• See? Liberals Make Up Their Own Points On OTHERS' Posts

    From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to I never on Mon Oct 9 00:56:14 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 22:02:47 -0700, Alan says...

    You claimed "strange, but true" with "not ONE cite"

    Are you fucking drunk?...

    "London (COMMA) having a warm day in October 1921 (COMMA) doesn't prove anything about whether global warming (IS) supposedly false.

    ... probably.

    I answer this below, but just so it might sink into your head... NO ONE said global warming is "supposedly false", because of the comparison of that date THIS YEAR and in 1921.

    There were heatwaves in 1921, which lasted JUST as long and were HOTTER than now, so CO² is NOT the culprit in the warming that's simply another warming cycle, warming Earth BACK up to where she was pre-Little Ice Age, when the Holocene Climatic Optimum, Roman, Minoan AND Medieval Warm Periods reigned for MOST of the last 10,000 years, along with other hotter times.

    https://i.imgur.com/tBIcoDh.png
    https://i.imgur.com/UtGRUFV.png
    https://i.imgur.com/oo9SDIz.mp4

    Even Wiki's temp graph shows this:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F63AojwXwAAd4n9?format=jpg&name=large

    Annnnd, if you thought I put together that Powerpoint slide disingenuously:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Holocene_Temperature_Variat ions.png

    You claimed "strange, but true" with "not ONE cite"

    One cite is all I needed and you snipped it. LOL... when I snip, I never snip out what I'm replying to. You snipped out the "one cite" that you said I didn't cite.

    That's the difference in the right and fucked in the head leftists. YOU'RE trying to deceive. I snip mostly for brevity... you snip to to fool people. NO ONE on the right falls for your faggot bullshit, Cuntnadian.

    Sooo... THIS isn't a cited site? It was in the OP, you lying little ski bunny boy-butt-banger.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20230319171710/https://realclimatescience.com/1921- heatwave

    OP: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/c/JUGLZUdQIMY/m/jiuaRnjoAgAJ

    OP:
    https://i.imgur.com/RG3ofLq.png

    Is your browser not working?

    LOL... faggot fails seem to be de rigueur for you these days.

    Do tell... what ARE these "other" fluctuations, and how do they prove me wrong,
    when I posted that London had it's warmest October 6th in London in 1921? (84F = 29C)

    I don't need to prove you wrong.

    I never said you "needed to", did I? You think I'm wrong... prove it.

    London having a warm day in October 1921 doesn't prove anything about
    whether global warming supposedly false.

    No one said it did, so off-topic non sequitur... as usual.

    That's not the point, is it? Just another instance of liberal faggot failure, being incapable of either disproving what I posted or what they/them tried to lie about.

    So, they/them changes the conditions of the discussion. Talk about being a pussy... anyone who has to change the topic, which is NOT global warming (sic) supposedly false, is a pussy and a faggot and a proven moron.

    Stick to the topic YOU say is false, answers the questions, and don't change anything, if you're right.

    This is how we know I'm right, you're wrong, you suck dick and can't prove yourself right.

    --

    Sig file for faggot Cuntnadian leftists:

    Non-Sequitur Noted: Thank You. Now Go Suck A Dick... We Know You're Jonesing For One

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Sun Oct 8 22:59:05 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2023-10-08 22:56, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 22:02:47 -0700, Alan says...

    You claimed "strange, but true" with "not ONE cite"

    Are you fucking drunk?...

    "London (COMMA) having a warm day in October 1921 (COMMA) doesn't prove anything about whether global warming (IS) supposedly false.

    ... probably.

    Not "probably". I'm right and you know it.


    I answer this below, but just so it might sink into your head... NO ONE said global warming is "supposedly false", because of the comparison of that date THIS YEAR and in 1921.

    There were heatwaves in 1921, which lasted JUST as long and were HOTTER than now, so CO² is NOT the culprit in the warming that's simply another warming cycle, warming Earth BACK up to where she was pre-Little Ice Age, when the Holocene Climatic Optimum, Roman, Minoan AND Medieval Warm Periods reigned for
    MOST of the last 10,000 years, along with other hotter times.

    Sorry, but you've jumped to an unwarranted conclusion.


    https://i.imgur.com/tBIcoDh.png
    https://i.imgur.com/UtGRUFV.png
    https://i.imgur.com/oo9SDIz.mp4

    Even Wiki's temp graph shows this:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F63AojwXwAAd4n9?format=jpg&name=large

    Annnnd, if you thought I put together that Powerpoint slide disingenuously:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Holocene_Temperature_Variat
    ions.png

    You claimed "strange, but true" with "not ONE cite"

    One cite is all I needed and you snipped it. LOL... when I snip, I never snip out what I'm replying to. You snipped out the "one cite" that you said I didn't
    cite.

    That's the difference in the right and fucked in the head leftists. YOU'RE trying to deceive. I snip mostly for brevity... you snip to to fool people. NO
    ONE on the right falls for your faggot bullshit, Cuntnadian.

    Sooo... THIS isn't a cited site? It was in the OP, you lying little ski bunny boy-butt-banger.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20230319171710/https://realclimatescience.com/1921-
    heatwave

    OP: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/c/JUGLZUdQIMY/m/jiuaRnjoAgAJ

    OP:
    https://i.imgur.com/RG3ofLq.png

    Is your browser not working?

    LOL... faggot fails seem to be de rigueur for you these days.

    Do tell... what ARE these "other" fluctuations, and how do they prove me wrong,
    when I posted that London had it's warmest October 6th in London in 1921? >>> (84F = 29C)

    I don't need to prove you wrong.

    I never said you "needed to", did I? You think I'm wrong... prove it.

    London having a warm day in October 1921 doesn't prove anything about
    whether global warming supposedly false.

    No one said it did, so off-topic non sequitur... as usual.

    That's not the point, is it? Just another instance of liberal faggot failure, being incapable of either disproving what I posted or what they/them tried to lie about.

    So, they/them changes the conditions of the discussion. Talk about being a pussy... anyone who has to change the topic, which is NOT global warming (sic)
    supposedly false, is a pussy and a faggot and a proven moron.

    Stick to the topic YOU say is false, answers the questions, and don't change anything, if you're right.

    This is how we know I'm right, you're wrong, you suck dick and can't prove yourself right.

    --

    Sig file for faggot Cuntnadian leftists:

    Non-Sequitur Noted: Thank You. Now Go Suck A Dick... We Know You're Jonesing For One

    LOL!

    You're such a Pussey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)