XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment


And all that noise about Trumps tax returns... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F-VugQAasAA9z_F?format=jpg&name=large


Oh sweetie, all they have are lies and innuendos... https://twitter.com/i/status/1721910574571745408


Because he is guilty dead to rights.


Those were the debts of corruption, not finance.


Shocker..
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F-VtjKdaQAAd4C-?format=jpg&name=large


Won't or Can't? Payment for loans my ass!


"We've investigated ourselves and deemed ourselves not guilty"


LOANS MY ASS

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely- have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health- study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals- more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have- a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer- from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a- mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody- else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have- mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be- mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 - 12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans

That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

House Oversight subpoenas Hunter Biden, James Biden, and business associate Rob Walker as part of its investigation into Biden Family business dealings.

Oversight Chair James Comer has also requested transcribed interviews with Joe Biden's Daughter-in-law and former Hunter love interest Hallie Biden, James Biden's wife Sara Biden, Hallie Biden's older sister Elizabeth Secundy, and Hunter Biden's wife Melissa Cohen.

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely- have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health- study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals- more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have- a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer- from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a- mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody- else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have- mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be- mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 - 12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans

That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

No evidence of your claim, means it's a lie, liberal.

How does money, not earned in a working capacity, show up in accounts that aren't loans?

If the money was earned, show us the money trail.

Fucking blowhard blowjobbing liberal.

=====

The White House today made clear to us that President Biden is refusing to hand over loan documents for any "loans" he provided to his brother, James Biden.

We've exposed nearly a quarter of a million of dollars that James Biden sent to Joe Biden as "loan repayments" that were funded by laundered China money and influence peddling schemes.

Is this what "the most transparent administration in history" is supposed to look like?

We won't be stopped by the President's stonewalling. We'll continue to follow the money, expose President Biden's corruption, and deliver accountability.


Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely- have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

Makes sense if these were legit loans...no problem...show the documents. Simple way to clear things up...right?

Won't provide documents, then you act like it's not a loan, but a bribery payment. As such, impeach.


Refusal to cooperate implies guilt. If it were really loans then he could just hand over the evidence.


So Trump is TOLD to had over his tax returns to Congress but you guys ask Biden pretty please and he tells you to ram it, you then run here and cry! MY GOD!


Am I allowed to just refuse to provide documents when the government asks me for them? I am starting to think I am going to try this method and site all these cases from left and right as proof I do not have to comply.


Comer should tell Biden look; we want to see one entry, and that's the original withdrawal of the money for the loan, and the bank can confirm it or not in this case.


Impeach him
There are no loans, no documents, its bribery money

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F-DGKedXsAACmrT?format=jpg&name=large

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health- study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals- more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have- a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer- from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a- mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody- else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have- mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be- mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 - 12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-08 11:10, AlleyCat wrote:

House Oversight subpoenas Hunter Biden, James Biden, and business associate Rob
Walker as part of its investigation into Biden Family business dealings.

Oversight Chair James Comer has also requested transcribed interviews with Joe
Biden's Daughter-in-law and former Hunter love interest Hallie Biden, James Biden's wife Sara Biden, Hallie Biden's older sister Elizabeth Secundy, and Hunter Biden's wife Melissa Cohen.

Good luck with that.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >>>> them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

Anything at all?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >>>>> them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore...

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

Anything at all?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >>>>>> them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

Got it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-08 15:38, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world, without proving what you claimed.

So you're claiming the converse?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world, without proving what you claimed.

Liberal fail... again.

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely- have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health- study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals- more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have- a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer- from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a- mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody- else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have- mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be- mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 - 12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >>>>>>> them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence. >>

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

Got it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:29:38 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 15:38, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world,
without proving what you claimed.

So you're claiming the converse?

I wear "New Balance".

We ALL wore Chuck Taylor All-Star Cons in Jr. High and High school.

Gold. Black trim.

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/qb0AAOSwgMZk7MT1/s-l1600.jpg

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely- have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health- study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals- more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have- a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer- from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a- mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody- else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have- mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be- mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 - 12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:49:05 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 11:10, AlleyCat wrote:

House Oversight subpoenas Hunter Biden, James Biden, and business associate Rob
Walker as part of its investigation into Biden Family business dealings.

Oversight Chair James Comer has also requested transcribed interviews with Joe
Biden's Daughter-in-law and former Hunter love interest Hallie Biden, James Biden's wife Sara Biden, Hallie Biden's older sister Elizabeth Secundy, and Hunter Biden's wife Melissa Cohen.

Good luck with that.

Thanks for admitting Biden and other Democrats, ESPECIALLY the Clintons, are protected and immune from prosecution, because Clinton and the Democrats OWN the 3-letter administrations like the DoJ, et al., under the threat of retaliation.

============================================================================

How many people do you personally know who have died mysteriously?

How about in plane crashes or car wrecks?

Bizarre suicides?

People beaten to death or murdered in a hail of bullets, or hung in a jail cell?

And what about violent freak accidents - like separate mountain biking and skiing collisions in Aspen, Colorado? Or barbells crushing a person's throat?

Apparently, if you're Bill or Hillary Clinton, the answer to that question is at least 33 - and possibly many more.

"Clinton body count or left-wing conspiracy? Three with ties to DNC mysteriously die."

Ted Koppel, then-anchor of ABC News' "Nightline," routinely had discussions on the issue following the July 20, 1993, death of White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster. In fact, he appeared on Koppel's show.

"One of the things I said was, 'Who knows what happened here? But let me ask you a question.' I said, 'Ted, how many people do you know in your life who've been murdered? Ted, how many people do you know in your life that have died under suspicious circumstances?'

"Of course, the answer is zilch, zero, nada, none, very few." "Ask the Clintons that question. And it's a significant number. It's a lot of people that they know who have died, who've been murdered.

"And the same question here from Rachel Alexander. It's amazing the cycle that exists with the Clintons. [Citing Townhall]: 'What it comes down to is this: how many other politicians have you heard of who have had so many mysterious deaths associated with them? You don't hear of a Bush body count - not even an Obama body count.' There is a Clinton body count."

==============================

Barbara Wise - Nov. 29, 1996

Barbara Wise, 48, was a 14-year Commerce Department staff member who worked with Ron Brown (see "Ron Brown" entry below, killed in a plane crash) and John Huang, who worked at the Worthen Bank in Little Rock, where he met then-Gov. Bill Clinton. Huang, who was born in China, was also a former executive of the Lippo Group in Indonesia. Huang met with Clinton at the White House 10 times between June 21 and June 27, 1994. As WND reported in 2000, "Right after that, Webster Hubbell ... received $100,000 from the Lippo Group. Shortly after the money was given to Mr. Hubbell, Huang obtained a secret clearance and an executive position as assistant secretary of the Commerce Department. While at the Commerce Department, Huang obtained secret materials on trade deals with Indonesia, China, Japan, Korea and the Middle East. Huang also obtained information on U.S. Patriot missile deals with South Korea and mobile artillery for Kuwait." Asked if he was a spy for Beijing, Huang reportedly took pleaded the Fifth Amendment nearly 2,000 times.

Wise's body was found partially nude and bruised in her office. Her death was attributed to natural causes, as Wise had reportedly received several blood transfusions for a liver ailment.

Ron Brown - April 3, 1996

Ron Brown, who had served as U.S. secretary of commerce, was killed in a plane crash after Hillary Clinton dispatched him on a dubious mission to a war-torn corner of the world, as WND reported. Brown and 34 others died when their Air Force plane crashed into a Croatian mountainside. Brown's flight left the Tuzla airport in Bosnia, a Muslim country where some were hostile to the American presence there.

"To protect his son Michael from prison, Ron Brown threatened to expose the White House's yet unrevealed Asian fundraising scheme, in which Brown had played a major role," wrote WND contributor and investigative writer Jack Cashill. "Just weeks before his death, Brown started going to church for the first time in ages. He was scared for his life and that of his confidante, Nolanda Hill."

Cashill noted that the Croatian government suddenly insisted on a Dubrovnik stop, a two-mile deviation from the flight path that the Air Force said was "inexplicable."

"For the first time ever on friendly soil, the White House ordered the Air Force to skip the 'safety' phase of the investigation and move directly to the 'accident' phase," Cashill wrote. "There would be no consideration other than accident, even though the airport was near the Bosnian border and in a potential hot fire zone.

"Three days after the crash and two days before his scheduled interview by the Air Force, the Croatian responsible for the airport's navigation system was found dead with a bullet hole in his chest," Cashill continued.

"A day later, every pathologist who viewed Brown's body back in America concluded that his head wound, at the very least, looked like a bullet hole."

There would be no autopsy. No forensic testing. No search for an exit wound. Head X-rays were destroyed, or "lost."

"The three Armed Forces pathologists and the forensic photographer who blew the whistle on this case had their careers destroyed," Cashill wrote. "... [T]he Armed Forces Institute of Pathology brass assured the public that Brown dies of 'multiple blunt force injuries to the head.' He was the only one of the 35 victims to have a reported head wound."

Charles Meissner - April 3, 1996

Charles Meissner, the assistant secretary of commerce, had issued John Huang a security clearance. (See "Ron Miller" and "Barbara Wise" entries.) He and Ron Brown were killed in a plane crash. (See "Ron Brown" entry.)

Stanley Huggins - June 23, 1994

Stanley Huggins reportedly had been investigating the Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan collapse (see "James McDougal" entry). Reports indicate he died of viral pneumonia before his 300 pages of findings could be released.

Bill Shelton - June 12, 1994

Bill Shelton was the fianc� of Kathy Ferguson (see "Kathy Ferguson" entry below), and he questioned whether Ferguson had actually committed suicide.

Shelton, too, was reported to have committed suicide with a gun at Ferguson's grave site.

Kathy Ferguson - May 10, 1994

Kathy Ferguson was reported to have died from a suicide in which she shot herself in the head, though her packed bags were found next to her body, possibly indicating she planned to leave her home.

Ferguson was the ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, who had been a co- defendant, along with Clinton, in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Danny Ferguson had escorted Paula Jones to Clinton's hotel room. Kathy Ferguson was a corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

James Bunch - Feb. 11, 1994

James Bunch, 46, a Texas state employee in Austin who ran a prostitution ring from his office, reportedly died from a suicide involving a gun. Bunch was said to have owned a "little black book" of influential people, including at least one "state legislator," from Texas and Arkansas who visited prostitutes. Bunch's files contained descriptions of his high-profile clients, their sexual preferences, the amount of money they were willing to spend, and whether they were "good" or "bad" clients who might hurt the escorts. According to a report in the Telegraph, "There [was] a possibility that juveniles were involved in his business. Police told the Associated Press Bunch was arrested and interrogated, but he hadn't appeared distraught or suicidal.

Gandy Baugh - Jan. 8, 1994

Gandy Baugh, who had been an attorney for Clinton pal and drug convict Dan Lasater, reportedly killed himself by leaping from a window of a tall building. Lasater, a figure in the Whitewater controversy, had been convicted of dealing cocaine and served six months in jail. But Clinton later pardoned him.

In 1984, Lasater had purchased Angel Fire Resort, a ski resort near Taos, New Mexico, and promoted it using Clinton's name. A U.S. Customs investigative report revealed the resort was used for drug operations and money laundering.

Ed Willey - Nov. 29, 1993

image: https://www.wnd.com/files/2014/05/kathleen-willey.jpg
Kathleen Willey

Kathleen Willey

In her book alleging a campaign of slander and intimidation orchestrated chiefly by Hillary Clinton, Kathleen Willey pointed a finger of suspicion at the former first couple for the death of her husband, Ed Willey, who was believed to have killed himself.

Kathleen Willey, who said she was groped by President Clinton in the White House, acknowledged in an interview with WND in November 2007 that she stood by the speculation she posed about her husband's demise in "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton."

Asked if she suspected her husband Ed, a lawyer and son of a prominent Virginia lawmaker, was murdered, Willey replied, "Most definitely."

Did she believe the Clintons were involved?

"I do have suspicions," Willey said, "yes."

It was Ed Willey's dire financial straits that prompted Kathleen, then a White House volunteer, to seek a meeting with President Clinton in the Oval Office to plead for a paying job and any other help the commander-in-chief could give.

But Willey alleges the Nov. 29, 1993, meeting ended abruptly when the president cornered her in a private passageway and sexually assaulted her.

At the time of that meeting, Clinton and Willey were unaware that Ed Willey was lying dead of a gunshot wound to his mouth in the woods near his car, parked on a hunting path in rural King and Queen County, Virginia.

What makes a book about Bill and Hillary Clinton so explosive that someone would STEAL it? Kathleen Willey tells America the shocking story in her book, "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton."

Kathleen Willey became known in the summer of 1997 after lawyers for Clinton accuser Paula Jones gave her name to a national magazine reporter. She was scheduled to become one of only three witnesses in the Clinton impeachment trial until some members of the House and Senate refused to allow her to testify.

In the book, Willey recounts numerous incidents she believes were designed to terrorize her into silence, with the latest taking place in September, just as the book was in its final stages.

As WND reported, Willey said she was the target of an unusual house burglary over the Labor Day weekend for which she blames the Clintons. While asleep upstairs in her Virginia home, she said, a copy of a manuscript for "Target" was stolen.

Willey told WND the break-in at her house reminded her of the widely reported incident 10 years ago in which she claimed she was threatened near her present Richmond-area home by a "jogger" just two days before she was to testify against President Clinton in the Jones case.

She contends elements of the autopsy report of her husband's death are inconsistent with suicide, pointing to similarities to the death of White House aide Vince Foster, also believed to have killed himself. (See "Vince Foster" entry.)

"I've seen too much evidence regarding other people who have been involved with the Clintons," she told WND.

Facing a deadline to repay hundreds of thousands of dollars he owed to "bad people" who threatened him, Ed Willey had an apparent motive for suicide, and five notes to loved ones were discovered by his secretary.

But Kathleen Willey writes "she could never understand how he could leave us," noting that while the letters are in his writing, "I also know that anyone would write anything at gunpoint."

What motive could anyone have to murder him?

Willey writes that after her husband's death, her friend Carole in Colorado told her something she had not known. Ed had confided to Carole's husband that he had taken a briefcase full of cash to Little Rock, Ark., during the presidential campaign.

Willey said she was shocked but acknowledged her husband could have done it. Later she found a reference on a blog that explored illegal fundraising activities by the Clintons and noted Ed Willey was known for "handling large briefcases full of cash" as part of the 1992 presidential campaign.

She speculates: "I have no idea how anyone other than the Clintons would know that Ed might have carried cash in briefcases. So why would he be killed? Because he was carrying illegal money? That's probably not enough reason. But what if, in his desperation, Ed had 'illegally borrowed' from the campaign?"

In the book, Willey says she goes back and forth in her mind on what happened to her husband, and "as I do, the possibility lingers, logical or not, that Ed was murdered."

Jerry Luther Parks - Sept. 26, 1993

image: https://www.wnd.com/files/2016/08/Jerry-Luther-Parks.jpg
Jerry Luther Parks

Jerry Luther Parks

Two months after White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster died, Jerry Luther Parks - who had been head of security for Bill Clinton's headquarters in Little Rock, Arkansas, during the 1992 presidential campaign and gubernatorial years - was shot through the rear window of his car with a semiautomatic handgun.

As WND reported, Jerry Luther Parks was reportedly watching a news bulletin on the death of Vincent Foster (see "Vince Foster" entry below) when he turned from the television and muttered, "I'm a dead man." His son, Gary, was with him in the room. It was July 21, 1993. Foster had just been found dead in Fort Marcy Park, about seven miles from the White House, across the Potomac River in Virginia. Foster had been shot through the head, said the bulletin, an apparent suicide. (See "Vince Foster" entry below.)

British journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard interviewed the Parks family extensively. In "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton," he reported that Parks was a nervous wreck for the next two months. He packed a gun and drove evasively to shake off any possible pursuers. At one point, Parks told his family that Bill Clinton was "cleaning house" and that he was "next on the list."

On Sept. 23, 1993, as Parks was driving to his suburban Little Rock home along the Chenal Parkway, a white Chevrolet Caprice with two men inside drove alongside and peppered Parks' car with semiautomatic gunfire. Parks's car ground to a halt. A man emerged from the white Chevy, fired two rounds into Parks' chest with a 9-mm pistol, then sped off.

Several witnesses watched the murder. The killers were never found. As with so many other "Arkancides" - the name given to the long list of suspicious deaths among Arkansas associates of the Clintons - Big Media ignored the event.

One of the last people to see Vincent Foster alive was Linda Tripp, who then worked as a secretary for Foster's boss, White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum. Tripp testified before Kenneth Starr's grand jury on July 28, 1998, that the reason she had leaked Monica Lewinsky's story to Michael Isikoff at Newsweek was that Tripp hoped the spotlight of national publicity might protect her from physical harm.

"I am afraid of this administration," Tripp told the grand jury.

She continued, "I have what I consider to be well-founded fears of what they are capable of ... I had reasons to believe that the Vince Foster tragedy was not depicted accurately under oath by members of the administration ... I knew based on personal knowledge, personal observations, that they were lying under oath. So it became very fearful to me that I had information even back then that was dangerous."

A juror asked, "But do you have any examples of violence being done by the administration to people who were a threat to them?"

Tripp named Jerry Parks: "[T]he behavior in the West Wing with senior staff to the president during the time the Jerry Parks [murder report] came over the fax frightened me. He had been killed," she said.

The "flurry of activity," the closed-door meetings and the "hush-hush" atmosphere in the White House all struck her as ominous and frightening.

"Maybe you had to be there," said Tripp.

"[The news of Parks' death] was something they wanted to get out in front of. There was talk that this would be another body to add to the list of 40 bodies or something that were associated with the Clinton administration. At that time, I didn't know what that meant. I have since come to see such a list."

After the murder, Gary Parks told a staffer of the New York Observer his father and Vince Foster had investigated Clinton's affairs at Hillary's request.

"He said that Vince Foster had called up his father, who was working as a private investigator, to look into Clinton's romantic life in about 1980, after Bill Clinton had lost the governor's office following his first term. Parks said Hillary wanted a divorce. It looked like maybe the juggernaut she'd believed in, and married, was over. Clinton had by then lost two big races and won two. Till the Comeback Kid-boy is Bill Clinton gutsy-won back the governorship in 1982. But in the early 80s, Parks said, Hillary asked her law partner Vince Foster to prepare a divorce case and Foster called Parks, who compiled a dossier of women's statements. Parks said that Hillary later decided against a divorce, but that his father held on to the dossier. Then in 1993, Parks said, after Vince Foster went to Washington, he demanded the return of the file, and even called Jerry Parks in the days before his, Foster's, death, to demand it. And that two months later his father was murdered, because, Parks said, he had held out on returning the file. (The L.R. police never solved his father's murder, not when I was looking into it a few years afterward.)"

Dr. Stanley Heard - Sept. 10, 1993

Dr. Stanley Heard of Hot Springs, Arkansas, had treated Bill Clinton's mother, stepfather and brother and served as chairman of Clinton's National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee. He was killed, along with his attorney, Steve Dickson, of Topeka, Kansas, in a plane crash 50 miles west of Washington.

The plane radioed to Dulles that there was a fire before it crashed. That aircraft was the second one to cause problems for Dickson on the trip.

In 1993, the Washington Post reported, "Dickson flew his own plane from Topeka, but on the way to Washington it developed problems in St. Louis. There, he left his plane for repair and rented another plane."

The National Transportation and Security Board said the crash was due to " an inadequate annual inspection of the airplane and non-compliance with airworthiness directives by company maintenance personnel."

Jon Parnell Walker - Aug. 15, 1993

Jon Parnell Walker fell to his death from the top of the Lincoln Towers building in Arlington, Virginia.

On July 10, 1994, Connecticut's The Day newspaper reported, "In March 1992, Walker, and investigator for the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), had contacted the Kansas City RTC regional office for information concerning possible ties between Whitewater Development, Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan [above] and the Clintons."

Vince Foster - July 20, 1993

image: https://www.wnd.com/files/2015/05/Vince_Foster.jpg
Hillary and Vince Foster

Hillary and Vince Foster

Vince Foster was deputy White House counsel and Hillary's friend and law partner who had connections to the Travelgate and Whitewater scandals. In 1993, Foster was found dead in a park with a fatal gunshot wound to his mouth. As WND reported, his suicide was the subject of much speculation and three official investigations.

Investigations by the U.S. Park Police, the Department of Justice, the FBI, Congress, Independent Counsel Robert B. Fiske and Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr concluded Foster's death was a suicide. However, as WND reported in 2003, one of Starr's key investigators challenged the official line, insisting the probe's result was predetermined, only a few plotters were required to engineer the result, the crime scene was altered and that major newspaper editors killed stories by reporters pursuing the truth. The Washington Post reported that federal investigators were not allowed to enter Foster's office after his death, but "White House aides enter[ed] Foster's office shortly after his death, giving rise to speculation that files were removed from his office."

In his 2005 book "The Truth about Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, And How Far She'll Go to Become President," Edward Klein wrote of Hillary's involvement in the effort to remove Foster's files:

The night of [Foster's] death, Hillary launched one of the most shameful - and illegal - cover-ups of her entire career.

She sent two of her most trusted White House loyalists - Maggie Williams, the First Lady's chief of staff, and Patsy Thomasson, who was in charge of White House administration - into Foster's office to retrieve embarrassing and incriminating documents related to Whitewater and Hillary's other personal affairs. While White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum barred investigators from entering Foster's office, Maggie Williams, Patsy Thomasson, and Craig Livingston, Hillary's director of White House security, removed armloads of files and loose-leaf binders.

"In addition, a White House staffer allegedly tampered with the titles of several memos and removed the first lady's initials in an effort to erase her role in improper behavior."

Jim Wilhite - Dec. 21, 1992

Jim Whilhite, 54, vice chairman of ARKLA (see "Ron Miller" entry), is killed in a one-man skiing accident. He reportedly "suffered severe head injuries when he skied into a tree on Snowmass Mountain in Aspen, Colorado, while on a family vacation." He had planned to retire from ARKLA the following April.

C. Victor Raiser II and Montgomery Raiser - July 30, 1992

C. Victor Raiser II, the finance co-chairman of Bill Clinton's presidential campaign, was killed in a plane crash, along with his son, Montgomery, and three other passengers. Another passenger and the pilot were injured.

Clinton campaign Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers described C. Victor Raiser II as "a major player" in the Clinton organization, according to the New York Times. He was the national finance co-chairman of Clinton's presidential campaign and had been a friend of the Clintons for about a decade. He was also previously the national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. He served on the boards of the Democratic Business Council and the Center for National Policy and the board of advisers of the Democratic Leadership Council.

Susan Coleman - Feb. 15, 1977

Susan Coleman, who was pregnant at the time of her death, was rumored to have had an affair with Clinton while he was still Arkansas attorney general. Clinton had been Coleman's law professor at the university of Arkansas in Fayetteville.

Though Coleman died of a gunshot wound to the back of her head, her death was ruled a suicide.

==================================================================

A number of people connected to Bill Clinton have turned up dead.

James McDougal - Clinton's convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr's investigation. Was James McDougal Murdered In A Federal Prison To Silence Him?

Ron Brown - Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown's skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.

The Botched Ron Brown Investigation

An Interview with AFIP Forensic Photographer Kathleen Janoski
by Wesley Phelan

Vince Foster - Former white House counselor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock's Rose law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide. Snippets From The Vince Foster Death Investigation

Mary Mahoney - A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder happened just as she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
Mary C. Mahoney and Eric Butera

Was this just a robbery gone bad? - See: Starbucks Suspect Faces Host of Charges By Bill Miller Washington Post, August 5, 1999

C. Victor Raiser II - & - Montgomery Raiser: Major players in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

Paul Tulley - Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock, September 1992. Described by Clinton as a "Dear friend and trusted advisor".

Ed Willey - Clinton fund raiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in Virginia of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

Jerry Parks - Head of Clinton's gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Park's son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

James Bunch - Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a "Black Book" of people containing names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas.

James Wilson - Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.

Kathy Ferguson - Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson died in May 1994 was found dead in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she was going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

Bill Shelton - Arkansas state Trooper and fianc�e of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fianc�e, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave-site of his fianc�e.

Gandy Baugh - Attorney for Clinton friend Dan Lassater died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.

Florence Martin - Accountant - Sub-contractor for the CIA related to the Barry Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case. Died of three gunshot wounds.

Suzanne Coleman - Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.

Paula Grober - Clinton's speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.

Danny Casolaro - Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparent suicide in the middle of his investigation.

Paul Wilcher - Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 "October Surprise" was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993 in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.

Jon Parnell Walker - Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August 15,1993 Was investigating Morgan Guarantee scandal.

Barbara Wise - Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

Charles Meissner - Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

Dr. Stanley Heard - Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton's advisory council personally treated Clinton's mother, stepfather and brother.

Barry Seal - Drug running pilot out of Mena Arkansas, Death was no accident.

Johnny Lawhorn Jr. - Mechanic, found a check made out to Clinton in the trunk of a car left in his repair shop. Died when his car hit a utility pole.

Stanley Huggins - Suicide. Investigated Madison Guarantee. His report was never released.

Hershell Friday - Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1, 1994 when his plane exploded.

Kevin Ives & Don Henry - Known as "The boys on the track" case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. Controversial case where initial report of death was due to falling asleep on railroad track. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury. see: The Train Deaths - plus some comments from a mother of one of the boys about the connection to Bill Clinton..
THE FOLLOWING SEVEN PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES / HENRY CASE:

Keith Coney - Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck July, 1988

Keith McMaskle - Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

Gregory Collins - Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

Jeff Rhodes - He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.

James Milan - Found decapitated. Coroner ruled death due to natural causes.

Jordan Kettleson - Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

Richard Winters - Was a suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. Was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD
Major William S. Barkley Jr.
Captain Scott J. Reynolds
Sgt. Brian Hanley
Sgt. Tim Sabel
Major General William Robertson
Col. William Densberger
Col. Robert Kelly
Spec. Gary Rhode

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 18:16:33 -0500, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA>
wrote:

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

Because Comer doesn't want it presented. Push come to shove, it will be presented to the
Senate but I don't hold out much hope of the GOP holding the House next year.

Swill
--
"I don't want everybody to vote. As a matter of fact, our leverage in
the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."
- Paul Weyrich, co founder of Heritage Foundation and Moral Majority

Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sl�va Ukraj�ni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief. <https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-09 04:18, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:29:38 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 15:38, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >>>> them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world,
without proving what you claimed.

So you're claiming the converse?

I wear "New Balance".

Yeah... ...ducking the question is precisely what I expected.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-09 04:18, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:49:05 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 11:10, AlleyCat wrote:

House Oversight subpoenas Hunter Biden, James Biden, and business associate Rob
Walker as part of its investigation into Biden Family business dealings. >>>
Oversight Chair James Comer has also requested transcribed interviews with Joe
Biden's Daughter-in-law and former Hunter love interest Hallie Biden, James >>> Biden's wife Sara Biden, Hallie Biden's older sister Elizabeth Secundy, and >>> Hunter Biden's wife Melissa Cohen.

Good luck with that.

Thanks for admitting Biden and other Democrats, ESPECIALLY the Clintons, are protected and immune from prosecution, because Clinton and the Democrats OWN the 3-letter administrations like the DoJ, et al., under the threat of retaliation.

I admitted no such thing.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence. >>>

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-09 12:16, AlleyCat wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:57:37 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-09 04:18, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:29:38 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 15:38, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >>>>>> them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world,
without proving what you claimed.

So you're claiming the converse?

I wear "New Balance".

Yeah... ...ducking the question is precisely what I expected.

Then, why did you ask?

To let you demonstrate your cowardice.

And you didn't disappoint!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:57:37 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-09 04:18, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:29:38 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 15:38, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >>>> them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world,
without proving what you claimed.

So you're claiming the converse?

I wear "New Balance".

Yeah... ...ducking the question is precisely what I expected.

Then, why did you ask?

Stupid is as stupid does, and asking a question when you know the outcome won't be an answer, is stupid... and racist.

Pretty fucking ironic, seeing how you NEVER answer questions... only deflecting and ducking away to post only what YOU want to talk about.

Fucking Cuntnadian pansy-ass pussy hypocrite racists.

Dime a dozen, you fuckers are.


Holier-than-thou LIBERAL Canadians, think they're soooo superior when it comes to slavery, because they "ended" it (not really) a mere 30 years earlier.

Holier-than-thou LIBERAL Canadians, think they're soooo superior when it comes to slavery, because they "ended" it (not really) a mere 30 years earlier.

Canada "ended" slavery a mere 30 years before Lincoln wrote the "Emancipation Proclamation".

HOW does that make Canada ANY "better" or different? It doesn't.

Canada's Shameful, Modern-Day Slave Trade https://torontosun.com/2012/02/10/canadas-shameful-modern-day-slave- trade/wcm/2e410af6-9dc4-4ef7-bc3e-821a5970ed41

Colonial Canada Had Slavery For More Than 200 Years. And Yes, It Still Matters Today

More Canadians Say Racism Is A "Serious Problem" Today Than 1 Year Ago

Canada Urged To Open Its Eyes To Systemic Racism In Wake Of Police Violence

Racism In Canada Is Ever-Present, But We Have A Long History Of Denial

Majority (60%) See Racism as a Serious Problem in Canada Today, Up 13 points Since Last Year

Nearly a Third of Canadians (28%) Say They Have Personally Experienced Racism in the Past Year - 24 July 2020 https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/majority-60-see-racism-serious-problem-canada- today-13-points-last-year

Canada's Enduring Legacy Of Power, Politics And Racism https://theclarion.ca/politicslaw/canadians-no-less-racist-than-americans/

75 Per Cent of Canadians Polled, Say Royal Canadian Mounted Police Has Systemic Racism Issue

Systemic Racism In The Royal Canadian Mounted Police Force https://www.citynews1130.com/2020/07/11/study-canadians-agree-rcmp-systemic- racism/


The Reality of Anti-Black Racism in Canada | BCG https://www.bcg.com/en-ca/publications/2020/reality-of-anti-black-racism-in- canada
Anti-Black racism in Canada is worse than most Canadians want to believe. With the COVID-19 pandemic amplifying the injustices against Black People, it is now more important than ever for Canadians to take action.

Racism & the Canadian historical past ... https://divercityvisa.com/racism-the-americanization-of-canadian-historical- past-why-we-should-not-take-a-look-at-ourselves-by-a-u-s-lens
The Canadian response to racism south of the border will be described as an Americanization of Canadian historical past. The media's lack of protection of racism in Canada, in its traditionally correct context, is a trigger for concern. Totally different histories of racism.

Racism in Canada | News, Videos & Articles https://globalnews.ca/tag/racism-in-canada
Canadian MPs vote to condemn Atlanta mass shooting, anti-Asian racism. The move comes days after eight people were killed by a white gunman in Atlanta. Six of the victims were Asian American women ...

Anti-Asian Racism Lead, The Canadian Race Relations ... https://cpac-canada.ca/anti-asian-racism-lead
The Canadian Race Relations Foundation (CRRF) was created in 1996 to reaffirm the principles of justice and equality for all in Canada. The CRRF's mandate is to facilitate throughout Canada the development, sharing, and application of knowledge and expertise to eliminate racism and all forms of racial discrimination in Canadian society.

Is Canada a racist country? One-third of respondents in a ... https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2021/06/21/is-canada-a-racist-country- one-third-of-respondents-in-a-new-study-say-yes.html
Jun 21, 2021
One-third of respondents in a new study say yes. Most Canadians agree that Canada's diverse population makes it a better country. But on the question of whether or not Canada is a racist country ...

Most Canadians Experience Racism ... - New Canadian Media https://newcanadianmedia.ca/most-canadians-experience-racism-where-they-live- survey
Canadian racism is sometimes called 'polite' and is characterized by microaggressions, but that is a misnomer. Words like that are used to deflect criticisms and differentiate Canada from the United States, says Henry, though she does see similar ideologies and motivations.

Canada Must Withdraw From Racist Core Group - Yves Angler https://yvesengler.com/2021/10/24/canada-must-withdraw-from-racist-core-group The least Canadian antiracist activists should do is educate themselves about racism in foreign affairs. There is no justification for Canada participating in this nakedly imperialist alliance. All Canadians of conscience owe a debt of solidarity to the people of Haiti. We must demand Ottawa immediately withdraw from the racist Core Group.

Sikh Canadians Surge Politically In "Systemically Racist ... https://capforcanada.com/sikh-canadians-surge-politically-in-systemically- racist-canada
"The reality is, our Canada is a place of racism, of violence." - NDP Party Leader Jagmeet Singh, June 14th 2021. An unprecedented event occurred last night in Alberta, Canada. Sikh-Canadian candidates won in both Calgary and Edmonton mayoral elections.. Jhoti Gondek is the first Sikh-Canadian to become mayor of Calgary. She will be taking over from Naheed Nenshi, three-time winner as ...

Racism at IRCC could determine who gets in - New Canadian ... https://newcanadianmedia.ca/racism-at-ircc-could-determine-who-gets-in

IRCC employees are reporting racist workplace behaviour such as racially- charged microaggressions at work, says survey. NCM reporter Isabel Inclan reports on the deeper fallout. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) employees remain skeptical of the measures in place to tackle racism at their workplace, according to a new report.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans

Comer won't release of evidence that his family payments were for loans:

'James Comer, Like Joe Biden, Also Paid His Brother $200K'

<https://www.thedailybeast.com/james-comer-like-joe-biden-also-paid-his-brother-dollar200k#>

'Comer has in particular been trying to make hay out of two personal
loan repayments from James Biden to his brother, for $40,000 and $200,000—with all transactions occurring in 2017 and 2018, when Joe
Biden was neither in office nor a candidate.

But if Comer genuinely believes these transactions clear the “shady
business practices” bar, he might want to consider a parallel inquiry
into his own family.

According to Kentucky property records, Comer and his own brother have
engaged in land swaps related to their family farming business. In one deal—also involving $200,000, as well as a shell company—the more
powerful and influential Comer channeled extra money to his brother,
seemingly from nothing. Other recent land swaps were quickly followed
with new applications for special tax breaks, state records show. All of
this, perplexingly, related to the dealings of a family company that
appears to have never existed on paper.'

And moreover:

'Comer has held important positions in agriculture oversight since 2003,
while running a family farming business, and those roles overlapped in
2019, the year of the land swaps. He only stepped back from an
agriculture oversight role recently, in 2020—one year after the family business pivoted away from farming.'

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-09 17:29, AlleyCat wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 12:19:43 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-09 12:16, AlleyCat wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:57:37 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-09 04:18, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:29:38 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 15:38, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world,
without proving what you claimed.

So you're claiming the converse?

I wear "New Balance".

Yeah... ...ducking the question is precisely what I expected.

Then, why did you ask?

To let you demonstrate your cowardice.

Whah whah whah and boo hoo hoo.

What a cryin' bitch.

And you didn't disappoint!

You are welcome.

Quit deleting my words, whiner-hypocrite.

"Whah whah WHAH! You snipped out the good parts, that no one can EVER see again, because you snipped them!" - Alan "Ski Bunny" Baaker

I delete your irrelevant words.

It's not my fault that that's most of them.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 12:19:43 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-09 12:16, AlleyCat wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:57:37 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-09 04:18, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:29:38 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 15:38, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world,
without proving what you claimed.

So you're claiming the converse?

I wear "New Balance".

Yeah... ...ducking the question is precisely what I expected.

Then, why did you ask?

To let you demonstrate your cowardice.

Whah whah whah and boo hoo hoo.

What a cryin' bitch.

And you didn't disappoint!

You are welcome.

Quit deleting my words, whiner-hypocrite.

"Whah whah WHAH! You snipped out the good parts, that no one can EVER see again, because you snipped them!" - Alan "Ski Bunny" Baaker

=====

Holier-than-thou LIBERAL Canadians, think they're soooo superior when it comes to slavery, because they "ended" it (not really) a mere 30 years earlier.

Holier-than-thou LIBERAL Canadians, think they're soooo superior when it comes to slavery, because they "ended" it (not really) a mere 30 years earlier.

Canada "ended" slavery a mere 30 years before Lincoln wrote the "Emancipation Proclamation".

HOW does that make Canada ANY "better" or different? It doesn't.

Canada's Shameful, Modern-Day Slave Trade https://torontosun.com/2012/02/10/canadas-shameful-modern-day-slave- trade/wcm/2e410af6-9dc4-4ef7-bc3e-821a5970ed41

Colonial Canada Had Slavery For More Than 200 Years. And Yes, It Still Matters Today

More Canadians Say Racism Is A "Serious Problem" Today Than 1 Year Ago

Canada Urged To Open Its Eyes To Systemic Racism In Wake Of Police Violence

Racism In Canada Is Ever-Present, But We Have A Long History Of Denial

Majority (60%) See Racism as a Serious Problem in Canada Today, Up 13 points Since Last Year

Nearly a Third of Canadians (28%) Say They Have Personally Experienced Racism in the Past Year - 24 July 2020 https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/majority-60-see-racism-serious-problem-canada- today-13-points-last-year

Canada's Enduring Legacy Of Power, Politics And Racism https://theclarion.ca/politicslaw/canadians-no-less-racist-than-americans/

75 Per Cent of Canadians Polled, Say Royal Canadian Mounted Police Has Systemic Racism Issue

Systemic Racism In The Royal Canadian Mounted Police Force https://www.citynews1130.com/2020/07/11/study-canadians-agree-rcmp-systemic- racism/


The Reality of Anti-Black Racism in Canada | BCG https://www.bcg.com/en-ca/publications/2020/reality-of-anti-black-racism-in- canada
Anti-Black racism in Canada is worse than most Canadians want to believe. With the COVID-19 pandemic amplifying the injustices against Black People, it is now more important than ever for Canadians to take action.

Racism & the Canadian historical past ... https://divercityvisa.com/racism-the-americanization-of-canadian-historical- past-why-we-should-not-take-a-look-at-ourselves-by-a-u-s-lens
The Canadian response to racism south of the border will be described as an Americanization of Canadian historical past. The media's lack of protection of racism in Canada, in its traditionally correct context, is a trigger for concern. Totally different histories of racism.

Racism in Canada | News, Videos & Articles https://globalnews.ca/tag/racism-in-canada
Canadian MPs vote to condemn Atlanta mass shooting, anti-Asian racism. The move comes days after eight people were killed by a white gunman in Atlanta. Six of the victims were Asian American women ...

Anti-Asian Racism Lead, The Canadian Race Relations ... https://cpac-canada.ca/anti-asian-racism-lead
The Canadian Race Relations Foundation (CRRF) was created in 1996 to reaffirm the principles of justice and equality for all in Canada. The CRRF's mandate is to facilitate throughout Canada the development, sharing, and application of knowledge and expertise to eliminate racism and all forms of racial discrimination in Canadian society.

Is Canada a racist country? One-third of respondents in a ... https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2021/06/21/is-canada-a-racist-country- one-third-of-respondents-in-a-new-study-say-yes.html
Jun 21, 2021
One-third of respondents in a new study say yes. Most Canadians agree that Canada's diverse population makes it a better country. But on the question of whether or not Canada is a racist country ...

Most Canadians Experience Racism ... - New Canadian Media https://newcanadianmedia.ca/most-canadians-experience-racism-where-they-live- survey
Canadian racism is sometimes called 'polite' and is characterized by microaggressions, but that is a misnomer. Words like that are used to deflect criticisms and differentiate Canada from the United States, says Henry, though she does see similar ideologies and motivations.

Canada Must Withdraw From Racist Core Group - Yves Angler https://yvesengler.com/2021/10/24/canada-must-withdraw-from-racist-core-group The least Canadian antiracist activists should do is educate themselves about racism in foreign affairs. There is no justification for Canada participating in this nakedly imperialist alliance. All Canadians of conscience owe a debt of solidarity to the people of Haiti. We must demand Ottawa immediately withdraw from the racist Core Group.

Sikh Canadians Surge Politically In "Systemically Racist ... https://capforcanada.com/sikh-canadians-surge-politically-in-systemically- racist-canada
"The reality is, our Canada is a place of racism, of violence." - NDP Party Leader Jagmeet Singh, June 14th 2021. An unprecedented event occurred last night in Alberta, Canada. Sikh-Canadian candidates won in both Calgary and Edmonton mayoral elections.. Jhoti Gondek is the first Sikh-Canadian to become mayor of Calgary. She will be taking over from Naheed Nenshi, three-time winner as ...

Racism at IRCC could determine who gets in - New Canadian ... https://newcanadianmedia.ca/racism-at-ircc-could-determine-who-gets-in

IRCC employees are reporting racist workplace behaviour such as racially- charged microaggressions at work, says survey. NCM reporter Isabel Inclan reports on the deeper fallout. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) employees remain skeptical of the measures in place to tackle racism at their workplace, according to a new report.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-09 12:18:41 +0000, AlleyCat said:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:29:38 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-08 15:38, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan says...

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove >>>> them.

And you made the claim, that "this" isn't how "it's " done in the real world,
without proving what you claimed.

So you're claiming the converse?

I wear "New Balance".

<sad trombone>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>>>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence. >>>>

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 11/10/2023 4:11 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

The accusations are bullshit, and everyone knows it, especially the Republiscums/QAnon who are doing the accusing.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 11/10/2023 10:44 AM, BlueBitch, stupid knuckle-dragging right-wingnut shitbag, lied:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, BlueBitch, stupid knuckle-dragging right-wingnut shitbag, lied:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, BlueBitch, stupid knuckle-dragging right-wingnut shitbag, lied:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, BlueBitch, stupid knuckle-dragging right-wingnut shitbag, lied:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, BlueBitch, stupid knuckle-dragging right-wingnut shitbag, lied:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, BlueBitch, stupid knuckle-dragging right-wingnut shitbag, lied:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

Accusations without evidence to support them are dismissed, dummy.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for
President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd
recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it
wasn't bribery

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-10 11:32, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for
President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it
wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:40:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 11:32, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for
President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd
recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it
wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

Right, what I did was to demonstrate the dishonest premise of your
question. When did you stop molesting children?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-10 12:52, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:40:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 11:32, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for
President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd
recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it
wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

Right, what I did was to demonstrate the dishonest premise of your
question.

There was no dishonest premise, BLM.

There was an ANALOGY.

You suggest that if someone doesn't refute an accusation, that is
evidence of their guilt.

I merely drew a pointed analogy to show why we don't do that.

The fact remains that you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone
in this matter.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:05:35 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 12:52, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:40:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 11:32, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother... >>>>>>>>>>>>

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for
President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd
recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it
wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

Right, what I did was to demonstrate the dishonest premise of your
question.

There was no dishonest premise, BLM.

There was an ANALOGY.

You suggest that if someone doesn't refute an accusation, that is
evidence of their guilt.

Nope, I suggested that a politician running for office and publicly
accused of a crime, might want to have a defense.

I merely drew a pointed analogy to show why we don't do that.

"we? The voters don't consider such things?

The fact remains that you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone
in this matter.

Biden's black markers are getting bigger and louder.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-10 14:14, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:05:35 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 12:52, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:40:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 11:32, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother... >>>>>>>>>>>>>

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for
President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd >>>>> recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it
wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

Right, what I did was to demonstrate the dishonest premise of your
question.

There was no dishonest premise, BLM.

There was an ANALOGY.

You suggest that if someone doesn't refute an accusation, that is
evidence of their guilt.

Nope, I suggested that a politician running for office and publicly
accused of a crime, might want to have a defense.

1. He hasn't actually been accused of a crime. There's been a ton of
innuendo thrown around.

2. It's up to those who WOULD accuse him to produce EVIDENCE. You
basically admit they have none to produce.

I merely drew a pointed analogy to show why we don't do that.

"we? The voters don't consider such things?

"We" as a society.

The fact remains that you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone
in this matter.

Biden's black markers are getting bigger and louder.

Nope. The people shouting about them are getting louder.

Did you notice your new speaker declared that there was not enough
evidence to impeach?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-10, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

So where did the insane level of wealth the Biden clan accumulated come from? And what were they selling?
Ginsu knives?


--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024.
Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-10 18:16, pothead wrote:

On 2023-11-10, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

So where did the insane level of wealth the Biden clan accumulated come from?

Do you ask the same question of all politicians?

At least Biden released his tax returns.

And what were they selling?

Why don't you go look at them?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 2023-11-11, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 18:16, pothead wrote:

On 2023-11-10, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:mwwjycdus

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

So where did the insane level of wealth the Biden clan accumulated come from?

Do you ask the same question of all politicians?

At least Biden released his tax returns.

And what were they selling?

Why don't you go look at them?

I'm asking about Joe Biden and his family.
Did Joe Biden list the 20+ shell companies on his tax forms?
Hunter is under investigation himself for tax evasion.

How about kids in the Biden clan getting millions deposited in their bank accounts.
Shit, I wish someone did that for me was I was 7yo.
And exactly what were the Biden's selling for those millions of dollars?


--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024.
Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan says...

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

OK.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

I can't.

You good with that?

Yes.

When I was lifeguarding, I fucked a FINE ass 17 year old from Tennessee. Her name was Haven and yes, she WAS heaven.

There... call the police.

Penalties for Age of Consent Violation

Florida's age of consent is 18, although Florida does have a "Romeo and
Juliet" statute.

The statutory rape statue is codified under Florida Statute Section 794.05, under the statute if a person who is 24 years old or older engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a second degree felony.

Oops.

It is important to notice that consent of the 16 or 17 year old does not matter, it's not an element of the crime like it is under the Sexual Battery statue. The penalty for a second-degree felony is up to $10,000 and up to 15 years in prison.

I feel so dirty.

LOL... NOPE. She was F I N E fine.

Rudy's sucking his own dick, right about now.

He's so jealous of me.

LOL

=====

Rudy, The Insanely Jealous Narcissist

Rudy, the narcissist, usually has a deep need to be better than everyone else. This makes him likely to become jealous of anyone he perceives as better than him in any possible way.

Surprisingly, you don't have to be better in a real sense for you to trigger his jealousy.

As long as you have any advantage he doesn't have, that's enough to make him jealous. Sometimes jealousy can force Rudy the narcissist to act in ways that defy normal human behaviour.

Jealousy is one of the emotions that makes Rudy, the narcissist, both hilarious and sad.

A Sense of Competition:

A sense of competition, real or perceived can trigger jealous narcissists,
like Rudy.

Surpassing a narcissist, like Rudy, at anything that you are both involved in or succeeding at something he failed at, can make him extremely jealous.

Rudy Has Low Self-Esteem:

Rudy, the narcissist, may not be jealous of someone on Usenet, who is better looking, as long as he is confident in his looks.

LOL

But, he isn't, so he isn't confident in his ability to socialize. Rudy is always jealous of his social and Usenet rivals, who make him look like the runt child he is... daily.

Actually... Rudy, the narcissist, makes himself look like a child. We do not need to help him in this realm.

Because Rudy, the narcissist has very low self-esteem behind the mask of ultra- confidence, he becomes very jealous of anyone who has genuine confidence... like those he pretends to be better than.

They Are Happier Than Rudy:

When a narcissist is depressed, he doesn't like to see someone happier and excited, especially if that person makes him look stupid... which is usually hourly.

This is because he knows that a happy person is powerful. Powerful enough to make him feel like a worthless turd... that is, until that person makes a spelling or grammar mistake.

Rudy's self-esteem is so low, that even though HE'S fucked up so many times, grammatically and spelling-wise, he still has to show his imaginary superiority, by pointing out others' mistakes.

When you are happy, you became more confident, assertive and clear-minded. On the other hand, when a person is sad or depressed, he usually feels weak and vulnerable, like Rudy, who lashes out at those he sees as his superiors.

When a narcissist, like Rudy is depressed, feelings of vulnerability that accompany depression make him see a happy person as a threat, especially when it's a person that he doesn't get along with, which is 99.9% of Usenet, since he's a homophobic racist, who insults everyone, because Rudy HATES everyone he thinks is his superior.

Rudy Is Insecure:

Insecurities make a person doubt his ability to keep anyone interested.

If he is financially unsuccessful (well... YEAH!) and believes that his Usenet rivals are MORE successful (well... duh!), he may be very jealous their success.

Rudy, the narcissist, hates it when people around him are better in every possible way. He needs to be above everybody else in order to feel superior, and have the ability to sleep.

For this reason, he becomes very jealous of anyone he sees as superior than him, especially when there is a sense of competition.

We Are Stealing His Attention:

RUDY, THE NARCISSIST NEEDS SO MUCH ATTENTION, hence the replies that offer NO refutations. He only replies to say, "play with me!"

Rudy doesn't have the mental capacity to form his own opinions on subject matters that are above his head, so he simply replies in the negative, even if it's proven that the OP is correct in everything he says or quotes.

Because he thinks that he is better than common people, Rudy believes that he deserves more attention than the average Usenet member.

Getting the attention that a narcissist believes HE deserves, can cause a lot of jealousy.

Poor Rudy.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:35:23 -0800, Alan says...

"Whah whah WHAH! You snipped out the good parts, that no one can EVER see again, because you snipped them!" - Alan "Ski Bunny" Baaker

I delete your irrelevant words.

Wow, Shelly.

https://i.imgur.com/E1ThLYS.mp4

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely- have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health- study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals- more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have- a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer- from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a- mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody- else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have- mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be- mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 - 12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 18:59:15 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 14:14, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:05:35 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 12:52, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:40:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 11:32, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for
President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd >>>>>> recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it
wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

Right, what I did was to demonstrate the dishonest premise of your
question.

There was no dishonest premise, BLM.

There was an ANALOGY.

You suggest that if someone doesn't refute an accusation, that is
evidence of their guilt.

Nope, I suggested that a politician running for office and publicly
accused of a crime, might want to have a defense.

1. He hasn't actually been accused of a crime. There's been a ton of >innuendo thrown around.

Yes he has..

2. It's up to those who WOULD accuse him to produce EVIDENCE.

No, it's not...

You
basically admit they have none to produce.

I merely drew a pointed analogy to show why we don't do that.

"we? The voters don't consider such things?

"We" as a society.

The fact remains that you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone
in this matter.

Biden's black markers are getting bigger and louder.

Nope. The people shouting about them are getting louder.

Did you notice your new speaker declared that there was not enough
evidence to impeach?

Impeachment is a waste of time and money.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

On 2023-11-11, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA> wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 18:59:15 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 14:14, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:05:35 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 12:52, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:40:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 11:32, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for
President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd >>>>>>> recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it >>>>>>> wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

Right, what I did was to demonstrate the dishonest premise of your
question.

There was no dishonest premise, BLM.

There was an ANALOGY.

You suggest that if someone doesn't refute an accusation, that is
evidence of their guilt.

Nope, I suggested that a politician running for office and publicly
accused of a crime, might want to have a defense.

1. He hasn't actually been accused of a crime. There's been a ton of >>innuendo thrown around.

Yes he has..

2. It's up to those who WOULD accuse him to produce EVIDENCE.

No, it's not...

You
basically admit they have none to produce.

I merely drew a pointed analogy to show why we don't do that.

"we? The voters don't consider such things?

"We" as a society.

The fact remains that you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone >>>> in this matter.

Biden's black markers are getting bigger and louder.

Nope. The people shouting about them are getting louder.

Did you notice your new speaker declared that there was not enough
evidence to impeach?

Impeachment is a waste of time and money.

It is.
Biden should be tried for treason, influence peddling and whatever else they can discover.

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 11/10/2023 6:16 PM, pothead wrote:

On 2023-11-10, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right?

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes >>>>>>>>> "this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof >>>>>>>>> that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... > >>>>>>>> But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother...

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments? >>>>>>>

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan, >>>>>>> and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense..

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

So where did the insane level of wealth the Biden clan accumulated come from?

What wealth?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 15:24:34 GMT, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-11, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA> wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 18:59:15 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 14:14, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:05:35 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 12:52, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:40:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 11:32, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-10 10:44, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-10 04:11, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-09 02:33, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, Blue Lives Matter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for >>>>>>>> President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd >>>>>>>> recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it >>>>>>>> wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

Right, what I did was to demonstrate the dishonest premise of your >>>>>> question.

There was no dishonest premise, BLM.

There was an ANALOGY.

You suggest that if someone doesn't refute an accusation, that is
evidence of their guilt.

Nope, I suggested that a politician running for office and publicly
accused of a crime, might want to have a defense.

1. He hasn't actually been accused of a crime. There's been a ton of >>>innuendo thrown around.

Yes he has..

2. It's up to those who WOULD accuse him to produce EVIDENCE.

No, it's not...

You
basically admit they have none to produce.

I merely drew a pointed analogy to show why we don't do that.

"we? The voters don't consider such things?

"We" as a society.

The fact remains that you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone >>>>> in this matter.

Biden's black markers are getting bigger and louder.

Nope. The people shouting about them are getting louder.

Did you notice your new speaker declared that there was not enough >>>evidence to impeach?

Impeachment is a waste of time and money.

It is.
Biden should be tried for treason, influence peddling and whatever else they can discover.

Too bad they haven't discovered any of those things, eh?

Swill
--
"I don't want everybody to vote. As a matter of fact, our leverage in
the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."
- Paul Weyrich, co founder of Heritage Foundation and Moral Majority

Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sl�va Ukraj�ni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief. <https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

On 11/11/2023 7:24 AM, Charlie Glock wrote:

On 2023-11-11, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 18:59:15 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 14:14, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:05:35 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 12:52, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied:

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:40:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-10 11:32, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:00:51 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-10 10:44, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied: >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:13:56 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-10 04:11, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-09 02:33, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:28:44 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-08 15:16, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:46:00 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 14:16, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:05:43 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 13:35, BlueBitch, Nazi *fake* retired cope, lied:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You mean other than the memo line on the cheques, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you mean that if someone writes a check to your mother and writes
"this is payment for all the the blowjobs" in the memo line is proof
that she's a whore, right?

No. Not even close.

Ok, it's not proof, it's just evidence that the she's a whore... >

But you asked for evidence, and that memo line is a part of the evidence.

Just as much as the nasty check sent to your mother... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Can you present any evidence that the cheques weren't loan repayments?

No, but it would be very easy to present evidence that it was a loan,
and *THAT* hasn't been presented. Why not?

So you've got nothing.

... and apparently, Gibberish Joe has no defense.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>

What defense does he need?

He's being accused of taking bribes, Dummy.

That means the accusing him need to present evidence that that has happened.

Nope, all they need to do is accuse him.

I accuse you of being ch**d mo*****r.

Now you have to prove you aren't.

You good with that?

<LOL> If, "ch**d mo*****r" was bribery, and I was running for >>>>>>>> President, and if the voters knew about the accusations, and that I'd >>>>>>>> recieved a check for $40,000, I'd be wishing I had proof that it >>>>>>>> wasn't bribery

Failure to answer my question noted.

Right, what I did was to demonstrate the dishonest premise of your >>>>>> question.

There was no dishonest premise, BLM.

There was an ANALOGY.

You suggest that if someone doesn't refute an accusation, that is
evidence of their guilt.

Nope, I suggested that a politician running for office and publicly
accused of a crime, might want to have a defense.

1. He hasn't actually been accused of a crime. There's been a ton of
innuendo thrown around.

Yes he has..

2. It's up to those who WOULD accuse him to produce EVIDENCE.

No, it's not...

You
basically admit they have none to produce.

I merely drew a pointed analogy to show why we don't do that.

"we? The voters don't consider such things?

"We" as a society.

The fact remains that you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone >>>>> in this matter.

Biden's black markers are getting bigger and louder.

Nope. The people shouting about them are getting louder.

Did you notice your new speaker declared that there was not enough
evidence to impeach?

Impeachment is a waste of time and money.

It is.
Biden should be tried for treason, influence peddling and whatever else they can discover.

They can't discover any of those things, because Biden hasn't done them...and you know it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

Siri Cruise wrote:

Blue Lives Matter wrote:

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You clowns must have grown up as dirt poor orphans. In real families,
family members can loan with or without interest or just give each other money. With or without records. Real families are about mutual support not victims whence to extract every last penny.

zing!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

On 11/8/2023 1:35 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:45 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2023-11-08 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:10:18 -0800, Alan says...

On 2023-11-07 17:43, AlleyCat wrote:

White House Won't Release Evidence That Biden Family Payments Were For Loans


That basically confirms it was a bribery payment

Ummmmmm...no, Pussey.

Mmmmmm... yes, gay boy.

That's not the way it works in the real world.

Show us how you know how the real world works, liberal.

In the real world, those who make claims are the ones who need to prove
them.

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

Someone saying they weren't loans has to present evidence that they weren't. The
burden of proof is on those making any accusations. No one named "Biden" has to produce any evidence. People making claims *against* people named "Biden" have to produce evidence of their claims. The haven't, and they can't...because there
*is* no such evidence.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:47:59 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

Siri Cruise wrote:

Blue Lives Matter wrote:

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than
loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You clowns must have grown up as dirt poor orphans. In real families,
family members can loan with or without interest or just give each other
money. With or without records. Real families are about mutual support not >> victims whence to extract every last penny.

zing!

<LOL> The simple fact stands... nobody has presented any evidence that
these were loans.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 04:39:08 -0500, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA>
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:47:59 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

Siri Cruise wrote:

Blue Lives Matter wrote:

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You clowns must have grown up as dirt poor orphans. In real families,
family members can loan with or without interest or just give each other >>> money. With or without records. Real families are about mutual support not >>> victims whence to extract every last penny.

zing!

<LOL> The simple fact stands... nobody has presented any evidence that
these were loans.

You're a fucking liar.

"Comer�s team does not dispute that these banking records show that James Biden was sent a
$200,000 wire transfer on January 12, 2018, less than two months before James Biden and
Sara Biden wrote Joe Biden the March 1, 2018, �loan repayment� check for $200,000. "
<https://tinyurl.com/yeyn5zpz>

So . . . James received $200K in a wire transfer and six weeks later James wrote a $200K
check.

And Comer does NOT dispute these facts.

Swill
--
"I don't want everybody to vote. As a matter of fact, our leverage in
the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."
- Paul Weyrich, co founder of Heritage Foundation and Moral Majority

Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sl�va Ukraj�ni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief. <https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:25:38 -0500, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 04:39:08 -0500, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA>
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:47:59 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

Siri Cruise wrote:

Blue Lives Matter wrote:

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You clowns must have grown up as dirt poor orphans. In real families,
family members can loan with or without interest or just give each other >>>> money. With or without records. Real families are about mutual support not >>>> victims whence to extract every last penny.

zing!

<LOL> The simple fact stands... nobody has presented any evidence that >>these were loans.

You're a fucking liar.

"Comer�s team does not dispute that these banking records show that James Biden was sent a
$200,000 wire transfer on January 12, 2018, less than two months before James Biden and
Sara Biden wrote Joe Biden the March 1, 2018, �loan repayment� check for $200,000. "
<https://tinyurl.com/yeyn5zpz>

So . . . James received $200K in a wire transfer and six weeks later James wrote a $200K
check.

And Comer does NOT dispute these facts.

And the proof that they were loans rather than money laundering???

Swill the unthinking

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

On 11/16/2023 4:30 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:25:38 -0500, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 04:39:08 -0500, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA>
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:47:59 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

Siri Cruise wrote:

Blue Lives Matter wrote:

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You clowns must have grown up as dirt poor orphans. In real families, >>>>> family members can loan with or without interest or just give each other >>>>> money. With or without records. Real families are about mutual support not
victims whence to extract every last penny.

zing!

<LOL> The simple fact stands... nobody has presented any evidence that
these were loans.

You're a fucking liar.

"Comer’s team does not dispute that these banking records show that James Biden was sent a
$200,000 wire transfer on January 12, 2018, less than two months before James Biden and
Sara Biden wrote Joe Biden the March 1, 2018, “loan repayment” check for $200,000. "
<https://tinyurl.com/yeyn5zpz>

So . . . James received $200K in a wire transfer and six weeks later James wrote a $200K
check.

And Comer does NOT dispute these facts.

And the proof that they were loans rather than money laundering???

Where's the evidence it was money laundering? There's none.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism

Governor Swill wrote:

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 04:39:08 -0500, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA>

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:47:59 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>

Siri Cruise wrote:

Blue Lives Matter wrote:

No one has presented any evidence that these were anything other than >>>>>> loan repayments.

Nobody has presented any evidence that these were loans.

You clowns must have grown up as dirt poor orphans. In real families,
family members can loan with or without interest or just give each other >>>> money. With or without records. Real families are about mutual support not >>>> victims whence to extract every last penny.

zing!

<LOL> The simple fact stands... nobody has presented any evidence that
these were loans.

You're a fucking liar.

"Comer’s team does not dispute that these banking records show that James Biden was sent a
$200,000 wire transfer on January 12, 2018, less than two months before James Biden and
Sara Biden wrote Joe Biden the March 1, 2018, “loan repayment” check for $200,000. "
<https://tinyurl.com/yeyn5zpz>

So . . . James received $200K in a wire transfer and six weeks later James wrote a $200K
check.

And Comer does NOT dispute these facts.

double zing!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)