• Childish Lee, Childs Again

    From AlleyCat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 5 22:49:03 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 02:34:15 +0000, Lee says...


    How Marjorie Taylor Greene Became
    a Russian State Media Darling
    9/5/23

    Because someone opposes the giving of a trillion dollars to Ukraine, does not mean MTG is pro-Russian, and she can't help what "Russia" thinks.

    Obama was loved by The Black Panther Party... does that make him a Black Panther?

    You're such a fucking child.

    =====

    Russia's Pro-Putin Commentators Praise Biden After Summit - The New ...

    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/17/world/europe/russia-putin-biden-summit.html

    17 Jun 2021 - GENEVA - For months, Russia's state news media have ridiculed President Biden as bumbling, confused and well past his prime. But by Thursday, the mood had shifted: Here was a man in the White ...

    =====

    Russian Media Apparently Sees Biden As A Shrewd Statesman, Not A ...

    https://news.yahoo.com/russian-media-reportedly-sees-biden-042743740.html

    June 18, 2021 at 12:27 AM 2 min read We probably won't know for a while whether President Biden's sit-down with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Geneva this week produced any tangible...

    =====

    China Loves Obama - Bloomberg

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2014-11-12/china-loves-obama-even- if-us-doesnt

    12 Nov 2014 - A Tuesday USA Today - story, widely circulated on Chinese social media, noted that "some Chinese" were "riled" by his rude behavior, which included chewing gum as he stepped out of the...

    =====

    China Loves Obama Even If U.S. Doesn't - CHINA US Focus

    https://www.chinausfocus.com/news/china-loves-obama-even-if-u-s-doesnt

    But Chinese social media, in particular, has been a reliable fan and supporter of Obama since 2008. Much of the interest is in his personal story as a self- made leader, which resonates in a country where top leaders achieve their positions primarily on the basis of family connections, and racial or ethnic minorities are effectively shut out of ...

    =====



    ========================================================================

    The Liberal Argument Outline

    1. Use spun facts:

    These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin.

    Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one
    post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or
    experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the
    liberals.

    2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your
    Source

    If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to
    believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is right
    wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty
    source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts
    themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road
    (there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. Go
    back to the facts.

    3. The Limbaugh Defense:

    This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

    4. The Personal Attack:

    Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even something as innocuous as "I am a chef".

    They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention
    from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet
    to be refuted.

    5. Name Calling:

    Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

    6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

    When they find out they are unable to engage
    you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they
    will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or
    often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of
    rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on
    a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and
    disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will
    supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and
    personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at
    them.

    Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch
    did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to
    continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts
    that established your victory are for entertainment and educational
    purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on
    the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find
    someone else that will engage them on their terms.

    Now, go away, Snowflake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)