XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican
On 2024-03-04 19:39, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:05:55 -0800, Alan says...
No amendment to follow, nerd.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GH1_aMHXMAA1YzO?format=jpg&name=large
"A finding that Trump had himself engaged in insurrection WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED for keeping the former president off the ballot. The clause says that
a person could be disqualified from holding office again if they had 'engaged in insurrection or rebellion'."
Trump did not partake. Trump didn't even incite. That would be that government
spy and mole and plant, Ray Epps.
Three courts in Colorado disagreed...
...as did the congress that impeached him for it...
...loser.
The Colorado court heard testimony and saw evidence presented and ruled
that Trump had engaged in insurrection.
From the Colorado Supreme Court:
'He is, the majority concludes, disqualified from being President of the
United States again because he, as an officer of the United States, took
an oath to support the Constitution and thereafter engaged in insurrection.'
<
https://research.coloradojudicial.gov/vid/972706828>
The USSC had the opportunity to rule that the CSC erred in that
conclusion, but chose to remain mute.
So Trump has been judged to have engaged in insurrection.
So ruled after a 5 day trial by the District Court, City and County of
Denver, State of Colorado...
...positively affirmed by the Colorado Supreme Court...
...and despite having Trump present the argument to them that he did
not, not overturned by the US Supreme Court. That which is not reversed
in an appeal still stands after the decision is released.
AND, the US House of Representatives already found that he had engaged
in insurrection.
You lose, loser...
...just like your orange make-up clown.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)