XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

Why are you still taking out can.politics, todds, if you're not a Cuntnadian
liberal?

At "first" because my Usenet service frowns on more than 5 groups and you always use 6.

No. And at "second"? (you said "At first"... what's second... the "now" because you think it pisses me off "now", thingy? Aaahnnnnng.... wrong!)

NOT that I care, but you're going out of your way to delete can.politics, ALONE, so fess up.

I think that's a lie. Are you not using Eternal-September? It really looks like you are, though I can't be sure, because I've never really taken the time to see what headers REALLY list and WHO the data belongs to, but I can see Lee's with a different server by looking at HIS header, whereas yours only lists Eternal-September, so it would seem you're lying, because I can post to 6 groups, no problem.

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org! USENET.BLUEWORLDHOSTING.COM!DIABLO1.USENET.BLUEWORLDHOSTING.COM! FEEDER.USENETEXPRESS.COM!TR2.IAD1.USENETEXPRESS.COM!69.80.99.27.MISMATCH! XL.TAGS.GIGANEWS.COM!LOCAL-2.NNTP.ORD.GIGANEWS.COM!NEWS.GIGANEWS.COM.POSTED! NOT-FOR-MAIL
From: "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>
References: <MPG.3f62e99b39f3dc0c503@news.eternal-september.org> <udbhcf$2s0ne $1@dont-email.me> <MPG.3f63130755542629509@news.eternal-september.org>

I use E-S and I can post to 6, and HAVE been posting to 6 ever since I started using him.

Anyways, I REALLY don't CARE whether you reply with or to the same newsgroups. That's YOUR psychoses. I'm going to continue filling the box with what I want.

I have a system whereas I put in the same groups every time, regardless of what you and Rudy and Siri and any of the other children here, do.

Again, I don't CARE what you do, but it seems silly and childish to delete the group-name that is listed second, instead of last, don't you think?

alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican

Do you REALLY have loyalties to THESE groups:

alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican

LOL

Again... I don't CARE what you do, so WHY do you delete "can.politics" instead of one of the other 4, providing you want to leave Limbaugh in. I figured you'd rather leave Limbaugh OUT more than any other, but then, I gather, you'd be too afraid, like Rudy, that no one would see what you post.

Aren't you one of those who, in addition to having Trump Derangement Syndrome, you also have Rush Limbaugh Derangement Syndrome?

What is it about can.politics, that makes you skip these other groups, not deleting one of them, instead?

alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

Do you have a loyalty to THOSE groups, but not can.politics? LOL... we have a NOTHER* lying Cuntnadian liberal, here.

If your Usenet service allows only five groups, tell us WHO your service is and let us look it up and verify that, and tell us why you delete can.politics, instead of the others.

The other users here would like to know and understand YOUR psychoses too, I'm sure.

Also, why not just delete one of the others? "can.politics" is listed 2nd, so you're going out of your way to delete that one ONLY.

LOL... what a child. ANOTHER lying Cuntnadian liberal child.

Yes... I DO repeat myself. I know you liberals have a hard time with attention spans and comprehending the written word, so...

(continued in part 5)

========================================================================

The Liberal Argument Outline

1. Use spun facts:

These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.

Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
liberals.

2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
Source

If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
(there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
back to the facts.

3. The Limbaugh Defense:

This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

4. The Personal Attack:

Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".

They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
to be refuted.

5. Name Calling:

Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

When they find out they are unable to engage
you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
them.

Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
someone else that will engage them on their terms.

Now, go away, Snowflake.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)