XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.republicans
XPost: alt.elections

Well, right now, it's true.

However she still gets the MOST after Trump.

Best tact ... stick with it until after Super Tuesday
and then take a step back.

But only ONE step back.

She IS and now will REMAIN "relevant" - and that
means political relevance, donor relevance and
ideological relevance.

By keeping one toe in, she will also be there if
Trump does something horribly wrong or has a stroke
or the Dems make him ineligible or whatever. She
needs to be there as the First-Alternate.

Her ability to bring-in cross-over votes is
VERY important too. Trump has a big active
base, but it's not grown very much. His
personality alienates too many. By itself
the base is NOT enough to win the election,
cross-overs WILL be required. Do the math.

No escaping the math.

And Trump ... QUIT bashing Haley now. She's not
"competition" anymore - but she can/does have her
useful role. The election is not JUST about
electing Trump, it's about dis-assembling the
hyper-left/wokie insanity that's turning the
USA into a 3rd-world shithole. Haley is PART
of addressing that Bigger Picture.

Ron ... good guy ... but doesn't have "it"
personality-wise relative to running for POTUS.
Kind of like Jeb Bush. I see a future for him
in the Senate however.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)