• President Trump's Kafkaesque Civil Trial in New York State

    From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 19 21:05:01 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: ny.politics

    Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a $355 million fine and has been barred from doing business in New York State for three years. Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Trump to pay essentially all of his cash reserves of $400 million, which fine if upheld would force Trump to sell some of his real estate
    holdings to raise cash to live on. Once interest is added on the total fine will rise to $450 million. This is all on top of an $83.3 million fine Trump must pay for allegedly defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. The fines in
    total could deprive Trump of between 11% and 13% of his wealth. Trump's
    adult sons Donald Jr. and Eric have also been fined, and they are barred from doing business in New York State for two years. Ivanka or Melania Trump
    could legally run the Trump businesses for the next two years, but Judge Engoron appointed retired U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones to continue in
    her role as an "independent monitor" of the Trump business empire but
    expanded her authority to review financial disclosures before they are submitted to third parties. Judge Jones can hire an independent director of compliance, and she has the authority to compel Trump to sell some or even
    all of his businesses down the road. This is all punishment for Trump allegedly committing fraud by falsely in inflating and deflating the value of his real estate assets to pay lower state taxes and to receive more favorable loans from banks.

    The New York State laws used to go after Trump have NEVER been used in this way, historically, and while Trump may owe some back state taxes, if Judge Engoron is right, not a single bank claimed that it had been defrauded by
    Trump in the loans it had made to him. This is truly a victimless crime.

    Bankers took the stand at Trump's civil trial testifying that they would have gladly made loans to Donald Trump given his extraordinary success as a businessman. It must also be noted that the banks that made loans to Trump
    did not take his assessment of the net worth of his assets at face value but made their own independent assessments of the value of Trump's assets. This
    is apparently standard practice in the New York State real estate market
    where borrowers often overstate the value of their assets.

    The bottom line is that a never before used New York State penalty has been twisted into a tool for a grossly excessive fine and more seriously the completely inappropriate appointment of Judge Jones as an "independent
    monitor" who can micromanage the Trump business, which she is not competent
    to do, and to even order the dissolution of the Trump Business in New York State. This outcome was pursued by Letitia James, a politically ambition Democrat, who is the Attorney General of New York State, and who hopes to win
    a future Democratic primary for Governor of or Senator from New York State.

    Ms. James and Judge Engeron have essentially turned a vaguely worded New York State law into a modern day Bill of Attainder targeted at Donald Trump both
    for political gain and because they despise his political views and
    desperately want to call his truthfulness into question as he runs for President of the United States inn 2024. In doing this, the have violated Trump's First Amendment right to freedom of speech and of the press; his
    Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty or property without due process of law; his Fifth Amendment right not to have property taken away
    from him except for a pubic use with just compensation being paid; his Eighth Amendment right not to be made to pay an excessive fine; his Article IV, Section 2 right as a citizen of Florida to do make and enforce contracts in
    New York on the same terms as are other New Yorkers; and his Fourteenth Amendment right to be free to pursue an occupation without unnecessary and burdensome regulation.

    The civil fraud judgment against Donald Trump is a travesty and an unjust political act rivaled only in American politics by the killing of former Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton by Vice President Aaron Burr. If the
    New York State appellate courts do not reverse this judgment, the U.S.
    Supreme Court MUST grant cert on this case and reverse Judge Engeron's outrageous decisions. National, presidential politics will be permanently altered if a local State's legal system can be used in this way against candidates for President of the United States. This case raises a national issue of profound importance and if the New York State appellate courts do
    not address it, the U.S. Supreme Court MUST!

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Mon Feb 26 12:55:26 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: ny.politics

    On 2/19/2024 5:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
    Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a $355 million fine and has been barred from doing business in New York State for three years.

    Entirely lawfully and appropriately.


    The New York State laws used to go after Trump have NEVER been used in this way, historically, and

    That's a lie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Mon Feb 26 13:45:33 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: ny.politics

    On 2/19/2024 6:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
    Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a $355 million fine and has been barred from doing business in New York State for three years. Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Trump to pay essentially all of his cash reserves of $400 million, which fine if upheld would force Trump to sell some of his real estate holdings to raise cash to live on. Once interest is added on the total fine will rise to $450 million. This is all on top of an $83.3 million fine Trump must pay for allegedly defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. The fines in total could deprive Trump of between 11% and 13% of his wealth. Trump's adult sons Donald Jr. and Eric have also been fined, and they are barred from doing business in New York State for two years. Ivanka or Melania Trump could legally run the Trump businesses for the next two years, but Judge Engoron appointed retired U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones to continue in her role as an "independent monitor" of the Trump business empire but expanded her authority to review financial disclosures before they are submitted to third parties. Judge Jones can hire an independent director of compliance, and she has the authority to compel Trump to sell some or even all of his businesses down the road. This is all punishment for Trump allegedly committing fraud by falsely in inflating and deflating the value of his real estate assets to pay lower state taxes and to receive more favorable loans from banks.

    The New York State laws used to go after Trump have NEVER been used in this way, historically, and while Trump may owe some back state taxes, if Judge Engoron is right, not a single bank claimed that it had been defrauded by Trump in the loans it had made to him. This is truly a victimless crime.

    Claiming your property is worth more than it is while getting loans (by
    playing tricks like inflating the occupancy rate) means the honest
    businesses pay more in interest to make up for your gain.

    Claiming property is worth less than it is at tax time, by doing things
    like keeping a second set of books that shows the occupancy rate is very
    low, means honest businesses pay more in taxes to make up for your cheating.

    Using two or three sets of books to defraud lenders, renters, and tax authorities is not a victimless crime.

    Trump's right, though, that if he hadn't become president, his crimes
    might have gone undetected thanks to his reputation for suing the shit
    out of people and using NDAs. But after a few people got out from under
    the NDAs and started squealing, it was no longer as easy to hide all his crimes.





    Bankers took the stand at Trump's civil trial testifying that they would have gladly made loans to Donald Trump given his extraordinary success as a businessman. It must also be noted that the banks that made loans to Trump did not take his assessment of the net worth of his assets at face value but made their own independent assessments of the value of Trump's assets. This is apparently standard practice in the New York State real estate market where borrowers often overstate the value of their assets.

    The bottom line is that a never before used New York State penalty has been twisted into a tool for a grossly excessive fine and more seriously the completely inappropriate appointment of Judge Jones as an "independent monitor" who can micromanage the Trump business, which she is not competent to do, and to even order the dissolution of the Trump Business in New York State. This outcome was pursued by Letitia James, a politically ambition Democrat, who is the Attorney General of New York State, and who hopes to win a future Democratic primary for Governor of or Senator from New York State.

    Ms. James and Judge Engeron have essentially turned a vaguely worded New York State law into a modern day Bill of Attainder targeted at Donald Trump both for political gain and because they despise his political views and desperately want to call his truthfulness into question as he runs for President of the United States inn 2024. In doing this, the have violated Trump's First Amendment right to freedom of speech and of the press; his Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty or property without due process of law; his Fifth Amendment right not to have property taken away from him except for a pubic use with just compensation being paid; his Eighth Amendment right not to be made to pay an excessive fine; his Article IV, Section 2 right as a citizen of Florida to do make and enforce contracts in New York on the same terms as are other New Yorkers; and his Fourteenth Amendment right to be free to pursue an occupation without unnecessary and burdensome regulation.

    The civil fraud judgment against Donald Trump is a travesty and an unjust political act rivaled only in American politics by the killing of former Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton by Vice President Aaron Burr. If the New York State appellate courts do not reverse this judgment, the U.S. Supreme Court MUST grant cert on this case and reverse Judge Engeron's outrageous decisions. National, presidential politics will be permanently altered if a local State's legal system can be used in this way against candidates for President of the United States. This case raises a national issue of profound importance and if the New York State appellate courts do not address it, the U.S. Supreme Court MUST!

    --
    Let's go Brandon!


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David LaRue@21:1/5 to OrigInfoJunkie on Mon Feb 26 22:07:58 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: ny.politics

    OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> wrote in news:2V6DN.435148$PuZ9.358824@fx11.iad:

    On 2/19/2024 5:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
    Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a $355 million fine and has been
    barred from doing business in New York State for three years.

    Entirely lawfully and appropriately.

    We seem to disagree that the fine is needed and appropriate.



    The New York State laws used to go after Trump have NEVER been used
    in this way, historically, and

    That's a lie.

    Please state when, where, and to whom thia law has previously been used in
    a similar way. Especially if it has been in modern times.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to NoOne@private.corp on Thu Mar 28 13:26:46 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: ny.politics

    NoOne@private.corp wrote:
    On 2/19/2024 6:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:

    Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a $355 million fine and has been barred >> from doing business in New York State for three years. Judge Arthur Engoron >> ordered Trump to pay essentially all of his cash reserves of $400 million, >> which fine if upheld would force Trump to sell some of his real estate
    holdings to raise cash to live on. Once interest is added on the total fine >> will rise to $450 million. This is all on top of an $83.3 million fine Trump
    must pay for allegedly defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. The fines in
    total could deprive Trump of between 11% and 13% of his wealth. Trump's
    adult sons Donald Jr. and Eric have also been fined, and they are barred from
    doing business in New York State for two years. Ivanka or Melania Trump
    could legally run the Trump businesses for the next two years, but Judge
    Engoron appointed retired U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones to continue in >> her role as an "independent monitor" of the Trump business empire but
    expanded her authority to review financial disclosures before they are
    submitted to third parties. Judge Jones can hire an independent director of >> compliance, and she has the authority to compel Trump to sell some or even >> all of his businesses down the road. This is all punishment for Trump
    allegedly committing fraud by falsely in inflating and deflating the value of
    his real estate assets to pay lower state taxes and to receive more favorable
    loans from banks.

    The New York State laws used to go after Trump have NEVER been used in this >> way, historically, and while Trump may owe some back state taxes, if Judge >> Engoron is right, not a single bank claimed that it had been defrauded by
    Trump in the loans it had made to him. This is truly a victimless crime.

    Claiming your property is worth more than it is while getting loans (by >playing tricks like inflating the occupancy rate) means the honest
    businesses pay more in interest to make up for your gain.

    Claiming property is worth less than it is at tax time, by doing things
    like keeping a second set of books that shows the occupancy rate is very
    low, means honest businesses pay more in taxes to make up for your cheating.

    Using two or three sets of books to defraud lenders, renters, and tax >authorities is not a victimless crime.

    Trump's right, though, that if he hadn't become president, his crimes
    might have gone undetected thanks to his reputation for suing the shit
    out of people and using NDAs. But after a few people got out from under
    the NDAs and started squealing, it was no longer as easy to hide all his >crimes.

    Ah, so you're OK with John Stewart being charged and sent to jail for doing the same?

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Thu Mar 28 17:40:19 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: ny.politics

    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote in
    news:uu498m$3mvq5$4@dont-email.me:

    NoOne@private.corp wrote:
    On 2/19/2024 6:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:

    Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a $355 million fine and has
    been barred from doing business in New York State for three years.
    Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Trump to pay essentially all of his
    cash reserves of $400 million, which fine if upheld would force
    Trump to sell some of his real estate holdings to raise cash to live
    on. Once interest is added on the total fine will rise to $450
    million. This is all on top of an $83.3 million fine Trump must pay
    for allegedly defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. The fines in
    total could deprive Trump of between 11% and 13% of his wealth.
    Trump's adult sons Donald Jr. and Eric have also been fined, and
    they are barred from doing business in New York State for two years.
    Ivanka or Melania Trump could legally run the Trump businesses for
    the next two years, but Judge Engoron appointed retired U.S.
    District Judge Barbara Jones to continue in her role as an
    "independent monitor" of the Trump business empire but expanded her
    authority to review financial disclosures before they are submitted
    to third parties. Judge Jones can hire an independent director of
    compliance, and she has the authority to compel Trump to sell some
    or even all of his businesses down the road. This is all punishment
    for Trump allegedly committing fraud by falsely in inflating and
    deflating the value of his real estate assets to pay lower state
    taxes and to receive more favorable loans from banks.

    The New York State laws used to go after Trump have NEVER been used
    in this way, historically, and while Trump may owe some back state
    taxes, if Judge Engoron is right, not a single bank claimed that it
    had been defrauded by Trump in the loans it had made to him. This
    is truly a victimless crime.

    Claiming your property is worth more than it is while getting loans
    (by playing tricks like inflating the occupancy rate) means the honest >>businesses pay more in interest to make up for your gain.

    Claiming property is worth less than it is at tax time, by doing
    things like keeping a second set of books that shows the occupancy
    rate is very low, means honest businesses pay more in taxes to make up
    for your cheating.

    Using two or three sets of books to defraud lenders, renters, and tax >>authorities is not a victimless crime.

    Trump's right, though, that if he hadn't become president, his crimes
    might have gone undetected thanks to his reputation for suing the
    shit out of people and using NDAs. But after a few people got out from >>under the NDAs and started squealing, it was no longer as easy to hide
    all his crimes.

    Ah, so you're OK with John Stewart being charged and sent to jail for
    doing the same?


    Who did Jon Stewart force to sign an NDA?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Thu Mar 28 15:18:53 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: ny.politics

    On 3/28/2024 11:26 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
    NoOne@private.corp wrote:
    On 2/19/2024 6:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:

    Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a $355 million fine and has been barred
    from doing business in New York State for three years. Judge Arthur Engoron
    ordered Trump to pay essentially all of his cash reserves of $400 million, >>> which fine if upheld would force Trump to sell some of his real estate
    holdings to raise cash to live on. Once interest is added on the total fine
    will rise to $450 million. This is all on top of an $83.3 million fine Trump
    must pay for allegedly defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. The fines in >>> total could deprive Trump of between 11% and 13% of his wealth. Trump's >>> adult sons Donald Jr. and Eric have also been fined, and they are barred from
    doing business in New York State for two years. Ivanka or Melania Trump >>> could legally run the Trump businesses for the next two years, but Judge >>> Engoron appointed retired U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones to continue in >>> her role as an "independent monitor" of the Trump business empire but
    expanded her authority to review financial disclosures before they are
    submitted to third parties. Judge Jones can hire an independent director of
    compliance, and she has the authority to compel Trump to sell some or even >>> all of his businesses down the road. This is all punishment for Trump
    allegedly committing fraud by falsely in inflating and deflating the value of
    his real estate assets to pay lower state taxes and to receive more favorable
    loans from banks.

    The New York State laws used to go after Trump have NEVER been used in this
    way, historically, and while Trump may owe some back state taxes, if Judge >>> Engoron is right, not a single bank claimed that it had been defrauded by >>> Trump in the loans it had made to him. This is truly a victimless crime. >>
    Claiming your property is worth more than it is while getting loans (by
    playing tricks like inflating the occupancy rate) means the honest
    businesses pay more in interest to make up for your gain.

    Claiming property is worth less than it is at tax time, by doing things
    like keeping a second set of books that shows the occupancy rate is very
    low, means honest businesses pay more in taxes to make up for your cheating. >>
    Using two or three sets of books to defraud lenders, renters, and tax
    authorities is not a victimless crime.

    Trump's right, though, that if he hadn't become president, his crimes
    might have gone undetected thanks to his reputation for suing the shit
    out of people and using NDAs. But after a few people got out from under
    the NDAs and started squealing, it was no longer as easy to hide all his
    crimes.

    Ah, so you're OK with John Stewart being charged and sent to jail for doing the
    same?


    Cool non sequitur. If Jon Stewart OR ANYONE ELSE used two sets of books
    to defraud the state and defraud the other people paying taxes, yes,
    they should go to jail. If you have undiscovered evidence that anyone
    did this, by all means report them to the authorities, regardless of
    their political leanings.

    If ANYONE tries to overthrow our government or change the results of a
    legal national election, they should go to jail.

    If anyone steals from charity to spend it on themselves, as Trump did,
    they should go to jail, not just pay a fine.

    I could go on with Trump's crimes, but people who pay attention to Trump
    and the news already know full well he's a despicable crime lord. He
    just has a smaller team than most mafia bosses.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Voice of Authority@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 29 00:25:44 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: ny.politics

    NoOne@private.corp wrote:
    On 2/19/2024 6:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:

    Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a $355 million fine and has been
    barred from doing business in New York State for three years. Judge
    Arthur Engoron ordered Trump to pay essentially all of his cash
    reserves of $400 million, which fine if upheld would force Trump to
    sell some of his real estate holdings to raise cash to live on. Once
    interest is added on the total fine will rise to $450 million. This
    is all on top of an $83.3 million fine Trump must pay for allegedly
    defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. The fines in total could deprive
    Trump of between 11% and 13% of his wealth. Trump's adult sons Donald
    Jr. and Eric have also been fined, and they are barred from doing
    business in New York State for two years. Ivanka or Melania Trump
    could legally run the Trump businesses for the next two years, but
    Judge Engoron appointed retired U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones to
    continue in her role as an "independent monitor" of the Trump business
    empire but expanded her authority to review financial disclosures
    before they are submitted to third parties. Judge Jones can hire an
    independent director of compliance, and she has the authority to
    compel Trump to sell some or even all of his businesses down the road.
    This is all punishment for Trump allegedly committing fraud by
    falsely in inflating and deflating the value of his real estate assets
    to pay lower state taxes and to receive more favorable loans from
    banks.

    The New York State laws used to go after Trump have NEVER been used
    in this way, historically, and while Trump may owe some back state
    taxes, if Judge Engoron is right, not a single bank claimed that it
    had been defrauded by Trump in the loans it had made to him. This is
    truly a victimless crime.

    Claiming your property is worth more than it is while getting loans (by >>playing tricks like inflating the occupancy rate) means the honest >>businesses pay more in interest to make up for your gain.

    Claiming property is worth less than it is at tax time, by doing things >>like keeping a second set of books that shows the occupancy rate is very >>low, means honest businesses pay more in taxes to make up for your >>cheating.

    Using two or three sets of books to defraud lenders, renters, and tax >>authorities is not a victimless crime.

    Trump's right, though, that if he hadn't become president, his crimes
    might have gone undetected thanks to his reputation for suing the shit
    out of people and using NDAs. But after a few people got out from under
    the NDAs and started squealing, it was no longer as easy to hide all his >>crimes.

    Ah, so you're OK with John Stewart being charged and sent to jail for
    doing the same?

    --
    Let's go Brandon!




    Let's hope they lock him up. For the safety of the children. The last
    thing we need are white collar criminal rapists who steal our nation's
    secrets roaming our streets.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)