CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are interested in viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
Even democratic foghorn CNN is starting to realize supporting Biden is a losing path.
"CNN Host Stunned as Data Exposes Reality of Bidenomics: Depressing"
<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4203718/posts>
"A CNN host was left stunned when the networks data analyst revealed
data that highlighted the true state of the economy under Democrat
President Joe Biden.
During a Friday report, CNNs Erica Hill after data reporter Harry Enten laid out the economic numbers that expose the reality of so-called Bidenomics.
As Enten explained the figures and broke the bad news to CNNs viewers,
Hill remarked that Bidens economy is kind of depressing.
Enten explained that, despite other economic metrics trending in positive directions, the decline in disposable income largely explains Americans bleak view of the economy.
From the first year of a presidents term to now in a term, look at this, he said.
Weve actually had negative growth.
We have actually decreased the amount of disposable income weve had,
2.7% for the Biden administration.
Look at that. The average for the president since JFK is plus 4.5
percent.
And even in the last few months, the last six months, the growth that weve had just 0.2 percent.
The average six months since 1960 [is] 1.1 percent, so were even behind on that metric.
After hearing Enten spell doom for the economy, Hill said:
Thats kind of depressing.
It is kind of depressing, Enten agreed.
And the one last thing Ill note even wages here [are] not going up.
Median wage: minus one [percent] since pre-pandemic, minus one [percent] since Bidens first year.
Since last quarter? Zero percent.
Wages have been stagnant for a long time and its continuing to be so.
VIDEO AT LINK................
<https://slaynews.com/news/cnn-host-stunned-data-exposes-reality-
bidenomics-depressing/>
Inflation has ticked down from its high of more than nine percent in 2022
but remains higher than the Feds target rate of two percent.
Prices for rent, groceries, and transportation remain high, data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis shows.
Total prices are up 17.2 percent since Biden took office in January
2021."
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothead wrote:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are interested in viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news reporting. CNN is highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't credible
because you all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't cite
a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't make shit up as your bullshit sources do.
On 12/16/2023 7:07 AM, Paul Ragna wrote:
"CNN Host Stunned as Data Exposes Reality of ‘Bidenomics’: ‘Depressing’"
<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4203718/posts>
A lie from a lie site. The host was not "stunned" by anything at all.
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 7:07 AM, Paul Ragna wrote:
"CNN Host Stunned as Data Exposes Reality of ‘Bidenomics’: ‘Depressing’"
<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4203718/posts>
A lie from a lie site. The host was not "stunned" by anything at all.
And you snipped the link showing the original video from CNN.
Why did you do that Rudy?
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothead wrote:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are interested in viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news reporting. CNN is >> highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't credible
because you all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't cite
a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't make shit up as
your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you.
On 12/16/2023 8:36 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 7:07 AM, Paul Ragna wrote:
"CNN Host Stunned as Data Exposes Reality of ‘Bidenomics’: ‘Depressing’"
<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4203718/posts>
A lie from a lie site. The host was not "stunned" by anything at all.
And you snipped the link showing the original video from CNN.
Why did you do that Rudy?
Because I knew that that shitbag Ragna lied about the CNN host's demeanor.
On 12/16/2023 8:44 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothead wrote:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are interested in viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news reporting. CNN is >>> highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't credible
because you all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't cite
a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't make shit up as
your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you.
That Nazi punk kid extracted a small settlement from CNN because it was cheaper
to CNN than the expense of going to trial, where they risked a right-wingnut jury comprised of dirty shitbags like you going berserk and awarding the punk Nazi a much larger amount.
CNN did not say a single false thing about the Nazi white supremacist punk.
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothead wrote:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are
interested in viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news reporting. CNN
is highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers like you say CNN
isn't credible because you all say it, and you want to fit in. That's
all it is. You can't cite a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for
certain they don't make shit up as your bullshit sources do.
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:44 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:Goal post move alert !!
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are interested in viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news reporting. CNN is
highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't credible
because you all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't cite
a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't make shit up as
your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you.
That Nazi punk kid extracted a small settlement from CNN because it was cheaper
to CNN than the expense of going to trial, where they risked a right-wingnut >> jury comprised of dirty shitbags like you going berserk and awarding the punk
Nazi a much larger amount.
CNN did not say a single false thing about the Nazi white supremacist punk. >>
"CNN Host Stunned as Data Exposes Reality of ‘Bidenomics’: ‘Depressing’"
<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4203718/posts>
Charlie Glock wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothead wrote:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are interested in >>> viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news reporting. CNN is >> highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't
credible because you all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. >> You can't cite a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't >> make shit up as your bullshit sources do.
Does the phrase: "Trump Russian Collusion" ring a bell??
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 16:18:49 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-16, Paul Ragna <tpragna@gmail.com> wrote:
Even democratic foghorn CNN is starting to realize supporting Biden is a >>> losing path.
"CNN Host Stunned as Data Exposes Reality of ?Bidenomics?: ?Depressing?" >>>
<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4203718/posts>
Oh.
Free Republic.
*click*
Swill
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 16:44:39 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothead wrote:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are interested in viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news reporting. CNN is >>> highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't credible
because you all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't cite
a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't make shit up as
your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you. >><https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/07/media/cnn-settles-lawsuit-viral-video/index.html>
You might also wish to research "Hand's Up Don't Shoot".
"Nicholas Sandmann, the Covington student featured in most media coverage of the incident,
settled lawsuits with CNN, The Washington Post, and NBCUniversal.[14][15][16] He later
lost his suits against The New York Times, CBS, ABC, Rolling Stone, and Gannett.[17]"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Lincoln_Memorial_confrontation>
Swill
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 16:36:14 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 7:07 AM, Paul Ragna wrote:
"CNN Host Stunned as Data Exposes Reality of Bidenomics: Depressing"
<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4203718/posts>
A lie from a lie site. The host was not "stunned" by anything at all.
And you snipped the link showing the original video from CNN.
Why did you do that Rudy?
Things slow at the Jolly Kone today?
Here it is:
<https://slaynews.com/news/cnn-host-stunned-data-exposes-reality-bidenomics-depressing/>
That said, Rudy is right, the guy wasn't stunned at all. He reported on a consumer
survey.
Swill
On 2023-12-16, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 16:44:39 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-16, Charlie Glock <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothead wrote:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are interested in viewership which
directly translates into advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news reporting. CNN is
highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't credible
because you all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't cite
a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't make shit up as
your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you.
<https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/07/media/cnn-settles-lawsuit-viral-video/index.html>
You might also wish to research "Hand's Up Don't Shoot".
"Nicholas Sandmann, the Covington student featured in most media coverage of the incident,
settled lawsuits with CNN, The Washington Post, and NBCUniversal.[14][15][16] He later
lost his suits against The New York Times, CBS, ABC, Rolling Stone, and Gannett.[17]"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Lincoln_Memorial_confrontation>
Swill
Yea, but Sandman is a multi-millionaire and you aren't.
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 19:47:54 GMT, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-16, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 16:18:49 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-16, Paul Ragna <tpragna@gmail.com> wrote:
Even democratic foghorn CNN is starting to realize supporting Biden is a >>>>> losing path.
"CNN Host Stunned as Data Exposes Reality of ?Bidenomics?: ?Depressing?" >>>>>
<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4203718/posts>
Oh.
Free Republic.
*click*
Swill
It's a video of the show on CNN,
What's the difference who is hosting it?
Do you blame Youtube when you disagree with videos posted there?
The article is cleverly presented. I watched the video. The "negative growth" referred
to is in disposable income.
Harry did not appear "stunned" at all. Neither did Erica. The facts presented in the
video are simple survey results, clearly presented. Such freshness as there was appeared
to be surprise that with so many economic indicators up, the public is still concerned.
Polls are polls. If Christmas shopping beats the inflation rate this year, there is
plenty of confidence and the economy is in good shape.
If Christmas sales drop, there's a recession.
The video isn't at the link provided by the poster but at this one:
<https://slaynews.com/news/cnn-host-stunned-data-exposes-reality-bidenomics-depressing/>
DOW, NASDAQ and S&P 500 are all up, 200,000 new jobs and unemployment down to 3.7%.
Inflation is down to 3.1%
So, why then do 71% of consumers in CNN's survey rate economic conditions poor?
I suspect part of the issue is the inflation is lingering in some part due to producers
simply increasing profits and prices. The market will settle that and soon enough they'll
have everything back in stock, begging you to buy it again.
--
Swill
On 12/16/2023 8:55 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
On 2023-12-16, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:44 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
On 2023-12-16, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are
interested in viewership which directly translates into
advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news
reporting. CNN is highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers
like you say CNN isn't credible because you all say it, and you
want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't cite a single story
CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't make shit up as
your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you.
That Nazi punk kid extracted a small settlement from CNN because it
was cheaper to CNN than the expense of going to trial, where they
risked a right-wingnut jury comprised of dirty shitbags like you
going berserk and awarding the punk Nazi a much larger amount.
CNN did not say a single false thing about the Nazi white
supremacist punk.
Goal post move alert !!
Not at all. In order for a plaintiff to win a verdict in his favor in
a defamation suit, what the defendant said about the plaintiff has to
be found to be false. Nothing CNN said was false. In fact, CNN really
didn't say anything *themselves* about the Nazi punk. What they did
was report what Nathan Phillips said, and they accurately reported
Phillips's comments.
CNN and the Post caved in too fast. They should have held out. The
Nazi punk's suits against other news media, including the New York
Times (the Gold Standard) and Rolling Stone, were *thrown out* back
in August by a federal appeals court.
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2023/08/16/nick-sandmann-loses-appeal-in-defamation-suits-against-news-outlets/70605892007/
You lose, "pothole," you stupid Nazi shitbag.
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 14:30:17 -0800, "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:rTkfN.8795$taff.3331@fx41.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> typed:
On 12/16/2023 8:55 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
On 2023-12-16, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:44 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
On 2023-12-16, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are
interested in viewership which directly translates into
advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news
reporting. CNN is highly credible. Right-wingnut knuckle-draggers >>>>>>> like you say CNN isn't credible because you all say it, and you
want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't cite a single story
CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they don't make shit up as
your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you.
That Nazi punk kid extracted a small settlement from CNN because it
was cheaper to CNN than the expense of going to trial, where they
risked a right-wingnut jury comprised of dirty shitbags like you
going berserk and awarding the punk Nazi a much larger amount.
CNN did not say a single false thing about the Nazi white
supremacist punk.
Goal post move alert !!
Not at all. In order for a plaintiff to win a verdict in his favor in
a defamation suit, what the defendant said about the plaintiff has to
be found to be false. Nothing CNN said was false. In fact, CNN really
didn't say anything *themselves* about the Nazi punk. What they did
was report what Nathan Phillips said, and they accurately reported
Phillips's comments.
CNN and the Post caved in too fast. They should have held out. The
Nazi punk's suits against other news media, including the New York
Times (the Gold Standard) and Rolling Stone, were *thrown out* back
in August by a federal appeals court.
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2023/08/16/nick-sandmann-loses-appeal-in-defamation-suits-against-news-outlets/70605892007/
You lose, "pothole," you stupid Nazi shitbag.
"Now, this misuse of 'Nazi'
Language is filled with words with meanings distorted in usage. "Woke" is only a recent
one. While it began to indicate someone aware of social injustice in our institutions, it
was made to mean something radical, destructive and vile.
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 14:30:17 -0800, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:rTkfN.8795$taff.3331@fx41.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> typed:
On 12/16/2023 8:55 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
On 2023-12-16, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:44 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
On 2023-12-16, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn>
wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are
interested in viewership which directly translates into
advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news
reporting. CNN is highly credible. Right-wingnut
knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't credible because you
all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. You can't
cite a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain they
don't make shit up as your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you.
That Nazi punk kid extracted a small settlement from CNN because
it was cheaper to CNN than the expense of going to trial, where
they risked a right-wingnut jury comprised of dirty shitbags like
you going berserk and awarding the punk Nazi a much larger amount.
CNN did not say a single false thing about the Nazi white
supremacist punk.
Goal post move alert !!
Not at all. In order for a plaintiff to win a verdict in his favor
in a defamation suit, what the defendant said about the plaintiff
has to be found to be false. Nothing CNN said was false. In fact,
CNN really didn't say anything *themselves* about the Nazi punk.
What they did was report what Nathan Phillips said, and they
accurately reported Phillips's comments.
CNN and the Post caved in too fast. They should have held out. The
Nazi punk's suits against other news media, including the New York
Times (the Gold Standard) and Rolling Stone, were *thrown out* back
in August by a federal appeals court.
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2023/08/16/nick-sandmann-loses-appeal-in-defamation-suits-against-news-outlets/70605892007/
You lose, "pothole," you stupid Nazi shitbag.
"Now, this misuse of 'Nazi' is clearly an example of mainstream
historical and media propaganda. It is constantly applied to people
on the political right, who are diametrically opposed to those on
the left, i.e., socialists and communists. This, however, is simply
not the correct definition. The Nazis were socialists - just look
at their name! And just because they fought communists, that
doesn't make them right-wing. Trotskyite communists fought
Stalinists, but they both were communist/leftwing factions. The
Mensheviks fought the Bolsheviks, but both were leftwing.
"Further, the Nazi ideology is entirely opposite to that of the
conservative Americans to whom they are often lumped together (by
the mainstream media). An American conservative is a person who
believes in smaller government, less regulation, and more
individualism. A Nazi believed in big government, which regulated
everything and anything, and that the individual should prostrate
himself before the state and the state's leader, Adolf Hitler. And
if you don't believe me, check out any objective historical book....
"Words and definitions mean what they mean. Not what we want them
to mean. And changing their meaning is a misuse of language that
often obscures the facts and hinders the debate.
"Simply put, I don't think we should be doing that."
https://townhall.com/columnists/adamturner/2023/11/19/of-neocons-and-nazis-the-misuse-of-words-n2631396
Language is filled with words with meanings distorted in usage.
"Woke" is only a recent one. While it began to indicate someone
aware of social injustice in our institutions, it was made to mean
something radical, destructive and vile.
The fact is, having Socialist in their name didn't make Germany's
fascists leftists or even socialists. After all, North Korea is
officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, is it not?
The Nazis were a fascist party that believed in free markets, private enterprise, uber nationalism, authoritarianism and ethic exclusivity
among other qualities. This latter is why the alliance between
Mussolini and Hitler was so fraught. The Italians weren't Aryans and
the Germans weren't Italians.
It's that component of ethnic exclusivity that causes fascism to self destruct. It's why today we see so many white nationalists and other
racial 'purists' supporting Republican candidates...
... and issues at a time when the Party is fractured and crumbling like never before.
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:14:16 -0800, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:lj42oi5mdmemjjf92dtcdau3r4541gam5u@4ax.com, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> typed:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 14:30:17 -0800, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:rTkfN.8795$taff.3331@fx41.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<tpragna1900O@gmail.corn> typed:
On 12/16/2023 8:55 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied:
On 2023-12-16, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn>
wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:44 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag, lied: >>>>>>>> On 2023-12-16, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <tpragna1900O@gmail.corn>
wrote:
On 12/16/2023 8:18 AM, pothole, stupid lying Nazi shitbag,
lied:
CNN is no different than other media organizations. They are >>>>>>>>>> interested in viewership which directly translates into
advertising dollars.
They get and hold that viewership by providing solid news
reporting. CNN is highly credible. Right-wingnut
knuckle-draggers like you say CNN isn't credible because you >>>>>>>>> all say it, and you want to fit in. That's all it is. You
can't cite a single story CNN ever got wrong, and for certain >>>>>>>>> they don't make shit up as your bullshit sources do.
Nicolas Sandman would disagree with you.
That Nazi punk kid extracted a small settlement from CNN because >>>>>>> it was cheaper to CNN than the expense of going to trial, where
they risked a right-wingnut jury comprised of dirty shitbags
like you going berserk and awarding the punk Nazi a much larger
amount.
CNN did not say a single false thing about the Nazi white
supremacist punk.
Goal post move alert !!
Not at all. In order for a plaintiff to win a verdict in his favor
in a defamation suit, what the defendant said about the plaintiff
has to be found to be false. Nothing CNN said was false. In fact,
CNN really didn't say anything *themselves* about the Nazi punk.
What they did was report what Nathan Phillips said, and they
accurately reported Phillips's comments.
CNN and the Post caved in too fast. They should have held out. The
Nazi punk's suits against other news media, including the New York
Times (the Gold Standard) and Rolling Stone, were *thrown out*
back in August by a federal appeals court.
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2023/08/16/nick-sandmann-loses-appeal-in-defamation-suits-against-news-outlets/70605892007/
You lose, "pothole," you stupid Nazi shitbag.
"Now, this misuse of 'Nazi' is clearly an example of mainstream
historical and media propaganda. It is constantly applied to
people on the political right, who are diametrically opposed to
those on the left, i.e., socialists and communists. This,
however, is simply not the correct definition. The Nazis were
socialists - just look at their name! And just because they
fought communists, that doesn't make them right-wing. Trotskyite
communists fought Stalinists, but they both were
communist/leftwing factions. The Mensheviks fought the Bolsheviks,
but both were leftwing.
"Further, the Nazi ideology is entirely opposite to that of the
conservative Americans to whom they are often lumped together (by
the mainstream media). An American conservative is a person who
believes in smaller government, less regulation, and more
individualism. A Nazi believed in big government, which regulated
everything and anything, and that the individual should prostrate
himself before the state and the state's leader, Adolf Hitler. And
if you don't believe me, check out any objective historical
book....
"Words and definitions mean what they mean. Not what we want them
to mean. And changing their meaning is a misuse of language that
often obscures the facts and hinders the debate.
"Simply put, I don't think we should be doing that."
https://townhall.com/columnists/adamturner/2023/11/19/of-neocons-and-nazis-the-misuse-of-words-n2631396
Language is filled with words with meanings distorted in usage.
"Woke" is only a recent one. While it began to indicate someone
aware of social injustice in our institutions, it was made to mean
something radical, destructive and vile.
The fact is, having Socialist in their name didn't make Germany's
fascists leftists or even socialists. After all, North Korea is
officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, is it not?
The Nazis were a fascist party that believed in free markets,
private enterprise, uber nationalism, authoritarianism and ethic
exclusivity among other qualities. This latter is why the alliance between >>> Mussolini and Hitler was so fraught. The Italians weren't Aryans and
the Germans weren't Italians.
It's that component of ethnic exclusivity that causes fascism to
self destruct. It's why today we see so many white nationalists
and other racial 'purists' supporting Republican candidates...
Why?
Because the ethnicity practicing Fascism considers *their* nation,
*their* ethnicity to be superior. All others are inferior. This
fracturing of the society can fracture the nation. Consider the
economic losses Germany suffered when all those Jewish businesses
were forced to close. When one group in a society is bent on
destroying all the others, they're destroying the society itself.
... and issues at a time when the Party is fractured and crumbling
like never before.
Oh, bullshit..We see this everytime the incumbent president running
for re-election is of another party.
Right now, both parties are in disarray. Democrats are dismayed at
their choice of candidate and the Republicans are in disarray at
their . . . choice . . . hmmm. Seems like one of these is a lot like
the other.
If any "Party is fractured and crumbling like never before," it is
the Democrats with its no apparent leadership, an impotent Old Guard
looking on in horror as its Loony Left anti-Semites curse Israel and
cry for Ukraine. It's been a coalition of fringe groups for 50
years, united only in their reverence for abortion.
It took the Repubs how many votes to select a Speaker? Then, just a
few months later, they fired him and argued for weeks about his
replacement.
How many long time, experienced Republicans are leaving Congress?
McCarthy quit over hard line fractiousness. Ditto Paul Ryan and John
Boehner and oh yeah, Mitt Romney has announced his retirement from
the Senate for the same reason.
" Heck of a week for the Left. Gay porn in the Senate, swearing in
ceremony on child porn in Virginia, tranny tap dancers in the White
House, and Satanic statues in Iowa.
" What else am I missing? https://t.co/MIUaf715fq
" - Rep. Mike Collins (@RepMikeCollins) December 15, 2023"
None of which matters....
... What matters is what people think about the economy and any wedge issues >the GOP can drive home. What are they? Gay marriage (dead issue),...
... Roe (also a dead issue) ...
...and illegal immigration (must be allowed to continue!).
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 108:19:45 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,598 |