• Re: Are Your Workers Too Expensiv? Replace Them With Children!

    From 55c.1056@21:1/5 to Lamont Cranston on Fri Sep 29 00:00:09 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.misc XPost: alt.elections

    On 9/28/23 12:40 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:
    On 9/28/2023 8:57 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:22:56 -0700, Lamont Cranston
    <FightingForJustice@avatar.org> wrote:

    On 9/27/2023 9:44 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
    Lamont Cranston wrote:
    On 9/27/2023 8:54 AM, Lee wrote:





    US legislators should be cracking
    down on child labor. But they want
    more
    Sept 27

    American legislators should be
    working to crack down on child
    labor, here and abroad, but
    instead, politicians – including
    Democrats – in at least 11 states
    have introduced or passed bills
    that weaken child labor laws. At
    a time when adult workers are
    demanding a fairer slice of the
    increasingly behemoth pie of
    corporate profits, child labor
    is a capitalist work-around to
    increase the labor pool and
    lower the wages of all those
    who have to work for a living.

    Laws restricting or banning child labor are a Big Labor scam.  So are >>>>> compulsory education laws.


    How dare we teach children skills they will let them choose the job
    they want.

    Compulsory education laws are not for the benefit of children.
    They're for the
    benefit of organized labor.

    Either way the kids come out winners.

    Some may, others may not.  There are also the kids families to
    consider.  In developed countries, families may not depend (much) on
    their children's earnings, but in under/undeveloped countries, many
    families do.  If you prohibit all work by children, you may be making
    the families seriously worse off.

    Well, at least SOMEBODY "gets it".

    The 1st-world has sabotaged most peoples perception
    about the normal, real, world.

    Sorry, in the 2nd/3rd world the kiddies do NOT go
    play all day - they WORK to support their families.
    Without their input, EVERYBODY starves.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lamont Cranston@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 29 07:27:44 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.misc XPost: alt.elections

    On 9/28/2023 9:00 PM, 55c.1056 wrote:
    On 9/28/23 12:40 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:
    On 9/28/2023 8:57 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:22:56 -0700, Lamont Cranston
    <FightingForJustice@avatar.org> wrote:

    On 9/27/2023 9:44 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
    Lamont Cranston wrote:
    On 9/27/2023 8:54 AM, Lee wrote:





    US legislators should be cracking
    down on child labor. But they want
    more
    Sept 27

    American legislators should be
    working to crack down on child
    labor, here and abroad, but
    instead, politicians – including
    Democrats – in at least 11 states
    have introduced or passed bills
    that weaken child labor laws. At
    a time when adult workers are
    demanding a fairer slice of the
    increasingly behemoth pie of
    corporate profits, child labor
    is a capitalist work-around to
    increase the labor pool and
    lower the wages of all those
    who have to work for a living.

    Laws restricting or banning child labor are a Big Labor scam.  So are >>>>>> compulsory education laws.


    How dare we teach children skills they will let them choose the job they want.

    Compulsory education laws are not for the benefit of children. They're for the
    benefit of organized labor.

    Either way the kids come out winners.

    Some may, others may not.  There are also the kids families to consider.  In
    developed countries, families may not depend (much) on their children's
    earnings, but in under/undeveloped countries, many families do.  If you
    prohibit all work by children, you may be making the families seriously worse
    off.

      Well, at least SOMEBODY "gets it".

      The 1st-world has sabotaged most peoples perception
      about the normal, real, world.

    A first world reality and level of development are what all countries aspire to have.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 55c.1056@21:1/5 to Lamont Cranston on Fri Sep 29 21:47:35 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.misc XPost: alt.elections

    On 9/29/23 10:27 AM, Lamont Cranston wrote:
    On 9/28/2023 9:00 PM, 55c.1056 wrote:
    On 9/28/23 12:40 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:
    On 9/28/2023 8:57 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:22:56 -0700, Lamont Cranston
    <FightingForJustice@avatar.org> wrote:

    On 9/27/2023 9:44 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
    Lamont Cranston wrote:
    On 9/27/2023 8:54 AM, Lee wrote:





    US legislators should be cracking
    down on child labor. But they want
    more
    Sept 27

    American legislators should be
    working to crack down on child
    labor, here and abroad, but
    instead, politicians – including
    Democrats – in at least 11 states
    have introduced or passed bills
    that weaken child labor laws. At
    a time when adult workers are
    demanding a fairer slice of the
    increasingly behemoth pie of
    corporate profits, child labor
    is a capitalist work-around to
    increase the labor pool and
    lower the wages of all those
    who have to work for a living.

    Laws restricting or banning child labor are a Big Labor scam.  So >>>>>>> are
    compulsory education laws.


    How dare we teach children skills they will let them choose the
    job they want.

    Compulsory education laws are not for the benefit of children.
    They're for the
    benefit of organized labor.

    Either way the kids come out winners.

    Some may, others may not.  There are also the kids families to
    consider.  In developed countries, families may not depend (much) on
    their children's earnings, but in under/undeveloped countries, many
    families do.  If you prohibit all work by children, you may be making
    the families seriously worse off.

       Well, at least SOMEBODY "gets it".

       The 1st-world has sabotaged most peoples perception
       about the normal, real, world.

    A first world reality and level of development are what all countries
    aspire to have.


    Yes - but very very few can manage it. There's a kind of
    thinking required to get it together and keep it together.
    You have to create an efficient "money machine" and keep
    it running through thick and thin. Doesn't work if everyone
    is corrupt, if everyone is apathetic, if "easy" always
    trumps "best practice".

    Oh, and now, the existing 1st-world has seriously depleted
    certain global resources and is also keen to punish those
    who might, say, get energy from "dirty" sources. "We Got
    Ours - Fuck YOU !" is what a lot of "emerging" countries
    hear.

    But the current 1st-world is degrading fast. Those things
    you can't do - they've been doing them too much, too often.
    "Quick buck" rules - the long haul, "the machine", who cares ?
    The youngest gen don't even KNOW about The Machine.

    Rather a LOT are gonna care Real Soon Now judging by the
    news and economic reports.

    TOO LATE. If you aren't at least seven diversified figures
    right now things are NOT going to go well.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)