    “Whatever the impact of those pressures on the final Report, it flouts Department regulations and norms,” Bauer said. “Very little in this opus
    adds to a clear, succinctly stated understanding of a straightforward conclusion: no misconduct occurred, no charges are warranted. The Report delves into a discussion of the ‘evidence’ of ‘willful’ retention of
    classified documents, only to acknowledge that there is, in fact, no case
    of ‘willful’ retention at all.”

    One White House official told CNN that Biden was “understandably
    distracted” with the Israel-Hamas conflict at the time of the interview.

    “To now retrospectively go back and suggest it is indicative of some
    bigger issue with memory is wrong. It’s just wrong,” the official said.

    The White House is also particularly taking issue with the report saying
    that Biden did not remember when his son Beau died.

    “He remembers the day Beau died every day of his life and to suggest
    otherwise is insulting,” the official said.

    A spokesperson for the special counsel’s office declined to comment.

    Sauber said in a statement that the report acknowledges “mistakes when
    packing documents at the end of an Administration or when Members of
    Congress leave office are unfortunately a common occurrence.”

    “We disagree with a number of inaccurate and inappropriate comments in the Special Counsel’s report,” he said. “Nonetheless, the most important
    decision the Special Counsel made—that no charges are warranted—is firmly
    based on the facts and evidence.”

    Congress receives the report
    Even before the report’s release, Republican lawmakers vowed to continue
    their own congressional investigation into the matter. Congressional
    lawmakers received a hard copy of the report on Thursday afternoon,
    according to two sources familiar with the matter.

    Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Hur, a former Trump-appointed
    US attorney, to lead the criminal probe after Biden’s aides found
    classified files at his home in Delaware and a private office in
    Washington, DC.

    Though Biden frequently avoids commenting on the case, he said in January
    2023 he was surprised to learn that classified documents were found in his former office and that he did not know what was in them. The White House Counsel’s Office has already reviewed the report, according to a
    spokesperson, and declined to exert any executive privilege on its
    content.

    CNN previously reported that US intelligence memos and briefing materials covering a range of topics, including Ukraine, Iran and the United
    Kingdom, were among the documents found at the locations connected to
    Biden, according to a source familiar with the matter.

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/politics/white-house-special-counsels- report-response/index.html?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)