1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Cowardice Extreme!

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 20 10:03:49 2024
    For years, believers have tried to claim that nothing happened at
    Bethesda prior to the 8pm start of the autopsy - yet they quite
    desperately REFUSE to address the evidence showing that JFK's body
    arrived much earlier than they can explain.

    Believers know the silliness of trying to explain that JFK's body
    simply laid there for an hour or more without anyone doing anything,
    so they're forced to demonstrate their cowardice in facing the
    evidence for the time of arrival of JFK's body.

    And thus, evidence for a pre-autopsy autopsy.

    Wounds were enlarged, the brain was removed, and quite certainly
    bullet(s) were removed. But until believers can admit the evidence
    showing the EARLY arrival of JFK, (indeed, *MULTIPLE* "arrivals!"),
    they will simply continue to show that they don't believe the
    evidence.

    Watch folks, as not a *SINGLE* believer will respond listing the
    evidence, ALL the evidence, for when JFK's body arrived at Bethesda.

    I've predicted it - and I'll be proven correct yet again...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to hsienzant@aol.com on Tue Feb 20 11:27:10 2024
    On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:33:26 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 1:03:54?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    For years, believers have tried to claim that nothing happened at
    Bethesda prior to the 8pm start of the autopsy - yet they quite
    desperately REFUSE to address the evidence showing that JFK's body
    arrived much earlier than they can explain.

    What evidence? Post it here...

    Simple denial won't work. The evidence has ALREADY been posted,
    you've ONCE AGAIN proven yourself a coward.

    But we already *KNOW* you're a coward:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)