• Re: If Donald Trump wins, he'll control Europe's gas

    From Europe better hope Trump@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 8 03:27:28 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.europe.misc, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 05 Jan 2022, TrumpenFuehrer News Network <HeilTrumpenFuehrer@gop.net>
    posted some news:sr52a9$22k$1@news.freedyn.de:

    Trump will be too busy hanging Democrats to worry about Europe.

    Arecent US policy announcement is a sharp reminder of how crucial America
    is to global energy supply, and the geopolitics that surround it. On 26 January, Joe Biden declared a “temporary pause” on pending decisions
    regarding US exports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG. These exports were
    the reason Europe was able to stop importing Russian gas without
    widespread shortages and blackouts, and they remain fundamental to
    Europe’s energy security. They give America a new power over Europe, and a
    new question: what would Donald Trump do with it?

    To be clear, this does not mean that Biden is cutting off or even reducing
    the supply of LNG from the US to Europe. The European Commission and the
    US Department of Energy discussed the “pause” in advance, and export
    projects that have already been approved are going ahead. But the delays
    in planning new exports in the years to come leave companies with fewer options. Canada is increasing its LNG exports, but the terminals are on
    its west coast, making them far more suited for export to Asia.

    Qatari LNG, on which Britain is highly dependent, is typically sold under
    very long, exclusive agreements, which might make an importer dependent
    beyond 2030 or even 2050 — with implications for net zero plans — and
    prevent buyers from selling the gas on to third parties.

    America’s LNG is sold with no such strings attached. This has been great
    for global energy security. Germany previously imported most of its gas
    from Russia, but the flexibility of US exports after Russia invaded
    Ukraine allowed Europe to cut off Vladimir Putin’s gas while keeping its
    lights on and boilers running. However, it’s not the greatest look for
    Biden, who — having been elected on bold promises to take action on the
    climate crisis and phase out fossil fuels — has presided over America’s
    rise to become the world’s biggest exporter of natural gas (US oil
    production has also reached record highs).

    Henning Gloystein, director of energy, climate and resources at Eurasia
    Group, says there is “a heavy political angle” to the LNG pause, in that
    it gives Biden an opportunity to say that he is selecting only the
    greenest projects for approval. In reality, Gloystein says, most forecasts assume that only a minority of the currently proposed projects will
    eventually come online. The likely outcome of the current “pause” is that
    it introduces a year of “planning insecurity” for Europe before the next president is inaugurated and business continues as usual

    Then again, it’s worth testing the idea that anything under a vengeful
    Trump administration would continue as usual. Trump is not going to
    restrict US LNG exports because he cares about the climate crisis, which
    in 2022 he described as “a hoax”. But this doesn’t mean he won’t relish
    the opportunity to squeeze Europe’s gas supply.

    Trump has previously shown willingness to intervene in both American trade
    and America’s contributions to Nato. It’s not outlandish to imagine him demanding a 10 per cent “US security tariff” on US LNG exports to Europe,
    to make up for a perceived lack of defence spending – “it's Trump”, says Gloystein, “this could happen” – and in doing so force a new period of inflation into the EU.

    Trump is also far more sympathetic to Putin and ambivalent, at best,
    towards Ukraine. The geopolitics of gas are likely to become even more significant if he returns to the White House. The risk of being exposed to
    a very small number of energy sources will become even more apparent –
    supplies from Qatar, too, could be affected by conflict in the Middle
    East.

    “When you have really high prices of fossil fuels, because of geopolitical
    risk and unreliable supply”, says Gloystein, “politically and
    economically, that sends a really clear message you need to invest into
    clean domestic supply. That's the only option.”

    https://www.newstatesman.com/spotlight/sustainability/energy/2024/02/if- donald-trump-wins-hell-control-europes-gas

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)