• JOE BIDEN'S BOTCHED AFGHANISTAN EXIT Is A Disaster At Home And ... - CN

    From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 26 15:50:11 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    Biden's Botched Afghan Exit Is A Disaster At Home And Abroad Long In The Making

    ANOTHER BLOW TO THE US IMAGE ABROAD

    BIDEN CARRIES THE CAN

    (CNN) The debacle of the US defeat and chaotic retreat in Afghanistan is a political disaster for Joe Biden, whose failure to orchestrate an urgent and orderly exit will further rock a presidency plagued by crises and stain his legacy.

    But a stunning Taliban blitzkrieg followed more than 20 years of US and allied policy failures, misunderstandings of Afghan politics and culture, public war fatigue and the culpability and corruption of the failed state's leaders.

    And while Biden's political and geopolitical rivals rush to exploit his mistakes, the true magnitude of the crisis can only be judged in the human tragedy of a people again subject to Taliban persecution. And a failure to fulfill the now apparently near-impossible tasks of evacuating all the Afghan translators, workers and fixers on whom the US relied and who now face Taliban retribution would besmirch America's conscience and global reputation.

    "It is a stain on our nation's integrity and honor that even just a few months ago, we were not meeting our obligation to the men and women, our Afghan allies who served alongside us," Jake Wood, a former US Marine and Afghan war veteran, told CNN's Pamela Brown on Sunday. "We owe them the special immigrant visas. We owe them safety, every bit as much as we owe safety to our embassy workers in Kabul.

    What will an Afghanistan under the Taliban look like? Its rise to power in the '90s paints a grim picture

    Biden remained at the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland on Monday morning, but was set to return to the White House to address the nation during the afternoon. Senior national security officials appeared on television news shows in an apparent effort to counter the impression that the administration had been badly overtaken by events.

    After video emerged of Afghans flooding the tarmac at Kabul airport, deputy national security adviser Jon Finer admitted that the airport was crowded with "desperate" Afghans wanting to leave, but insisted on CNN's "New Day" that the US had the forces in place "that are necessary to bring stability and security to that airport."

    Biden's national security adviser Jake Sullivan deflected the blame for the scenes of chaos in Kabul, saying on ABC News that the President would speak to Americans "soon." And he blamed Afghan armed forces for folding in the face of the lightning Taliban advance.

    "(Biden) thought the Afghan national security forces could step up and fight because we spent 20 years, tens of billions of dollars training them, giving them the best equipment, giving them support of US forces for 20 years and when push came to shove, they decided not to step up and fight for their country," Sullivan said.

    The US launched the Afghan war 20 years ago in a mood of vengeance, resolve and unity, after al Qaeda's attacks on New York and Washington shattered the post- Cold War myth of American hyper power. It is ending it in a rushed race to get out, humbled by a primitive militia, that is nevertheless ready to die for jihad on its home soil and is re-imposing its feudal writ on a war-ravaged nation that bleeds foreign invaders dry.

    That a war that killed or maimed thousands of Americans, many more Afghan civilians and cost a trillion dollars, ended so abruptly with such an ignominious eclipse was shocking. But it perhaps should not have been.

    Ironically, Biden's mismanagement of the withdrawal from Afghanistan underscored his core point - that US visions of forging a functioning nation were illusory and that many more years of US involvement would not make any difference. The evaporating Afghan forces and police that the US spent billions building up to fight the Taliban mystified many Washington officials. This encapsulated how top military brass and diplomats were misled by their own preconceptions and the investment of years of US blood and treasure, troops surges, drawdowns, diplomatic offensives and arbitrary timelines to leave.

    The sudden Afghan crisis, that developed at stunning speed - at least to most people in Washington who had long since looked away from the country's longest war - is the most serious political reversal yet for Biden. And it came only days after he celebrated his biggest victories so far - the passage of more than $4.5 trillion combined in infrastructure and budget spending through the Senate. The win defied the skeptics who had long mocked his vow to bring Republicans and Democrats together, followed his earlier signing of a huge Covid-19 relief bill and bolstered his reputation as an effective domestic leader. Much of that momentum - at least for now - risks being drowned out by the imagery of American defeat abroad.
    Biden carries the can

    Biden now finds himself carrying the political can for two decades of the missteps of others - after adding his own errors. He will be accused of rushing the US exit to create a favorable political narrative as the President who got US troops home before the 20th anniversary of the September 11 attacks in 2001 - plotted by al Qaeda from Afghanistan - and ahead of next year's midterm congressional elections.

    At the same time, Biden was doing exactly what most Americans, exhausted by long years of foreign quagmires and confused as to why US troops were still in Afghanistan 20 years after 9/11, wanted. There was no national support for escalating the war. To check the Taliban advance, the President would have had to deploy thousands more US troops and to wage new combat without public support. That and his own long-term skepticism about the war left his own withdrawal decision almost inevitable. But the strength of the Taliban advance caught the White House flat footed.

    Try as Secretary of State Antony Blinken did on Sunday talk shows, there is no way to spin events of the last few days as anything but a domestic political, and geopolitical, wreck.

    After telling troops to leave, Biden has now had to retain 6,000 of their comrades in Afghanistan to secure the retreat of US personnel at the embassy as Kabul airport is besieged with crowds wanting to leave.

    A failure to safely get all Americans out, or any ensuing US troop casualties, would threaten catastrophic political damage for the President amid fresh comparisons with the haunting US legacy of Vietnam.
    Smoke rises next to the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, Sunday, Aug. 15, 2021. Taliban fighters entered the outskirts of the Afghan capital on Sunday, further tightening their grip on the country as panicked workers fled government offices and helicopters landed at the embassy. Wisps of smoke could be seen near the embassy's roof as diplomats urgently destroyed sensitive documents, according to two American military officials. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul)

    US completes evacuation of embassy in Afghanistan as flag comes down at diplomatic compound

    Biden's judgment as commander-in-chief is being called into question since he is on record, in damning video footage, saying that the Taliban's victory was "not inevitable." He said there would be no Saigon-style pictures of helicopters lifting off the roof of the US embassy in Kabul. That exact scenario unfolded this weekend after the US rushed to get its people out, and the Stars and Stripes was run down the flagpole as the fundamentalist militia routed by the United States in 2001, surged back into the Afghan capital.

    Biden was at Camp David all weekend and did not speak to the American people on camera. He did release a paper statement justifying his decision to leave Afghanistan, in which he spoke, misleadingly, about an "orderly" evacuation. And photos of Biden in a secure conference room at the presidential retreat, in a polo shirt, speaking with officials on screen, hardly promoted the intended image of an engaged commander-in-chief.
    Republicans attack

    On CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, Blinken argued that the US had completed its mission - crushing al Qaeda - and that Biden had been left in an impossible position by ex-President Donald Trump's deal with the Taliban for the US to leave for good in May, a deadline slightly extended by his successor.

    If Biden had breached that agreement, Blinken said: "We would have been back at war with the Taliban. And we would have been back at war, with tens of thousands of troops having to go in, because the 2,500 troops we had there and the air power would not have sufficed to deal with the situation." Despite his defense of the administration's preparations, Blinken did express surprise at the "hollowness" of the Afghan forces and their collapse and the swift folding of the US-backed democratic government in Kabul.

    The Secretary of State made some solid points. The initial US victory in Afghanistan over al Qaeda and the Taliban for harboring Osama bin Laden's terror group did prevent any repeat of 9/11. And Trump did intend for an even quicker withdrawal than Biden. It's not clear if Trump put any plans in motion to secure an evacuation of US personnel, embassy staff or Afghan translators who supported two decades of US military effort when he signed an agreement with the Taliban to pull US troops out by May of this year.

    The Trump administration's decision to hold negotiations with the Taliban - who Trump had hoped to invite to Camp David - without the Afghan government present - made Afghan government officials and security forces question the support of the US, some analysts say.

    Scenes from the Afghan capital left the President open to easy Republican attacks.

    "I ask President Biden to stop finding excuses for his own mistakes and address the country in person," House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy of California said in a statement. Republican Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell complained about the "botched" exit from Afghanistan, adding in a statement: "Everyone saw this coming except the President, who publicly and confidently dismissed these threats just a few weeks ago." On "State of the Union," the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas, blasted Biden for presiding over an "unmitigated disaster of epic proportions."

    That many of those aiming the sharpest criticism of Biden advocated the kind of hawkish policies and long engagement in Afghanistan that failed year-after- year, and helped lead to this weekend, is unlikely to quell the political storm raging around the President.
    Another blow to the US image abroad

    Biden's challenge must now prevent a narrative of failure developing around his administration. The President was already faced with a resurgence of the pandemic - thanks to the refusal of many conservatives to take free, life- saving vaccinations. And despite soaring job creation numbers and Biden's infrastructure win, Republicans are citing rising inflation and record numbers of undocumented migrants being turned back at the US border to claim his presidency is in crisis.

    Still, given the deep skepticism of the American public about the cost and the outcome of the post-9/11 wars, snap judgments that the current crisis will permanently wound Biden are premature.

    Internationally however, the messy US exit from Afghanistan will spur doubts about Washington's steadfastness as an ally.

    After declaring "America is back" following the alienating and destabilizing Trump era on his first overseas trip to Europe earlier this summer, Biden's first real foreign policy crisis is over a botched US retreat. And the President's clarion calls for the protection of democracy abroad will be undermined by his decision to abandon a fragile democratic government in Afghanistan.

    ============================================================================

    Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White- Religious Freak, Joe Biden

    Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

    =====

    Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

    https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

    https://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

    =====

    Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press Conference
    https://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo?t=32

    Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a- story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


    Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow. https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


    Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


    Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History? https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


    Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
    https://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


    Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
    https://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


    Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect' https://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


    Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxxAyHgBiNU


    Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
    https://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


    Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred https://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


    Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYch-1fRhiE


    Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero Sense!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg4OUk0qyWM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Tue Dec 26 14:45:06 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2023-12-26 13:50, AlleyCat wrote:

    Biden's Botched Afghan Exit Is A Disaster At Home And Abroad Long In The Making


    Hmmmmmm... "Long in the making": what do you suppose that means?

    Do you think they only meant the 7 months Biden was in office before the
    last withdrawal of US troops was all they were talking about?

    I'll leave in the part you probably didn't even bother to read:

    On CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, Blinken argued that the US had completed its mission - crushing al Qaeda - and that Biden had been left in an
    impossible position by ex-President Donald Trump's deal with the Taliban for the US to leave for good in May, a deadline slightly extended by his successor.

    And Trump's release of all those Taliban prisoners...

    ...do you think that played no role?

    'By early 2018, it was clear President Trump wanted out of Afghanistan regardless of the alarming outcomes the intelligence community
    cautioned. But he likewise did not want to preside over the nightmarish
    scenes we’ve witnessed. Then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was the
    principal architect of America’s engagement with the Taliban that
    culminated with the catastrophic February 2020 withdrawal agreement,
    terms intended to get the president through the coming elections.'

    <https://www.justsecurity.org/77801/cias-former-counterterrorism-chief-for-the-region-afghanistan-not-an-intelligence-failure-something-much-worse/>

    But who's this guy to know?

    'As CIA’s Counterterrorism Chief for South and Southwest Asia before my
    2019 retirement, I was responsible for assessments concerning
    Afghanistan prepared for former President Donald Trump. And as a
    volunteer with candidate Joe Biden’s counterterrorism working group, I consulted on these same issues. The decision Trump made, and Biden
    ratified, to rapidly withdraw U.S. forces came despite warnings
    projecting the outcome we’re now witnessing.'

    'The decision Trump made' to 'get [him] through the coming elections'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pothead@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Dec 26 23:38:07 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2023-12-26, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-12-26 13:50, AlleyCat wrote:

    Biden's Botched Afghan Exit Is A Disaster At Home And Abroad Long In The Making


    Hmmmmmm... "Long in the making": what do you suppose that means?

    Do you think they only meant the 7 months Biden was in office before the
    last withdrawal of US troops was all they were talking about?

    I'll leave in the part you probably didn't even bother to read:

    On CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, Blinken argued that the US had
    completed its mission - crushing al Qaeda - and that Biden had been left in an
    impossible position by ex-President Donald Trump's deal with the Taliban for >> the US to leave for good in May, a deadline slightly extended by his successor.

    And Trump's release of all those Taliban prisoners...

    ...do you think that played no role?

    'By early 2018, it was clear President Trump wanted out of Afghanistan regardless of the alarming outcomes the intelligence community
    cautioned. But he likewise did not want to preside over the nightmarish scenes we’ve witnessed. Then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was the principal architect of America’s engagement with the Taliban that culminated with the catastrophic February 2020 withdrawal agreement,
    terms intended to get the president through the coming elections.'

    <https://www.justsecurity.org/77801/cias-former-counterterrorism-chief-for-the-region-afghanistan-not-an-intelligence-failure-something-much-worse/>

    But who's this guy to know?

    'As CIA’s Counterterrorism Chief for South and Southwest Asia before my 2019 retirement, I was responsible for assessments concerning
    Afghanistan prepared for former President Donald Trump. And as a
    volunteer with candidate Joe Biden’s counterterrorism working group, I consulted on these same issues. The decision Trump made, and Biden
    ratified, to rapidly withdraw U.S. forces came despite warnings
    projecting the outcome we’re now witnessing.'

    'The decision Trump made' to 'get [him] through the coming elections'

    As usual the libtard twists things to make Biden look good, impossible BTW, and Trump look bad.
    the point is not WHEN the withdrawal took place but the method and timeline WHICH was used to
    withdraw.

    1. Nothing was holding Biden to any date.That was his decision just as it would have been Trump's.
    2. Even a first year cadet knows you never do the following:

    A. Enlist the enemy to assist in securing the location until the withdrawal is complete.
    B. Withdraw the military prior to citizens evacuating.
    C. Turn over a strategic military base / airport to the enemy.
    D. Abandon high tech military gear, and to the tune of some $80 billion dollars.
    E. Trust the enemy.
    Biden held all the cards and he ended up giving the enemy a royal flush.
    The man is an idiot.
    --
    pothead
    Tommy Chong For President 2024.
    Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
    Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 26 17:44:40 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:45:06 -0800, Alan says...

    Biden's Botched Afghan Exit Is A Disaster At Home And Abroad Long In The Making


    Hmmmmmm... "Long in the making": what do you suppose that means?

    Biden's Botched Afghan Exit

    NOT Trump's.

    End of story.

    ============================================================================

    Holier-than-thou LIBERAL Canadians, think they're soooo superior when it comes to slavery, because they "ended" it (not really) a mere 30 years earlier.

    The Reality of Anti-Black Racism in Canada | BCG https://www.bcg.com/en-ca/publications/2020/reality-of-anti-black-racism-in- canada
    Anti-Black racism in Canada is worse than most Canadians want to believe. With the COVID-19 pandemic amplifying the injustices against Black People, it is now more important than ever for Canadians to take action.

    Racism & the Canadian historical past ... https://divercityvisa.com/racism-the-americanization-of-canadian-historical- past-why-we-should-not-take-a-look-at-ourselves-by-a-u-s-lens
    The Canadian response to racism south of the border will be described as an Americanization of Canadian historical past. The media's lack of protection of racism in Canada, in its traditionally correct context, is a trigger for concern. Totally different histories of racism.

    Racism in Canada | News, Videos & Articles https://globalnews.ca/tag/racism-in-canada
    Canadian MPs vote to condemn Atlanta mass shooting, anti-Asian racism. The move comes days after eight people were killed by a white gunman in Atlanta. Six of the victims were Asian American women ...

    Anti-Asian Racism Lead, The Canadian Race Relations ... https://cpac-canada.ca/anti-asian-racism-lead
    The Canadian Race Relations Foundation (CRRF) was created in 1996 to reaffirm the principles of justice and equality for all in Canada. The CRRF's mandate is to facilitate throughout Canada the development, sharing, and application of knowledge and expertise to eliminate racism and all forms of racial discrimination in Canadian society.

    Is Canada a racist country? One-third of respondents in a ... https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2021/06/21/is-canada-a-racist-country- one-third-of-respondents-in-a-new-study-say-yes.html
    Jun 21, 2021
    One-third of respondents in a new study say yes. Most Canadians agree that Canada's diverse population makes it a better country. But on the question of whether or not Canada is a racist country ...

    Most Canadians Experience Racism ... - New Canadian Media https://newcanadianmedia.ca/most-canadians-experience-racism-where-they-live- survey
    Canadian racism is sometimes called 'polite' and is characterized by microaggressions, but that is a misnomer. Words like that are used to deflect criticisms and differentiate Canada from the United States, says Henry, though she does see similar ideologies and motivations.

    Canada Must Withdraw From Racist Core Group - Yves Angler https://yvesengler.com/2021/10/24/canada-must-withdraw-from-racist-core-group The least Canadian antiracist activists should do is educate themselves about racism in foreign affairs. There is no justification for Canada participating in this nakedly imperialist alliance. All Canadians of conscience owe a debt of solidarity to the people of Haiti. We must demand Ottawa immediately withdraw from the racist Core Group.

    Sikh Canadians Surge Politically In "Systemically Racist ... https://capforcanada.com/sikh-canadians-surge-politically-in-systemically- racist-canada
    "The reality is, our Canada is a place of racism, of violence." - NDP Party Leader Jagmeet Singh, June 14th 2021. An unprecedented event occurred last night in Alberta, Canada. Sikh-Canadian candidates won in both Calgary and Edmonton mayoral elections.. Jhoti Gondek is the first Sikh-Canadian to become mayor of Calgary. She will be taking over from Naheed Nenshi, three-time winner as ...

    Racism at IRCC could determine who gets in - New Canadian ... https://newcanadianmedia.ca/racism-at-ircc-could-determine-who-gets-in

    IRCC employees are reporting racist workplace behaviour such as racially- charged microaggressions at work, says survey. NCM reporter Isabel Inclan reports on the deeper fallout. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) employees remain skeptical of the measures in place to tackle racism at their workplace, according to a new report.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Tue Dec 26 15:59:41 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2023-12-26 15:44, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:45:06 -0800, Alan says...

    Biden's Botched Afghan Exit Is A Disaster At Home And Abroad Long In The Making


    Hmmmmmm... "Long in the making": what do you suppose that means?

    Biden's Botched Afghan Exit

    NOT Trump's.

    End of story.

    Which is why you had to snip out all that parts that explain the "Long
    in the Making" part (which you also didn't include in your "End of story".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruise@21:1/5 to pothead on Tue Dec 26 16:20:48 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    pothead wrote:
    1. Nothing was holding Biden to any date.That was his decision just as it would have been Trump's.

    The US can ignore any agreement we make. That lets other countries
    know when the US gives it word it ain't worth shit.

    2. Even a first year cadet knows you never do the following:

    What about a first year State Department worker bee?

    A. Enlist the enemy to assist in securing the location until the withdrawal is complete.
    B. Withdraw the military prior to citizens evacuating.
    C. Turn over a strategic military base / airport to the enemy.

    By 'the enemy' are you referring to the government of sovereign
    Afghanistan?

    D. Abandon high tech military gear, and to the tune of some $80 billion dollars.

    So in addition to breaking our promise you wanted us to steal the
    property of sovereign Afghanistan. When do we get to rob Ukraine?

    E. Trust the enemy.

    The government of Afghanistan?

    Biden held all the cards and he ended up giving the enemy a royal flush.
    The man is an idiot.

    Who sorted the deck?

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 26 18:47:06 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    LOL... Even Rudy's Shit-Standard In Journalism Says Withdrawal All Biden's Fault - And Doesn't Even Mention Trump

    On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 15:47:16 -0800, Rudy "Mighty Mouse" Canoza says...

    Biden's Botched Afghan Exit

    NOT Trump's.

    Trump's. Trump locked it into place

    LOL... yeah, and Biden didn't reverse or stop ANY policy Trump had in place, when he robbed Trump and stole the White House.

    You are one stupid fucking undeserved narcissist.

    Your own shit-standard in journalism says it was BIDEN'S fault.

    =====

    Pay attention to the CAPITALIZED WORDS, moron.

    Guess what, cocksucker? The New York Times doesn't even MENTION Trump,

    The New York Times:

    Miscue After Miscue, U.S. Exit Plan Unravels

    President BIDEN PROMISED an orderly withdrawal.

    WASHINGTON - The nation's top national security officials assembled at the Pentagon early on April 24 for a secret meeting TO PLAN THE FINAL WITHDRAWAL OF AMERICAN TROOPS FROM AFGHANISTAN. It was two weeks after President Biden had announced the exit over the objection of his generals, but now they were carrying out his orders.

    (that means it was a NEW plan, from the BIDEN administration... NOT Trump's, you fucking idiot)

    In a secure room in the building's "extreme basement," two floors below ground level, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III and Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, met with top White House and intelligence officials. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken joined by video conference. After four hours, two things were clear.

    First, Pentagon officials said they could pull out the remaining 3,500 American troops, almost all deployed at Bagram Air Base, by July 4 - two months earlier than the Sept. 11 deadline MR. BIDEN HAD SET.

    THE PLAN (NOT Trump's) would mean closing the airfield that was the American military hub in Afghanistan, but Defense Department officials did not want a dwindling, vulnerable force and the risks of service members dying in a war declared lost.

    Second, State Department officials said they would keep the American Embassy open, with more than 1,400 remaining Americans protected by 650 Marines and soldiers. An intelligence assessment presented at the meeting estimated that Afghan forces could hold off the Taliban for one to two years. There was brief talk of an emergency evacuation plan - helicopters would ferry Americans to the civilian airport in Kabul, the capital - but no one raised, let alone imagined, what the United States would do if the Taliban gained control of access to that airport, the only safe way in and out of the country once Bagram closed.

    The (NEW BIDEN) plan was a good one, the group concluded.

    FOUR MONTHS LATER, THE PLAN IS IN SHAMBLES AS MR. BIDEN struggles to explain how a withdrawal most Americans supported went so badly wrong in its execution. On Friday, as scenes of continuing chaos and suffering at the airport were broadcast around the world, Mr. Biden went so far as to say that "I cannot promise what the final outcome will be, or what it will be that it will be without risk of loss."

    Interviews with key participants in the last days of the war show a series of misjudgments and THE FAILURE OF MR. BIDEN'S CALCULATION that pulling out American troops - prioritizing their safety before evacuating American citizens and Afghan allies - would result in an orderly withdrawal.

    Biden administration officials consistently believed they had the luxury of time. Military commanders overestimated the will of the Afghan forces to fight for their own country and underestimated how much the American withdrawal would destroy their confidence. The administration put too much faith in President Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan, who fled Kabul as it fell.

    And although Biden White House officials say that they held more than 50 meetings on embassy security and evacuations, and that so far no Americans have died in the operation, all the planning failed to prevent the mayhem when the Taliban took over Kabul in a matter of days.

    Only in recent weeks did the administration change course from its original plan. By then it was too late.

    A Sinking Feeling

    Five days after the April meeting at the Pentagon, General Milley told reporters on a flight back to Washington from Hawaii that the Afghan government's troops were "reasonably well equipped, reasonably well trained, reasonably well led." He declined to say whether they could stand on their own without support from the United States.

    THE PRESIDENT'S TOP INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS echoed that uncertainty, privately offering concerns about the Afghan abilities. But they still predicted that a complete Taliban takeover was not likely for at least 18 months. One senior administration official, discussing classified intelligence information that had been presented to Mr. Biden, said there was no sense that the Taliban were on the march.

    In fact, they were. Across Afghanistan the Taliban were methodically gathering strength by threatening tribal leaders in every community they entered with warnings to surrender or die. They collected weapons, ammunition, volunteers and money as they stormed from town to town, province to province.

    In May, they launched a major offensive in Helmand Province in the south and six other areas of Afghanistan, including Ghazni and Kandahar. Back in Washington, refugee groups grew increasingly alarmed by what was happening on the ground and feared Taliban retribution against thousands of translators, interpreters and others who had helped the American war effort.

    Leaders of the groups estimated that as many as 100,000 Afghans and family members were now targets for Taliban revenge. On May 6, representatives from several of the United States' largest refugee groups, including Human Rights First, the International Refugee Assistance Project, No One Left Behind, and the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service logged onto Zoom for a call with National Security Council staff members.

    The groups pleaded with the White House officials for a mass evacuation of Afghans and urged them not to rely on a backlogged special visa program that could keep Afghans waiting for months or years.

    There was no time for visas, they said, and Afghans had to be removed quickly to stay alive. The response was cordial but noncommittal, according to one participant, who recalled a sinking feeling afterward that the White House had no plan.

    Representative Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat, veteran and ally of Mr. Biden, echoed those concerns in his own discussions with the administration. Mr. Moulton said he told anyone who would listen at the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon that "they need to stop processing visas in Afghanistan and just get people to safety."

    But doing what Mr. Moulton and the refugee groups wanted would have meant launching a dangerous new military mission that would probably require a surge of troops just at the moment that Mr. Biden had announced the opposite. It also ran counter to what the Afghan government wanted, because a high-profile evacuation would amount to a vote of no confidence in the government and its forces.

    Instead, the State Department sped up its efforts to process visas and clear the backlog. Officials overhauled the lengthy screening and vetting process and reduced processing time - but only to under a year. Eventually, they issued more than 5,600 special visas from April to July, the largest number in the program's history but still a small fraction of the demand.

    The Taliban continued their advance as the embassy in Kabul urged Americans to leave. On April 27, the embassy had ordered nearly 3,000 members of its staff to depart, and on May 15, officials there sent the latest in a series of warnings to Americans in the country: "U.S. Embassy strongly suggests that U.S. citizens make plans to leave Afghanistan as soon as possible."

    A Tense Meeting With Ghani

    On June 25, Mr. Ghani met with Mr. Biden at the White House for what would become for the foreseeable future the last meeting between an American president and the Afghan leaders they had coaxed, cajoled and argued with over 20 years.

    When the cameras were on at the beginning of the meeting, Mr. Ghani and Mr. Biden expressed mutual admiration even though Mr. Ghani was fuming about the decision to pull out American troops. As soon as reporters were shooed out of the room, the tension was clear.

    Mr. Ghani, a former World Bank official whom Mr. Biden regarded as stubborn and arrogant, had three requests, according to an official familiar with the conversation. He wanted the United States to be "conservative" in granting exit visas to the interpreters and others, and "low key" about their leaving the country so it would not look as if America lacked faith in his government.

    He also wanted to speed up security assistance and secure an agreement for the U.S. military to continue to conduct airstrikes and provide overwatch from its planes and helicopters for his troops fighting the Taliban. American officials feared that the more they were drawn into direct combat with the militant group, the more its fighters would treat American diplomats as targets.

    Mr. Biden agreed to provide the air support and to not make a public show of the Afghan evacuations.

    Mr. Biden had his own request for Mr. Ghani. The Afghan forces were stretched too thin, Mr. Biden told him, and should not try to fight everywhere. He repeated American advice that Mr. Ghani consolidate Afghan forces around key locations, but Mr. Ghani never took it.

    A week later, on July 2, Mr. Biden, in an ebullient mood, gathered a small group of reporters to celebrate new jobs numbers that he said showed that his economic recovery plan was working. But all the questions he received were about news from Afghanistan that the United States had abandoned Bagram Air Base, with little to no notice to the Afghans.

    "It's a rational drawdown with our allies," he insisted, "so there's nothing unusual about it."

    But as the questions persisted, on Afghanistan rather than the economy, he grew visibly annoyed. He recalled Mr. Ghani's visit and said, "I think they have the capacity to be able to sustain the government," though he added that there would have to be negotiations with the Taliban.

    Then, for the first time, he was pressed on what the administration would do to save Kabul if it came under direct attack. "I want to talk about happy things, man," he said. He insisted there was a plan.

    "We have worked out an over-the-horizon capacity," he said, meaning the administration had contingency plans should things go badly. "But the Afghans are going to have to be able to do it themselves with the Air Force they have, which we're helping them maintain," he said. But by then, most of the U.S. contractors who helped keep the Afghan planes flying had been withdrawn from Bagram along with the troops. Military and intelligence officials acknowledge they were worried that the Afghans would not be able to stay in the air.

    By July 8, nearly all American forces were out of Afghanistan as the Taliban continued their surge across the country. In a speech that day from the White House defending his decision to leave, Mr. Biden was in a bind trying to express skepticism about the abilities of the Afghan forces while being careful not to undermine their government. Afterward, he angrily responded to a reporter's comparison to Vietnam by insisting that "there's going to be no circumstance where you see people being lifted off the roof of an embassy of the United States from Afghanistan. It is not at all comparable."

    But five days later, nearly two dozen American diplomats, all in the Kabul embassy, sent a memo directly to Mr. Blinken through the State Department's "dissent" channel. The cable, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, urged that evacuation flights for Afghans begin in two weeks and that the administration move faster to register them for visas.

    The next day, in a move already underway, the White House named a stepped-up effort "Operation Allies Refuge."

    By late July, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., the head of U.S. Central Command who oversees all military operations in the region, received permission from Mr. Austin to extend the deployment of the amphibious assault ship Iwo Jima in the Gulf of Oman, so that the Marines on board could be close enough to get to Afghanistan to evacuate Americans. A week later, Mr. Austin was concerned enough to order the expeditionary unit on the ship - some 2,000 Marines - to disembark and wait in Kuwait so that they could reach Afghanistan quickly.

    By Aug. 3, top national security officials met in Washington and heard an updated intelligence assessment: District capitals across Afghanistan were falling rapidly to the Taliban and the Afghan government could collapse in "days or weeks." It was not the most likely outcome, but it was an increasingly plausible one.

    "We're assisting the government so that the Talibs do not think this is going to be a cakewalk, that they can conquer and take over the country," the chief American envoy to Afghan peace talks, Zalmay Khalilzad, told the Aspen Security Forum on Aug. 3. Days later, however, that is exactly what happened.

    The End Game

    By Aug. 6, the maps in the Pentagon showed a spreading stain of areas under Taliban control. In some places, the Afghans had put up a fight, but in many others, there was just surrender.

    That same day in Washington, the Pentagon reviewed worst-case scenarios. If security further deteriorated, planning - begun days after Mr. Biden's withdrawal announcement in April - led by Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, the president's homeland security adviser, called for flying most of the embassy personnel out of the compound, and many out of the country, while a small core group of diplomats operated from a backup site at the airport.

    On its face, the Kabul airport made sense as an evacuation point. Close to the center of the city, it could be as little as a 12-minute drive and a three- minute helicopter flight from the embassy - logistics that had helped reassure planners after the closure of Bagram, which was more than 50 miles and a far longer drive from Kabul.

    By Wednesday, Aug. 11, the Taliban advances were so alarming that Mr. Biden asked his top national security advisers in the White House Situation Room if it was time to send the Marines to Kabul and to evacuate the embassy. He asked for an updated assessment of the situation and authorized the use of military planes for evacuating Afghan allies.

    Overnight in Washington, Kandahar and Ghazni were falling. National security officials were awakened as early as 4 a.m. on Aug. 12 and told to gather for an urgent meeting a few hours later to provide options to the president. Once assembled, Avril D. Haines, the director of national intelligence, told the group that the intelligence agencies could no longer assure that they could provide sufficient warning if the capital was about to be under siege.

    Everyone looked at one another, one participant said, and came to the same conclusion: It was time to get out. An hour later, Jake Sullivan, Mr. Biden's national security adviser, walked into the Oval Office to deliver the group's unanimous consensus to start an evacuation and deploy 3,000 Marines and Army soldiers to the airport.

    By Saturday, Aug. 14, Mr. Biden was at Camp David for what he hoped would be the start of a 10-day vacation. Instead, he spent much of the day on dire video conference calls with his top aides.

    On one of the calls, Mr. Austin urged all remaining personnel at the Kabul embassy be moved immediately to the airport. It was a stunning turnaround from what Ned Price, the State Department spokesman, had said two days earlier: "The embassy remains open, and we plan to continue our diplomatic work in Afghanistan." Ross Wilson, the acting U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan who was on the call, said the staff still needed 72 hours to leave.

    "You have to move now," Mr. Austin replied.

    Mr. Blinken spoke by phone to Mr. Ghani the same day. The Afghan president was defiant, according to one official familiar with the conversation, and insisted that he would defend Afghanistan until the end. He did not tell Mr. Blinken that he was already planning to flee his country, which American officials first learned by reading news reports.

    Later that day, the U.S. embassy in Afghanistan sent a message saying it would pay for American citizens to get out of the country, but warned that although there were reports that international commercial flights were still operating from Kabul, "seats may not be available."

    On Sunday, Mr. Ghani was gone. His departure - he would eventually turn up days later in the United Arab Emirates - and scenes of the Taliban celebrating at his presidential palace documented the collapse of the government. By the end of the day, the Taliban addressed the news media, declaring their intention to restore the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

    The evacuation of the Kabul embassy staff was by that point underway as diplomats rushed to board military helicopters for the short trip to the airport bunker.

    Others stayed behind long enough to burn sensitive documents. Another official said embassy helicopters were blown up or otherwise destroyed, which sent a cloud of smoke over the compound.

    Many Americans and Afghans could not reach the airport as Taliban fighters set up checkpoints on roads throughout the city and beat some people, leaving top F.B.I. officials concerned about the possibility that the Taliban or criminal gangs might kidnap Americans, a nightmare outcome with the U.S. military no longer in the country.

    As Mr. Biden made plans Sunday evening to address Americans the next day about the situation, the American flag was lowered over the abandoned embassy. The Green Zone, once the heart of the American effort to remake the country, was again Taliban territory.


    © 2023 The New York Times Company

    and Biden could do nothing about it.

    Wrong.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)