• Re: BREAKING NEWS: Legal Scholars Confirm That Trump Is Eligible To Run

    From Borgman@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 3 22:19:55 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.appalachian
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, talk.politics.guns

    On 03 Jan 2024, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> posted
    some news:1OilN.108892$Ama9.84114@fx12.iad:

    On 1/3/2024 9:30 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
    child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

    In article <qvglN.13184$Wbff.9907@fx37.iad>,
    mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

    On 1/3/2024 8:41 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
    convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

    In article <un41bk$38iol$11@dont-email.me>, patriot1@protonmail.com
    says...

    The Constitution is clear about who can run for president and who
    cannot. It says any American citizen can run for president, with
    four big exceptions.

    Article II of the Constitution lays down the first three. Anybody
    can run for president as long as they are at least 35 years old,
    are a natural-born citizen and have lived in the United States for
    at least 14 years.

    After the Civil War, members of Congress added a fourth test. Not
    wanting this country to fear that federal officials might again
    attempt to overthrow the government, they added the 14th Amendment
    which, among other provisions, disqualifies as a candidate for any
    federal office anybody who swore to uphold the Constitution and
    then sought to overturn it.

    The language of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is clear: ?No
    person shall?hold an office, civil or military, under the United
    States?who, having previously taken an oath?to support the
    Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
    insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
    comfort to the enemies thereof.?

    Then Congress added an important final clause: ?But Congress may
    by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.?

    Which leaves only three questions. First: Did Donald Trump ?engage
    in insurrection? and/or ?give comfort to? those who did?
    Absolutely. Even though not yet convicted of doing so (which the
    Constitution does not require), we know from multiple sources,
    including his own words on tape, that Trump summoned an armed mob
    to Washington to attack the U.S. Capitol; called state officials
    to find him more votes; called members of the Electoral College to
    persuade them to change their votes; pressured Vice President
    Pence not to certify the Electoral College results; and has
    promised to pardon those convicted in the Jan. 6 attack.

    Second question: Has Congress by a two-thirds vote given Donald
    Trump a free pass? No.

    Third question: Do we believe in the Constitution or not? If so,
    there?s only one answer.

    Banning Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential ballot does not
    deprive the people from their right to vote. It simply affirms the
    United States Constitution. Case closed.

    LOCK HIM UP

    They don't get to decide. The constitution does.

    The Constitution *has* decided. 14.3 says Trump is ineligible.

    Nope.


    Yep.

    Actually it permits him to run in direct opposition to what you illiterate leftnut bags say.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)