• Re: Even When Faced With Irreutable FACTS - Dick-Tucking Buffalo Ski-Bu

    From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Tue Feb 13 19:28:02 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2024-02-13 19:00, AlleyCat wrote:

    More bullshit semantics.

    On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:29:52 -0800, Alan says...

    "Q[uestion] Did you ever talk to the President about having National
    Guard troops at -- on standby for January 6th?

    Key word semantics: "talk to" "heard".

    More bullshit semantics. NO ONE is questioning whether Kellogg "heard" Trump say anything or "talk" to him about the NG.

    So why'd you snip all the factual information I provided you, loser?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Tue Feb 13 20:41:41 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2024-02-13 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:28:02 -0800, Alan says...

    More bullshit semantics. NO ONE is questioning whether Kellogg "heard" Trump
    say anything or "talk" to him about the NG.

    So why'd you snip all the factual information I provided you, loser?

    It's all irrelevant non sequiturs.


    Kellogg's actual testimony is irrelevant...

    ...loser?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Wed Feb 14 17:52:20 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2024-02-14 17:42, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:41:41 -0800, Alan says...


    On 2024-02-13 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:28:02 -0800, Alan says...

    More bullshit semantics. NO ONE is questioning whether Kellogg "heard" Trump
    say anything or "talk" to him about the NG.

    So why'd you snip all the factual information I provided you, loser?

    It's all irrelevant non sequiturs.

    Kellogg's actual testimony is irrelevant...

    Yes... the part YOU misinterpret and then try to use it as an argument point, when it's NOT the point.

    This is... pussy.[1][2][3][4][5]

    You're bringing up bullshit that's NOT in question.

    Why did YOU snip all the factual information I provided you, pansy?

    Because it IS relevant to the topic and conversation, whereas yours is not. That's all you liberals can do, is pick something as little as ONE word and start harping on IT, when you KNOW that it's not pertinent.

    NO ONE is questioning whether Kellogg "heard" Trump say anything or "talk" to him about the NG.

    Did Trump want troops and did he intimate that to ANYONE?

    Yes.

    You have presented no direct testimony of anyone saying that.

    Only hearsay.


    So... again... piss off, ski bunny. When you can prove it that Trump never said, requested, yearned for, intimated, hinted at, insinuated, suggested, inferred, declared, announced, implied, expressed, voiced it, that he wanted troops, just shut the fuck up.

    It's not up to me to prove negatives, loser.


    You can reply all you want.

    https://i.imgur.com/wLGGfM4.mp4

    I do NOT "win", but... you lose.

    =====

    So, YOU think that in Trump circle, no one knows anything, unless they HEAR Trump say it in front of their faces? No one can see paperwork, or get told by
    someone else in that circle, it HAS to be from the horse's mouth to the goat's
    ears?

    No one can testify under oath that Trump did or said anything when what actually happened is they heard about it from someone else.



    No.

    Has EVERYTHING you know, come straight from someone's mouth IN PERSON? Fucking
    liberals... can't win an argument on merit, so they have to come up with bullshit semantics, like Rudy Canoza.

    Look up, "hearsay".


    Whining like a liberal: "Kelloggggg neverrr hearrrrd Trmmmmp SAAAAAY heee wannnnted National Guard Troooopppps, so it neverrr happenennnnned."

    Look up, "hearsay".

    Why can't you fucking pussies ever, EVER, argue without your bullshit liberal semantics being at the core of your argument?

    THAT Kellogg never "HEARD" Trump say anything, is irrelevant. The MANY people in government RARELY "hear" or see the President DO anything, because he's NOT
    always surrounded by his whole fucking staff, you fucking stupid moron.

    Look up, "hearsay".

    Your testimony came from when? Dec.14, 2021

    What Kellogg said, was that he never talked to (and never "HEARD") Trump.

    THIS is all that matters.

    [1]
    August 05, 2022:
    Retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg said LAST WEEK that former PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP DID IN FACT REQUEST NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS BE DEPLOYED in Washington D.C. Before the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

    A[answer by Kellogg] No.

    So, HOW could he have EVER "heard" Trump say ANYTHING, if he never spoke with him?

    I never "heard" you call me a loser, either, stupid, but I'm damn sure you've muttered it a time or two... pussy.

    Look up, "hearsay".


    [2]
    "To be clear on 6 Jan/NG. Pg 199 of my book, 'On 3 Jan the President asked the
    Def Dept to deploy NG troops' into DC for J6 contingencies. OK for J6 Cmte to publicly release my full sworn testimony. Release Army Guard and DC Mayor J6 testimonies as well. Would be illuminating."

    I'm 100% positive that your testimony is not the same as what Kellogg wants released. WHY would he be requesting a release of testimony around August 1, 2022?

    So produce this other testimony.

    At the very least, tell us where and when it was taken.

    YOUR testimony is dates as Dec. 2021, so fuck off, pansy.

    [3]
    "Great OpEd. Reinforces my earlier comment on 6 Jan Cmte. Has quote from DOD IG
    Report regarding 3 Jan 2021 meeting with Actg Def Secy Miller/CJCS Milley in the Oval on the 6 Jan NG request by POTUS on troops needed. I was in the room." - Kellogg

    WHY would Kellogg say he knows Trump wanted troops 2 years after the fact? He no longer works for him.

    I don't know.

    I do know that when asked directly about this...

    ...UNDER OATH...

    ...he said it didn't happen.


    If at least TWO liberal left-wing sites say that Trump "floated" the idea of having National Guard troops at the Capitol, who are YOU to say they're lying?

    The claim under discussion was that Trump supposedly offered troops and
    Pelosi turned them down.

    You haven't provided any proof that either of those happened.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)