• Re: HE'S SHOT: Biden [erase bullshit]

    From Charlie Glock@21:1/5 to pothead on Mon Dec 18 10:51:11 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 12/17/2023 8:39 AM, pothead wrote:

    It is kind of a conundrum indeed. I think it comes down to people wanting "free stuff" without
    regard to where the money is coming from and who is paying for this free stuff.

    "As of November 2023, there were 134.63 million full-time employees in the United States." https://www.statista.com/statistics/192361/unadjusted-monthly-number-of-full-time-employees-in-the-us/

    " In November 2023, around 27.52 million people were employed on a part-time basis in the United States." https://www.statista.com/statistics/192342/unadjusted-monthly-number-of-part-time-employees-in-the-us/

    I don't think most of these 162.15 million working people are looking for much in the way of "free stuff." Where do you *get* this bullshit, anyway?

    There are so many low information voters

    I notice that everyone who says that kind of bullshit always exempts themselves.
    Why is that? You do not give *any* impression of being a high-information anything. Neither does that mackerel-reeking cunt not-jane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pothead@21:1/5 to Charlie Glock on Mon Dec 18 23:46:35 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 2023-12-18, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
    On 12/17/2023 8:39 AM, pothead wrote:

    It is kind of a conundrum indeed. I think it comes down to people wanting "free stuff" without
    regard to where the money is coming from and who is paying for this free stuff.

    "As of November 2023, there were 134.63 million full-time employees in the United States." https://www.statista.com/statistics/192361/unadjusted-monthly-number-of-full-time-employees-in-the-us/

    " In November 2023, around 27.52 million people were employed on a part-time basis in the United States." https://www.statista.com/statistics/192342/unadjusted-monthly-number-of-part-time-employees-in-the-us/

    I don't think most of these 162.15 million working people are looking for much
    in the way of "free stuff." Where do you *get* this bullshit, anyway?

    There are so many low information voters

    I notice that everyone who says that kind of bullshit always exempts themselves.
    Why is that? You do not give *any* impression of being a high-information anything. Neither does that mackerel-reeking cunt not-jane.


    I can see that statistics is not your strong point Rudy.
    Hint: the first thing you need to look at is what is being measured and HOW is it being measured.
    You can start here<https://www.marketplace.org/2019/09/23/4-ways-to-measure-inflation/>

    --
    pothead
    Tommy Chong For President 2024.
    Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
    Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charlie Glock@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 18 17:02:43 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 12/18/2023 3:46 PM, "pothole," Nazi liar, lied:
    On 2023-12-18, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
    On 12/17/2023 8:39 AM, "pothole," Nazi liar, lied:

    It is kind of a conundrum indeed. I think it comes down to people wanting "free stuff" without
    regard to where the money is coming from and who is paying for this free stuff.

    "As of November 2023, there were 134.63 million full-time employees in the >> United States."
    https://www.statista.com/statistics/192361/unadjusted-monthly-number-of-full-time-employees-in-the-us/

    " In November 2023, around 27.52 million people were employed on a part-time >> basis in the United States."
    https://www.statista.com/statistics/192342/unadjusted-monthly-number-of-part-time-employees-in-the-us/

    I don't think most of these 162.15 million working people are looking for much
    in the way of "free stuff." Where do you *get* this bullshit, anyway?

    There are so many low information voters

    I notice that everyone who says that kind of bullshit always exempts themselves.
    Why is that? You do not give *any* impression of being a high-information
    anything. Neither does that mackerel-reeking cunt not-jane.


    I can see that statistics is not your strong point Rudy.

    Wrong.

    This is about you falsely imagining that you are *not* one of the low information voters. You are one of them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)