XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

Part 2

Providing one of his most egregious examples...

Not as "egregious" as what Warren did. In most circles, what SHE did was not only unethical and insulting to Native Americans, but criminal.

... of that is NOT "off-topic" at all, dingleberry.

I agreed... at first, but then YOU jumped down MY throat for commenting on
YOUR example, as if I had no right.

You asked THE stupidest question, ever.

"Did Elizabeth Warren have a damn thing to do with the reason those Native Americans were there that day, blithering idiot?"

YOU brought Warren up. Asking me if she was at the meeting between Trump and those Native Americans, was a non-sequitur at best.

Me saying what I said about Warren's lying and the way Native Americans feel about her, was NO different than you linking what that Limey said about Trump not being able to understand what a joke is.

No difference. YOU gave an example of Trump, in YOUR mind, being obtuse. I simply showed Warren for who SHE is... a lying little cowardly Democrat.

I know... I know... I'm being redundant. Sorry. Not.

YOU started this Warren bullshit, and you need to own it. Your stupid question about Warren "being there", Chauncey, had nothing to DO with me showing you what The Native Americans think about Elizabeth Warren, so why did you freak out and ask if Warren was at that meeting?

YOU don't get to choose the conditions of what and how *I'M* going to reply.

YOU were the one asking stupid questions, after YOU brought her up. So, fuck off.

I swear you act like you're too stupid to breathe.

Intelligence has nothing to do with autonomic nervous system. Stupid.

I swear you act like you're too stupid to breathe.

Intelligence has nothing to do with autonomic nervous system. Stupid.

It's a figure of speech, dumbass.

LOL... I know this, stupid... I was being facetious. See? Trump has a MILLION times more humour than you liberals could ever DREAM of having.

Liberals can't meme!

https://i.imgur.com/kwz1hwv.jpg

Yes, that's mine. Thinking about copyrighting it.

You couldn't tell I was being facetious. You liberals have the awareness of a deaf, dumb and blind guard dog and the attention spans of gnats.

YOU just never see Trump away from MSNBC or CNN, whose JOB it was, was to make him LOOK like that. Maybe you don't care, but before you pass judgment on someone, even through someone ELSE'S eyes, maybe you should know more about what you're saying.

Trump has every one of the qualities you and SpermMan (by proxy) and that Limey think he doesn't. Y'all just never SEE him in any other light, than what the left-wing-run media WANTS you to see.

I have a feeling that that Limey bastard from Britain had the exact same "contact" with Trump, as you do.

Which is your favorite lie-site?

MSNBC?
CNN?
Slate?
Vox?
Salon?

He saw only ONE side of him, from the BBC probably, and doesn't KNOW him like Americans do... Americans who get their news from MANY sources, not just one.

Contrary to your idiot left-wing BLM/Drag Queen/Gay/Socialist/Antifa Fascist/Marxist/Communist/Racist/ Insurrectionist/Liberal Democrat beliefs... "we" don't watch Fox News "only".

I don't watch news shows at all, preferring to get my news from MANY different sources, and yes, I read what the wingers say too. That helps me KNOW who's lying, and it's ALWAYS the wingers.

CNN made a living at lying for 6 straight years, and now their audience
numbers reflect it. LOL

YOU MUST BE CANADIAN.

(continued in part 3)

========================================================================

The Liberal Argument Outline

1. Use spun facts:

These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.

Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
liberals.

2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
Source

If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
(there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
back to the facts.

3. The Limbaugh Defense:

This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

4. The Personal Attack:

Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".

They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
to be refuted.

5. Name Calling:

Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

When they find out they are unable to engage
you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
them.

Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
someone else that will engage them on their terms.

Now, go away, Snowflake.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)