Hmmm. . . .anyone who doesn't, or can't, or won't
draw the line at encouraging children to get
irreversible genital and breast removal.
People do not have a right to indoctrinate a child that he or she needs
a sex change operation,
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 17:31:39 -0700 (PDT), BT
<robert.m.tiernan@gmail.com> wrote:
People do not have a right to indoctrinate a child that he or she
needs a sex change operation,
Have you ever heard of the first amendment freedom of speech clause?
What other people do or say is no one else's business.
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, especially with students essentially captive to the school and forced to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the teachers, the taxpayers have a right to tell the teacherswhat to teach.
Well, thanks for making it all too obvious that you're just trolling.
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech,
especially with students essentially captive to the school and forced
to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the teachers,
the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhite
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech,
especially with students essentially captive to the school and forced
to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the teachers,
the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech,
especially with students essentially captive to the school and forced
to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the teachers,
the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in news:ucl24v$2abjc$1@dont- email.me:
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in
news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, >>>>especially with students essentially captive to the school and forced >>>>to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the teachers, >>>>the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
Too many taxpayers think the world is flat. Do we want Flat Earthers
setting the geography courses?
Do we want Young Earthers setting the
geology cirriculum?
Taxpayers believe all sorts of things that are
simply not true, because THEIR education failed them.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:ucl2q9$2abjc$4@dont-email.me...
Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
news:ucl24v$2abjc$1@dont- email.me:
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in
news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, >>>>>especially with students essentially captive to the school and
forced to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the >>>>>teachers, the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to >>>>>teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
Too many taxpayers think the world is flat. Do we want Flat Earthers
setting the geography courses?
Yet you tell us we should allow liberals to do exactly that. Where
feelings and opinion matter more than science, physics, fact or even
proven history.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:ucl24v$2abjc$1@dont-email.me...
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in
news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, >>>>especially with students essentially captive to the school and forced >>>>to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the teachers, >>>>the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
By "appropriately educated" you mean "suitably indoctrinated"...
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:ucl2q9$2abjc$4@dont-email.me...
Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
news:ucl24v$2abjc$1@dont- email.me:
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in
news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, >>>>>especially with students essentially captive to the school and
forced to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the >>>>>teachers, the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to >>>>>teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
Too many taxpayers think the world is flat. Do we want Flat Earthers
setting the geography courses?
Yet you tell us we should allow liberals to do exactly that. Where
feelings and opinion matter more than science, physics, fact or even
proven history.
Do we want Young Earthers setting the
geology cirriculum?
Why not? They can present their case and educated people can rip it
apart just as your assertions are being ripped apart.
Taxpayers believe all sorts of things that are
simply not true, because THEIR education failed them.
Which is why liberals jumped all over the mask mandate and tried to
force people to wear them everywhere.
 Taxpayers believe all sorts of things that are
simply not true, because THEIR education failed them.
Which is why liberals jumped all over the mask mandate and tried
to force people to wear them everywhere.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >news:ucl24v$2abjc$1@dont-email.me...
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in
news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, >>>>especially with students essentially captive to the school and forced >>>>to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the teachers, >>>>the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
By "appropriately educated" you mean "suitably indoctrinated"...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in >news:uclbc1$2brau$7@dont-email.me:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:ucl2q9$2abjc$4@dont-email.me...
Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
news:ucl24v$2abjc$1@dont- email.me:
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in
news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, >>>>>>especially with students essentially captive to the school and >>>>>>forced to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the >>>>>>teachers, the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to >>>>>>teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
Too many taxpayers think the world is flat. Do we want Flat Earthers
setting the geography courses?
Yet you tell us we should allow liberals to do exactly that. Where
feelings and opinion matter more than science, physics, fact or even
proven history.
No, I don't say that. That claim is a conservaturd strawman.
Do we want Young Earthers setting the
geology cirriculum?
Why not? They can present their case and educated people can rip it
apart just as your assertions are being ripped apart.
it's not practical to present EVERY lunatic theory as if it had merit.
Strange how fewer mask wearers died than those who refused to wear masks.
Taxpayers believe all sorts of things that are
simply not true, because THEIR education failed them.
Which is why liberals jumped all over the mask mandate and tried to
force people to wear them everywhere.
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:uclbc0 $2brau$6@dont-email.me:
Nope. I meant what I said. It's you that wants to indoctrinate.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:ucl24v$2abjc$1@dont-email.me...
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in
news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhiteReligion in public or private schools is indoctrination.
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, >>>>>especially with students essentially captive to the school and forced >>>>>to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the teachers, >>>>>the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
By "appropriately educated" you mean "suitably indoctrinated"...
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:ucljqd$2d1jo$2@dont-email.me...news:uclbc0
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
forced$2brau$6@dont-email.me:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:ucl24v$2abjc$1@dont-email.me...
CHUM LEE Attorney at Law <CHUM.LEE@space.invalid> wrote in
news:kl5dvsFe416U1@mid.individual.net:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT), hal lillywhite
<hlillywh@juno.com> wrote:
There is a big difference between free speech and paid speech, >>>>>>especially with students essentially captive to the school and
teachers,to listen to what is taught there. If the taxpayers pay the
Nope. I meant what I said. It's you that wants to indoctrinate.Religion in public or private schools is indoctrination.the taxpayers have a right to tell the teachers what to teach.
If you think students are sycophants then you are not very bright.
saying that taxpayers should determine education cirriculum is false
because taxpayers are not appropriately educated.
By "appropriately educated" you mean "suitably indoctrinated"...
Then why are you opposed to education then?
get preference over the child of a poor immigrant from someYes, Affirmative action is for the Poor and middle class - and you oppose
Asian country?
it.
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 03:28:03 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
get preference over the child of a poor immigrant from someYes, Affirmative action is for the Poor and middle class - and you
Asian country?
oppose it.
Oh come on , Baxter. It is for the unqualified Negro to get a
Casper's
job.
John Dillinger <johndillinger@duck.com.invalid> wrote in news:klpn7uFmh9lU1@mid.individual.net:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 03:28:03 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
get preference over the child of a poor immigrant from someYes, Affirmative action is for the Poor and middle class - and you
Asian country?
oppose it.
Oh come on , Baxter. It is for the unqualified Negro to get a
Casper's
job.
OTOH, conservaturds scream "nobody want to work".
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:ud8qmc$2bd2b$1@dont-email.me...
John Dillinger <johndillinger@duck.com.invalid> wrote in
news:klpn7uFmh9lU1@mid.individual.net:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 03:28:03 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
get preference over the child of a poor immigrant from someYes, Affirmative action is for the Poor and middle class - and you >>>>oppose it.
Asian country?
Oh come on , Baxter. It is for the unqualified Negro to get a
Casper's
job.
OTOH, conservaturds scream "nobody want to work".
Given all the advertising for jobs right now.. I can't see how that
isn't a valid observation.
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in >news:ud9vab$2h2mv$1@dont-email.me:
You might try dispensing with the ambiguity and double negatives and
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:ud8qmc$2bd2b$1@dont-email.me...
John Dillinger <johndillinger@duck.com.invalid> wrote in
news:klpn7uFmh9lU1@mid.individual.net:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 03:28:03 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
get preference over the child of a poor immigrant from someYes, Affirmative action is for the Poor and middle class - and you >>>>>oppose it.
Asian country?
Oh come on , Baxter. It is for the unqualified Negro to get a
Casper's
job.
OTOH, conservaturds scream "nobody want to work".
Given all the advertising for jobs right now.. I can't see how that
isn't a valid observation.
actually say something.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >news:ud8qmc$2bd2b$1@dont-email.me...
John Dillinger <johndillinger@duck.com.invalid> wrote in
news:klpn7uFmh9lU1@mid.individual.net:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 03:28:03 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
get preference over the child of a poor immigrant from someYes, Affirmative action is for the Poor and middle class - and you >>>>oppose it.
Asian country?
Oh come on , Baxter. It is for the unqualified Negro to get a
Casper's
job.
OTOH, conservaturds scream "nobody want to work".
Given all the advertising for jobs right now.. I can't see how that isn't a >valid observation.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 15:18:05 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in >>news:ud9vab$2h2mv$1@dont-email.me:
You might try dispensing with the ambiguity and double negatives and >>actually say something.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:ud8qmc$2bd2b$1@dont-email.me...
John Dillinger <johndillinger@duck.com.invalid> wrote in
news:klpn7uFmh9lU1@mid.individual.net:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 03:28:03 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
get preference over the child of a poor immigrant from someYes, Affirmative action is for the Poor and middle class - and you >>>>>>oppose it.
Asian country?
Oh come on , Baxter. It is for the unqualified Negro to get a
Casper's
job.
OTOH, conservaturds scream "nobody want to work".
Given all the advertising for jobs right now.. I can't see how that
isn't a valid observation.
He did say something. He said a tight labor market with employers
competing for labor is bad for the economy because it means nobody
wants to work. What it actually means is there are more jobs than
people available to do them.
He also ignores the types of jobs advertised.
Swill
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in >news:0nhhfiln6qbsu21alr6qjij96fki1mck7e@4ax.com:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 15:18:05 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in >>>news:ud9vab$2h2mv$1@dont-email.me:
You might try dispensing with the ambiguity and double negatives and >>>actually say something.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:ud8qmc$2bd2b$1@dont-email.me...
John Dillinger <johndillinger@duck.com.invalid> wrote in
news:klpn7uFmh9lU1@mid.individual.net:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 03:28:03 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
get preference over the child of a poor immigrant from someYes, Affirmative action is for the Poor and middle class - and you >>>>>>>oppose it.
Asian country?
Oh come on , Baxter. It is for the unqualified Negro to get a
Casper's
job.
OTOH, conservaturds scream "nobody want to work".
Given all the advertising for jobs right now.. I can't see how that
isn't a valid observation.
He did say something. He said a tight labor market with employers
competing for labor is bad for the economy because it means nobody
wants to work. What it actually means is there are more jobs than
people available to do them.
I don't think that's what Scut said. In fact, I'm not sure Scut knows
what he said.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 119:22:48 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,369 |