• USSC : Trump MUST Be On State Ballots - Big Slap For Wokie Election Tam

    From 63h.1504@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 4 15:18:17 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.elections, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa

    https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/colorado-supreme-court-decision-trump-14th-amendment/

    SCOTUS rules that Donald Trump can stay on Colorado ballot

    SCOTUS ruled unanimously to keep Trump on Colorado ballot

    This ends other efforts to kick him off ballots in Illinois, Maine

    “We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or
    attempting to hold state office,” justices wrote in their
    ruling. “But States have no power under the Constitution to
    enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially
    the Presidency.”

    This Supreme Court decision, made a day before Super Tuesday
    primaries, ends efforts in other states such as Illinois and
    Maine to kick Trump off the ballot.

    Trump’s legal team, said. “This victory is not just for President
    Trump but for the integrity of our electoral system and the rights
    of voters across the country.”

    . . .

    UNANIMOUS decision - even the 'liberal' justices.

    The big point was individual states trying to suppress
    FEDERAL candidates they simply don't like.

    Trump has never been convicted for "insurrection" (except
    by the Soros-suckin' MSM) which should have been a secondary
    point. The Court DID say that states have no power to
    enforce the 14th relative to federal candidates regardless ;
    likely an act of Congress would be required to withhold
    an otherwise-qualified federal candidate.

    That last quote is of great relevance - this was quickly
    headed towards totally destroying the electoral system.
    People have only so much confidence as-is ... for states
    to use partisan whim to decide which federal candidates
    can or cannot be on their ballots would screw the whole
    thing. Then we'd be in Deep Shit and the whole "Great
    Experiment In Democracy" thing would be OVER (which the
    further left, sometimes further right, kinda HOPES for -
    each imagining they'd be the new dictators).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 4 16:57:51 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.elections, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa

    On 3/4/2024 1:18 PM, 63h.1504 wrote:
    https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/colorado-supreme-court-decision-trump-14th-amendment/

    SCOTUS rules that Donald Trump can stay on Colorado ballot

    SCOTUS ruled unanimously to keep Trump on Colorado ballot

    This ends other efforts to kick him off ballots in Illinois, Maine

    “We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or
    attempting to hold state office,” justices wrote in their
    ruling. “But States have no power under the Constitution to
    enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially
    the Presidency.”

    This Supreme Court decision, made a day before Super Tuesday
    primaries, ends efforts in other states such as Illinois and
    Maine to kick Trump off the ballot.

    Trump’s legal team, said. “This victory is not just for President
    Trump but for the integrity of our electoral system and the rights
    of voters across the country.”

    . . .

      UNANIMOUS decision - even the 'liberal' justices.

      The big point was individual states trying to suppress
      FEDERAL candidates they simply don't like.

      Trump has never been convicted for "insurrection" (except
      by the Soros-suckin' MSM) which should have been a secondary
      point. The Court DID say that states have no power to
      enforce the 14th relative to federal candidates regardless ;
      likely an act of Congress would be required to withhold
      an otherwise-qualified federal candidate.

      That last quote is of great relevance - this was quickly
      headed towards totally destroying the electoral system.
      People have only so much confidence as-is ... for states
      to use partisan whim to decide which federal candidates
      can or cannot be on their ballots would screw the whole
      thing. Then we'd be in Deep Shit and the whole "Great
      Experiment In Democracy" thing would be OVER (which the
      further left, sometimes further right, kinda HOPES for -
      each imagining they'd be the new dictators).

    Yup. The right-leaning Supreme Court sure jettisons states' rights when
    it's convenient for them. But there was dissent. Just not on one point.

    As a matter of fact, though, those of us who watched the live
    proceedings on January 6th have compelling evidence that Trump approved
    of the mayhem at the capitol. If he disapproved, he had HOURS during
    which he could have said, "Hey, wait. This is not what I wanted you to do."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)