• A Final Farewell to the Lone Nut Assclowns

    From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 22 10:25:50 2024
    Inquiring minds want to know: what makes someone a Lone Nutter and how do
    I know if I'm one ?
    Let me channel my inner Jeff Foxworthy:

    If you do no research of your own, preferring to take the lazy way out and
    fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report....you might
    be a Lone Nutter.

    If your online source is the John McAdams website
    ( jfkassassination.net )....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If all you post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that doesn't
    work ) insults....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you rely on "reasoning" or "common sense" instead of evidence....you
    might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you rely on "possibilities" instead of evidence....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you rely on "theories" instead of evidence....you might be a Lone
    Nutter.

    If you are unable to prove what you say is true....you might be a Lone
    Nutter.

    If you don't know the evidence....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you run from the evidence....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you feel that the burden of proof is not on the accuser, but instead on
    the accused to prove himself innocent....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If the topic of your thread is name-calling like a silly little 10 year old....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you have no credibility and have been proven to be a liar and deceiver
    over and over again....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you put words in the mouth of your opponent....you might be a Lone
    Nutter.

    If you answer questions with questions....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you come in here time and time again with the intent of embarrassing
    others, but instead you only embarrass yourself....you might be a Lone
    Nutter.

    If you have little or no knowledge of police procedures but argue them anyways.....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you accept hearsay evidence as fact......you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you've convicted in your mind someone after hearing only one side of
    the story....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you have never read the 26 volumes of testimony and exhibits that you
    so religiously support....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you don't understand what you read......you may be a Lone Nutter.

    If you can't honestly answer a simple "yes" or "no" question.....you
    might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore the results of your own rifle tests....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore the results of your own wounds tests.....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore your own autopsy report......you may be a Lone Nutter.

    If you believe a witness' credibility is based solely on whether or not
    they have evidence against Oswald....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you quickly change the subject from the topic of discussion....you
    might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore witnesses with info that casts doubt on Oswald's
    guilt....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore all of the evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and
    unethical police procedures and accept them as proper....you might be a
    Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon
    after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth
    floor..
    https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
    ...you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas
    Police on the afternoon of the assassination..... https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were chosen
    in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could make. https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective that
    it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at. https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the back wound.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else, could
    have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the FBI said
    it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence. https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the FBI lied in its reports. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they responded
    when the shooting started.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI. https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness- intimidation-tampering
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his speech.
    ( Proverbs 14:7 ) --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Farewell to all of the asshole trolls who spend their boring, pathetic and worthless lives in newsgroups where they don't belong, flaming the people
    who post there.
    Not just in this newsgroup, but in ANY newsgroup.

    With Google's cancellation of Usenet service effective 2/22/24, you will
    no longer be able to use Google Groups to play your childish games for
    free.

    Now you'll have to put your money where your hate-filled mouths are. Since
    most free READERS don't allow posting, you'll have to either pay for a newsreader that allows you to post, or find a pay NNTP server to go along
    with that free reader. NNTP servers are not free.

    Fighting people is fine until you have to pay for it. Then it's not so
    much fun. All of a sudden, your not so loyal and ready to defend what you allegedly believe.

    IOW, your reign of terror is over. No more posting anonymously under fake screennames. Now you'll have to expose your true identities to a USENET provider. And by purchasing their product, you'll be under their terms of service.

    The alternative is the forums, where you can still debate your topic for
    free but under the control of moderators. But it's just not the same
    without the ability to insult.

    After all, that's the purpose of a troll: to insult and tease.

    So there are your options: post free with moderation or pay to post.
    And even of you pay to post, your postings can be blocked from view with a
    kill filter.

    The time has come for you dry up and blow away like the dog shit we all
    know you are.

    Thank You, Google for doing your part in keeping these hatemongers and assclowns out of the USENET.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 22 07:21:32 2024
    On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:25:50 GMT, Gil Jesus <gjjmail120253@aol.com>
    wrote:

    Inquiring minds want to know: what makes someone a Lone Nutter and how do
    I know if I'm one ?
    Let me channel my inner Jeff Foxworthy:

    If you do no research of your own, preferring to take the lazy way out and >fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report....you might
    be a Lone Nutter.

    If your online source is the John McAdams website
    ( jfkassassination.net )....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If all you post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that doesn't >work ) insults....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you rely on "reasoning" or "common sense" instead of evidence....you
    might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you rely on "possibilities" instead of evidence....you might be a Lone >Nutter.

    If you rely on "theories" instead of evidence....you might be a Lone
    Nutter.

    If you are unable to prove what you say is true....you might be a Lone >Nutter.

    If you don't know the evidence....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you run from the evidence....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you feel that the burden of proof is not on the accuser, but instead on >the accused to prove himself innocent....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If the topic of your thread is name-calling like a silly little 10 year >old....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you have no credibility and have been proven to be a liar and deceiver >over and over again....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you put words in the mouth of your opponent....you might be a Lone
    Nutter.

    If you answer questions with questions....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you come in here time and time again with the intent of embarrassing >others, but instead you only embarrass yourself....you might be a Lone >Nutter.

    If you have little or no knowledge of police procedures but argue them >anyways.....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you accept hearsay evidence as fact......you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you've convicted in your mind someone after hearing only one side of
    the story....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you have never read the 26 volumes of testimony and exhibits that you
    so religiously support....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you don't understand what you read......you may be a Lone Nutter.

    If you can't honestly answer a simple "yes" or "no" question.....you
    might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore the results of your own rifle tests....you might be a Lone >Nutter.

    If you ignore the results of your own wounds tests.....you might be a Lone >Nutter.

    If you ignore your own autopsy report......you may be a Lone Nutter.

    If you believe a witness' credibility is based solely on whether or not
    they have evidence against Oswald....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you quickly change the subject from the topic of discussion....you
    might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore witnesses with info that casts doubt on Oswald's
    guilt....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore all of the evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and
    unethical police procedures and accept them as proper....you might be a
    Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon
    after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth >floor..
    https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
    ...you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas
    Police on the afternoon of the assassination..... >https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were chosen
    in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could make. >https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective that
    it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at. >https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the back >wound.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else, could
    have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the FBI said
    it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence. >https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the FBI lied in its reports. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they responded >when the shooting started.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    If you ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI. >https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness- >intimidation-tampering
    ....you might be a Lone Nutter.

    Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his speech.
    ( Proverbs 14:7 ) >--------------------------------------------------------------------
    Farewell to all of the asshole trolls who spend their boring, pathetic and >worthless lives in newsgroups where they don't belong, flaming the people
    who post there.
    Not just in this newsgroup, but in ANY newsgroup.

    With Google's cancellation of Usenet service effective 2/22/24, you will
    no longer be able to use Google Groups to play your childish games for
    free.

    Now you'll have to put your money where your hate-filled mouths are. Since >most free READERS don't allow posting, you'll have to either pay for a >newsreader that allows you to post, or find a pay NNTP server to go along >with that free reader. NNTP servers are not free.

    Fighting people is fine until you have to pay for it. Then it's not so
    much fun. All of a sudden, your not so loyal and ready to defend what you >allegedly believe.

    IOW, your reign of terror is over. No more posting anonymously under fake >screennames. Now you'll have to expose your true identities to a USENET >provider. And by purchasing their product, you'll be under their terms of >service.

    The alternative is the forums, where you can still debate your topic for
    free but under the control of moderators. But it's just not the same
    without the ability to insult.

    After all, that's the purpose of a troll: to insult and tease.

    So there are your options: post free with moderation or pay to post.
    And even of you pay to post, your postings can be blocked from view with a >kill filter.

    The time has come for you dry up and blow away like the dog shit we all
    know you are.

    Thank You, Google for doing your part in keeping these hatemongers and >assclowns out of the USENET.

    This was such a complete list that I could only think of *one* that
    you missed... If logical fallacies are your 'bread & butter' for
    debate, you might be a Lone Nutter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)