So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

Now, why did Chickenshit run from this question for months? It's
simple, it proves that Bugliosi was a moron.

By arguing that the "oval" shape of Connally's back wound was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT - he must **ALSO** have said
this about JFK's back wound. For it too was oval.

But who was behind JFK and in a position to be shot???

Chickenshit understood the problem with Bugliosi's statement, and
couldn't defend it... so he was forced to prove how much a coward he
is. And he did.

There is **NO** defender of the faith who cannot be refuted with the
evidence, as I did with Bugliosi.

And that fact tells the tale

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)