• Re: Jack Smith Has Recruited an Incestuous Group of Lawyers to Go After

    From NoBody@21:1/5 to NoBody on Thu Aug 10 06:58:29 2023
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: rec.arts.tv

    On Wed, 09 Aug 2023 06:52:57 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 08 Aug 2023 22:46:00 -0400, Governor Swill
    <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:19:30 -0700, "Mr. B1ack" <bykkker@dogshit~rag.nut> wrote:

    On 8/8/2023 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
    On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 12:26:20 -0400, Governor Swill
    <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 06:58:08 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On Sun, 06 Aug 2023 13:31:43 -0400, Governor Swill
    <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 06 Aug 2023 09:29:01 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On Sat, 05 Aug 2023 18:39:03 -0400, Governor Swill
    <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 01 Aug 2023 21:05:01 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    A special counsel is supposed to be independent and objective. But >>>>>>>>>> Merrick Garland’s choice of Jack Smith is anything but. Watch as >>>>>>>>>> Mark unravels Jack Smith’s web of corruption, spun to unite a small >>>>>>>>>> army of pit bull lawyers and prosecutors- who have all worked together
    before predominantly under Obama and Biden—to ensnare Donald Trump and
    put him in jail for life.

    https://rumble.com

    Gee, thanks! A new website to ignore!


    Because history has shown that facts bother you.

    You aren't going to get any facts from that shite site.

    Humor me. What was incorrect about what was reported above at their >>>>>> site?

    Pretty much everything except they pronounced the names right.

    As soon as I read "incestuous" in the headline I knew it was nothing more than a
    sensationalist hack job. When I viewed the video, I got bored within minutes. Geez, that
    guy ought to get work as a sleeping pill!


    Specific points please or

    I gave them to you yesterday. Here they are again:

    * claim that Smith isn't independent or objective
    * that there is a "web of corruption"
    * that the prosecutors are "pit bulls"
    * that there is anything wrong with some of them having worked together before
    * that they are trying to "ensnare" Trump

    The whole thing is just rabid right-wing foam with no basis in fact.

    That's exactly what it is. Irrational, partisan screed with little fact to back it up.
    And where there are facts, there are also *opinions* presented as facts and that's where
    the manipulation bit comes in.

    Swill

    You just described the prosecution cases and the media coverage of
    them perfectly. Now can *YOU* answer the question put to you and let
    someone else answer for you?

    And Swilly has no answer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)