• No one's buying Bidenomics, teens not so polarized and other commentary

    From useapen@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 26 06:00:26 2023
    XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: sac.politics

    Econ watch: No One’s Buying Bidenomics
    To hear President Biden “and his team tell it, he was dealt an unusually
    bad hand” on the economy when he took office — yet, in truth, corrects
    David Winston at Roll Call, it had “already begun to turn around” before
    then. Inflation was just 1.4%, and pandemic-era 14.7% unemployment had
    fallen to 6.3%. Biden then pushed “trillion-dollar spending bills” that
    sent inflation soaring: Prices are 16.6% higher than when he took office, though earnings are up just 12.2%, “leaving Bidenomics with a 4.4 [point] negative wage gap.” No wonder his job approval on the economy is only 34%,
    per CBS News: “People who fill their grocery carts and cars every week
    simply aren’t buying the Bidenomics’ narrative.”

    Libertarian: Teens Not So Polarized
    A survey supposedly showing a “stark gender divide” in high-school
    seniors’ politics “has sparked misplaced panic,” explains Reason’s Emma
    Camp. “Yes, more boys than girls identify as conservative — about twice”
    as many — “and girls identify as liberal at a rate 17 percentage points
    higher than their male classmates.” But “majorities of both genders
    responded without identifying a partisan political identity.” Some 64% of
    boys and 58% of girls “didn’t identify as conservative or liberal —
    instead, they identified as ‘moderate,’ ‘none of the above,’ or ‘I don’t know.’” So “in reality, these surveyed high school seniors don’t seem to
    care all that much about partisan politics.” The poll warrants no concern
    over youth polarization and doesn’t justify “government regulation of
    social media or online speech.”

    Eye on the Empire State: Pointless Wind Power
    A recent analysis “reveals the critical weakness in the state’s energy
    policy — the need for long-term reliable backup power — and underscores
    the tremendous cost of heavy reliance on expensive and unreliable offshore wind,” warns the Empire Center’s James E. Hanley. The study found wind
    lulls are “dangerously common,” especially during the summer. So
    electricity users “will have to pay for very expensive offshore wind” plus “backup power due to the unreliability of that wind.” When the choice
    becomes “unprecedentedly high electricity costs or enduring regular
    blackouts, New Yorkers may find getting off the climate activism bandwagon their most attractive option.”

    Foreign desk: A Friendless China
    “China has spent tens of billions of dollars to boost its global
    popularity over the past decade. It hasn’t worked,” exults The Wall Street Journal’s Sadanand Dhume. “In soft power — the attractiveness of a
    country’s ideas, institutions and culture — the U.S. far outstrips China.”
    In a 2005 Journal piece, “Joseph Nye, the Harvard professor who coined the
    term ‘soft power,’ quoted a 22-country BBC poll that found more people
    viewed China positively (nearly 50%) than the U.S. (38%).” Pop culture, including the smash film “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” and Houston
    Rockets star Yao Ming, helped. But “global public opinion has soured,”
    with two-thirds responding to a 24-country poll seeing “China unfavorably.
    Only 28% held a positive opinion.” Yet “America shouldn’t be too
    sanguine,” as “raw military and economic power can still count for more
    than charm,” and China has plenty of that. And America “is prone to soft-
    power blunders of its own, for instance by attempting to export
    fashionable woke ideas about sex.”

    Liberal: Dems’ Working-Class Woes Grow
    Overlooked from the latest New York Times poll, frets The Liberal
    Patriot’s Ruy Teixeira, is President “Biden’s weakness among nonwhite working-class (noncollege) voters” — he leads President Donald Trump “by a
    mere 16 points among this demographic” vs. a 48-point lead in 2020 and
    “Obama’s 67-point advantage in 2012.” This poses “a direct threat to the massive margins Democrats need to maintain among nonwhite voters to
    achieve victory,” since they’re “two-thirds to three-quarters of the
    nonwhite vote.” The issue: They’re not progressive, “while the Democratic
    Party has become more so.” On issues from public safety to renewable
    energy to Bidenomics, they feel the party’s left them behind. Remember
    Trump’s 2020 success, and don’t “be so sure it couldn’t happen again.”

    — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

    https://nypost.com/2023/08/06/no-ones-buying-bidenomics-teens-not-so- polarized-and-other-commentary/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)