XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

"No One Wants To Work Anymore"

The Truth Behind This Unemployment Benefits Myth

WHY do they ALWAYS say UNemployment numbers, instead of EMployment?

Because the EMployment numbers suck.

US Employees Are Concerned About Safety

Others Have Care-giving Responsibilities And Some Are Using Their Job Loss As An Opportunity To Find Other Work, and NOT filing for UNemployment.

THAT'S where they get their UNemployment numbers from... and NOT the EMployment numbers.

What is the jobs-to-people ratio now? THAT is an indicator or EMployment percentages, NOT the UNemployment rate.

THIS means nothing, since the population rises and jobs go away in Fall and Winter:

LOL... "Seasonally Adjusted".

https://i.imgur.com/Hwr3zTi.png

LOL... had to peruse Google Groups, you lucky sumbitch! You're still on "ignore" though. No killfile... ignore ticks ARE so helpful, weeding out non- rebuttals, whiners lying and no refutations.

=====

At restaurants across the country - from Albuquerque, New Mexico, to Fort Worth, Texas - the same sign is popping up: "We are short staffed. Please be patient with the staff that did show up. No one wants to work any more."

The implication is that the federal government's expanded unemployment benefits of $300 each week are keeping people at home instead of behind cash registers and in fast-food kitchens.

It's a concern shared by independent business owners in interviews with local and national media, worried that their efforts to bump wages and increase benefits aren't luring in the workers they need as Covid-19 restrictions fall and consumer spending soars.

Unfortunately for them, what's happening is a feature, not a bug, of the US economic system and the blame can't entirely be placed on a $300 weekly check.

The University of Pennsylvania economist Ioana Marinescu said: "In the absence of the benefits there would probably be a little bit more applications and hiring would be a little bit easier, but the main drive of the recent change in sentiment is that hiring is accelerating."

Job openings rose to a two-year high in February, according to the US Labor Department's job openings and labor turnover survey published last month. And in March, employers added nearly 1 million new jobs, with many economists expecting similar or better gains in the April jobs report on Friday.

If job openings accelerate faster than people apply for work, there will be pain for business owners. The pandemic has added some quirks to this economic reality.

It is true that a sliver of people would rather stay home for a few months making as much, or more, from unemployment than they would defrosting meat patties or answering phones.

But would-be employees are also concerned about safety - 46% of the population hasn't received a single vaccine dose and the spread of Covid-19 is uncontrolled in the US. Potential employees also have care-giving responsibilities: this recession has disproportionately affected women, who largely take up these duties and in late March more than half of schools were still doing remote learning or a combination of remote and in-person classes.

Others, like LaShanta Knowles in Cleveland, Ohio, are using their job loss as an opportunity to do something different.

Until September, Knowles had worked the same job at a relocation services company for seven years, unhappy and unsupported, only ever receiving attention for doing things wrong.

"I stayed out of comfort and out of fear if this job didn't want me, I didn't think anyone else would," Knowles said. "Luckily, I don't feel that way any more since I went back to school."

This month, Knowles will receive a certification in web programming and development. Even with the unemployment, the financial situation has been tough, in part because Ohio has been inconsistent with unemployment payments.

This is a problem facing millions across the country because the benefit system is unequipped to respond to this recession. It's been such an issue that the not-for-profit Ohio Organizing Collaborative stepped in to help people like Knowles navigate the system and invite them to take action to call for something better. And momentum is picking up to consider a national unemployment reform.

Ultimately, though, Knowles feels like luck is on her side. "Unemployment actually helped direct me on the path that I should have been on," Knowles said.

Unemployment benefits have also allowed out of work people to help support the economy.

University of Chicago researchers found that the unemployment expansion of $600 a week in 2020 allowed people to spend money in a way they wouldn't without it. That means some of the same businesses complaining about hiring might not earn as much money without unemployment.

The expansion is set to expire in early September and economists are watching to see what that means for business owners and low-wage workers, who are still struggling while the economy recovers more quickly for high-wage workers.

The University of Massachusetts Amherst economist Arindrajit Dube said the fiscal stimulus, including unemployment benefits, could lead to a once in a generation or two generations increase in wages and reduced unemployment rates.

The last time this type of wage growth happened was in the late 1990s when the labor market tightened, with many employers chasing fewer workers.

"You had a tight enough labor market which led to broad-based wage growth of the sort we hadn't really seen since maybe the 70s," Dube said. "And that was unusual and yes, employers had a hard time filling vacancies and they had to raise wages a lot and that's OK."

In Cleveland, Knowles is most concerned about finding work with her new certificate. She didn't know when the unemployment expansion ended, and when the Guardian informed her it was September, she exclaimed: "I hope I find a job before then!"

===============================================================================

The Liberal Argument Outline

1. Use spun facts:

These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.

Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
liberals.

2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
Source

If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
(there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
back to the facts.

3. The Limbaugh Defense:

This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

4. The Personal Attack:

Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".

They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
to be refuted.

5. Name Calling:

Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

When they find out they are unable to engage
you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
them.

Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
someone else that will engage them on their terms.

Now, go away, Snowflake.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)