XPost: talk.politics.guns, or.politics, alt.sockpuppeteer
XPost: alt.reciprocity

In article <unvbq0$5c3k$3@dont-email.me>
fudgepacker <patriot1@protonmail.com> wrote:

Marijuana smokers are the largest group of incestuous vermin.

Jessica Yaniv had brought over a dozen similar complaints

A human rights tribunal has dismissed a trans woman's claim
after she sued a beauty clinic for refusing to wax her scrotum.

Jessica Yaniv went to a beauty salon in British Columbia,
Canada, where she requested a bikini wax.

But the trans woman was refused by stunned staff when they
discovered she had a full set of male genitalia.

Yaniv claimed the beauty salon workers’ refusal to wax her
scrotum was discriminatory.

But the tribunal found that her complaint was part of a campaign
to both enrich herself at the expense of South Asians and punish
them for what Yaniv saw as transphobia.

The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal said Yaniv had had
“manufactured the conditions for a human rights complaint” when
she had demanded a bikini wax despite still having a full set of
male genitalia.

A number of the salon workers had voiced religious objections to
carrying out the work while others said they weren’t
appropriately trained.

Because the salon had never waxed anyone’s scrotum, the tribunal
said, it could not be said to be discriminating against Ms Yaniv.

The verdict from the tribunal read: "Human rights legislation
does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals
they are not trained for and have not consented to wax.”

Yaniv, the ruling said, “targeted small businesses, manufactured
the conditions for a human rights complaint, and then leveraged
that complaint to pursue a financial settlement from parties who
were unsophisticated and unlikely to mount a proper defence".

The evidence Yaniv herself gave was, according to the tribunal,
“disingenuous and self-serving”.

Welcoming the verdict Jay Cameron, a lawyer for the Justice
Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, said: “Self-identification
does not erase physiological reality."

“Our clients do not offer the service requested. No woman should
be compelled to touch male genitals against her will,
irrespective of how the owner of the genitals identifies.”

It was revealed that Yaniv had brought over a dozen similar
complaints, seeking damages in the region of $15,000 (£11,600)
each from several beauty salons.

Yaniv has ordered to pay $2,000 (£1,200) to three of the women
she complained about, one of whom was forced out of business as
a result of the case.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/trans-woman-who-sued-beauty-
20704662

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)