On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:16:42 GMT, Gil Jesus <
gjjmail120253@aol.com>
wrote:
Oswald would not have been interrogated after he asked for a lawyer.
The interrogation sessions would have been recorded or transcribed.
No lineups would have been conducted without defense counsel present.
His family would not have been denied access to him on Friday evening.
His use of a phone to contact a lawyer would not have been delayed until 1:40pm on Saturday.
The lineups would have been conducted fairly, not using "fillers" that did not resemble witnesses' descriptions, like blonds, teenagers or a Mexican.
Oswald would have been assigned counsel at the Tippit arraignment, as required by Texas law.
The paper "gunsack" would have been in the crime scene photographs.
Witnesses who saw the "package" he allegedly brought to work that morning would have identified the 38 inch "gunsack" as the package he had.
Jack Dougherty would have seen the package when Oswald entered the building.
The shells recovered from the Tippit murder scene would have matched the bullets removed from Tippit's body.
The autopsy photographs would have matched the autopsy x-rays and the autopsy report.
A solid "chain of custody" would have been established for ALL of the evidence.
Oswald's receipt of the weapons would have been established by identifying the persons who handed him the weapons at the Dallas Post Office and at REA Express.
Witnesses who found items would have positively identified the evidence in the government's possession as the items they found.
Every effort would have been made to protect the prisoner after death threats were received by police and the FBI. This included transferring the prisoner under the cover of darkness.
Nothing here that's unreasonable... yet believers run...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)