• NOT The Results You Wanna Hear

    From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 9 13:18:13 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/55P_XcF_E8E?feature=share


    ===============================================================================

    The Liberal Argument Outline

    1. Use spun facts:

    These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.

    Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
    post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
    experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
    liberals.

    2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
    Source

    If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
    believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
    wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
    source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
    themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
    (there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
    back to the facts.

    3. The Limbaugh Defense:

    This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

    4. The Personal Attack:

    Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".

    They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
    from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
    to be refuted.

    5. Name Calling:

    Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

    6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

    When they find out they are unable to engage
    you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
    will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
    often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
    rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
    a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
    disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
    supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
    personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
    them.

    Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
    did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
    continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
    that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
    purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
    the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
    someone else that will engage them on their terms.

    Now, go away, Snowflake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Bernstein@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 9 19:02:31 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    The Liber


    Trump will be prison assraped by a negro soon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Sat Sep 9 12:34:12 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2023-09-09 11:18, AlleyCat wrote:

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/55P_XcF_E8E?feature=share

    You've not presented any "results", Pussy.

    I don't watch YouTube videos to try find YOUR argument.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 11 11:05:00 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 23:28:59 -0400, Governor Swill says...

    If you want me to humiliate you, post some substance, not ignored
    videos and your excessive .signature

    C'mon, Siri! Humiliate him anyway.

    Yeah... c'mon, Siri... humiliate me, by actually watching the videos I post.

    We know you do.

    LOL

    Siri's idea of substantive replies:

    "I can feel your luv."

    "I, myself, don't have close acquaintances with imaginary persons."

    "You are an obsessive little freak."

    "Phil who?"

    "You."

    "Thanks for giving me laugh in a dour week."

    "Are you saying gays never have children?"

    One liner replies.

    Soooo substantive.

    ===============================================================================

    White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely- have-mental-health-cond/

    Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

    =====

    Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than...

    https://phillipschneider.com/vice-admits-liberal-men-are-weaker-less- attractive-than-conservatives/

    Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than Conservatives By Phillip Schneider on August 11, 2020 ( Leave a comment ) While the flames of the culture war rage, even far-left media publication Vice admits that liberal men are weaker and less competent than conservatives.

    =====

    White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

    https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health- study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

    The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among those aged 18-29, according to evie...

    =====

    TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/truth-liberals-weaker-conservatives

    TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives. Speaking of weak liberals, who can't even stand the sight of history: Texas Restaurant Defending Controversial Sign Some Are Calling Racist - by Robert Gehl. A Texas restaurant is under attack on social media for what many are calling its racist décor. The neon sign hung at Cook's Garage...

    =====

    Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals- more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

    Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

    =====

    Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal

    https://redstate.com/terichristoph/2017/05/26/shocker-study-shows-physically- weak-men-tend-to-be-liberal-n72373

    Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal. In news that will surprise absolutely no one, a new study reveals that girly men are more likely to favor socialist policies. The study, conducted by researchers at Brunel University London, looked at the height, weight, physical strength, and bicep circumference of 171 men, along...

    =====

    Science Proves That Liberals Are Crazier Than Conservatives

    https://freedomwire.com/liberals-are-crazy/

    Well, I recently came across a fantastic article about another study of Liberals - except this time, instead of focusing on the weak males, it focuses on the average Liberal woman instead. A Ph.D. candidate at Georgia State University has analyzed the data out of a recent Pew Research Center poll, and the results are amazing.

    =====

    Liberalism Breeds Soft, Weak, Young "Men" - Louder With...

    https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/liberalism-breeds-soft-weak-young-men

    by Steven Crowder I know some of you think when I say "liberalism breeds weak, fat men," that I'm merely politicizing an issue to be polarizing. I assure you that's not the case. Allow me five hundred words to make my case. I was a chubby kid. Strike that, I was a jiggly shrimp. Skinny-fat. The kind of kid who was relatively thin, yet managed to ma

    =====

    62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

    https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have- a-mental-health-condition/

    According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have been told they have such a condition, the study found.

    =====

    Why Liberals Are So Physically Monstrous And Repulsive...

    https://www.returnofkings.com/118536/why-liberals-are-so-physically-monstrous- and-repulsive

    Liberals are not born uglier. They voluntarily remain ugly or become uglier to fit a narrative. "Appearance is ideology". It takes a special kind of hypocrisy to call something that is universally seen as ugly "beautiful" and vice-versa.

    =====

    Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

    https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer- from-mental-illness/

    White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter.

    SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

    https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

    Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

    =====

    Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic

    https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to- pyschotic-traits/

    Jun 9, 2016 Turns out liberals are the real authoritarians. A political-science journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with "psychoticism"...

    =====

    12 Reasons Why Liberals And Progressives Will Always Be...

    https://www.returnofkings.com/100887/12-reasons-why-liberals-and-progressives- will-always-be-losers

    Liberal men however are inexcusable, they are either effeminate enough to be emotionally manipulated or are weak and yielding to social pressures. December 10, 2016 Take The Red Pill Don't forget that Liberal men are usually the offspring of domineering feminists or divorced feminists and sometimes single mothers.

    =====

    White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

    https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

    Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental health problems.

    =====

    6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

    https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a- mental-disorder/

    In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

    =====

    Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody- else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

    specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have found that people identifying as politically...


    =====

    Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

    https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have- mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be- mentally-unwell/

    Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 - 12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News

    =====

    Men With Weak Upper Bodies Tend to Be Liberal - Physically Strong Men Tend to Be Conservative

    Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.

    Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.

    Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.

    The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen, of Aarhus University in Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to influence behavior today.

    Professor Petersen said: 'While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon, it has - in a sense - always been with our species.'

    In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of resources were not made in courthouses or legislative offices, but through shows of strength.

    With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesized that upper-body strength - a proxy for the ability to physically defend or acquire resources - would predict men's opinions about the redistribution of wealth.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 11 22:34:39 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:07:28 -0700, Siri Cruise says...


    AlleyCat wrote:

    On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 23:28:59 -0400, Governor Swill says...

    If you want me to humiliate you, post some substance, not ignored
    videos and your excessive .signature

    C'mon, Siri! Humiliate him anyway.

    Yeah... c'mon, Siri... humiliate me, by actually watching the videos I post.

    We know you do.

    LOL

    Siri's idea of substantive replies:

    "I can feel your luv."

    "I, myself, don't have close acquaintances with imaginary persons."

    "You are an obsessive little freak."

    "Phil who?"

    "You."

    "Thanks for giving me laugh in a dour week."

    "Are you saying gays never have children?"

    One liner replies.

    Soooo substantive.

    I win.

    LOL... nerds, and ONLY nerds think they have to win. Such low-self-esteem.

    OK... you win. Nerd.

    https://i.imgur.com/g9UfSG4.mp4

    If it makes you feel better about your crummy life.

    https://i.imgur.com/gUcGwoi.jpg


    ===============================================================================

    The Liberal Argument Outline

    1. Use spun facts:

    These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.

    Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
    post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
    experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
    liberals.

    2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
    Source

    If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
    believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
    wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
    source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
    themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
    (there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
    back to the facts.

    3. The Limbaugh Defense:

    This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

    4. The Personal Attack:

    Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".

    They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
    from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
    to be refuted.

    5. Name Calling:

    Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

    6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

    When they find out they are unable to engage
    you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
    will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
    often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
    rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
    a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
    disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
    supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
    personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
    them.

    Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
    did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
    continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
    that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
    purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
    the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
    someone else that will engage them on their terms.

    Now, go away, Snowflake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 12 20:55:14 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:07:28 -0700, Siri Cruise says...

    Siri's idea of substantive replies:

    "I can feel your luv."

    "I, myself, don't have close acquaintances with imaginary persons."

    "You are an obsessive little freak."

    "Phil who?"

    "You."

    "Thanks for giving me laugh in a dour week."

    "Are you saying gays never have children?"

    One liner replies.

    Soooo substantive.

    I win.

    Of course, you do, sweetie! Now, go get mommy that fifth of Gilby's.

    =====

    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 21:21:49 -0400, Governor Swill says...

    Nailed it!

    He sure did.

    I win.

    LOL... nerds, and ONLY nerds think they have to win. Such low-self-esteem.

    OK... you win. Nerd.

    https://i.imgur.com/g9UfSG4.mp4

    If it makes you feel better about your crummy life.

    https://i.imgur.com/gUcGwoi.jpg

    ==============================================================================

    Common Disguises of People with Low Self-Esteem

    Low self-esteem's first "disguise" is pretending to be valid and true.

    Low self-esteem is a painful belief system; sufferers create habits, even entire lifestyles, based on managing those beliefs and that pain.

    Studies show that people with low self-esteem establish behaviors that protect themselves from the failure and rejection they fear and expect.

    1. Isolation: I bet 90% of the low self-esteemed nerds here live ONLY with mommy.

    2. Over-achievement: Ahhh... the "I'll win if I finish my math assignment first!" quest.

    3. Perfectionism: Rudy's a stickler for grammar and spelling being correct, but fucks up more than anyone, taking us back to #2.

    4. Boredom: Low self-esteem Usenet nerds have NOTHING going on in their lives, 'cept sitting at home, waiting to do mommy's bidding, so they get on Usenet and rage.

    5. Meanness: That snippy, snarky, wicked critic, castigator, or complainer might employ the same reflexes as a wounded creature: scratch, sting, bite; attack to overcompensate for real or perceived weakness.

    These disguises aim to manage pain. This is self-hatred's driving force: a suffering that feels eternal, yet deserved. Its captives lurch through life trying to dodge or soothe it while involuntarily creating more.

    (hence the all-day outings on Usenet)

    And these disguises can lead to misdiagnoses. They are not causes; they are effects. How often, seeing just such symptoms and not searching further, do we mistreat others?

    ===============================================================================

    The Liberal Argument Outline

    1. Use spun facts:

    These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.

    Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
    post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
    experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
    liberals.

    2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
    Source

    If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
    believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
    wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
    source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
    themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
    (there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
    back to the facts.

    3. The Limbaugh Defense:

    This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

    4. The Personal Attack:

    Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".

    They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
    from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
    to be refuted.

    5. Name Calling:

    Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

    6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

    When they find out they are unable to engage
    you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
    will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
    often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
    rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
    a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
    disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
    supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
    personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
    them.

    Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
    did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
    continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
    that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
    purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
    the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
    someone else that will engage them on their terms.

    Now, go away, Snowflake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 13 11:57:23 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 03:38:53 -0700, Siri Cruise says...

    I'll be kind and explain to you

    Ooooh... the language of the low self-esteemed nerd narcissist and someone who DOES care and to whom it DOES matter...

    ... condescension.[1][1][1][1]

    It was over as far as I was concerned.

    LOL... obviously not, since, you know... you replied... again. [snicker]

    But you obsess on proving I'm not better than you.

    No. My ONLY obsession, is smacking down the lies and misguided OPINIONS you weirdo liberals obsess over.

    I'm just here to have fun(COMMA)...

    Now, where have I heard THAT before. Do you liberals EVER have an original thought? And I'm not talking about YOUR thoughts... you're one weirdo NO ONE gets. Your unclever and unfunny retorts are famously indecipherable, and that has NOTHING to do with intelligence. You can't convey a message if no one knows what the fuck your talking about.

    Have you EVER had anyone but me, reply to one of your idiotic one-line replies?

    No. THAT should tell you something. *I* bother you... THAT'S why you bother to reply to me. If you don't want me replying to your other-dimensional replies that only YOU think is clever, don't bother replying to me.

    It really IS that simple. I'm OBVIOUSLY getting under your skin lately, hence the abundance of replies you send. You used to ignore me, and that's just fine... do it again... I REALLY don't care. I WILL not miss your psycho ripostes.

    ... not to decide the future of western civilisation

    I'm pretty sure, no one has asked you to. Californians using British and/or Canadian spellings, is a good sign of schizophrenia.

    WHO are you today?

    I don't care about proving anything

    [giggle]

    So I ignore your declarations of masculinity.

    Really? No. Do me a favour*... go back to that.

    It just doesn't matter to me.

    Really?

    But... "I win." And hence your reply. See? Psycho.

    But not at the expense of another one having a warm, happy, fun life.

    LOL... NONE of you Usenet nerds have A life, let alone a "fun" one. All you fuckers EVER do is complain, while showing your disdain for everything not liberal, and GOD... your absolute sad Trump Derangement Syndrome.

    You fuckers HATE success, so HOW could you POSSIBLY enjoy life and be happy? You can't, no matter HOW much you plead with us and yourselves.

    I'm working today's crossword puzzle. I get many don't like these
    puzzles. That doesn't bother me. Working them makes me happy. I
    hope you're finding something that makes you happy. The idea of
    you being happy makes me happy.

    Annnnd, we're back to [1].

    Ta.

    ===============================================================================

    The Liberal Argument Outline

    1. Use spun facts:

    These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.

    Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
    post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
    experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
    liberals.

    2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
    Source

    If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
    believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
    wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
    source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
    themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
    (there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
    back to the facts.

    3. The Limbaugh Defense:

    This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

    4. The Personal Attack:

    Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".

    They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
    from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
    to be refuted.

    5. Name Calling:

    Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

    6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

    When they find out they are unable to engage
    you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
    will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
    often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
    rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
    a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
    disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
    supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
    personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
    them.

    Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
    did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
    continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
    that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
    purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
    the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
    someone else that will engage them on their terms.

    Now, go away, Snowflake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)