On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is
the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is
the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 03:21:01 -0000 (UTC), Charles Scripter <cs@wieber.con> wrote:
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in >news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is
the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up of >Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
Or the Republican who called Obama a liar in the middle of his SOTU?
Or wearing a MAGA hat and heckling the President loudly for several minutes?
Swill
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is
the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up of Trump's speech?
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wrote in message news:usgkis$3qqb$2@news.mixmin.net...
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in
news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is
the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up of
Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
Well other than it was a federal crime....
On 3/8/2024 7:21 PM, Charles Scripter wrote:
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is
the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up of Trump's speech?
That was awesome! It sent you knuckle-dragging right-wingnut shitbags into a frenzy. Pelosi clapping insolently at Trump was just as good. https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/gettyimages-1094214646-nancypelosi-trump-1570562122.jpg?crop=0.551xw:0.826xh;0.306xw,0.174xh&resize=980:*
Just fucking great!
In article <To0HN.678031$p%Mb.40777@fx15.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/8/2024 7:21 PM, Charles Scripter wrote:
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in
news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com >>>>> says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is >>>>>> the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up of >>> Trump's speech?
That was awesome! It sent you knuckle-dragging right-wingnut shitbags into a >> frenzy. Pelosi clapping insolently at Trump was just as good.
https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/gettyimages-1094214646-nancypelosi-trump-1570562122.jpg?crop=0.551xw:0.826xh;0.306xw,0.174xh&resize=980:*
Just fucking great!
This is the future of our country.
In article <gM0HN.678039$p%Mb.124696@fx15.iad>, gmcguffee@mcgoofy- associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wrote in message
news:usgkis$3qqb$2@news.mixmin.net...
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in
news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com >>>>>> says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no >>>>>>> consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is >>>>>>> the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did >>>>> some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up of >>>> Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
Well other than it was a federal crime....
No, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government property. >> NARA didn't expect any of those copies to be returned.
It was disrespectful
and childish.
In article <gM0HN.678039$p%Mb.124696@fx15.iad>, gmcguffee@mcgoofy- associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wrote in message
news:usgkis$3qqb$2@news.mixmin.net...
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in
news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>,
max.boot@lathymes.com
says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is
the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up
of
Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
Well other than it was a federal crime....
No, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government
property.
NARA didn't expect any of those copies to be returned.
It was disrespectful and childish.
In article <7tunuilhsapbs5qacgd6qi9jtihni2bdjg@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 03:21:01 -0000 (UTC), Charles Scripter <cs@wieber.con>
wrote:
Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote in
news:cIMGN.87592$6ePe.31034@fx42.iad:
On 3/8/2024 12:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <TRJGN.472373$PuZ9.140628@fx11.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
says...
On 3/7/2024 10:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
An opinion piece by Jarrett Stepman.
A Heritage Foundation (right-wingnut lie site) Nazi. He is of no
consequence.
There is only *one* big failure of Biden's presidency, and that is
the failure to start the prosecution of Trump 18 months earlier.
They booed him out of the place last night.
No, they didn't. Some rude, childish, ill-bred Republiscums/QAnon did
some booing, but they don't matter.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up of
Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
Or the Republican who called Obama a liar in the middle of his SOTU?
Or wearing a MAGA hat and heckling the President loudly for several
minutes?
Swill
I
's always "but what about" with you. So you are saying it's all right no matter who does it?
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up >>>>>>> of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?Well other than it was a federal crime....
property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up >>> >> of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?Well other than it was a federal crime....
property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the speaker to >be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just that - a copy.
Swill
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:tearing up
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wrote
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish
governmentNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was notof Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?Well other than it was a federal crime....
speaker toproperty.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the
House Speech writingsbe put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White
just that - a copy.before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was
president.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an juvenile display of carpet bagger contempt for a great
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>>>>> property.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childishWell other than it was a federal crime....
tearing up
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the
speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White
House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was
just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible president.
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearingWell other than it was a federal crime....
up
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the
speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House
Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just
that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
That's how liberals work.
On 3/11/24 21:42, Michael A Terrell wrote:
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childishWell other than it was a federal crime....
tearing up
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
government property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the
speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White
House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held
was just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible
president.
It was politics, and an example of Democrat double standards.
Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wrote
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up
of Trump's speech?
Well other than it was a federal crime....No, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government
property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the >speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech
writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just >>> that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
That's how liberals work.
No, there is a hardcopy, signed by the President which is presented to the Speaker to insure it is turned over to the National Archives.
On 3/11/24 21:42, Michael A Terrell wrote:
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>>>>>> property.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up >>>>>>>>> of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?Well other than it was a federal crime....
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House >>>> Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just >>>> that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible president.
It was politics
In article <kiPHN.86298$zF_1.7667@fx18.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>>>>>> property.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up >>>>>>>>> of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?Well other than it was a federal crime....
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible president.
Just shows how unprofessional the left is.
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>>>> property.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up >>>>>>> of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?Well other than it was a federal crime....
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible president.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to
the speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by
White House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she
held was just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible
president.
It was politics, and an example of Democrat double standards.
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:MPG.40596bd822687c6a99224b@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing >> >>> >> upWell other than it was a federal crime....
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the
speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House
Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just >> that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
That's how liberals work.
No, there is a hardcopy, signed by the President which is presented to the Speaker to insure it is turned over to the National Archives. The other hard copies and the electronic copies are just that.. copies of the signed original.
Copies are just copies, the original is unique because there is only one of it as it carries the ACTUAL Presidential signature.
On 3/12/2024 4:07 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wrote
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up
of Trump's speech?
It *was* theatrical ? in fact, brilliant theater ? but it was not childish. If
it had been childish, you knuckle-draggers wouldn't have made so much of it. No,
it really was brilliant, and you're *still* shitting yourselves in rage over it.
Well other than it was a federal crime....No, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>> >>> property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the >speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech
writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just >>> that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
That's how liberals work.
No, there is a hardcopy, signed by the President which is presented to the Speaker to insure it is turned over to the National Archives.
That's false, scooter, so naturally you can't cite a source for your bullshit.
The copy given to the speaker is the speaker's to do with as she pleases. No crime was committed, scooter.
"Pelosi Tearing Up SOTU Speech Not A Crime"
WASHINGTON (AP) ? There?s no disputing that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi caused
quite a stir when she tore up her copy of President Donald Trump?s State of
the Union speech at the end of his address. Pelosi said she decided to shred
what she saw as a ?compilation of falsehoods? to make a statement ?that
clearly indicates to the American people that this is not the truth.? Trump
and his Republican allies, for their part, saw Pelosi?s action as an act of
disrespect [richly deserved] ? and an illegal one at that. Legal experts
disagreed, saying the speech was Pelosi?s to do with what she wanted.
TRUMP: ?I thought it was a terrible thing when she ripped up the speech.
First of all, it?s an official document. You?re not allowed. It?s illegal
what she did. She broke the law.?
THE FACTS:
Legal experts say no laws were broken. They said it was not an original
government document, but Pelosi?s copy of the speech.
Steven Aftergood, a records expert at the private Federation of American
Scientists, said: ?Legally, this is a non-issue. Pelosi was expressing
contempt [richly deserved] for the president?s speech, and her views are
constitutionally protected.? He said her torn-up pieces of the speech might
themselves be considered a new record of historical value.
Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law professor at Harvard University, said
Pelosi did not violate 18 U.S. Code Section 2071, the federal law defining
the deliberate destruction of an official record that *has been filed with a*
*court or other government agency* ? a felony punishable by a prison term and
by forfeiture of office.
Heidi Kitrosser, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, said: ?This
is *not an archival document*. ... This is one of many, many, many copies of
President Trump?s speech and Nancy Pelosi is free to do with it whatever she
will.? Kitrosser added that any disagreement with Trump?s speech is protected
by the First Amendment ?and in Pelosi?s case, under the speech and debate
clause of the Constitution.?
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-politics-ap-fact-check-77d3c62029ec3003ff33d54c9ef4de4a
Pelosi's copy of the shitty address was hers to do with as she pleased, scooter.
It was not an official government document, scooter. There was no expectation or
requirement that she hand it over to NARA, scooter ? which is why you can't cite
a source for that bullshit claim. This is settled.
On 3/12/2024 11:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <kiPHN.86298$zF_1.7667@fx18.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>>>>>> property.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing upWell other than it was a federal crime....
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible president.
Just shows how unprofessional the left is.
No. It was a brilliant show of contempt for a shitbag who deserves contempt.
In article <JV%HN.58769$hN14.30648@fx17.iad>, another.wieber.loser@arent.they.all says...
On 3/12/2024 4:07 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied: >>>>>>>>> "Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wrote
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up
of Trump's speech?
It *was* theatrical ? in fact, brilliant theater ? but it was not childish. If
it had been childish, you knuckle-draggers wouldn't have made so much of it. No,
it really was brilliant, and you're *still* shitting yourselves in rage over it.
It was childish and unprofessional.
Well other than it was a federal crime....No, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>>>>>>> property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the >speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech
writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just
that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
That's how liberals work.
No, there is a hardcopy, signed by the President which is presented to the >>> Speaker to insure it is turned over to the National Archives.
That's false, scooter, so naturally you can't cite a source for your bullshit.
The copy given to the speaker is the speaker's to do with as she pleases. No >> crime was committed, scooter.
The proof has already been posted.
"Pelosi Tearing Up SOTU Speech Not A Crime"
WASHINGTON (AP) ? There?s no disputing that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi caused
quite a stir when she tore up her copy of President Donald Trump?s State of
the Union speech at the end of his address. Pelosi said she decided to shred
what she saw as a ?compilation of falsehoods? to make a statement ?that >> clearly indicates to the American people that this is not the truth.? Trump
and his Republican allies, for their part, saw Pelosi?s action as an act of
disrespect [richly deserved] ? and an illegal one at that. Legal experts
disagreed, saying the speech was Pelosi?s to do with what she wanted. >>
TRUMP: ?I thought it was a terrible thing when she ripped up the speech.
First of all, it?s an official document. You?re not allowed. It?s illegal
what she did. She broke the law.?
THE FACTS:
Legal experts say no laws were broken. They said it was not an original >> government document, but Pelosi?s copy of the speech.
Steven Aftergood, a records expert at the private Federation of American
Scientists, said: ?Legally, this is a non-issue. Pelosi was expressing >> contempt [richly deserved] for the president?s speech, and her views are
constitutionally protected.? He said her torn-up pieces of the speech might
themselves be considered a new record of historical value.
Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law professor at Harvard University, said
Pelosi did not violate 18 U.S. Code Section 2071, the federal law defining
the deliberate destruction of an official record that *has been filed with a*
*court or other government agency* ? a felony punishable by a prison term and
by forfeiture of office.
Heidi Kitrosser, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, said: ?This
is *not an archival document*. ... This is one of many, many, many copies of
President Trump?s speech and Nancy Pelosi is free to do with it whatever she
will.? Kitrosser added that any disagreement with Trump?s speech is protected
by the First Amendment ?and in Pelosi?s case, under the speech and debate
clause of the Constitution.?
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-politics-ap-fact-check-77d3c62029ec3003ff33d54c9ef4de4a
Pelosi's copy of the shitty address was hers to do with as she pleased, scooter.
It was not an official government document, scooter. There was no expectation or
requirement that she hand it over to NARA, scooter ? which is why you can't cite
a source for that bullshit claim. This is settled.
It was still childish and unprofessional.
On 3/12/2024 1:05 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <fW0IN.563770$xHn7.330@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/12/2024 11:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <kiPHN.86298$zF_1.7667@fx18.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>>>>>>>> property.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing upWell other than it was a federal crime....
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible president.
Just shows how unprofessional the left is.
No. It was a brilliant show of contempt for a shitbag who deserves contempt.
You voted for
ethical people. You voted for crooks and insurrectionists and terrorists.
Yes.
In article <JV%HN.58769$hN14.30648@fx17.iad>, another.wieber.loser@arent.they.all says...
On 3/12/2024 4:07 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wrote
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing up
of Trump's speech?
It *was* theatrical ? in fact, brilliant theater ? but it was not childish. If
it had been childish, you knuckle-draggers wouldn't have made so much of it. No,
it really was brilliant, and you're *still* shitting yourselves in rage over it.
It was childish and unprofessional.
Well other than it was a federal crime....No, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >> >>> >>> property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the >speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech
writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just
that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
That's how liberals work.
No, there is a hardcopy, signed by the President which is presented to the >> > Speaker to insure it is turned over to the National Archives.
That's false, scooter, so naturally you can't cite a source for your bullshit.
The copy given to the speaker is the speaker's to do with as she pleases. No >> crime was committed, scooter.
The proof has already been posted.
"Pelosi Tearing Up SOTU Speech Not A Crime"
WASHINGTON (AP) ? There?s no disputing that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi caused
quite a stir when she tore up her copy of President Donald Trump?s State of
the Union speech at the end of his address. Pelosi said she decided to shred
what she saw as a ?compilation of falsehoods? to make a statement ?that >> clearly indicates to the American people that this is not the truth.? Trump
and his Republican allies, for their part, saw Pelosi?s action as an act of
disrespect [richly deserved] ? and an illegal one at that. Legal experts >> disagreed, saying the speech was Pelosi?s to do with what she wanted.
TRUMP: ?I thought it was a terrible thing when she ripped up the speech. >> First of all, it?s an official document. You?re not allowed. It?s illegal
what she did. She broke the law.?
THE FACTS:
Legal experts say no laws were broken. They said it was not an original >> government document, but Pelosi?s copy of the speech.
Steven Aftergood, a records expert at the private Federation of American >> Scientists, said: ?Legally, this is a non-issue. Pelosi was expressing >> contempt [richly deserved] for the president?s speech, and her views are >> constitutionally protected.? He said her torn-up pieces of the speech might
themselves be considered a new record of historical value.
Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law professor at Harvard University, said
Pelosi did not violate 18 U.S. Code Section 2071, the federal law defining
the deliberate destruction of an official record that *has been filed with a*
*court or other government agency* ? a felony punishable by a prison term and
by forfeiture of office.
Heidi Kitrosser, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, said: ?This
is *not an archival document*. ... This is one of many, many, many copies of
President Trump?s speech and Nancy Pelosi is free to do with it whatever she
will.? Kitrosser added that any disagreement with Trump?s speech is protected
by the First Amendment ?and in Pelosi?s case, under the speech and debate
clause of the Constitution.?
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-politics-ap-fact-check-77d3c62029ec3003ff33d54c9ef4de4a
Pelosi's copy of the shitty address was hers to do with as she pleased, scooter.
It was not an official government document, scooter. There was no expectation or
requirement that she hand it over to NARA, scooter ? which is why you can't cite
a source for that bullshit claim. This is settled.
It was still childish and unprofessional.
In article <Wa3IN.103568$zqTf.8552@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/12/2024 1:05 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <fW0IN.563770$xHn7.330@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/12/2024 11:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <kiPHN.86298$zF_1.7667@fx18.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/11/2024 7:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government >>>>>>>>>>> property.
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childish tearing upWell other than it was a federal crime....
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was just that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
It was an excellent display of utter contempt for a contemptible president.
Just shows how unprofessional the left is.
No. It was a brilliant show of contempt for a shitbag who deserves contempt.
You voted for
ethical people. You voted for crooks and insurrectionists and terrorists.
Yes.
No insurrection.
In article <uspfpk$94j4$1@dont-email.me>, me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
You overlooked the unprofessional part again.
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.40596bd822687c6a99224b@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not government
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childishWell other than it was a federal crime....
tearing
up
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
property.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the
speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White House
Speech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held was
just
that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
That's how liberals work.
No, there is a hardcopy, signed by the President which is presented to
the
Speaker to insure it is turned over to the National Archives. The other
hard
copies and the electronic copies are just that.. copies of the signed
original.
Copies are just copies, the original is unique because there is only one
of
it as it carries the ACTUAL Presidential signature.
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:MPG.405a629f25c53ec1992257@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <uspfpk$94j4$1@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
You overlooked the unprofessional part again.
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.40596bd822687c6a99224b@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <vcdvui1bvtm4cdca6i0887r0j749uomueg@4ax.com>,government
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:08:28 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrotegmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 3/9/2024 2:53 AM, scooter lied:
"Charles Scripter" <cs@wieber.con> wroteNo, scooter, it was not. The copy of the speech was not
You mean like when Nancy Pelosi did her theatical childishWell other than it was a federal crime....
tearing
up
of Trump's speech? That kind of don't matter?
Houseproperty.
It wasn't a copy. It was the original which is turned over to the
speaker to
be put in the National Archives.
Liar. The "original" was on any number of laptops used by White
was >> justSpeech writings
before being loaded into the 'prompter. The paper copy she held
that - a copy.
Swill
No matter what it was still unprofessional.
That's how liberals work.
No, there is a hardcopy, signed by the President which is presented
to the
Speaker to insure it is turned over to the National Archives. The
other hard
copies and the electronic copies are just that.. copies of the signed
original.
Copies are just copies, the original is unique because there is only
one of
it as it carries the ACTUAL Presidential signature.
True... but when it comes to Democrats, I'm not sure they even
understand the concept of respect.
Copies are just copies, the original is unique because there isYou overlooked the unprofessional part again.
only one of
it as it carries the ACTUAL Presidential signature.
True... but when it comes to Democrats, I'm not sure they even
understand the concept of respect.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 101:05:23 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,859 |
