1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part IV / The X-rays

    From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 2 13:18:09 2024
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/xrays-part-iv.mp4

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 4 07:53:09 2024
    On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 13:18:09 GMT, Gil Jesus <gjjmail120253@aol.com>
    wrote:

    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/xrays-part-iv.mp4

    The evidence is so overwhelming, that there can be no doubt that JFK
    was hit more than once from the front.

    This explains why believers absolutely refuse to acknowledge this
    evidence, or discuss it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 10:52:41 2024
    On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 07:53:09 -0800, Ben Holmes wrote:

    The evidence is so overwhelming, that there can be no doubt that JFK
    was hit more than once from the front.

    I tend to agree with that assessment. It seems to me that he was hit
    at least twice from the front, one entering the skull in the right front
    and exiting the rear. The second shot just skimmimg the head enough to tear
    the scalp backwards. I believe that these shots were right on top of
    each other and could have been the "boom-boom" some of the witnesses heard.

    It would also make sense why some witnesses described the head shot as the third shot and others, like Chaney were fooled by the closeness of the shots
    to think it was the second shot.

    "How could a bullet fired from behind tear the scalp from the front, back ?" ----Dallas doctor Joel Goldstrich

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 14:21:18 2024
    On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 10:52:41 GMT, Gil Jesus <gjjmail120253@aol.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 07:53:09 -0800, Ben Holmes wrote:

    The evidence is so overwhelming, that there can be no doubt that JFK
    was hit more than once from the front.

    I tend to agree with that assessment. It seems to me that he was hit
    at least twice from the front, one entering the skull in the right front
    and exiting the rear. The second shot just skimmimg the head enough to tear >the scalp backwards. I believe that these shots were right on top of
    each other and could have been the "boom-boom" some of the witnesses heard.

    It would also make sense why some witnesses described the head shot as the >third shot and others, like Chaney were fooled by the closeness of the shots >to think it was the second shot.

    "How could a bullet fired from behind tear the scalp from the front, back ?" >----Dallas doctor Joel Goldstrich

    I see the same evidence somewhat differently. I think the scalp
    "wound" was created at the pre-autopsy autopsy, rather than an almost
    missed bullet.

    And lest we forget, the throat was a shot from the front. My two
    cents worth :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)