On 2/11/2024 4:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uqbf5m$14sab$1@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.comIt won't affect the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. The
says...
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 1:12 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 12:39 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:noun
On 2/11/2024 11:39 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
On 2/11/2024 11:07 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrtreason /tre'z?n/
The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country,
especially by committing hostile acts
against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts.
Biden hasn't done that. There have been no hostile acts.
Really?
The various families who have had relatives murdered by illegal
aliens would disagree. Those people might still be alive if it
weren't for Biden's reckless policies.
and now Joe has been proven unfit.
[...]
Has a state ever disqualified someone from holding or running
for federal office under 14.3?
Utterly irrelevant as to the point of congressional action being
needed. Also, 14.3 says an insurrectionist is disqualified from
any office, not just federal office.
As I said, this decision is going to be completely untethered
from the Constitution. The court will be punting on the issue.
An insurrectionist based upon whose decision?
A competent court's decision.
Facts:
* that attack on the Capitol on 01/06/2021 was an insurrection
* Trump organized, financed, incited, directed and engaged in
it * while the insurrection raged, Trump tweeted to the
insurrectionists to
encourage them
Trump engaged in insurrection.
So what court has ruled this an insurrection?
Has anyone been charged/convicted of insurrection?
Why not?
He will call you names and twist what you say now.
states invoking 14.3A against Trump will have their electoral votes
go to the democratic candidate anyway. They will be only achieve
the ignominious outcome of having disenfranchising their state's
voters from voting for the newly re-elected President Trump.
On 11 Feb 2024, Francis Mark Hansen <fmhlaw@comcast.net>, sleazy rent-skip chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:
On 2/11/2024 4:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uqbf5m$14sab$1@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.comIt won't affect the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. The
says...
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 1:12 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 12:39 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:noun
On 2/11/2024 11:39 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
On 2/11/2024 11:07 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrtreason /tre'z?n/
The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country,
especially by committing hostile acts
against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts.
Biden hasn't done that. There have been no hostile acts.
Really?
The various families who have had relatives murdered by illegal
aliens would disagree. Those people might still be alive if it
weren't for Biden's reckless policies.
and now Joe has been proven unfit.
[...]
Has a state ever disqualified someone from holding or running
for federal office under 14.3?
Utterly irrelevant as to the point of congressional action being >>>>>>> needed. Also, 14.3 says an insurrectionist is disqualified from
any office, not just federal office.
As I said, this decision is going to be completely untethered
from the Constitution. The court will be punting on the issue.
An insurrectionist based upon whose decision?
A competent court's decision.
Facts:
* that attack on the Capitol on 01/06/2021 was an insurrection
* Trump organized, financed, incited, directed and engaged in
it * while the insurrection raged, Trump tweeted to the
insurrectionists to
encourage them
Trump engaged in insurrection.
So what court has ruled this an insurrection?
Has anyone been charged/convicted of insurrection?
Why not?
He will call you names and twist what you say now.
states invoking 14.3A against Trump will have their electoral votes
go to the democratic candidate anyway. They will be only achieve
the ignominious outcome of having disenfranchising their state's
voters from voting for the newly re-elected President Trump.
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
On 11 Feb 2024, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> posted some news:rieyN.86124$CYpe.72226@fx40.iad:
On 2/11/2024 4:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uqbf5m$14sab$1@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.comIt won't affect the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. The
says...
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 1:12 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 12:39 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:noun
On 2/11/2024 11:39 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
On 2/11/2024 11:07 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrtreason /tre'z?n/
The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country,
especially by committing hostile acts
against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts.
Biden hasn't done that. There have been no hostile acts.
Really?
The various families who have had relatives murdered by illegal
aliens would disagree. Those people might still be alive if it
weren't for Biden's reckless policies.
and now Joe has been proven unfit.
[...]
Has a state ever disqualified someone from holding or running
for federal office under 14.3?
Utterly irrelevant as to the point of congressional action being >>>>>>> needed. Also, 14.3 says an insurrectionist is disqualified from
any office, not just federal office.
As I said, this decision is going to be completely untethered
from the Constitution. The court will be punting on the issue.
An insurrectionist based upon whose decision?
A competent court's decision.
Facts:
* that attack on the Capitol on 01/06/2021 was an insurrection
* Trump organized, financed, incited, directed and engaged in
it * while the insurrection raged, Trump tweeted to the
insurrectionists to
encourage them
Trump engaged in insurrection.
So what court has ruled this an insurrection?
Has anyone been charged/convicted of insurrection?
Why not?
He will call you names and twist what you say now.
states invoking 14.3A against Trump will have their electoral votes
go to the democratic candidate anyway. They will be only achieve
the ignominious outcome of having disenfranchising their state's
voters from voting for the newly re-elected President Trump.
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:41:12 -0000 (UTC), Steve From Colorado wrote:
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
That's true. Otoh, those Republican anti vax and anti mask voters are going to stay dead
for at least the foreseeable future.
Swill
In article <kikksilrscm5bnhultsss38rrk6gjq185o@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:41:12 -0000 (UTC), Steve From Colorado wrote:
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
That's true. Otoh, those Republican anti vax and anti mask voters are going to stay dead
for at least the foreseeable future.
Swill
No shot, no mask and I'm still here.
"Steve From Colorado" <SteveFromColorado@cocks.net> wrote in message news:uqbsvo$o9h$2@toxic.dizum.net...
On 11 Feb 2024, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> posted some
news:rieyN.86124$CYpe.72226@fx40.iad:
On 2/11/2024 4:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uqbf5m$14sab$1@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.comIt won't affect the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. The
says...
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 1:12 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 2/11/2024 12:39 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:noun
On 2/11/2024 11:39 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
On 2/11/2024 11:07 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrtreason /tre'z?n/
The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country,
especially by committing hostile acts
against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts.
Biden hasn't done that. There have been no hostile acts.
Really?
The various families who have had relatives murdered by illegal
aliens would disagree. Those people might still be alive if it
weren't for Biden's reckless policies.
and now Joe has been proven unfit.
[...]
Has a state ever disqualified someone from holding or running >>>>>>>>> for federal office under 14.3?
Utterly irrelevant as to the point of congressional action
being needed. Also, 14.3 says an insurrectionist is
disqualified from any office, not just federal office.
As I said, this decision is going to be completely untethered
from the Constitution. The court will be punting on the issue.
An insurrectionist based upon whose decision?
A competent court's decision.
Facts:
* that attack on the Capitol on 01/06/2021 was an
insurrection * Trump organized, financed, incited, directed
and engaged in it * while the insurrection raged, Trump
tweeted to the insurrectionists to
encourage them
Trump engaged in insurrection.
So what court has ruled this an insurrection?
Has anyone been charged/convicted of insurrection?
Why not?
He will call you names and twist what you say now.
states invoking 14.3A against Trump will have their electoral votes
go to the democratic candidate anyway. They will be only achieve
the ignominious outcome of having disenfranchising their state's
voters from voting for the newly re-elected President Trump.
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
Yea, now they aren't even pretending to listen to the people. I hear
that in at least 2 states the DNC has told the people they aren't even
going to put the matter to a vote. Biden is their candidate and that's
that.
Yea, if the Democrats had their way, they would simply announce the
election results now and state that Biden has already been reelected.
I mean WHO needs to actually allow the people to vote, when the result
as already been predetermined by the DNC?
Yea, we certainly see how government would work if the DNC could do
whatever they wanted.
In article <kikksilrscm5bnhultsss38rrk6gjq185o@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:41:12 -0000 (UTC), Steve From Colorado wrote:
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
That's true. Otoh, those Republican anti vax and anti mask voters are going to stay dead
for at least the foreseeable future.
Swill
No shot,
It wasn't the DNC that cancelled all presidential debates
Skeeter wrote:
In article <kikksilrscm5bnhultsss38rrk6gjq185o@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:41:12 -0000 (UTC), Steve From Colorado wrote:
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
That's true. Otoh, those Republican anti vax and anti mask voters are going to stay dead
for at least the foreseeable future.
Swill
No shot, no mask and I'm still here.
here's where skeeter admits he was vaccinated for covid -
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=+%3C253keg58m2bf5dufr0pf23mjor4m5c0fmb%404ax.com%3E
- lie cry and deny below here lying pissbum -
In article <17b33178f05c840d$126206$1979536
$72dd786b@news.thecubenet.com>, precent@yahoo.net says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <kikksilrscm5bnhultsss38rrk6gjq185o@4ax.com>,>
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:41:12 -0000 (UTC), Steve From Colorado wrote:
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this >>>>> time either.
That's true. Otoh, those Republican anti vax and anti mask voters are going to stay dead
for at least the foreseeable future.
Swill
No shot, no mask and I'm still here.
here's where skeeter admits he was vaccinated for covid -
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=+%3C253keg58m2bf5dufr0pf23mjor4m5c0fmb%404ax.com%3E
- lie cry and deny below here lying pissbum -
No one even lies on usenet do they Chad Bryant?
"Steve From Colorado" <SteveFromColorado@cocks.net> wrote in message >news:uqbsvo$o9h$2@toxic.dizum.net...
On 11 Feb 2024, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> posted some
news:rieyN.86124$CYpe.72226@fx40.iad:
On 2/11/2024 4:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uqbf5m$14sab$1@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.comIt won't affect the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. The
says...
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 1:12 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 2/11/2024 12:39 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:noun
On 2/11/2024 11:39 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
On 2/11/2024 11:07 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrtreason /tre'z?n/
The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country,
especially by committing hostile acts
against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts.
Biden hasn't done that. There have been no hostile acts.
Really?
The various families who have had relatives murdered by illegal
aliens would disagree. Those people might still be alive if it
weren't for Biden's reckless policies.
and now Joe has been proven unfit.
[...]
Has a state ever disqualified someone from holding or running >>>>>>>>> for federal office under 14.3?
Utterly irrelevant as to the point of congressional action being >>>>>>>> needed. Also, 14.3 says an insurrectionist is disqualified from >>>>>>>> any office, not just federal office.
As I said, this decision is going to be completely untethered
from the Constitution. The court will be punting on the issue.
An insurrectionist based upon whose decision?
A competent court's decision.
Facts:
* that attack on the Capitol on 01/06/2021 was an insurrection >>>>>> * Trump organized, financed, incited, directed and engaged in
it * while the insurrection raged, Trump tweeted to the
insurrectionists to
encourage them
Trump engaged in insurrection.
So what court has ruled this an insurrection?
Has anyone been charged/convicted of insurrection?
Why not?
He will call you names and twist what you say now.
states invoking 14.3A against Trump will have their electoral votes
go to the democratic candidate anyway. They will be only achieve
the ignominious outcome of having disenfranchising their state's
voters from voting for the newly re-elected President Trump.
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
Yea, now they aren't even pretending to listen to the people. I hear that in >at least 2 states the DNC has told the people they aren't even going to put >the matter to a vote. Biden is their candidate and that's that.
Yea, if the Democrats had their way, they would simply announce the election >results now and state that Biden has already been reelected. I mean WHO
needs to actually allow the people to vote, when the result as already been >predetermined by the DNC?
Yea, we certainly see how government would work if the DNC could do whatever >they wanted.
They wouldn't even hold elections they would simply declare who "the people" >had elected and that's that.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:47:53 -0500, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Steve From Colorado" <SteveFromColorado@cocks.net> wrote in message >>news:uqbsvo$o9h$2@toxic.dizum.net...
On 11 Feb 2024, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> posted some
news:rieyN.86124$CYpe.72226@fx40.iad:
On 2/11/2024 4:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uqbf5m$14sab$1@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.comIt won't affect the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. The
says...
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
wrote:
On 2/11/2024 1:12 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-11, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2/11/2024 12:39 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:noun
On 2/11/2024 11:39 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
On 2/11/2024 11:07 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrtreason /tre'z?n/
The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country,
especially by committing hostile acts
against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts.
Biden hasn't done that. There have been no hostile acts.
Really?
The various families who have had relatives murdered by illegal
aliens would disagree. Those people might still be alive if it
weren't for Biden's reckless policies.
and now Joe has been proven unfit.
[...]An insurrectionist based upon whose decision?
Has a state ever disqualified someone from holding or running >>>>>>>>>> for federal office under 14.3?
Utterly irrelevant as to the point of congressional action being >>>>>>>>> needed. Also, 14.3 says an insurrectionist is disqualified from >>>>>>>>> any office, not just federal office.
As I said, this decision is going to be completely untethered >>>>>>>>> from the Constitution. The court will be punting on the issue. >>>>>>>>
A competent court's decision.
Facts:
* that attack on the Capitol on 01/06/2021 was an insurrection >>>>>>> * Trump organized, financed, incited, directed and engaged in >>>>>>> it * while the insurrection raged, Trump tweeted to the
insurrectionists to
encourage them
Trump engaged in insurrection.
So what court has ruled this an insurrection?
Has anyone been charged/convicted of insurrection?
Why not?
He will call you names and twist what you say now.
states invoking 14.3A against Trump will have their electoral votes
go to the democratic candidate anyway. They will be only achieve
the ignominious outcome of having disenfranchising their state's
voters from voting for the newly re-elected President Trump.
Democrats don't have COVID to subvert the presidential election this
time either.
Yea, now they aren't even pretending to listen to the people. I hear that >>in
at least 2 states the DNC has told the people they aren't even going to
put
the matter to a vote. Biden is their candidate and that's that.
If this is true isn't that insurrection???
Yea, if the Democrats had their way, they would simply announce the >>election
results now and state that Biden has already been reelected. I mean WHO >>needs to actually allow the people to vote, when the result as already
been
predetermined by the DNC?
Yea, we certainly see how government would work if the DNC could do >>whatever
they wanted.
They wouldn't even hold elections they would simply declare who "the >>people"
had elected and that's that.
It's what the did overnight at the last Presidential election.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 117:02:21 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,334,237 |