• Re: Jim Jordan probes whether 'spies who lie' letter signers were CIA w

    From Michael A Terrell@21:1/5 to Eunice Wunderlich on Fri Dec 29 19:40:48 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.org.cia, sac.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    On 12/29/2023 7:26 PM, Eunice Wunderlich wrote:
    On 29 Dec 2023, "RKBA! Mass Killings Are Codified in The 2A" <elonx@protonmail.com> posted some news:umns1d$11765$3@dont-email.me:

    Biden is doing his best to cover up his crimes using the office of the
    Presidency.

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) is investigating whether any of the 51 “spies who lie” who signed a statement in October 2020 claiming Hunter Biden’s laptop was likely a Russian disinformation operation were on the CIA’s payroll at the time.

    Another waste of time and money, and proof the Republiscums/QAnon are not fit to
    govern.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eunice Wunderlich@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 30 04:26:02 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.org.cia, sac.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    On 29 Dec 2023, "RKBA! Mass Killings Are Codified in The 2A" <elonx@protonmail.com> posted some news:umns1d$11765$3@dont-email.me:

    Biden is doing his best to cover up his crimes using the office of the Presidency.

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) is investigating
    whether any of the 51 spies who lie who signed a statement in October
    2020 claiming Hunter Bidens laptop was likely a Russian disinformation operation were on the CIAs payroll at the time.

    [W]e understand that former intelligence officials often return to the intelligence community under private contract for their previous
    agencies, Jordan wrote in a Dec. 4 letter to CIA Director William Burns obtained by The Post.

    It is vital to the Committees oversight to understand whether any of
    the signatories of the public statement were actively employed by CIA as contractors or consultants at the time they signed the public
    statement.

    Jordan gave Burns until Dec. 15 to reveal any of the 51 signers who have
    been on an active contract or consulting for the CIA at any time since
    Jan. 1, 2020, and in what capacity especially if their work related to
    the Biden family.

    Jordan also said the CIA has not complied with records requests that his
    panel submitted in May, citing fundamental concerns about the role of
    the CIA in helping to falsely discredit allegations about the Biden
    family in the weeks before the 2020 presidential election.

    The Judiciary chairman said that earlier production of documents
    indicated initially unclassified records had been marked as classified
    before coming into the committees hands and that the records related directly to the CIAs awareness of the public statement before its publication.

    After a careful review of the classified production of documents that
    were originally unclassified and retained their previous unclassified
    markings, it is apparent that the classification of these documents was
    not for the purpose of protecting American national security, but rather
    to shield the CIA from potential embarrassment, Jordan wrote.

    Thus, it appears that the CIAs decision to baselessly classify these documents frustrates and impedes the Committees ability to fulfill our constitutional oversight obligations.

    Jordan had threatened to subpoena the CIA in May if it declined to hand
    over the information.

    The Oct. 18 open letter sought to discredit The Posts bombshell
    reporting that the first son had involved his father, then-presidential candidate Joe Biden, in his lucrative overseas business ventures,
    according to emails found on his abandoned laptop.

    The 51 officials said the leaked emails possessed all the classic
    earmarks of a Russian information operation, a claim which Big Tech
    platforms like Facebook and Twitter used to suppress the storys reach,
    saying The Post report violated their policies concerning hacked
    material.

    The social media companies censored The Post even after having been
    informed by the FBI that the contents of the laptop were authentic.

    The Post revealed many of the signatories on its March 19, 2022, front
    page, one of whom was later discovered to be a former CIA agent who was employed at Twitter on Election Day 2020.

    Former CIA acting director Mike Morell had recruited the signatories
    after having spoken with then-Biden campaign adviser Antony Blinken, now secretary of state.

    Then-candidate Joe Biden referenced the letter during the second and
    final presidential debate against former President Donald Trump on Oct.
    22, 2020, falsely claiming the laptop to be a Russian plant.

    David Cariens, a former CIA analyst, revealed that Morell had asked for
    the analysts signature on the infamous letter when Cariens was speaking
    with the agencys Prepublication Classification Review Board about his forthcoming memoir.

    That exchange and others about the CIAs knowledge of the letter were
    disclosed by the House Judiciary Committee in a May staff report.

    Under questioning from reporters, several former intelligence officials
    who signed the letter have chosen to defend the statement, with
    Obama-era CIA Director Leon Panetta telling Fox News in October, No, I
    dont have any regrets.

    https://nypost.com/2023/12/08/news/jordan-probes-if-spies-who-lie-signers -were-cia-workers/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)