XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns

On 03 Jan 2024, David Hartung <junk@LCMS_shitbags.org> posted some news:XDjlN.127396$xHn7.58506@fx14.iad:

On 1/3/2024 12:20 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

In article <vQilN.108894$Ama9.74038@fx12.iad>, junk@LCMS_shitbags.org
says...

On 1/3/2024 11:43 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

In article <p9ilN.125701$p%Mb.5638@fx15.iad>,
junk@LCMS_shitbags.org says...

On 1/3/2024 10:40 AM, scooter lied:

"David Hartung" <junk@LCMS_shitbags.org> wrote in message
news:6EglN.25555$Sf59.8063@fx48.iad...

On 1/3/2024 9:03 AM, Robert Peters wrote:

On 1/3/2024 11:17 AM, Real American 1944 wrote:

The Constitution is clear about who can run for president and >>>>>>>>> who cannot. It says any American citizen can run for
president, with four big exceptions.

Article II of the Constitution lays down the first three.
Anybody can run for president as long as they are at least 35 >>>>>>>>> years old, are a natural-born citizen and have lived in the
United States for at least 14 years.

After the Civil War, members of Congress added a fourth test. >>>>>>>>> Not wanting this country to fear that federal officials might >>>>>>>>> again attempt to overthrow the government, they added the 14th >>>>>>>>> Amendment which, among other provisions, disqualifies as a
candidate for any federal office anybody who swore to
uphold the Constitution and then sought to overturn it.

The language of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is clear: ?No >>>>>>>>> person shall?hold an office, civil or military, under the
United States?who, having previously taken an oath?to support >>>>>>>>> the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in >>>>>>>>> insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given
aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.?

Then Congress added an important final clause: ?But Congress >>>>>>>>> may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such
disability.?

Which leaves only three questions. First: Did Donald Trump
?engage in insurrection? and/or ?give comfort to? those who
did? Absolutely. Even though not yet convicted of doing so
(which the Constitution does not require),

So much for due process.

Bullshit. Due process has been followed. You don't know what due >>>>>>> process is or means. Fuck off.

Ok, in which Criminal Court has he been convicted of insurrection
or

Section 3 of the 14th amendment does *not* require a criminal
conviction, scooter.

But he was never even indicted for it.

It doesn't require that, either. It doesn't require anything to do
with any criminal case. He is *civilly* held to have engaged in
insurrection, and that's all it takes. He's now ineligible.

No charges.

Not needed.

In that case, you're guilty of raping Hillary Clinton AND Nancy Pelosi
because I said so. No proof needed, just hearsay.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)