XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican
I've been busy all night doing other things, and trying to write a pithy reply between those things, but it turned into a long drawn out post, so if I ramble, things get repeated, or are just incomprehensible...
... fuck it.
I don't CARE!
LOL
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 20:29:15 -0500, super70s says...
You filter everybody in here who has made a fool out of you
Like your buddies, wy and swill? I don't see you saying anything about their admitting they killfile. LOL... poor hypocritical toddler.
But, please, do tell, and be specific. WHO has made a fool out of me? *I'M* the one who gets to decide who makes a fool out of me, dumb ass, because if I do not CARE what anyone says about me, and not the article, it matters not and no fool has been made.
I CAN'T care less what YOU think, but you DO have the right to FEEL any which way you want. But again... it does NOT matter. Your feewings are of little concern to me.
Actually, I only filter people I don't wanna see, no matter WHAT they're doing, like Dolf, those who invoke God and Jesus, or Jews and those who spew gibberish, like Kensiff, McLean, and those trying to sell edibles. (there are more, but they're not anyone I EVER engage with. Their posts have NOTHING to do with politics, or the KIND of politics THEY espouse.
I filter (killfile) NO ONE else, ESPECIALLY those who reply to me. There is not ONE filter I have, that deletes anyone's posts, other than a couple of idiots in the global-warming group, but I only do that, because they write Arsetralian bogan-speak, that I REALLY don't want to take the time to try and decipher.
I simply ignore those who TRY to be cute, NOT refuting what I post, like Siri, but only attacking the messenger, instead of the message, and refusing to refute what I post... I guess because they can't, like you, Rudy and Alan, though you DO try. Points for that. A-
This is why I ignore you many times. You never refute what's posted... you just hate what I've posted and can't refute it, so you act like a toddler and attack me. I really don't care what you call me or what you say, so why waste time arguing about ME, and not the topic?
It's a waste of time arguing with insecure little nerds who only want to argue, be contradictory and never REALLY address the issue, without attacking the messenger. It's that "from a distance thing".
If any of you nerds took Debate and Speech classes, like I did, you wouldn't have thrown out the number one rule... never get personal. Debate the topic, not the person. I don't mind you attacking me, IF I'm wrong.
I'll only attack back, if I've been attacked first, but most times I just ignore you nerdy little fucks, because, for the 30 years I've been on Usenet, I've found that you insecure, low-self-esteemed narcissists DO get personal, ESPECIALLY if you have no argument.
I've said this a million times... I'm only here to keep you children in line. It's fun smacking you back down where you belong, when you start your lies, half-truths (like Lee's) and mis and disinformation. It really doesn't matter. I mean, WHO reads Usenet? LOL But it IS fun to watch you nerds do exactly what you've done here... piss, moan and cry about me, not the issue.
Argue the topic, and THEN, if I deserve it, call me names. Simply attacking the messenger, ONLY, is childish. If I'm "wrong", point it out, but remember... an OPINION is not really "wrong" OR "right". If you can prove my opinion wrong, have at it, but attacking me for simply HAVING an opinion, is stupid.
REFUTE MY OPINIONS!
Do you EVER see me post an article, OFF-THREAD, attacking someone for what they posted in another thread, and because I had no argument?
Nope.
That's chicken-shit cowardice. Man up and refute what I post, like I did with Alan. He made a good point, pointing out that something DID happen while Trump was President, but since I don't follow that "if it happens on the President's watch, it's his fault it happened" bullshit, I dug and dug and dug to find out a little more about this Kerch Incident.
"Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend."
I refuted Alan saying that the "Kerch Strait Incident" was Trump's "fault", simply because it happened while he was President. And, as I said, I don't believe in that shit, but, since he said it, I said Obama was responsible, because the whole Russo-Ukrainian War started when Obama was President.
I countered with the incident being part of the Russo-Ukraine War, which was started when Obama was President, and that the incident didn't even HAPPEN in Ukraine, but in a place where Russia AND Ukraine had agreements not to enter unless given permission.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerch_Strait_incident
Three whole vessels were fired upon. So, if Trump was "responsible" for THAT incident, does that mean Biden is responsible for every minor incident like that that happens now and till the end of his reign of economic terror?
No. But, some say that Russia invading Crimea during Obama's administration and Ukraine being invaded by Russia during Biden's, never would have happened under Trump.
I think that THAT kind of thinking is small-minded, and I only say such things as a counter to what you liberals say about Trump, like saying he and Putin "plotted"...
Trump saying he discussed Ukraine with Putin doesn't mean a fucking thing, unless WHAT he said to Putin was anything other than threatening sanctions if he invaded.
Trump saying he discussed Ukraine with Putin without context, is the SAME thing as when Obama AND/OR Biden or anyone else, spoke with Putin about Ukraine, but Brucie was trying to imply there was something sinister afoot, without saying EXACTLY what that was. Then, he had the gall to try and pass it off, telling me to argue the point with who he quoted.
That's chicken shit. I TRY to own what I post, but when I've grown weary of those who KEEP questioning what I post, like Alan does, I either ignore him, or give him the author's email or Twitter address, but ONLY after defending what I post. Alan's playing games, so MOST times I ignore it.
There was nothing Trump could have done about Kerch, because, first off, it didn't happen IN Ukraine because there was no "war" going on IN Ukraine at the time.
It was part of the "Russo-Ukraine War", which started when O B A M A was President, and secondly, it was a minor flare up that Alan had dug and dug and dug to find, THINKING it proved, that because it happened while Trump was President, it somehow had something to do with Trump and Putin "plotting" against Ukraine, which WAS the topic, not just aggressions happening while Trump was President.
It was a non-sequitur at best, mainly because it had NOTHING to do with what Bruce was trying to say... that Trump and Putin "plotted" against Ukraine, and THAT'S why Putin never went into Ukraine while Trump was President.
I pointed it out, that Trump DID speak with Putin ABOUT Ukraine, but it was probably about what Trump would do if they invaded.
Trump DID do something about what happened in the Kerch Strait Incident, so WHY would he have "plotted" with Putin and THEN sanction them for doing it?
Sorry Alan... the topic wasn't about what happened during WHOSE administration, but was about Trump "plotting" with Putin ABOUT Ukraine. WHY would Trump sanction Russia for the Kerch Strait Incident, if they were "plotting" something together?
Trump also sanctioned Russia on the Crimea annexation.
Biden took these down from the state.gov website, but here are the overviews.
=====
Apr 24
Statement - In response to Russian assault on Ukraine's sovereignty
The U.S. Department of State condemned Russia's decision to grant expedited citizenship to residents of Russia-controlled eastern Ukraine.
Mar 15
Sanctions - In response to Russia's continued aggression in Ukraine
Six Russian individuals and 8 entities were sanctioned for their involvement in attacks on Ukrainian naval vessels in the Kerch Strait, the annexation of Crimea, and backing of separatist government elections in eastern Ukraine. These actions complement sanctions also taken by the European Union and Canada on the same day.
Feb 27
Statement - On Russian occupation of Crimea
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a statement condemning Russia's illegal actions in Crimea and its continued aggression against Ukraine.
=====
Trump Imposes Major Sanctions on Russian Oligarchs, Officials, Companies
Mnuchin cited a number of Russian activities around the world as support for Friday's U.S. action, sanctioning Russia, including Moscow's occupation of Crimea and violence in eastern Ukraine, support for Syrian President Bashar al- Assad's attacks against civilians, and Russia's "ongoing cyber-activities" and efforts to "interfere in the democratic processes of the United States and its allies."
What Brucie and you liberals always forget, are the sanctions Trump imposed on Russia. Now, if Trump and Putin were in cahoots, then WHY would Trump do this?
*****
The Kerch Strait incident was an international incident that occurred on 25 November 2018 in the Kerch Strait, during which the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) coast guard fired upon and captured three Ukrainian Navy vessels after they attempted to transit from the Black Sea into the Sea of Azov through the strait on their way to the port of Mariupol. It was the first time that Russian forces had openly engaged Ukrainian forces during the Russo-Ukrainian War.
In 2014, Russia had annexed the nearby Crimean Peninsula, which is predominantly internationally recognized as Ukrainian territory. It later constructed the Crimean Bridge across the strait. Under a 2003 treaty, the strait and the Azov Sea are intended to be the shared territorial waters of both countries, and freely accessible. Russia, in turn, insists that, while the 2003 treaty remains legally valid, Ukrainian ships must ask for permission before entering Russian waters along the perimeter of Crimea as any transnational water crossing, as regulated by the Law of the Sea Treaty. The annexation of Crimea by Russia is not recognized by Ukraine, therefore Ukraine holds that the invocation of an international treaty with regard to Crimean waters is illegitimate.
*****
Show us the articles where what I posted was wrong, and NOT someone's opinion on me. Show us where the article(s) I've quoted are incorrect.
Back it up with fact, not truths.
https://i.imgur.com/7pFuLEA.mp4
============================================================================
Holier-than-thou LIBERAL Canadians, think they're soooo superior when it comes to slavery, because they "ended" it (not really) a mere 30 years earlier.
The Reality of Anti-Black Racism in Canada | BCG
https://www.bcg.com/en-ca/publications/2020/reality-of-anti-black-racism-in- canada
Anti-Black racism in Canada is worse than most Canadians want to believe. With the COVID-19 pandemic amplifying the injustices against Black People, it is now more important than ever for Canadians to take action.
Racism & the Canadian historical past ...
https://divercityvisa.com/racism-the-americanization-of-canadian-historical- past-why-we-should-not-take-a-look-at-ourselves-by-a-u-s-lens
The Canadian response to racism south of the border will be described as an Americanization of Canadian historical past. The media's lack of protection of racism in Canada, in its traditionally correct context, is a trigger for concern. Totally different histories of racism.
Racism in Canada | News, Videos & Articles
https://globalnews.ca/tag/racism-in-canada
Canadian MPs vote to condemn Atlanta mass shooting, anti-Asian racism. The move comes days after eight people were killed by a white gunman in Atlanta. Six of the victims were Asian American women ...
Anti-Asian Racism Lead, The Canadian Race Relations ...
https://cpac-canada.ca/anti-asian-racism-lead
The Canadian Race Relations Foundation (CRRF) was created in 1996 to reaffirm the principles of justice and equality for all in Canada. The CRRF's mandate is to facilitate throughout Canada the development, sharing, and application of knowledge and expertise to eliminate racism and all forms of racial discrimination in Canadian society.
Is Canada a racist country? One-third of respondents in a ...
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2021/06/21/is-canada-a-racist-country- one-third-of-respondents-in-a-new-study-say-yes.html
Jun 21, 2021
One-third of respondents in a new study say yes. Most Canadians agree that Canada's diverse population makes it a better country. But on the question of whether or not Canada is a racist country ...
Most Canadians Experience Racism ... - New Canadian Media
https://newcanadianmedia.ca/most-canadians-experience-racism-where-they-live- survey
Canadian racism is sometimes called "polite" and is characterized by microaggressions, but that is a misnomer. Words like that are used to deflect criticisms and differentiate Canada from the United States, says Henry, though she does see similar ideologies and motivations.
Canada Must Withdraw From Racist Core Group - Yves Angler
https://yvesengler.com/2021/10/24/canada-must-withdraw-from-racist-core-group The least Canadian antiracist activists should do is educate themselves about racism in foreign affairs. There is no justification for Canada participating in this nakedly imperialist alliance. All Canadians of conscience owe a debt of solidarity to the people of Haiti. We must demand Ottawa immediately withdraw from the racist Core Group.
Sikh Canadians Surge Politically In "Systemically Racist ...
https://capforcanada.com/sikh-canadians-surge-politically-in-systemically- racist-canada
"The reality is, our Canada is a place of racism, of violence." - NDP Party Leader Jagmeet Singh, June 14th 2021. An unprecedented event occurred last night in Alberta, Canada. Sikh-Canadian candidates won in both Calgary and Edmonton mayoral elections.. Jhoti Gondek is the first Sikh-Canadian to become mayor of Calgary. She will be taking over from Naheed Nenshi, three-time winner as ...
Racism at IRCC could determine who gets in - New Canadian ...
https://newcanadianmedia.ca/racism-at-ircc-could-determine-who-gets-in
IRCC employees are reporting racist workplace behaviour such as racially- charged microaggressions at work, says survey. NCM reporter Isabel Inclan reports on the deeper fallout. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) employees remain skeptical of the measures in place to tackle racism at their workplace, according to a new report.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)