XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 02:57:10 -0500, super70s says...
I think he just makes it up as he goes along, it only takes a few
minutes of googling to prove him wrong (and watch him try to lie his
way out of it anyway).
No lies. I simply replied to Siri after he asked, "how many code talkers were in attendance."
Seems *I* knew his intent and you did not. If Siri meant Vietnam era instead of WWII era Code talkers, he would have set me straight himself.
He meant the ORIGINAL Code Talkers, and THAT'S who I was talking about. I CAN'T care less if you or any other child-like thinker LIKE you thought I was talking about ALL Code Talkers of not.
I said what I said, because I was pretty sure Siri was referencing the ORIGINAL Code talkers.
Next time, maybe you ought to see if I'm wrong, before you blurt it out that I'm making things up, like you liberals do.
I was NOT wrong, when I said the last of "The Code Talkers" died before Trump said what he said about Warren in the presence of those Native Indians.
That YOU assumed Siri was talking about Code talkers who came AFTER the originals, is moot and doesn't mean shit.
I replied to what I thought Siri meant, so for you little teacher's pets and nerds to come along and screech like 3 year olds, doesn't matter one fucking bit.
It just shows how petty you and your ilk are, being picayune about something NO ONE thought of as being "wrong", except wittle Tudesies, who GOES OUT OF HIS WAY, to pick apart every minute detail of whatever anyone says, trying to find fault, and then YOU coming in after him, like the toddler nerd you are, piling on.
Piling on to something that was NOT wrong, because in the context of what *I* was talking about (AND Siri too, probably, was 100% correct...
... the last of the ORIGINAL Code Talkers, died before the pow wow at the White House.
Which of these do you think you employ the most?
The Liberal Argument Outline
1. Use spun facts:
These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.
Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
liberals.
2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
Source
If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
(there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
back to the facts.
3. The Limbaugh Defense:
This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.
4. The Personal Attack:
Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".
They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
to be refuted.
5. Name Calling:
Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.
6. The Liberal Bat Signal:
When they find out they are unable to engage
you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
them.
Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
someone else that will engage them on their terms.
Now, go away, Snowflake.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)