Haven't been here in awhile. Lot of bible verses in here.
On 22/03/2021 02:42, Euclides Zoto wrote:
Haven't been here in awhile. Lot of bible verses in here.
Then may I be the first to say 'welcome back', the bible verses are
being posted because we ran out of pron.
Lurk wrote:
On 22/03/2021 02:42, Euclides Zoto wrote:After hearing what the Snyder Cut of Justice League did to HBO's servers
Haven't been here in awhile. Lot of bible verses in here.
Then may I be the first to say 'welcome back', the bible verses are
being posted because we ran out of pron.
it brought back memories. Then I saw the edited ending of Shazam with
Henry Cavill " FINALLY! " in it as Superman then I said wow I haven't
posted here in so long. HBO says the servers were hacked. NO! People wanted to see this movie! HBO underestimated how many people wanted to
see it and instead blamed hackers and WB as well. Long movie but it was
 awesome.
On 22/03/2021 09:51, Euclides Zoto wrote:
Lurk wrote:
On 22/03/2021 02:42, Euclides Zoto wrote:After hearing what the Snyder Cut of Justice League did to HBO's
Haven't been here in awhile. Lot of bible verses in here.
Then may I be the first to say 'welcome back', the bible verses are
being posted because we ran out of pron.
servers it brought back memories. Then I saw the edited ending of
Shazam with Henry Cavill " FINALLY! " in it as Superman then I said
wow I haven't posted here in so long. HBO says the servers were
hacked. NO! People wanted to see this movie! HBO underestimated how
many people wanted to see it and instead blamed hackers and WB as
well. Long movie but it was awesome.
Sounds good, if it ever comes out on DVD I'll try to borrow a copy :)
'Hackers' get blamed for far too much stuff which isn't actually their
doing.
Lurk wrote:
On 22/03/2021 09:51, Euclides Zoto wrote:WB said Hackers overloaded the servers to make it look like more people wanted to see the movie. Total Bullcrap!!! That's what brought back memories. Always blaming hackers. Your right on point there. It just galled me to hear that said.
Lurk wrote:
On 22/03/2021 02:42, Euclides Zoto wrote:After hearing what the Snyder Cut of Justice League did to HBO's
Haven't been here in awhile. Lot of bible verses in here.
Then may I be the first to say 'welcome back', the bible verses are
being posted because we ran out of pron.
servers it brought back memories. Then I saw the edited ending of
Shazam with Henry Cavill " FINALLY! " in it as Superman then I said
wow I haven't posted here in so long. HBO says the servers were
hacked. NO! People wanted to see this movie! HBO underestimated
how many people wanted to see it and instead blamed hackers and WB as
well. Long movie but it was  awesome.
Sounds good, if it ever comes out on DVD I'll try to borrow a copy :)
'Hackers' get blamed for far too much stuff which isn't actually their
doing.
On 22/03/2021 10:17, Euclides Zoto wrote:
Lurk wrote:
On 22/03/2021 09:51, Euclides Zoto wrote:WB said Hackers overloaded the servers to make it look like more people
Lurk wrote:
On 22/03/2021 02:42, Euclides Zoto wrote:After hearing what the Snyder Cut of Justice League did to HBO's
Haven't been here in awhile. Lot of bible verses in here.
Then may I be the first to say 'welcome back', the bible verses are
being posted because we ran out of pron.
servers it brought back memories. Then I saw the edited ending of
Shazam with Henry Cavill " FINALLY! " in it as Superman then I said
wow I haven't posted here in so long. HBO says the servers were
hacked. NO! People wanted to see this movie! HBO underestimated
how many people wanted to see it and instead blamed hackers and WB as
well. Long movie but it was awesome.
Sounds good, if it ever comes out on DVD I'll try to borrow a copy :)
'Hackers' get blamed for far too much stuff which isn't actually their
doing.
wanted to see the movie. Total Bullcrap!!! That's what brought back
memories. Always blaming hackers. Your right on point there. It just
galled me to hear that said.
Hmmm... I would have thought that WB had more reason to 'overload' the >servers in order to "make it look like more people wanted to see the
movie" than 'hackers' (who were probably busy at home writing code at
the time) !
Haven't been here in awhile. Lot of bible verses in here.
Euclides Zoto wrote:
Haven't been here in awhile. Lot of bible verses in here.
Damn dude, where have you been hiding? Haven't seen you in some years now.
Damn dude, where have you been hiding? Haven't seen you in some years now.
Yes been working but not working anymore. Projects finished and got
hurt on the job so now can't do what I use to do. Hanging out on
Facebook in those groups. My favorite group is Retro Computers! Even
showed some of my " antique " computers and how much fun it is to
still make old builds. Especially Pentium Pros! My favorite
computer. Maybe I might finally upgrade to Win95 but who knows?
On 2021-03-24 13:20, Euclides Zoto wrote:
Damn dude, where have you been hiding? Haven't seen you in some years now. >>Yes been working but not working anymore. Projects finished and got
hurt on the job so now can't do what I use to do. Hanging out on
Facebook in those groups. My favorite group is Retro Computers! Even
showed some of my " antique " computers and how much fun it is to
still make old builds. Especially Pentium Pros! My favorite
computer. Maybe I might finally upgrade to Win95 but who knows?
I once bought a bunch of flight simulator programs for PC. Most of them >needed actual soundblaster card with DOS drivers and memory extenders
like qemm or MS's HIMEM.SYS .
Unfortunately anything 'new' can't seem to play them properly... [I
should try them in a FreeDOS emulator, maybe that'll work]
They were pretty fun at the time. One was a helicopter simulator called >'Atac'. Their "security" was you had to enter a word from the manual to
play them.
I got rid of most of my old hardware but still have some P-III boxen.
OUCH!!! That hurt! I just didn't have the heart to do that.
Seriously though if you wanted to build something od you could maybe
find an FPGA program for it. I think there's one for C64. (I have been >meaning to get into FPGA but hadn't yet bought the stuff I'd need to >experiment)
as for FB though, once you have a login and the cookies for it you're
tracked EVERYWHERE> If you see the 'F' icon, it's a fair bet "they"
know you're on that web page. Too easy to make that happen, after all.
I suppose you could erase all cookies,k history, and offline data from
your normal browser and have a "special one" JUST for using things that
track you (like FB), with a different login. One of my favorite Linux
and BSD hacks:
a) make sure X11 server has -listn_tcp (or similar) and firewall port
6000 from the intarwebs so you don't expose it
b) after logging onto the X desktop, enter "xhost +localhost" in an
xterm (or similar) command shell
c) use "su - username" from an xterm to log into a different user with a >completely new context.
d) from within that session, enter "export DISPLAY=localhost:0.0"
e) now run your browser from within that context, setting it up to
destroy all history on exit [use a shell script for chrome; firefox
should be able to purge history on exit]
And when you surf the web from THIS logon, there's no access to any of
your OTHER history, in your "regular logon" browser, other than by
looking at the IP address. And if you're using the tor network, and no >unique identifiers from the browser, you're now TRULY anonymous!!
THAT would be for general use web surfing where you can't turn off
script or cookies.
So then go ahead and use FB and Twatter and so on from a simuilar
"dedicated" login context, keeping cookies and history if you want,
allowing cookies, yotta yotta. Thing is, whatever history THAT browser
has will be known by *THEM*. If you don't care, it's no big deal, and
you can surf the "let them go ahead and see it" sites from THAT context,
no big deal at all.
heh
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 233:29:05 |
| Calls: | 6,624 |
| Files: | 12,172 |
| Messages: | 5,319,629 |