• Article 2, The U.S. Constitution permits "insurrection"

    From Alan Bond@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 9 05:17:15 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
    the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was meant
    to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against unlawful violence. Such threats might come from usurpers of governmental power, but
    they might also come from criminals whom the government is unwilling or
    unable to control.

    Why was there a need for the Second Amendment?
    Our Constitution's framers affirmed our right to bear arms through the
    Second Amendment for an important reason; to provide Americans with means
    of protection and self-defense.

    That includes defense against a tyrannical directionless government such
    as the Biden administration.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 67hx.1803@21:1/5 to Alan Bond on Sat Mar 9 01:49:05 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    On 3/9/24 12:17 AM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    True ... BUT ... the NEED has to be EXTREMELY CLEAR,
    COMPELLING, and FOR THE BEST.

    Any 'revolution' in a 1st-world country these days
    means it becomes a 3rd-world country pretty much
    overnight. 1st world is 1st world because everything
    required is so well integrated. Any significant
    disruption means it becomes UN-integrated, falls
    apart entirely. This starts with NO FOOD and gets
    much worse very quickly. No banking, no insurance,
    no fuel, no safety no ... well ... pretty much
    no ANYthing.

    3rd/4th-world shitholes ... fine ... but NOT 1st-world.

    This is the TRUTH, the FACT. Sorry Billy-Bobs and
    neo-Stalinists. Pull the trigger and you are shooting
    yourselves in the balls.

    Evil powers - local and foreign - WILL immediately
    take advantage. That's how it works - how it's
    always worked.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Alan Bond on Sat Mar 9 09:01:49 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    On 3/8/2024 9:17 PM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was meant
    to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against unlawful violence.

    Bullshit. The sole point of the second amendment was to preserve slave patrols.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 67hz.1803@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 9 09:05:28 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    On 3/8/2024 10:49 PM, 67hx.1803 wrote:
    On 3/9/24 12:17 AM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, >> the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

      True

    No, bullshit. And the stupid fucking blowjob — your good pal — is too fucking
    stupid to know that it's the *second amendment*, not "Article 2"

    You are all that stupid. You're fucking morons.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Just Wondering@21:1/5 to Alan Bond on Sat Mar 9 10:53:00 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    On 3/8/2024 10:17 PM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was meant
    to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against unlawful violence. Such threats might come from usurpers of governmental power, but they might also come from criminals whom the government is unwilling or unable to control.

    Why was there a need for the Second Amendment?
    Our Constitution's framers affirmed our right to bear arms through the
    Second Amendment for an important reason; to provide Americans with means
    of protection and self-defense.

    That includes defense against a tyrannical directionless government such
    as the Biden administration.

    But Article 2 isn't the Second Amendment. Article 2 delineates
    the powers of the Executive Branch.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Colangelo@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 9 10:28:43 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    On 3/9/2024 9:53 AM, Francis Mark Hansen <fmhlaw@comcast.net>, sleazy rent-skip chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:

    On 3/8/2024 10:17 PM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, >> the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was meant >> to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against unlawful
    violence. Such threats might come from usurpers of governmental power, but >> they might also come from criminals whom the government is unwilling or
    unable to control.

    Why was there a need for the Second Amendment?
    Our Constitution's framers affirmed our right to bear arms through the
    Second Amendment for an important reason; to provide Americans with means
    of protection and self-defense.

    That includes defense against a tyrannical directionless government such
    as the Biden administration.

    But Article 2 isn't the Second Amendment.  Article 2 delineates
    the powers of the Executive Branch.

    The fuckwit who wrote "Article 2" is your close ally, Francis. You always ally yourself with stupid fuckwits, Francis. That's because you're a stupid fuckwit yourself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruise@21:1/5 to OrigInfoJunkie on Sat Mar 9 10:42:48 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    On 3/8/2024 9:17 PM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a
    free State,
    the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
    infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment
    was meant
    to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against
    unlawful
    violence.

    Bullshit. The sole point of the second amendment was to preserve
    slave patrols.


    The second amendment is article two?

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Siri Cruise on Sat Mar 9 10:52:37 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    On 3/9/2024 10:42 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
    OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    On 3/8/2024 9:17 PM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, >>> the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was meant >>> to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against unlawful >>> violence.

    Bullshit. The sole point of the second amendment was to preserve slave patrols.


    The  second amendment is article two?

    No, you fuckwitted illiterate Canuckistani San Francisco faggot. The original poster, a fuckwit like you but on the other side, was confused between Article II and Amendment II. He fucked up. But at least he doesn't fuck up and incorrectly double a consonant in dozens of words, as you routinely do.

    "abandonned", "abandonning"
    "anchorred"
    "answerred", "answerring"
    "biasses"
    "bigotted"
    "blitherring"
    "botherred"
    "burdenned"
    "civillian"
    "conquerred"
    "considerred"
    "coverred"
    "cowerring"
    "deliverred"
    "developping", "developped"
    "discoverred"
    "edittor", "edittorial"
    "endangerring"
    "functionning"
    "gatherrers"
    "happenned", "happenning"
    "hardenned"
    "imprisonned"
    "limitted"
    "listenned"
    "marketting"
    "mentionned", "mentionning"
    "modelled"
    "monitorred"
    "murderred", "murderrer", "murderrers"
    "musterred"
    "Neighbourring"
    "offerred"
    "openned"
    "orderred"
    "pardonned"
    "pesterred"
    "ponderring"
    "prisonner"
    "prohibitted"
    "purgery"
    "questionned", "questionning"
    "registerred", "registerring", "unregisterred"
    "rememberred"
    "riotting"
    "sequesterred"
    "shelterring"
    "solicitted"
    "statistickal"
    "subpeana", "subpeona"
    "sufferring"
    "tamperred", "tamperring"
    "targetted"
    "threatenned", "threatenning"
    "towerring"
    "unlimitted"
    "uppitty"
    "waggon"
    "wonderred", "wonderring"

    You ignorant illiterate cunt. In *no* variant of English are any of those atrocities correct. I've instructed you on the rule many times:

    When adding a suffix, e.g. -ed or -ing, to a multi-syllabic English word that ends in a consonant preceded by a vowel, you double the ending consonant if the last syllable is stressed, and you do *not* double the consonant is the stress is not on that syllable. Examples:

    offer (stress on first syllable) --> offered, offering
    occur (stress on last syllable) --> occurred, occurring

    Stop being such a stubborn cunt, and get it right.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jon Brady@21:1/5 to Mike Colangelo on Sun Mar 10 20:19:54 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> wrote in news:uT1HN.95805$zqTf.20249@fx35.iad:

    On 3/9/2024 9:53 AM, Francis Mark Hansen <fmhlaw@comcast.net>, sleazy rent-skip chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:

    On 3/8/2024 10:17 PM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
    State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
    infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was
    meant to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves
    against unlawful violence. Such threats might come from usurpers of
    governmental power, but they might also come from criminals whom the
    government is unwilling or unable to control.

    Why was there a need for the Second Amendment?
    Our Constitution's framers affirmed our right to bear arms through
    the Second Amendment for an important reason; to provide Americans
    with means of protection and self-defense.

    That includes defense against a tyrannical directionless government
    such as the Biden administration.

    But Article 2 isn't the Second Amendment.  Article 2 delineates
    the powers of the Executive Branch.

    The fuckwit who wrote "Article 2" is your close ally, Francis. You
    always ally yourself with stupid fuckwits, Francis. That's because
    you're a stupid fuckwit yourself.

    They actually had a copy of the US Constitution in the Philippines for
    you to read, Rudy?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to Jon Brady on Mon Mar 11 07:11:33 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    "Jon Brady" <jbrady@amazon.com> wrote in message news:usl4l9$fh9c$6@news.mixmin.net...
    Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> wrote in news:uT1HN.95805$zqTf.20249@fx35.iad:

    On 3/9/2024 9:53 AM, Francis Mark Hansen <fmhlaw@comcast.net>, sleazy
    rent-skip chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:

    On 3/8/2024 10:17 PM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
    State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
    infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was
    meant to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves
    against unlawful violence. Such threats might come from usurpers of
    governmental power, but they might also come from criminals whom the
    government is unwilling or unable to control.

    Why was there a need for the Second Amendment?
    Our Constitution's framers affirmed our right to bear arms through
    the Second Amendment for an important reason; to provide Americans
    with means of protection and self-defense.

    That includes defense against a tyrannical directionless government
    such as the Biden administration.

    But Article 2 isn't the Second Amendment. Article 2 delineates
    the powers of the Executive Branch.

    The fuckwit who wrote "Article 2" is your close ally, Francis. You
    always ally yourself with stupid fuckwits, Francis. That's because
    you're a stupid fuckwit yourself.

    They actually had a copy of the US Constitution in the Philippines for
    you to read, Rudy?

    Rudy can read? For comprehension?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Just Wondering on Fri Mar 15 23:33:38 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    Just Wondering wrote:
    On 3/8/2024 10:17 PM, Alan Bond wrote:
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
    State,
    the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was
    meant
    to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against unlawful
    violence. Such threats might come from usurpers of governmental power,
    but
    they might also come from criminals whom the government is unwilling or
    unable to control.

    Why was there a need for the Second Amendment?
    Our Constitution's framers affirmed our right to bear arms through the
    Second Amendment for an important reason; to provide Americans with means
    of protection and self-defense.

    That includes defense against a tyrannical directionless government such
    as the Biden administration.

    But Article 2 isn't the Second Amendment.  Article 2 delineates
    the powers of the Executive Branch.

    HAHAHAHAHAH


    https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript

    Article I Section 8
    "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute
    the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and
    repel Invasions"

    AHAHAHAHHAAH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)