XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2024-02-27 21:53, AlleyCat wrote:

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:00:37 +0000, Lee says...

Malcolm Turnbull says Donald Trump's
'creepy' embrace of Vladimir Putin

Can't be any more creepy than these:

https://i.imgur.com/vIFOdKN.png

Proven false!

<rest of your bullshit snipped>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2024-02-29 10:33, AlleyCat wrote:

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:56:40 -0800, Alan says...

There has been no evidence that donations to the Clinton Foundation
influenced the Uranium One deal.

And ZERO evidence to the contrary.

Has there been any investigations to open up the books to the Clinton Foundation?

Trump's AG, Jeff Sessions, assigned John W. Huber, to look into whether
any further investigations were warranted, loser.

<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/5764662/Supl-Response-03-08-19.pdf>

He determined there was nothing there worth investigating, loser.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2024-02-29 21:45, AlleyCat wrote:

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:58:48 -0800, Alan says...

He determined there was nothing there worth investigating, winner.

No.

Yes.

Clinton's assassins and the FBI, DoJ, et al: https://i.imgur.com/ijU05td.mp4

"Justice Dept. Investigated Clinton Foundation Until Trump's Final Days" - New
York Times

Yes... they stalled as long as they had to. The Clintons OWN the DoJ.

LOL!

How convenient.

And all below is moving the goalposts because you know you've LOST on
Uranium One.

1. Frank Giustra made the donation to the Clinton Foundation 3 YEARS
before the Uranium One Russia deal came along. He was not part of that
deal in any way.

2. Clinton was ONE person on a NINE person committee that had to approve
the sale.

3. Despite the sale, Russia didn't get the right to export an ounce of
US uranium to Russia.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2024-03-01 04:32, AlleyCat wrote:

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 22:18:29 -0800, Alan says...

1. Frank Giustra made the donation to the Clinton Foundation 3 YEARS
before the Uranium One Russia deal came along. He was not part of that
deal in any way.

2. Clinton was ONE person on a NINE person committee that had to approve
the sale.

3. Despite the sale, Russia didn't get the right to export an ounce of
US uranium to Russia.

NONE of those prove Hitlery's or the Foundation's innocence.

And yet you insist that since Trump hasn't been found guilty we must
assume HIS innocence, right, loser?

Why are you now insisting that Clinton's innocence must be proven?

:-)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2024-03-01 19:46, AlleyCat wrote:

On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:11:54 -0800, Alan says...

And yet you insist that since Trump hasn't been found guilty

I don't insist... it's a fact.

It is. I have no problem with that.

It's you who have the glaring double standard where you are happy to say
that the state must prove Trump's guilt, while at the same time saying
that the Clintons need prove their innocence.

'NONE of those prove Hitlery's or the Foundation's innocence. '

Remember saying that, loser?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)