• The Tears at WaPo Over the SCOTUS Decision Are Bitter Indeed

    From "@dizum.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 04:24:03 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.journalism.newspapers XPost: talk.politics.guns

    Earlier today, Karen wrote about the rending of garments and
    gnashing of teeth at various liberal media outlets in response
    to the Supreme Court's unanimous ruling that Colorado will not
    be able to remove Donald Trump's name from the ballot this year.
    From that, we can infer that all other such efforts have been
    effectively shut down cold. CNN, MSNBC, and the alphabet
    networks were engaged in a pity party the likes of which we
    rarely see. But the print media didn't want to miss out on that
    party either. It took almost no time at all for the Washington
    Post to rush out their own bit of critical analysis from one of
    their regular firebrands, Philip Bump. It's not difficult to
    imagine Mr. Bump sitting at his desk with an old R.E.M favorite
    blasting in his earbuds at max volume. Because with Donald Trump
    still on the ballot, it is indeed the end of the world as we
    know it. And Phillip Bump most assuredly does not feel fine.

    Before even touching on the Supreme Court decision and what it
    might portend, Bump dives into a lengthy, ten-paragraph liberal
    retelling of history regarding the 2020 election and, more
    importantly, the events of January 6, 2021. We've heard it
    repeatedly. In this version of events, the election went
    swimmingly. There were no issues with the tens of millions of
    mail-in ballots that clogged a system that was totally
    unprepared to deal with them. Nobody took advantage of that and
    there were no more than "the usual few dozen votes had been cast
    illegally." (The people of Bridgeport, Connecticut will be
    relieved to learn this.) Everything was just fine and anyone who
    argues differently is clearly a Putin stooge.

    Then there was January 6. In the world imagined by Bump and his
    colleagues, Trump wasn't just giving another political address
    to his ardent followers, railing against perceived
    irregularities in the system and the corrupt stench of the
    swamp. He was issuing a battle cry. No mention is made of Trump
    saying that he knew that many people planned to go and
    "peacefully protest" at the Capitol Building. Instead, "he
    directed an angry crowd toward Capitol Hill." In Bump's world,
    there were no sketchy FBI agents and informants embedded in the
    crowd, possibly leading the charge. It was all murderous MAGA
    maniacs. Law enforcement officers were literally being murdered
    inside the building. (The only person who died in the riot was
    Ashli Babbitt.) The MAGA insurrectionists came within inches of
    dismantling the Senate permanently. No mention is made of the
    Capitol Hill Police being caught on camera peacefully leading
    the so-called Q-Anon Shaman around the building and opening
    doors for him. All of that is just some sort of right-wing
    fantasy. In short, "There is no real question about the intent
    of the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021."

    Finally, Bump gets down to the Supreme Court decision. So what
    went so wrong and is there any way to set the situation to
    rights? In reverse order, no... it's a lost cause. And the
    reason doesn't have so much to do with this specific court
    decision, but rather the failure of vision on the part of the
    nation's Founding Fathers. They didn't give the legislative
    branch enough power to put a leash on their co-equal partners in
    the judicial branch to block the election of an out-of-control
    monster from the executive branch.

    The superficial agreement on the decision erodes in the details,
    which isn’t uncommon. The result, though, is that the
    institution of the Supreme Court has decided that the
    institution of Congress is the only element of the American
    system that can apply the 14th Amendment to a candidate. And
    Congress, very obviously, won’t do so for Trump.

    One would assume that a democratic system predicated on checks
    and balances would have some process in place to enforce
    punitive measures when democracy itself was threatened or
    undermined, but it does not. It has decisions from motivated
    actors, enough of whom agree politically or ideologically with
    Trump that his specific actions are waved away. Instead of a
    defense of democracy, we are repeatedly asked to believe that
    anything short of Trump retaining power doesn’t count as a
    substantive challenge to democracy and, therefore, that his
    participation in the democratic process should be defended.

    Had he retained power after Jan. 20, 2021? Then, perhaps, his
    efforts to do so would have been considered a legitimate threat.
    And by then, the system that we would assume might hold him to
    account would already be destroyed.

    There you have it. If the system wasn't destroyed at its
    inception, it most assuredly is now. The idea that Donald
    Trump's "participation in the Democratic process" isn't a sign
    of the end times means that you simply aren't bright enough to
    understand what's going on. The "legitimate threat" was ignored
    and now the Devil is not just knocking at our door, but huffing
    and puffing and blowing it down.

    What Bump never gets around to addressing is how the evil
    conspirators on the Right managed to convince the three,
    liberal, Democrat-appointed justices to go along with the
    unanimous decision. Were they blackmailed? Were they undercover
    MAGA justices who stayed below the radar for their entire
    careers until being appointed? Or did they see the idea of a
    single state or group of states keeping a leading presidential
    candidate off of the ballot as undemocratic and
    unconstitutional? Bump goe so far as to describe the idea of
    this misuse of the 14th Amendment as "an understandably
    controversial position to hold." But he goes no further. It
    should be obvious to one and all that such a brazen move should
    be justifiable today. Why? Because, "If the two months that
    followed the 2020 election weren’t an effort to subvert a
    democratic election and if the riot at the Capitol wasn’t “an
    act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an
    established government” (as Merriam-Webster defines it), then
    what was it?"

    This is what we're dealing with today. It's a collision of
    reality with a retelling of history that's convenient to
    liberals who are so terrified of losing power and seeing Trump
    return that they can justify literally anything in their quest.
    I am counting the days until we see calls from the left - likely
    from the Washington Post - to simply cancel the 2024 elections
    and allow Joe Biden to remain in office. Why? To save Democracy,
    of course.

    https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2024/03/04/the-tears-at-wapo-over- the-scotus-decision-are-bitter-indeed-n3784048

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)