Hi all
I have tried most distros over the years been a Linux user since the beginning. Before Linus started I was using Mark Williams Coherent in
the late 80s. I think int came on 13 or 14 floppies.
Later I was tempted to the dark side and bought a copy of Red Hat 6
pack which included a full set of printed manual. I bought lots of
magazines Lo' DVD cover disks. I was then a serious distro hopper
but Hardy Heron on Ubuntu stopped all that.
Apart from the occasional check on the "Opposition" I have been with
Ubuntu since. Through all the pains of Unity and wayland and KDE woes
I made it to 20.04.4 LTS
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being
snapped up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on
other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
Hi all
I have tried most distros over the years been a Linux user since the beginning. Before Linus started I was using Mark Williams Coherent in
the late 80s. I think int came on 13 or 14 floppies.
Later I was tempted to the dark side and bought a copy of Red Hat 6
pack which included a full set of printed manual. I bought lots of
magazines Lo' DVD cover disks. I was then a serious distro hopper
but Hardy Heron on Ubuntu stopped all that.
Apart from the occasional check on the "Opposition" I have been with
Ubuntu since. Through all the pains of Unity and wayland and KDE woes
I made it to 20.04.4 LTS
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being snapped
up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on
other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
On 06/03/2022 14:41, Ray Hughes wrote:
Hi all
<<snipped some>>
Apart from the occasional check on the "Opposition" I have been with
Ubuntu since. Through all the pains of Unity and wayland and KDE woes
I made it to 20.04.4 LTS
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being snapped
up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on
other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your
thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
When 20.04 came out snapd was automaticalli installed.
It first came to my attention when my backup started overflowing the DVD I used.
Solution: get rid of snap. This was more than a year ago, and I have
been running (and updating) snap-free since with no noticeable ill
effects. Apt / apt-get still work.
I recommend having a look at: https://cialu.net/how-to-disable-and-remove-completely-snaps-in-ubuntu-linux/ though I'm sure you could find equivalent advice elsewhere.
Or move to a snap-free distro (too much like work for me as it took ma
a couple of months to get to where I like to be...)
Note: for 20.04 the only installation that requires snap, so far, is Chromium. There is a workaround using Debian repositries (Google is
your friend)
On Sun, 06 Mar 2022 12:41:29 +0000<<snipped>>
Ray Hughes
<rhughes@rays-dell.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
wrote:
Hi all
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being
snapped up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on
other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your
thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
I used Linux Mint for years, but have switched to MX Linux, and I'm
very happy with it.
The only thing I didn't like with the default setup was the panel was vertical on the left side. I found out the panel could be moved to the bottom using MX Tweak.
Snap packages and MX Linux
Running snap packages (snaps) is problematic on our default MX setup because of a couple of factors.
snapd (the snaps backend) requires systemd and we use sysVinit by default
snapd confinement doesn’t like the symlink we use to link /tmp to
/var/tmp.
Continued:
https://mxlinux.org/wiki/applications/snap-packages-and-mx-linux/
I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> writes:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2022 12:41:29 +0000<<snipped>>
Ray Hughes
<rhughes@rays-dell.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
wrote:
Hi all
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being
snapped up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on
other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your
thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
I used Linux Mint for years, but have switched to MX Linux, and I'm
very happy with it.
The only thing I didn't like with the default setup was the panel was
vertical on the left side. I found out the panel could be moved to the
bottom using MX Tweak.
Snap packages and MX Linux
Running snap packages (snaps) is problematic on our default MX setup because of a couple of factors.
snapd (the snaps backend) requires systemd and we use sysVinit by default
snapd confinement doesn’t like the symlink we use to link /tmp to
/var/tmp.
Continued:
https://mxlinux.org/wiki/applications/snap-packages-and-mx-linux/
Thanks Johnny thats an interesting read. I got to read a lot more before
I take any action.
RayH
Ray Hughes wrote:
I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
Personally I don't like snaps either. I was very pleased that my Ubuntu-based distro Mint is 'anti-snap' and doesn't follow Ub's lead on
that issue.
Hi all
I have tried most distros over the years been a Linux user since the beginning. Before Linus started I was using Mark Williams Coherent in
the late 80s. I think int came on 13 or 14 floppies.
Later I was tempted to the dark side and bought a copy of Red Hat 6
pack which included a full set of printed manual. I bought lots of
magazines Lo' DVD cover disks. I was then a serious distro hopper
but Hardy Heron on Ubuntu stopped all that.
Apart from the occasional check on the "Opposition" I have been with
Ubuntu since. Through all the pains of Unity and wayland and KDE woes
I made it to 20.04.4 LTS
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being snapped
up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on
other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
Hi all
I have tried most distros over the years been a Linux user since the beginning. Before Linus started I was using Mark Williams Coherent in
the late 80s. I think int came on 13 or 14 floppies.
Later I was tempted to the dark side and bought a copy of Red Hat 6
pack which included a full set of printed manual. I bought lots of
magazines Lo' DVD cover disks. I was then a serious distro hopper
but Hardy Heron on Ubuntu stopped all that.
Apart from the occasional check on the "Opposition" I have been with
Ubuntu since. Through all the pains of Unity and wayland and KDE woes
I made it to 20.04.4 LTS
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being snapped
up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on
other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
On 3/6/2022 10:38 AM, Ray Hughes wrote:
Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> writes:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2022 12:41:29 +0000<<snipped>>
Ray Hughes
<rhughes@rays-dell.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
wrote:
Hi all
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being
snapped up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on >>>> other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your
thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
I used Linux Mint for years, but have switched to MX Linux, and I'm
very happy with it.
The only thing I didn't like with the default setup was the panel was
vertical on the left side. I found out the panel could be moved to the >>> bottom using MX Tweak.
Snap packages and MX Linux
Running snap packages (snaps) is problematic on our default MX setup because of a couple of factors.
snapd (the snaps backend) requires systemd and we use sysVinit by default
snapd confinement doesn’t like the symlink we use to link /tmp to
/var/tmp.
Continued:
https://mxlinux.org/wiki/applications/snap-packages-and-mx-linux/
Thanks Johnny thats an interesting read. I got to read a lot more before
I take any action.
RayH
One thing that concerns me about Canonical, is seeing this.
Judging by the looks of it, once they started seeing web articles
with the words "snap... purge", they used the ole "bomb squad" approach
to the problem. It looks to me like they have wired the entire desktop environment (DE) to the snapd system. That's how I interpret the
"snap list" I'm seeing.
It implies if you purge snap, you just might end up with a text terminal
and that's it. No problem, just have another DE lined up to take its
place, I guess.
bullwinkle@TUNAFISH:~$ snap list
Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes
bare 1.0 5 latest/stable canonical✓ base
core18 20211215 2284 latest/stable canonical✓ base
core20 20220215 1361 latest/stable canonical✓ base
gnome-3-34-1804 0+git.3556cb3 77 latest/stable/… canonical✓ - <=== !!!
gnome-3-38-2004 0+git.1f9014a 99 latest/stable canonical✓ - <=== !!!
gnome-calculator 41.1-4-g5c9869a58c 920 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-characters 41.0+git1.8877a99 741 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-logs 3.36.0 106 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-system-monitor 41.0-5-g91e67f7982 174 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gtk-common-themes 0.1-59-g7bca6ae 1519 latest/stable/… canonical✓ - <=== !!!
snap-store 3.38.0-66-gbd5b8f7 558 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
snapd 2.54.3 14978 latest/stable canonical✓ snapd
bullwinkle@TUNAFISH:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS"
*******
Paul
On 06/03/2022 18:18, Paul wrote:
On 3/6/2022 10:38 AM, Ray Hughes wrote:Running 20.04.4 snapless, everyting on your list is available using apt, or preferably, synaptic.
Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> writes:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2022 12:41:29 +0000<<snipped>>
Ray Hughes
<rhughes@rays-dell.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
wrote:
Hi all
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being
snapped up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but >>>>> without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on >>>>> other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your >>>>> thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
I used Linux Mint for years, but have switched to MX Linux, and I'm
very happy with it.
The only thing I didn't like with the default setup was the panel was
vertical on the left side. I found out the panel could be moved to the >>>> bottom using MX Tweak.
Snap packages and MX Linux
Running snap packages (snaps) is problematic on our default MX setup because of a couple of factors.
snapd (the snaps backend) requires systemd and we use sysVinit by default
snapd confinement doesn’t like the symlink we use to link /tmp to
/var/tmp.
Continued:
https://mxlinux.org/wiki/applications/snap-packages-and-mx-linux/
Thanks Johnny thats an interesting read. I got to read a lot more before >>> I take any action.
RayH
One thing that concerns me about Canonical, is seeing this.
Judging by the looks of it, once they started seeing web articles
with the words "snap... purge", they used the ole "bomb squad" approach
to the problem. It looks to me like they have wired the entire desktop
environment (DE) to the snapd system. That's how I interpret the
"snap list" I'm seeing.
It implies if you purge snap, you just might end up with a text terminal
and that's it. No problem, just have another DE lined up to take its
place, I guess.
bullwinkle@TUNAFISH:~$ snap list
Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes
bare 1.0 5 latest/stable canonical✓ base
core18 20211215 2284 latest/stable canonical✓ base
core20 20220215 1361 latest/stable canonical✓ base
gnome-3-34-1804 0+git.3556cb3 77 latest/stable/… canonical✓ - <=== !!!
gnome-3-38-2004 0+git.1f9014a 99 latest/stable canonical✓ - <=== !!!
gnome-calculator 41.1-4-g5c9869a58c 920 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-characters 41.0+git1.8877a99 741 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-logs 3.36.0 106 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-system-monitor 41.0-5-g91e67f7982 174 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gtk-common-themes 0.1-59-g7bca6ae 1519 latest/stable/… canonical✓ - <=== !!!
snap-store 3.38.0-66-gbd5b8f7 558 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
snapd 2.54.3 14978 latest/stable canonical✓ snapd
bullwinkle@TUNAFISH:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS"
*******
Paul
(I don't recall actually having to install any of the gnome-* stuff, but it is in there somehow)
mike@alpha:~$ snap list
Command 'snap' not found, but can be installed with:
sudo apt install snapd
mike@alpha:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS"
mike@alpha:~$
mike@alpha:~$ sudo apt list gnome
[sudo] password for mike:
Listing... Done
gnome/focal 1:3.30+2 amd64
On 3/6/2022 11:03 PM, Henry Crun wrote:
On 06/03/2022 18:18, Paul wrote:
On 3/6/2022 10:38 AM, Ray Hughes wrote:Running 20.04.4 snapless, everyting on your list is available using apt, or preferably, synaptic.
Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> writes:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2022 12:41:29 +0000<<snipped>>
Ray Hughes
<rhughes@rays-dell.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
wrote:
Hi all
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being
snapped up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but >>>>>> without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on >>>>>> other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging >>>>>> apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your >>>>>> thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
I used Linux Mint for years, but have switched to MX Linux, and I'm
very happy with it.
The only thing I didn't like with the default setup was the panel was >>>>> vertical on the left side. I found out the panel could be moved to the >>>>> bottom using MX Tweak.
Snap packages and MX Linux
Running snap packages (snaps) is problematic on our default MX setup because of a couple of factors.
snapd (the snaps backend) requires systemd and we use sysVinit by default
snapd confinement doesn’t like the symlink we use to link /tmp to
/var/tmp.
Continued:
https://mxlinux.org/wiki/applications/snap-packages-and-mx-linux/
Thanks Johnny thats an interesting read. I got to read a lot more before >>>> I take any action.
RayH
One thing that concerns me about Canonical, is seeing this.
Judging by the looks of it, once they started seeing web articles
with the words "snap... purge", they used the ole "bomb squad" approach
to the problem. It looks to me like they have wired the entire desktop
environment (DE) to the snapd system. That's how I interpret the
"snap list" I'm seeing.
It implies if you purge snap, you just might end up with a text terminal >>> and that's it. No problem, just have another DE lined up to take its
place, I guess.
bullwinkle@TUNAFISH:~$ snap list
Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes
bare 1.0 5 latest/stable canonical✓ base
core18 20211215 2284 latest/stable canonical✓ base
core20 20220215 1361 latest/stable canonical✓ base
gnome-3-34-1804 0+git.3556cb3 77 latest/stable/… canonical✓ - <=== !!!
gnome-3-38-2004 0+git.1f9014a 99 latest/stable canonical✓ - <=== !!!
gnome-calculator 41.1-4-g5c9869a58c 920 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-characters 41.0+git1.8877a99 741 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-logs 3.36.0 106 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-system-monitor 41.0-5-g91e67f7982 174 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gtk-common-themes 0.1-59-g7bca6ae 1519 latest/stable/… canonical✓ - <=== !!!
snap-store 3.38.0-66-gbd5b8f7 558 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
snapd 2.54.3 14978 latest/stable canonical✓ snapd
bullwinkle@TUNAFISH:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS"
*******
Paul
(I don't recall actually having to install any of the gnome-* stuff, but it is in there somehow)
mike@alpha:~$ snap list
Command 'snap' not found, but can be installed with:
sudo apt install snapd
mike@alpha:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS"
mike@alpha:~$
mike@alpha:~$ sudo apt list gnome
[sudo] password for mike:
Listing... Done
gnome/focal 1:3.30+2 amd64
OK, I agree, I seem to have both.
apt list gnome
gnome/focal 1:3.30+2 amd64 <=== but Synaptic shows it is not installed
and then
snap list
Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes
gnome-3-34-1804 0+git.3556cb3 77 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-3-38-2004 0+git.1f9014a 99 latest/stable canonical✓ -
If I were to purge Snapd, how does the system know to install gnome metapackage (.deb) ?
My historical experience is, the user fixes whatever they break, and so
I'd be expected to do a
sudo apt install gnome
at my earliest convenience.
Back when the notion of purging stuff was invented, there wasn't
a gnome wedged into the snap list.
Paul
I believe in looking things up (he says, ending a sentence with a preposition)
start with https://askubuntu.com/questions/67764/how-to-remove-and-reinstall-gnome-3
... and I'm sure there is plenty more
On 3/7/2022 6:28 AM, Henry Crun wrote:
I believe in looking things up (he says, ending a sentence with a preposition)
start with
https://askubuntu.com/questions/67764/how-to-remove-and-reinstall-gnome-3
... and I'm sure there is plenty more
Well, as Admiral Ackbar would say "It's a trap".
It has that smell about it, of "purge my stuff, suffer the consequences". Sure, you can clean up anything, given enough time, donuts and coffee.
At least with Synaptic, if you make a "bad life choice", the tool
lists what packages it plans to remove as revenge. So at least you
get a chance to say "whoa, I didn't mean to do that". I don't know
if any plan to purge Snapd would warn you in quite the same way.
Paul
On 3/7/2022 6:28 AM, Henry Crun wrote:
I believe in looking things up (he says, ending a sentence with a preposition)
start with
https://askubuntu.com/questions/67764/how-to-remove-and-reinstall-gnome-3
... and I'm sure there is plenty more
Well, as Admiral Ackbar would say "It's a trap".
It has that smell about it, of "purge my stuff, suffer the consequences". Sure, you can clean up anything, given enough time, donuts and coffee.
At least with Synaptic, if you make a "bad life choice", the tool
lists what packages it plans to remove as revenge. So at least you
get a chance to say "whoa, I didn't mean to do that". I don't know
if any plan to purge Snapd would warn you in quite the same way.
Paul
Thanks Mike I shall def. have a look at Pop.
DE's and their changes are just wearisome as I spend most of my
time in Emacs anyway. :)
snap list
Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes
gnome-3-34-1804 0+git.3556cb3 77 latest/stable/… canonical✓ -
gnome-3-38-2004 0+git.1f9014a 99 latest/stable canonical✓ -
If I were to purge Snapd, how does the system know to install gnome metapackage (.deb) ?
On 3/7/22 13:39, Paul wrote:
On 3/7/2022 6:28 AM, Henry Crun wrote:
I believe in looking things up (he says, ending a sentence with a preposition)
start with
https://askubuntu.com/questions/67764/how-to-remove-and-reinstall-gnome-3 >>> ... and I'm sure there is plenty more
Well, as Admiral Ackbar would say "It's a trap".
It has that smell about it, of "purge my stuff, suffer the consequences".
Sure, you can clean up anything, given enough time, donuts and coffee.
At least with Synaptic, if you make a "bad life choice", the tool
lists what packages it plans to remove as revenge. So at least you
get a chance to say "whoa, I didn't mean to do that". I don't know
if any plan to purge Snapd would warn you in quite the same way.
Paul
I have removed snap (and flatpak) from KDE neon (which runs on Ubuntu 20.04) some time ago, I haven't encountered any
problems.
From my .bash_history, a bit redacted from 2 computers:
snap list
sudo snap remove gtk-common-themes
sudo snap remove gtk2-common-themes
sudo snap remove gnome-3-28-1804
sudo snap remove gnome-3-34-1804
sudo snap remove gnome-3-38-2004
sudo snap remove bare
sudo snap remove core18
sudo snap remove snap-store
sudo snap remove core18
sudo snap remove core20
sudo snap remove core
snap list
sudo rm -rf /var/cache/snapd
sudo apt purge snapd
sudo apt autoremove
rm-rf ~/snap
Your versions will differ now, IIRC some snaps can not be deleted unless others are deleted first, due to dependencies,
I suppose.
Trying to (re-)install the Gnome meta package in Synaptic should work, it also selects snap as a dependency.
Hi all
I have tried most distros over the years been a Linux user since the beginning. Before Linus started I was using Mark Williams Coherent in
the late 80s. I think int came on 13 or 14 floppies.
Later I was tempted to the dark side and bought a copy of Red Hat 6
pack which included a full set of printed manual. I bought lots of
magazines Lo' DVD cover disks. I was then a serious distro hopper
but Hardy Heron on Ubuntu stopped all that.
Apart from the occasional check on the "Opposition" I have been with
Ubuntu since. Through all the pains of Unity and wayland and KDE woes
I made it to 20.04.4 LTS
Now its SNAPs arggggggggggggg I hat them.
Slow
Nasty
Achingly slow
Packages
Slowly over the l ast couple of years every program/app is being snapped
up!
The software centre has become the snap-store.
OK to the point I want a system as similar as possible to Ubuntu but
without snaps.
Yes, I understand why developers like them, they can get there apps on
other OS's and CPU architecture pretty rapidly.
I know some other distros are also using snaps or similar packaging
apps.
Surely one of Linux strengths was the shared library concept.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
RayH (The other one)
The current solutions involve packaging entire alternate runtimes in
containerized environments. Flatpak, Snap, AppImage, Docker, and
Steam: these all provide an app packaging mechanism that replaces
most or all of the system’s runtime libraries, and they now all use containerization to accomplish this.
The container mechanism is named Easy Containers, and is designed
from scratch (Docker, LXC, etc are not used). Easy Containers are
extremely efficient, with almost no overhead -- the base size of each container is only several KB.
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
Am Sonntag, 06. März 2022, um 12:41:29 Uhr schrieb Ray Hughes:
I know there is much expertise in this group I am interested in your
thoughts. I dont want to stay with Snappy buntu.
I still use Ubuntu 21.10, but I don't use snap. I don't use Firefox or Chromium. I use Pale Moon and Claws Mail. PM needs its own apt repo.
I will stop using Ubuntu when they force users to use snap. I also run
Debian 11 on my Pentium M and Athlon XP machines. I may switch the
other machines to Debian if necessary.
Why I don't like snap: I takes much more space that normal deb packages. squashfs filesystems are being mounted during the boot process and
increase the boot time (I use IDE disks on some computers). I don't
like that.
And adds complication to backup, disk space usage, fs tree and
probably others, as yet unknown...
Am Dienstag, 05. April 2022, um 11:21:27 Uhr schrieb Henry Crun:
And adds complication to backup, disk space usage, fs tree and
probably others, as yet unknown...
The additional file systems add some complexity, but that is not really
a problem for me. I just don't care about them if they are not mounted
during the boot.
I don't see how they make backup more difficult. I don't create backups
of applications I can download from the internet.
I removed snap, snapd etc. soon after 20.04 was released.
Henry Crun wrote:
I removed snap, snapd etc. soon after 20.04 was released.
Why shouldn't there be an easy way to convert a snap, flatpak, appimage, etc to a conventional .deb for the particular
distro v?
When I say 'easy', I'm thinking of less resource intensive (and 'hazardous' in terms of stumbling blocks) than compiling
from source.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 90:49:48 |
Calls: | 6,697 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,232 |
Messages: | 5,348,569 |