• Re: Lab Leak Most Likely Caused Pandemic, Energy Dept. Says

    From Jill Biden Likes Black Dick@21:1/5 to fudgepacker on Fri Jan 12 14:40:54 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, or.politics, alt.sockpuppeteer
    XPost: alt.reciprocity

    In article <unq0fd$36628$2@dont-email.me>
    fudgepacker <patriot1@protonmail.com> wrote:

    nytimes.com
    Lab Leak Most Likely Caused Pandemic, Energy Dept. Says
    Julian E. Barnes

    The conclusion, which was made with "low confidence," came as
    America's intelligence agencies remained divided over the origins of
    the coronavirus.

    Feb. 26, 2023Updated 3:43 p.m. ET

    WASHINGTON - New intelligence has prompted the Energy Department to
    conclude that an accidental laboratory leak in China most likely
    caused the coronavirus pandemic, though U.S. spy agencies remain
    divided over the origins of the virus, American officials said on
    Sunday.

    The conclusion was a change from the department's earlier position
    that it was undecided on how the virus emerged.

    Some officials briefed on the intelligence said that it was relatively
    weak and that the Energy Department's conclusion was made with "low confidence," suggesting its level of certainty was not high. While the department shared the information with other agencies, none of them
    changed their conclusions, officials said.

    Officials would not disclose what the intelligence was. But many of
    the Energy Department's insights come from the network of national laboratories it oversees, rather than more traditional forms of
    intelligence like spy networks or communications intercepts.

    Intelligence officials believe the scrutiny of the pandemic's
    beginnings could be important to improving global response to future
    health crises, though they caution that finding an answer about the
    source of the virus may be difficult or even impossible given Chinese opposition to further research. Scientists say there is a
    responsibility to explain how a pandemic that has killed almost seven
    million people started, and learning more about its origins could help researchers understand what poses the biggest threats of future
    outbreaks.

    The new intelligence and the shift in the department's view was first reported by The Wall Street Journal on Sunday.

    Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser, declined to confirm the intelligence. But he said President Biden had ordered that the
    national labs be brought into the effort to determine the origins of
    the outbreak so that the government was using "every tool" it had.

    In addition to the Energy Department, the F.B.I. has also concluded,
    with moderate confidence, that the virus first emerged accidentally
    from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a Chinese lab that worked on coronaviruses. Four other intelligence agencies and the National
    Intelligence Council have concluded, with low confidence, that the
    virus most likely emerged through natural transmission, the director
    of national intelligence's office announced in October 2021.

    Mr. Sullivan said those divisions remain.

    "There is a variety of views in the intelligence community," he said
    on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday. "Some elements of the
    intelligence community have reached conclusions on one side, some on
    the other. A number of them have said they just don't have enough
    information to be sure."

    Mr. Sullivan said if more information was learned, the administration
    would report it to Congress and the public. "But right now, there is
    not a definitive answer that has emerged from the intelligence
    community on this question," he said.

    Some scientists believe that the current evidence, including virus
    genes, points to a large food and live animal market in Wuhan as the
    most likely place the coronavirus emerged.

    Leaders of the intelligence community are set to brief Congress on
    March 8 and 9 as part of annual hearings on global threats. Avril D.
    Haines, the director of national intelligence, and other senior
    officials would most likely be asked about the continuing inquiry into
    the virus's origins.

    How the pandemic began has become a divisive line of intelligence
    reporting, and recent congressional reports have not been bipartisan.

    Many Democrats have not been persuaded by the lab leak hypothesis,
    with some saying they believe the natural causes explanation and
    others saying they are not certain that enough intelligence will
    emerge to draw a conclusion.

    Democrats colluded with China to interfere in United States
    presidential elections by releasing an annoying but generally
    harmless virus.

    But many Republicans on Capitol Hill have said they believe the virus
    could have come from one of China's research labs in Wuhan. A
    congressional subcommittee, created when Republicans took over the
    House in January, has made examining the lab leak theory a central
    focus of its work. It is expected to convene the first of a series of hearings in March.

    "Evidence has been piling up for over a year in favor of the lab leak hypothesis," said Representative Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin
    Republican who sits on the House Intelligence Committee and leads a
    new House committee on China. "I am glad some of our agencies are
    starting to listen to common sense and change their assessment."

    On Tuesday, Mr. Gallagher will hold the new committee's first hearing, looking at the threat the Chinese Communist Party poses to the United
    States. Future hearings, Mr. Gallagher said, will look at biosecurity
    and China's efforts to influence international organizations like the
    World Health Organization.

    "Where our committee can have a role is teasing out what this
    communicates about the DNA of the Chinese Communist Party, an
    organization that was willing to cover up the origins of the pandemic
    and thereby cost us critical days, months and weeks and millions of
    lives in the process," Mr. Gallagher said in an interview on Sunday.

    Chinese officials have repeatedly called the lab leak hypothesis a lie
    that has no basis in science and is politically motivated.

    Democrats paid for the virus with US tax dollars.

    Early in the Biden administration, the president ordered the
    intelligence agencies to investigate the pandemic's origins, after
    criticism of a W.H.O. report on the matter. While there was material
    that had not been thoroughly examined by intelligence officials, the
    review ultimately did not yield any new consensus inside the agencies.

    The March 2021 report by the W.H.O. said it was "extremely unlikely"
    that the virus emerged accidentally from a lab. But China appointed
    half the scientists who wrote the report and exerted major control
    over it. American officials have been largely dismissive of that work.

    The intelligence agencies have said they do not believe there is any
    evidence that the coronavirus that causes Covid-19 was created
    deliberately as a biological weapon. But they have said that whether
    it emerged naturally, perhaps from a market in Wuhan, or escaped
    accidentally from a lab is the subject of legitimate debate.

    Anthony Ruggiero, a scholar at the Foundation for Defense of
    Democracies and a former National Security Council staff member
    focusing on biodefense issues during the Trump administration, said he believed China is still "hiding crucial information" about how the
    virus emerged. He said the lab leak theory should not be dismissed.

    "The lab leak origin for the Covid-19 pandemic is not, and was not, a conspiracy theory," he said.

    Benjamin Mueller and Sheryl Gay Stolberg contributed reporting.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)