XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from
running for president and removed from the state ballot
under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection'

. . .

THIS is how bad Colorado has become ... PURE POLITICS
in the guise of Law.

Sorry, Trump has not been convicted of "insurrection"
anywhere and those judges NEVER heard a word of
testimony, NEVER saw a bit of evidence.

The USSC should have those judges arrested.

Wow, talk about OVERT "election interference" !

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

On 12/20/23 00:42, 56g.1173 wrote:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from
running for president and removed from the state ballot
under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection'

. . .

  THIS is how bad Colorado has become ... PURE POLITICS
  in the guise of Law.

  Sorry, Trump has not been convicted of "insurrection"
  anywhere and those judges NEVER heard a word of
  testimony, NEVER saw a bit of evidence.

  The USSC should have those judges arrested.

I am not certain that the US Supreme Court has such power.

  Wow, talk about OVERT "election interference" !

Agreed.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

"56g.1173" <56g.1173@ztq9.net> wrote in news:BYacnU45aIxDER_4nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Cour t-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from
running for president and removed from the state ballot
under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection'

. . .

THIS is how bad Colorado has become ... PURE POLITICS
in the guise of Law.

Sorry, Trump has not been convicted of "insurrection"
anywhere and those judges NEVER heard a word of
testimony, NEVER saw a bit of evidence.

The USSC should have those judges arrested.

The USSC has no such enforcement power.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

On 12/20/2023 4:30 AM, David Hartung wrote:

On 12/20/23 00:42, 56g.1173 wrote:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from
running for president and removed from the state ballot
under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection'

. . .

   THIS is how bad Colorado has become ... PURE POLITICS
   in the guise of Law.

   Sorry, Trump has not been convicted of "insurrection"
   anywhere and those judges NEVER heard a word of
   testimony, NEVER saw a bit of evidence.

   The USSC should have those judges arrested.

I am not certain that the US Supreme Court has such power.

Of course it doesn't. That proves that the poster is a complete fuckwit.

   Wow, talk about OVERT "election interference" !

Agreed.

False.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

On 12/19/2023 10:42 PM, 56g.1173 wrote:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from
running for president and removed from the state ballot
under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection'

. . .

  THIS is how bad Colorado has become

No, this is how *great* Colorado has become.

  Sorry, Trump has not been convicted of "insurrection"

No need for that based on the plain text of section 3 of the 14th amendment.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

On 12/20/23 09:49, 53h.1948 wrote:

On 12/19/2023 10:42 PM, 56g.1173 wrote:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from
running for president and removed from the state ballot
under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection'

. . .

   THIS is how bad Colorado has become

No, this is how *great* Colorado has become.

   Sorry, Trump has not been convicted of "insurrection"

No need for that based on the plain text of section 3 of the 14th
amendment.

That text does not deny one of due process. Trump is not legally guilty
of insurrection until he has been tried and convicted.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

On 12/20/2023 8:49 AM, 53h.1948 wrote:

On 12/19/2023 10:42 PM, 56g.1173 wrote:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from
running for president and removed from the state ballot
under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection'

. . .

   THIS is how bad Colorado has become

No, this is how *great* Colorado has become.

Exactly. The complainers are basically saying we shouldn't be a nation
of laws when they personally find laws inconvenient.

   Sorry, Trump has not been convicted of "insurrection"

No need for that based on the plain text of section 3 of the 14th
amendment.

True. The law doesn't say "convicted." It says "engaging" The world saw
Trump spur them on and then fail to act when it got violent. And now we
have seen the private messages that basically say they planned this
action and they tried to make it look like a spontaneous decision when
in fact it was premeditated.

If Trump checks in to the White House again, he will never leave.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

On 12/20/2023 8:49 AM, Max Boot wrote:

On 12/20/2023 4:30 AM, David Hartung wrote:

On 12/20/23 00:42, 56g.1173 wrote:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from
running for president and removed from the state ballot
under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection'

. . .

   THIS is how bad Colorado has become ... PURE POLITICS
   in the guise of Law.

   Sorry, Trump has not been convicted of "insurrection"
   anywhere and those judges NEVER heard a word of
   testimony, NEVER saw a bit of evidence.

   The USSC should have those judges arrested.

I am not certain that the US Supreme Court has such power.

Of course it doesn't. That proves that the poster is a complete fuckwit.

Exactly. If anyone wants to see actual politics in the guise of law,
just look at the example in Texas. https://news.yahoo.com/texas-lieutenant-governor-threatens-ban-153728072.html
These guys are really unclear on the concept of law.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

from

I wonder if Trump will one day be found dead by his own hand like Hilter?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)